Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION

(TPL)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
Investment
Trading
ESG Refinitiv -
Financials
Sales Growth
Growth rating is based on the evolution of the turnover of the company between the last year and the three coming years according to consensus estimates
Earnings Growth
This rating is based on the expected evolution of the annual net Earnings Per Share (EPS) according to the estimates of the analysts who cover the company. The objective is to identify companies with dynamic earnings growth.
EBITDA / Sales
This rating is based on the EBITDA margin in relation to the company's sales, based on past performance and analysts' estimates for the coming years. Unlike profitability (final net profitability), the EBITDA margin does not include taxes, interest and depreciation. The higher this ratio, the better the rating.
Profitability
Profitability rating is based on net margin of the company for the current year and the next one according to consensus estimates
Finances
Finances rating is based on the evolution of the net debt of the company (debt or cash) and its Ebitda, compared to its revenue
Valuation
P/E ratio
Price Earnings Ratio rating compared the companyĺs current share price to its per-share earnings for the current fiscal year and the next one
EV / Sales
Valuation rating is based on the ratio between enterprise value and its turnover for the current fiscal year and the next one
Price to Book
This rating is based on the ratio of the company's share price to its book value, based on past performance and analysts' estimates for the coming years. The lower the ratio, the better the rating.
-
Price to Free Cash Flow
This rating is based on the ratio between the company's share price and the free cash flow per share generated by its activities, based on the past and analysts' estimates for the coming years. The lower the ratio, the better the rating.
Yield
"Yield" rating is based on the dividend relative to its share price
Momentum
Turnover review 12m
Revenue revisions (one year) rating is based on the evolution of revenue revisions of the company for the current fiscal year and the next one
Turnover review 4m
Revenue revisions (four months) rating is based on the evolution of revenue revisions of the company for the current fiscal year and the next one
Turnover review 7 days
The rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates based on historical and analysts' estimates for the coming years. In the last 7 days, the more the sales estimates have been revised upwards from a relative point of view, the better the rating.
Earnings revision 12m
EPS revisions (one year) rating is based on the evolution of EPS (earnings per share) revisions of the company for the current fiscal year and the next one
Earnings revision 4m
EPS revisions (four months) rating is based on the evolution of EPS (earnings per share) revisions of the company for the current fiscal year and the next one
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Consensus rating is based on analyst recommendations
Potential Price Target
Potential rating is based on the average target price fixed by the consensus from Thomson Reuters
Price target revision 4m
This rating is based on the evolution of the analysts' price target over the last 4 months. The objective is to identify the companies whose price target has changed the most. The more positive this variation is, the better the rating.
Revision of opinion 4m
This rating is based on the evolution of the general opinion of analysts over the last 4 months. The objective is to identify the companies for which the analysts' consensus has changed the most. The more positive the change, the better the rating.
-
Revision of opinion 12m
This rating is based on the evolution of the general opinion of analysts over the last 12 months. The objective is to identify the companies for which the analyst consensus has changed the most. The more positive the change, the better the rating.
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
This rating is based on the number of analysts present within the consensus as well as the number of numerical estimates concerning the future evolution of the company's business analysed. The more a company is followed, the better the rating.
Divergence of Estimates
Business Predictability rating is based on the dispersion of analysts' estimates on the evolution of the company business in the coming years (range estimates)
-
Divergence of analysts' opinions
This rating measures the dispersion of the different opinions of the analysts who make up the consensus. The smaller the difference of opinion, the better the rating.
-
Divergence of Target Price
This rating measures the dispersion of the different price targets of the analysts who make up the consensus. The lower the target divergence, the better the rating.
Earnings quality
Earnings quality rating is based on quality of past earnings released by the company compared to analysts' estimates
Technical analysis
Short Term Timing
Short Term Timing rating is defined according to the positioning of the last closed trading price, within the area between the short term support and resistance on the basis of technical analysis in daily data
Middle Term Timing
Mid-Term Timing rating is defined according to the positioning of the last closed trading price, within the area between the mid-term support and resistance on the basis of technical analysis in daily data
Long Term Timing
Long Term Timing rating is defined according to the positioning of the last closed trading price, within the area between the long term support and resistance on the basis of technical analysis in daily data
RSI
RSI rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator RSI 14 period
Bollinger Spread
Bollinger Bands rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the spread of the Bollinger bands
Unusual Volumes
Abnormal Volumes rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to volume of the last session compared to an average session
Summary
  • The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
  • From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Strengths
  • The prospective high growth for the next fiscal years is among the main assets of the company
  • The company's profit outlook over the next few years is a strong asset.
  • The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
  • The group's activity appears highly profitable thanks to its outperforming net margins.
  • Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
  • Over the last twelve months, the sales forecast has been frequently revised upwards.
  • For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.
  • The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
  • The group usually releases upbeat results with huge surprise rates.
Weaknesses
  • The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 43.89 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
  • The company's "enterprise value to sales" ratio is among the highest in the world.
  • The company is highly valued given the cash flows generated by its activity.
  • The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.
  • Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
  • The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Sector Other Oil & Gas Exploration and Production
1st jan.Capitalisation (M$)Investor Rating
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORAT..79.03%10 598
CONOCOPHILLIPS66.82%89 330
CNOOC LIMITED18.11%48 642
EOG RESOURCES, INC.64.05%47 766
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES ..48.55%42 632
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES C..42.27%40 990
ECOPETROL S.A.18.98%28 618
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPOR..62.33%28 189
HESS CORPORATION49.88%24 350
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORA..50.46%23 848
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION121.38%23 689
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY, INC.97.27%17 287
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.188.77%17 014
WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LTD0.62%16 161
PTT EXPLORATION AND PRODUCT..19.08%13 834
AKER BP ASA24.98%11 302
More Results