Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
51.36 USD | +1.52% | -3.84% | -36.27% |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a relative ranking of the company within its sector, comes out particularly poor.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- Margins returned by the company are among the highest on the stock exchange list. Its core activity clears big profits.
- The equity is one of the most attractive in the market with regard to earnings multiple-based valuation.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- For the last few months, EPS revisions have remained quite promising. Analysts now anticipate higher profitability levels than before.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- Based on current prices, the company has particularly high valuation levels.
- The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Broadcasting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-36.27% | 7.34B | D+ | ||
-42.76% | 985M | - | - | |
-28.57% | 626M | - | - | |
-32.15% | 575M | - | - | |
+0.94% | 456M | - | D+ | |
+16.05% | 390M | B- | ||
-34.73% | 336M | - | - | |
-0.93% | 332M | - | - | |
-6.83% | 305M | - | - | |
+5.62% | 251M | - | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- LBRDK Stock
- Ratings Liberty Broadband Corporation