Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

THE BOEING COMPANY

(BA)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Boeing 777's Midair Malfunction Puts Focus on Engine Cover--Update

02/23/2021 | 06:56pm EDT

By Alison Sider

The midair breakdown of a jet engine that spewed a trail of metal over a Colorado town is putting regulatory focus on the design and strength of engine coverings.

Four minutes into the Honolulu-bound United Airlines flight from Denver on Saturday, pilots and passengers heard a loud bang, and the plane's right engine began vibrating, according to the National Transportation Safety Board's preliminary analysis of the cockpit's voice recorder. Within 20 minutes, the plane had landed on the runway back at Denver International Airport, with no injuries to anyone on the ground or aboard the plane.

However, large pieces of debris plunged from the sky, landing in yards and a soccer field. Photos and videos taken by passengers show the airplane's right engine, stripped of its front coverings, oscillating and in flames.

Investigators have homed in on a fan blade that had weakened over time and broke off at its base. That fast-spinning blade remnant appears to have sheared a second blade roughly in half. But investigators are still trying to understand why the engine's front external cover, known as the cowling, was then ripped away, according to NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt. Something similar happened in a handful of other engine failures caused by broken fan blades in recent years.

"Certainly, we don't expect the cowling to separate like that," Mr. Sumwalt said this week, during a briefing with reporters. He added that the safety board's investigators would examine the engine's maintenance and inspection records.

Such damage to external engine sections isn't supposed to happen under current manufacturing and inspection systems, which have ushered in an era of record airline safety in the U.S. and globally. The incident raises concerns about whether engine coverings are too vulnerable to damage from engine components flying forward at great speed, in addition to questions about why the fan blades broke, some safety experts said.

Alan Diehl, a former U.S. aviation accident investigator, said investigators and regulators will need to think about the integrity of the structures that house aircraft engines and how they are designed and certified. If one were to fail, that can pose a danger to the rest of the aircraft. "They're going to have to re-examine that," he said.

Concerns about engine coverings also came to the fore after a Southwest Airlines flight in April, 2018, when remnants of engine blades broke off and battered front engine coverings. When airflow and severe vibration then broke up the damaged cover, fragments were hurled into the wings and body of the Boeing 737. One piece blasted out a cabin window, partially sucking out a passenger, who died.

After that deadly Southwest engine failure, then-acting Federal Aviation Administration chief Dan Elwell said the agency would conduct a broad safety review focused on potential threats from structural failures of front engine coverings. Airborne breakups of such ancillary parts typically haven't been considered in safety analyses or mandatory certification standards for modern jet engines.

In responses last year to recommendations the NTSB made after the Southwest incident, FAA Administrator Steve Dickson said the agency was working with Boeing Co. on a design change for the type of engine involved in the incident, and was reviewing design and certification standards for engine casings to determine whether broader changes were needed beyond that engine type.

The FAA is working on additional responses to the NTSB, a spokesman said Tuesday.

The engine failure Saturday was the third in a string of strikingly similar incidents involving the same type of Pratt & Whitney-made engine on Boeing 777 aircraft. In all three cases, a fan blade showing signs of fatigue largely broke off, and a second blade was also fractured. In all three cases, damaged engine coverings broke off.

Pratt & Whitney, a unit of Raytheon Technologies Corp., declined to comment Tuesday. On Sunday the engine maker said it was working with regulators and investigators.

The FAA said it had been in the process of evaluating a Dec. 4 engine failure on a Japan Airlines flight to Tokyo when the weekend incident happened.

A shielding ring surrounding the engine is designed to prevent rapidly spinning internal parts from shooting through the engine's outer casing.

Ray Valeika, a former maintenance and engineering chief at Delta Air Lines Inc., said the prospect that a broken fan blade can shoot forward out of the engine rather than through the sides of the casing necessitates a new approach to how these elements are designed and approved by regulators. It is possible, he said, that more-efficient fan blades aren't behaving in the way that regulators expected when the testing systems and regulations were designed.

"We have to think differently about containment," he said. "I think there needs to be a design review and a fault analysis review to see if we need to change the design criteria," he said.

Engines are tested to make sure they can survive if a fan blade breaks off. But those tests differ from conditions during flight in key ways, according to a safety board report following a 2018 engine failure on another United flight to Hawaii, also linked to a weakened fan blade that broke off. In that incident, fan blade fragments spiraled forward and engine covering pieces broke off.

During the tests, an inlet was attached to the engine, but it wasn't made of the same material as the inlet used on the aircraft, the NTSB report said. And coverings that surround the fan aren't required to be on during the tests. That is a standard practice so fan components can be observed during the tests, according to NTSB reports.

The NTSB's report last year didn't recommend changes to the testing procedure. The board previously had recommended that the FAA require engine makers and aircraft manufacturers to work together to ensure the structures that house the engines can withstand impact from fan blades. A spokesman for the NTSB said Tuesday that any new recommendations following from Saturday's incident would come after an exhaustive investigative process, expected to take 12 to 18 months, unless an urgent safety issue is found.

Write to Alison Sider at alison.sider@wsj.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

02-23-21 1855ET

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 0.32% 78.22 Delayed Quote.9.38%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. -0.87% 62.39 Delayed Quote.33.86%
THE BOEING COMPANY -1.17% 248.18 Delayed Quote.15.94%
UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS, INC. -0.45% 55.87 Delayed Quote.29.18%
All news about THE BOEING COMPANY
04/18BOEING  : Annual Meeting of Shareholders
PU
04/16BOEING  : Air Force One subcontractor countersues Boeing over delays
AQ
04/16Industrials Climb Amid Economic Optimism -- Industrials Roundup
DJ
04/16NASA Picks SpaceX to Build New Lunar Lander -- 2nd Update
DJ
04/16STREET COLOR : Boeing's MAX Review Finds Electrical Issues in Two New Areas, Rep..
MT
04/16MARKET CHATTER : Boeing Reportedly Finds More Electrical Issues in 737 MAX
MT
04/16AIRBNB  : Biden to nominate Senate staffer White, former close aide Bianchi as d..
RE
04/16NASA Picks SpaceX to Build New Lunar Lander -- Update
DJ
04/16Boeing 737 MAX Electrical Problem Affects More Locations on Aircraft
DJ
04/16BOEING  : Lawsuit over Indonesia 737 crash claims autothrottle problem
AQ
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 80 807 M - -
Net income 2021 870 M - -
Net Debt 2021 44 627 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 165x
Yield 2021 -
Capitalization 145 B 145 B -
EV / Sales 2021 2,34x
EV / Sales 2022 2,05x
Nbr of Employees 141 000
Free-Float 57,5%
Chart THE BOEING COMPANY
Duration : Period :
The Boeing Company Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends THE BOEING COMPANY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 25
Average target price 249,27 $
Last Close Price 248,18 $
Spread / Highest target 24,9%
Spread / Average Target 0,44%
Spread / Lowest Target -33,5%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
NameTitle
David L. Calhoun President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
Gregory D. Smith CFO & Executive VP-Enterprise Operations
Lawrence W. Kellner Non-Executive Chairman
Gregory L. Hyslop Chief Engineer, EVP-Engineering, Test & Technology
Susan Doniz Chief Information Officer & SVP-Data Analytics
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
THE BOEING COMPANY15.94%144 848
AIRBUS SE15.48%97 511
TEXTRON INC.21.13%13 284
DASSAULT AVIATION7.69%9 622
AVIC ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS CO.,LTD.-13.36%5 876
AVICHINA INDUSTRY & TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED-2.77%5 220