Yesterday,
keystone pipeline protestors in silhouette with man holding 'NO XL' sign (XXXL)
Why start here?
Well, it's a big deal, any way you look it. It's pretty much the end for large fossil fuel pipeline construction in the US. According to Bloomberg (subscription required), here's what
I can't imagine going to my board and saying, 'we want to build a new greenfield pipeline'. "I do not think there will be any funding of any big cross-country greenfield pipelines, and I say that because of the amount of money that's been wasted.
OK. But there's also another reason why this is important. Creating a new, renewable electricity grid is going to require substantial new transmission capacity. In terms of direct impacts, there isn't necessarily much difference between siting a pipeline and siting a transmission line. They can both cause damage to wetlands and endangered species.
The difference between them is simple and stark. Fossil fuel pipelines lead to greater GHG emissions, while new transmission is necessary to reduce GHG emissions. And so much for the Trump administration's efforts to minimize consideration of indirect impacts from infrastructure projects. It's all about the indirect impacts!
It can be a fine line between one person's NIMBY and another person's legitimate environmental concerns. I sure hope we figure out how to assess environmental costs and benefits in infrastructure siting sooner rather than later, or that grid we're all counting on to deliver zero-carbon electricity won't be there when we need it.
To view
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Mr
Seaport West
MA US 02210-2600
Tel: 6178321000
Fax: 617 8327000
E-mail: ACallanan@foleyhoag.com
URL: www.foleyhoag.com
© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source