Real-time
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
3.786 EUR | -0.21% | -1.82% | -10.92% |
Apr. 16 | La Gran Carpa Catedral Reaches New Audiences Across Europe and MENA | CI |
Apr. 15 | Eutelsat: partnership with Comtech in Antarctica | CF |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.
Weaknesses
- The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- With an enterprise value anticipated at 3.52 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Wireless Telecommunications Services
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-10.92% | 1.92B | B+ | ||
-13.09% | 150B | C+ | ||
-11.96% | 8.89B | - | D | |
-3.50% | 4.34B | D | ||
-25.19% | 3.74B | C- | ||
-33.51% | 2.43B | D | ||
-16.34% | 2.12B | B- | ||
+31.66% | 1.67B | - | ||
-7.28% | 1.59B | - | ||
-3.03% | 378M | B- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ETL Stock
- Ratings Eutelsat Communications