Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.


Strengths

● Analysts expect a sharply increasing business volume for the group, with high growth rates in the coming years.

● The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.

● Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.

● The company returns high margins, thereby supporting business profitability.

● Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Over the last 4 months, analysts have significantly revised upwards the company's estimated sales.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.

● Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised upwards significantly.

● Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.


Weaknesses

● With an expected P/E ratio at 31.17 and 31.28 respectively for both the current and next fiscal years, the company operates with high earnings multiples.

● Based on current prices, the company has particularly high valuation levels.

● The company appears highly valued given the size of its balance sheet.

● Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.