Trust Stamp has publicly addressed its position regarding the collection and use of biometric data in humanitarian contexts, focusing on why there is a strong need for proper data collection practices deployed during humanitarian interventions and why traditional biometrics solutions often fall short of protecting vulnerable people The use of biometric data in humanitarian aid is undoubtedly a double-edged sword. While it offers efficiency and accountability, it also poses significant risks to vulnerable populations. Striking a balance between these factors necessitates meticulous planning, informed consent, and a deep understanding of the potential harm that can arise, if privacy is not enforced.

Humanitarian actors and their donors need to commit to the fundamental data protection principle of data minimisation, i.e. collecting, using and retaining the minimum amount of data necessary for the purposes of their service, and they should refuse to collect that data until they can abide by the principles of data protection to the standard that all of deserve.