Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant

Previous independent registered public accounting firm

From April 9, 2019 through December 26, 2019 Prager Metis CPAs, LLC ("Prager"), was the independent registered public accounting firm of our company. On December 26, 2019, we notified Prager we were terminating them as our independent certifying accountant.

During their appointment, Prager provided our company with an audit report for the year ended August 31, 2019. The audit report of Prager on our company's financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2019 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, with the exception that, the report dated December 18, 2019, contained the following explanatory paragraph:





         "The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
         assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
         discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has
         no revenues, has negative working capital at August 31, 2019,
         has incurred recurring negative cash flow from operating
         activities, and has an accumulated deficit which raises
         substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
         concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also
         described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any
         adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
         uncertainty."

From April 9, 2019 to December 26, 2019, there were no disagreements (as defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with Prager on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Prager would have caused it to make reference in connection with its opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. Further, during the period of April 9, 2019 to December 26, 2019, there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

We furnished Prager with a copy of this disclosure, providing Prager with the opportunity to furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made by the Company herein in response to Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K and, if not, stating the respect in which he does not agree. A copy of Prager's response is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Report.






2

New independent registered public accounting firm

On January 6, 2020, we engaged KCCW Accountancy Corp. ("KCCW"), an independent registered public accounting firm, as our principal independent accountant with the approval of our board of directors.

During the two most recent fiscal years and through the date of engagement, we have not consulted with KCCW regarding either:

1. The application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to us nor oral advice was provided that KCCW concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or

2. Any matter that was either subject of disagreement or event, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv)(A) of Regulation S-K and the related instruction to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as that term is explained in Item 304(a)(1)(iv)(A) of Regulation S-K.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses