Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
4.632 EUR | +2.25% | +6.09% | +8.99% |
May. 23 | Eutelsat Expands Partnership with InterSat | MT |
May. 22 | Eutelsat, Yahsat Partner for Satellite Broadband Services in Ethiopia | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
Weaknesses
- The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- The company's enterprise value to sales, at 3.85 times its current sales, is high.
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Most analysts recommend that the stock should be sold or reduced.
- The three month average target prices set by analysts do not offer high potential in comparison with the current prices.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Wireless Telecommunications Services
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+8.99% | 2.38B | B+ | ||
-8.71% | 157B | C+ | ||
-9.94% | 9.09B | - | D | |
+15.87% | 5.21B | D | ||
-26.85% | 3.66B | C- | ||
-43.56% | 2.05B | D | ||
+31.23% | 1.65B | - | ||
-15.71% | 1.46B | - | ||
+37.23% | 1.16B | - | - | |
-6.06% | 369M | B- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ETL Stock
- Ratings Eutelsat Communications