Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.8768 EUR | +14.58% | -24.41% | -87.56% |
Jun. 14 | Market Update-Wall Street seen in the red, political risk dominates in Europe | RE |
Jun. 14 | Atos Gets $752 Million French Government Bid for Computing, Cyber Assets -- 2nd Update | DJ |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is good.
Strengths
- The company is one of the most undervalued, with an "enterprise value to sales" ratio at 0.38 for the 2024 fiscal year.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The appreciation potential seems limited due to the average target prices set by the analysts covering the stock.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: IT Services & Consulting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-87.56% | 104M | A- | ||
-18.30% | 180B | A- | ||
+1.02% | 166B | B+ | ||
+3.46% | 155B | B- | ||
+4.14% | 99.3B | A- | ||
+50.96% | 93.8B | C- | ||
+14.41% | 84.11B | A- | ||
-3.50% | 73.81B | A | ||
-2.39% | 46.39B | A- | ||
-36.10% | 42.58B | C |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ATO Stock
- Ratings AtoS SE