Sustainability Value Creation
Sustainability means long-term development at economic, social, and environmental levels. In addition to creating revenue, the company's operations will also have a certain degree of external impact, including in environmental and social aspects. Quantifying or monetizing the environmental and social external impacts of a company's operations can help them better understand their impact, respond to problems, and achieve the goals of sustainable development.
To strengthen corporate social responsibility (CSR) governance and achieve Acer's vision for sustainability, we have been evaluating the external economic, environmental, and social impacts of operations and translating them into specific numerical and monetary values since 2018. This not only helps us review the impact of our operations, but also helps us better manage and reduce the environmental and social impacts of our operations, providing a better reference for future sustainability and business decisions and increasing transparency of our external communications.
The quantification process is divided into four steps, the first of which is identifying the impact boundary of Acer's operating activities, the scope of the quantification, and external issues with significant impacts from the material topics identified this year. Next, taking into account the positive and negative impact of various activities in Acer's value chain and operations on stakeholders, the external issues that have significant impact are expanded upon each part of the value chain. Then, based on the materiality of each external issue (materiality matrix, industry specific issues, Acer's own situation), representative topics are selected for external quantification. After the initial calculation results are discussed internally and coefficients corrected, the value of Acer's external impact is obtained.
1
Boundary | Value Chain | Key | Calculation |
and Scope | and Impact | Externalities | Discussion |
Definition | Path | Selection | and |
Drawing | Calibration | ||
•Identify the | •Considering the | •Select | •Data |
boundaries and | inputs and | representative | Calculation, |
value chains | outputs of the | external | Discussion, and |
impacted by | process, clarify | influences to | Revision |
Acer's | the positive | quantify based | |
operational | and negative | on external | |
activities | impacts of | materiality | |
various | (materiality | ||
•Identify | |||
activities in the | matrix, | ||
significant | value chain on | industry | |
externalities | stakeholders | specific issues, | |
from Acer's | Acer's own | ||
•Expand | |||
material topics | circumstances), | ||
significant | data | ||
externalities to | availability, and | ||
all aspects | the degree of | ||
parts of the | association | ||
value chain | with Acer |
Figure 1: The Quantification Process
Acer is one of the world's leading ICT companies and brands, providing consumer and commercial PCs, digital displays, and electronic service solutions. First tier suppliers in the value chain are mainly ODM assembly plants, material and component manufacturers, while second tier suppliers and onward are upstream raw materials and parts manufacturing. In terms of downstream customers, products can be sold to commercial customers, general consumers, government departments, or schools through distributors or system integrators.
Figure 2: Acer's Value Chain
According to our 2022 materiality analysis, Acer has listed activities at various parts of the value chain. To clarify the impact of activities in the value chain on stakeholders, we have mapped out the impact pathway of each activity's inputs and outputs. After considering the
2
inputs and outputs of value chain activities, we list the potential environmental or social impact of those activities and the relevant stakeholders. Finally, we select 12 externally influential indicators to quantify based on the materiality of the topic and Acer's own situation, data quality, and availability.
Figure 3: Impact Pathway Diagram
3
We uses the externality assessment tool to monetize the environmental, social, and economic externalities of ourselves so as to examine the value created by the us. Based on the impact pathway, the materiality of each topic, and each topic's materiality, data quality, and availability, the following 12 impact indicators were selected as the basis for the subsequent valuation of Acer's value. The indicators, explanations, quantitative methods, and data sources are listed below:
Table 1: Analysis of Acer's impact indicators
Impact | Quality of | Positive/ | |||||
No | Aspects | valuation | Description | Calculating methods | Reference | ||
data | Negative | ||||||
items | |||||||
EBITDA | Measuring with EBITDA, the impact of | ||||||
(Earnings before | |||||||
Economic value created by the | corporate financing models or accounting | Acer Consolidated | |||||
interest, taxes, | |||||||
1 | Economy | company's core business | policies can be eliminated and present the real | Primary Data | + | Financial | |
depreciation | |||||||
capabilities | economic value created by the company's | Statements (2021) | |||||
and | |||||||
operations. | |||||||
amortization) | |||||||
Based on Input-Output analysis, after | Directorate- | ||||||
calculating the salaries of employees in each | General of Budget, | ||||||
region, one unit of investment can be calculated | Primary | Accounting, and | |||||
Remuneration | Economic Added Value Driven | through the Input-Output table of each | Statistics. Input- | ||||
2 | Economy | Data/Secondary | + | ||||
and Benefits | by Employee Salaries | country/region to create the overall indirect | Output Table | ||||
Data | |||||||
economic benefits of the region (considering | (2020), OECD | ||||||
value added and industry backward linkage | (2015), Internal | ||||||
effects). | Statistics | ||||||
4 |
Impact | Quality of | Positive/ | |||||
No | Aspects | valuation | Description | Calculating methods | Reference | ||
data | Negative | ||||||
items | |||||||
Based on Input-Output analysis, after | |||||||
calculating the public expenditure in each | |||||||
Economic Added Value Driven | region, one unit of investment can be calculated | Primary | |||||
Public | through the Input-Output table of each | ||||||
3 | Economy | by Public Expenditure (tax, | Data/Secondary | + | |||
Expenditure | country/region to create the overall indirect | ||||||
etc.) | Data | ||||||
economic benefits of the region (considering | |||||||
value added and industry backward linkage | |||||||
effects). | |||||||
Based on Input-Output analysis, the | |||||||
procurement amount of each region is | |||||||
Procurement | Economic Added Value Driven | calculated through the Input-Output table of | Primary | ||||
4 | Economy | each country/region to create the total indirect | Data/Secondary | + | |||
Activities | by Procurement | ||||||
economic benefits of the region (considering | Data | ||||||
value added and industry backward linkage | |||||||
effects). | |||||||
The company's own | Based on the Environmental Profit and Loss | Gundlach, J., & | |||||
Greenhouse | operations and its upstream | ||||||
5 | Environment | (EP&L) Accounting, we quantify Acer's | Primary Data | - | Paul, I. (2022), | ||
Gases | and downstream greenhouse | ||||||
greenhouse gas emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and 3) | internal statistics | ||||||
gas emissions can contribute | |||||||
5 |
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Acer Inc. published this content on 27 July 2023 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 27 July 2023 07:49:04 UTC.