Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure



On July 13, 2022, Uranium Energy Corp. (the "Company" or "UEC") issued a news
release to announce that it had filed a Technical Report Summary ("TRS") on
EDGAR disclosing mineral resources for the Company's Anderson Project located in
Arizona (the "Project").

Background:

? As a U.S. domestic and domiciled company, UEC is now reporting all mineral

resources in accordance with Item 1302 of Regulation S-K ("S-K 1300");

? S-K 1300 was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to

modernize mineral property disclosure requirements for mining registrants and

to align U.S. disclosure requirements more closely for mineral properties with

current industry and global regulatory standards;

? The mineral resource estimates set forth in this TRS have not previously been

reported under the S-K 1300 format; and

? The Anderson Project is the largest uranium deposit in the State of Arizona

and ranks among the largest U.S. deposits in states that support uranium


    mining.



Total disclosed Indicated Resources for the Anderson Project is stated at 32,055,000 lbs. eU3O8 with 16,175,000 tons grading 0.099% eU3O8. Drill data from 1,175 drill holes was used in the current mineral resource estimate.



The TRS was prepared under S-K 1300 and was filed on July 12, 2022 with the SEC
through EDGAR on Form 8-K and is also available on SEDAR as a "Material
Document" filed on July 12, 2022. The TRS was prepared on behalf of the Company
by Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G., Principal Engineer of BRS Engineering, and by
Clyde L. Yancey, P.G., Vice President of Exploration of UEC.

Amir Adnani, President and CEO stated: "We are very pleased with this update of
the Company's former NI-43 101 resources into fully compliant S-K 1300 resources
for our Anderson Project and to see resources move up from the Inferred category
to the Indicated category. America's uranium resources are becoming increasingly
important for utility and government buyers looking for reliable supplies from
stable U.S. jurisdictions. The Anderson Project is an important asset in UEC's
project pipeline that will be available to supply the longer term needs of
utilities and the Federal government seeking U.S. supply assurance."

About the Anderson Project



The Project is located in Yavapai County, west-central Arizona, approximately 75
miles northwest of Phoenix and 43 miles northwest of Wickenburg, Arizona. The
general area is situated along the northeast margin of the Date Creek Basin. The
planned mining method for the Project is by a combination of open-pit and
underground conventional mining. The Project covers 8,268 acres (12.9 square
miles) and is comprised of 386 contiguous, unpatented lode mining and placer
claims and one Arizona State land section. The northern section of the Anderson
Project area holds the open-pit resource, and the adjacent southern section
holds the underground resource.

                                     - 2 -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Project is located along the northeast margin of the Date Creek Basin of the
Basin and Range Province of the western United States. Uranium mineralization is
strata bound and occurs exclusively in the sequence of Miocene-age lacustrine
lakebed sediments. The lacustrine sediments unconformably overlie the andesitic
volcanic unit over most of the Project.

The area was discovered by radiometric surveys at outcrop in the 1950s, and 10,758 tons of material containing 33,230 pounds of uranium at a grade of 0.15 % eU3O8 was mined and shipped to the Atomic Energy Commission buying stations prior to 1960.

Within the Project area, drill data from 1,175 drill holes was used in the current mineral resource estimate, including hole location and radiometric equivalent data in 0.5 foot downhole increments. The Company has not completed any drilling on the Anderson Project since acquisition.

Mineral Resources



Estimated indicated mineral resources are summarized in following table at a
0.02% eU3O8 grade cutoff and a 0.1 ft % GT cutoff. Mineral resources were
estimated separately for each mineralized zone. The total contained mineralized
material was first estimated, then reasonable prospects for economic extraction
were applied.

Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability. However, considerations of reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction were applied to the mineral resource calculations herein.

                                                      Average          Average           Pounds
   Mineral Resource Estimates          Tons             Sum             Grade            eU3O8
      (0.1% Sum GT Cutoff)          (millions)       Thickness         (%eU3O8)        (millions)
                                                        (ft)
Resource Zone A
Reasonably Extractable Indicated
Resource                                0.862             3.8             0.111            1.907
Resource Zone B
Reasonably Extractable Indicated
Resource                                7.347             9.5             0.108           15.816
Resource Zone C
Reasonably Extractable Indicated
Resource                                6.211            10.4             0.094           11.730
Resource Zone D
Reasonably Extractable Indicated
Resource                                0.760             3.2             0.093            1.421



                                     - 3 -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Resource Zone E
Reasonably Extractable Indicated
Resource                                 0.911                7.6               0.060             1.095
Resource Zone F
Reasonably Extractable Indicated
Resource                                 0.084                4.6               0.051             0.086
                                         ALL ZONES GRAND TOTALS
 Extractable Indicated Resource          16.175               8.2               0.099            32.055

Notes:


1. Mineral Resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2. Economic factors have been applied to the estimates in consideration of reasonable prospects for
economic extraction.
3. Totals may not add due to rounding.



The technical information in the news release has been reviewed by each of
Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G., Principal Engineer of BRS Engineering, and Clyde
L. Yancey, P.G., Vice President of Exploration of UEC, being Qualified Persons
under Item 1302 of Regulation S-K.

A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.




Item 9.01    Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a)                   Financial Statements of Business Acquired

Not applicable.

(b)                   Pro forma Financial Information

Not applicable.

(c)                   Shell Company Transaction

Not applicable.

(d)                   Exhibits

Exhibit    Description

  99.1       News Release dated July 13, 2022.

  104      Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded
           within the inline XBRL document).


                                   __________

                                     - 4 -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses