HONG KONG, May 13 (Reuters) - Chinese developer Zhongliang
Holdings is scrambling to secure bondholder approval
to extend the repayment on notes worth $729 million ahead of a
key deadline next week, joining peers desperate to avoid
offshore debt defaults.
The Shanghai-based company has struggled to sell enough
houses amid a sustained property downturn in China or secure
refinancing to pay investors who are due full redemption on
their bonds in May and July.
A bond default by Zhongliang would deepen investor worries
about China's property sector as Beijing seeks to shore up
confidence in the wider economy.
Even if Zhongliang gets approval to extend by another year,
the developer, reeling under a cash crunch, would need to pay an
additional $1.25 million on its bond coupons now due to a weaker
yuan. For other cash-strapped issuers with heavier debt burdens,
additional repayment costs due to the currency swing could be
much larger.
"The situation is definitely more severe this time," said
Zhongliang Chief Financial Officer Albert Yau, comparing current
conditions to the yuan's last major decline in 2018.
Unlike the 2018 tumble, developers are now unable to
refinance offshore after a series of defaults by other issuers
in the troubled sector made new debt raising impossible. That
means repayments would need to be transferred from onshore yuan
accounts.
Zhongliang asked holders of its May and July 2022 notes
in late April to delay the
maturities by exchanging their bonds for new issuance due next
year.
Bondholders have until late Monday to give their consent, a
deadline extended from May 10. Failure to secure 90% approval
would likely result in a default.
FRESH CHALLENGES
Casting a cloud over Zhongliang's tight cashflow is a grim
outlook for the property market, which is now depressed by
strict COVID-19 lockdowns in many Chinese cities. Zhongliang's
sales have plunged 55% in the first four months of 2022.
"We expect it will take a longer period of time for sales to
recover - it's a long-term battle," Yau said, adding the
developer's business in 40% of the coastal cities were disrupted
because of the lockdowns.
A sharp slowdown in home sales in the world's second-largest
economy and a weaker yuan are set to pile pressure on property
developers already struggling to repay debt and raise fresh
capital.
An over 6% drop in the yuan has made offshore debt
maturities worth around $20 billion for rest of the year more
expensive for developers, some of whom have already defaulted on
their repayment obligations this year.
Sunac China on Wednesday became the latest to join
other developers that have failed to make dollar bond payments
in the recent months, renewing investor concerns about the
sector that accounts for a quarter of the country's economy.
The developers, who were hoping for the market to bottom out
in the second quarter, are revising down investor expectations
for full-year sales after posting a 50% plunge in the first four
months, with no demand rebound seen in the near future.
A developer based in the Guangdong province said city curbs
not only hurt short-term sales but also affect longer-term
purchasing power with potential buyers feeling insecure about
their jobs.
The mounting challenges for the developers come against the
backdrop of repeated assurances by the Chinese policymakers and
regulators to ensure healthy sector development by avoiding
defaults and efforts including banks extending loans.
"It is indeed a double whammy situation that they will face,
not only about this weaker revenue but on the other hand it's
this weaker currency plus higher yield," said Gary Ng, Asia
Pacific senior economist of Natixis.
"I think definitely there will be more concerns in terms of
repayment ability as we have seen the default ratio, which is
dominated by real estate developers in the offshore market, has
increased."
An executive of another listed developer, who has delayed
its dollar bond payments to next year, said a weaker yuan has a
big long-term impact on its offshore debt restructuring under
discussions because it will become much more expensive.
The executive declined to be named because the restructuring
discussion is private.
(Reporting by Clare Jim; Editing by Sumeet Chatterjee and Sam
Holmes)