Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Uber Technologies, Inc.    UBER

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(UBER)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener StrategiesAnalyst Recommendations

Uber and Lyft Must Classify Drivers as Employees, Appeals Court Says -- Update

10/23/2020 | 12:16am EST

By Preetika Rana

Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. must comply with an order that requires them to reclassify their drivers as employees, a California appeals court said Thursday, siding with a lower-court ruling from August that threatened to upend the companies' business models.

Uber and Lyft would need to comply with the reclassification within 30 days of a formal ruling, which could take several weeks.

The companies, along with DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Instacart Inc. have raised more than $189 million for a ballot initiative on Nov. 3, asking that voters exempt them from such a reclassification. That result would supersede any court rulings.

Proposition 22, as the ballot is called, is the most expensive proposition in California's history.

Thursday's opinion signals that California's judiciary is siding with the state in a high-stakes battle involving the nation's biggest ride-share and food-delivery companies. The state implemented a new law on Jan. 1 aimed at getting the companies to reclassify their drivers as employees, eligible for benefits such as paid sick days and health insurance. Those benefits would weigh the companies' bottom line at a time when they are already struggling to turn a profit.

The companies have argued that their workers are correctly classified as independent contractors even as they have raised record money asking that voters exempt them from it.

The law itself, known as AB5, doesn't restrict flexible work. But each company has aggressively campaigned on that point, saying the reclassification would force drivers to work pre-scheduled shifts. In recent weeks, for example, Uber has sent in-app notifications to drivers saying it would only be able to hire 3 out of 10 as employees. It has separately told riders their prices would rise between 20% and 100%.

"These are not made up estimates," Uber Chief Executive Dara Khosrowshahi said at a Wall Street Journal conference on Tuesday.

In a 70-page opinion, the appellate court said some of the arguments "sound very much like defendants are saying that they are 'too big to be enjoined.'"

"Defendants' detailed showing of their hundreds of thousands of drivers statewide, the size and scale of their respective operations, and the ripple effects on various third parties that they insist will flow from the trial court's injunction" ended up arguing against them, the appeals court said Thursday, "by confirming the extent of the harm being inflicted by virtue of their undisputed failure to provide the benefits of employment to many thousands of ride-share drivers across the state."

"Today's ruling means that if the voters don't say Yes on Proposition 22, rideshare drivers will be prevented from continuing to work as independent contractors, putting hundreds of thousands of Californians out of work and likely shutting down ridesharing throughout much of the state," an Uber spokesman said. A Lyft spokeswoman said: "This ruling makes it more urgent than ever for voters to stand with drivers and vote yes on Prop. 22."

If Proposition 22 succeeds, the companies say they will guarantee new protections to workers such as giving drivers 30 cents a mile driven to account for gas and other vehicle costs, health-care subsidies for drivers who work 15 hours or more a week and occupational-accident insurance coverage while on the job. But critics say those protections fall short compared with the benefits awarded to employees.

Uber and Lyft said they are considering appealing Thursday's decision to California's Supreme Court.

Write to Preetika Rana at preetika.rana@wsj.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

10-23-20 0012ET

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
LYFT, INC. -1.21% 39.04 Delayed Quote.-9.25%
RIPPLE (XRP/BTC) 6.45% 3.3E-5 Real-time Quote.26.92%
RIPPLE (XRP/EUR) 4.53% 0.46812 Real-time Quote.175.82%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. -0.16% 50.72 Delayed Quote.70.54%
All news about UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
11/27UBER TECHNOLOGIES : to make cash payments safer in Mexico and South America
AQ
11/27India to allow Uber and rivals to charge 20% commission
RE
11/26UBER TECHNOLOGIES : California's gig worker battle reveals the abuses of precari..
AQ
11/25UBER TECHNOLOGIES : Ontario Class Actions 2020 Mid-Year Review
AQ
11/24Didi launches service in Mexico for women to select only female passengers
RE
11/24VENUS CONCEPT : A Second California State Court Enforces Federal Forum Provision..
AQ
11/23LYFT : U.S. federal government awards transportation contract to Uber, Lyft
RE
11/20How Airbnb's CEO succumbed to an IPO he resisted
RE
11/20Freight Tech Firm Loadsmart Raises $90 Million in New Funding Round
DJ
11/18Uber looks to partner with other self-driving companies -CEO
RE
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2020 12 557 M - -
Net income 2020 -6 692 M - -
Net Debt 2020 1 789 M - -
P/E ratio 2020 -13,4x
Yield 2020 -
Capitalization 89 458 M 89 458 M -
EV / Sales 2020 7,27x
EV / Sales 2021 5,14x
Nbr of Employees 21 600
Free-Float 96,7%
Chart UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Duration : Period :
Uber Technologies, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 44
Average target price 49,26 $
Last Close Price 50,72 $
Spread / Highest target 28,2%
Spread / Average Target -2,87%
Spread / Lowest Target -55,6%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Dara Khosrowshahi Chief Executive Officer & Director
Ronald D. Sugar Chairman
Nelson J. Chai Chief Financial Officer
Sukumar Rathnam Chief Technology Officer
Yasir bin Othman Al-Rumayyan Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.70.54%89 458
TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED56.02%715 632
PROSUS N.V.36.78%181 504
THE TRADE DESK, INC.236.09%41 005
AUTO TRADER GROUP PLC-7.80%7 056
CARSALES.COM LTD22.94%3 699