Results from a phase II study investigating eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG-3 protein) and pembrolizumab in 2nd line PD-1/PD-L1 refractory metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients

Krebs M.G 1; Majem M2; Forster M3; Peguero J 4; Clay T5; Felip E6; Iams W7; Roxburgh P8; Dodger B9; Bajaj P10; Mueller C11; Triebel F12

1Krebs: Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; 2Majem: Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; 3Forster: UCL Cancer Institute / University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation, London, UK; 4Peguero: Oncology Consultants, P.A., Houston, USA; 5Clay: St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Australia; 6Felip: Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; 7Iams: Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tennessee, United States; 8Roxburgh: Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow and Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Scotland, United Kingdom; 9Doger: Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Madrid, Spain; 10Bajaj: Tasman Oncology, Queensland, Australia; 11Mueller: Clinical Development, Immutep GmbH, Berlin, Germany; 12Triebel: Research & Development, Immutep S.A.S., Orsay, France

BACKGROUND

Figure 1. efti's mechanism of action

METHODS

Study Design and Patients

Eftilagimod alpha (efti) is a soluble LAG-3 protein binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules, thus mediating antigen presenting cell (APC) and CD8 T-cell activation (Figure 1). Such stimulation of the dendritic cell network and resulting T cell recruitment may lead to stronger anti-tumor responses in combination with pembrolizumab than observed with pembrolizumab alone. We report results from the 2nd line PD-X refractory metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cohort (Part B) of the TACTI-002 study (NCT03625323).

  • Non-randomized, multinational, open-label, phase II trial.

  • 2nd line, PD-X refractory metastatic PD-L1 all-comer NSCLC patients.

  • Simon's two stage design.

  • Efti is administered as a 30 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for the first 8 cycles and every 3 weeks for the following 9 cycles (total 1 year). Pembrolizumab is administered at a standard dose of 200 mg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for maximum of 2 years (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Study design

Assessments and Statistical Analyses:

  • Primary Endpoint: Objective response rate (ORR), as per iRECIST.

  • Secondary Endpoints: Progression free survival (PFS) and other efficacy parameter, safety and tolerability, and exploratory biomarkers.

  • Central assessment of tumor cell PD-L1 expression (by Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx) after enrolment.

  • Imaging performed every 9 weeks and reported according to iRECIST and RECIST 1.1.

  • Safety and efficacy was analyzed following intent to treat principle (all patients who received at least one dose of study medication).

  • Database cut-off date was January 21, 2022 (min. follow up of 5+ months).

"Copies of this Poster obtained through QR, AR and/or text key codes are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without written permission of the authors"

First Author COI: Matthew Krebs,matthew.krebs@nhs.net

Honoraria - Roche, Jassen; Consulting or Advisory Role - Janssen; Roche, Bayer, Seattle Genetics; Research Funding - Roche (Inst); Travel, Accommodation, Expenses - AstraZeneca; BerGenBio; Immutep

Corresponding author: Frederic Triebel,frederic.triebel@immutep.com

Sponsored by: Immutep S.A

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA provided pembrolizumab for the study.

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

  • A total of 36 patients were enrolled and treated into this part of the study. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1.

  • Majority of patients presented with PD-L1 TPS <50% (69.4%) and received prior chemotherapy in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (72.2%).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics (N=36)

Baseline parameters, n (%)

Age (years), median (range)

67 (46-84)

Female Male

14 (38.9) 22 (61.1)

ECOG 0

ECOG 1

12 (33.3) 24 (66.7)

Current or Ex-smoker Non-smoker

31 (86.1) 5 (13.9)

Squamous Non-squamous pathology Unknown

7 (19.4)

28 (77.8)

1 (2.8)

Prior PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with chemotherapy

36 (100) 26 (72.2)

Liver metastasis

4 (11.1)

Tumor resistance*

Primary resistance Secondary resistance

11 (30.6) 24 (66.7)

PD-L1 (TPS)

<1% 1-49%50%

Not evaluable/not yet

13 (36.1)

12 (33.3)

7 (19.4)

4 (11.1)

*... Tumor resistance defined according to SITC Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce consensus1

References:

  • 1 Kluger HM et al, J Immunotherapy Cancer. 2020

    Mar;8(1):e000398. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000398

  • 2 Saâda-Bouzid E et al, Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1605-1611.

    doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx178

EXPOSURE AND SAFETY

EFFICACY

  • ORR (iRECIST) of 6% in the intent to treat population(Table 2).

  • Both responders showed deep (Figure 4) and durable partial responses (Figure 3).

  • 36 % disease control rate and 26% being progression free at 6 months

  • Comparable results using RECIST 1.1.

  • 6 patients still under therapy (Figure 3) and 73% alive at 6 months.

Figure 3. Spider plot (N=34)**

Table 4. General overview of adverse events (N=36)

**:1 treatment and1 post-baseline tumor staging + measurable target lesion post baseline

Figure 5. Tumor growth kinetics (N=19)*

% changefrombaseline

**:1 treatment and1 post-baseline tumor staging + measurable target lesions post baseline.

0

2

  • Tumour growth kinetics (TGK) obtained as a comparative ratio of the difference of the sum of the largest diameters of target lesions in the pre- and post-baseline setting (Figure 5)2.

  • 73.7% of evaluable patients had post-treatment TGK shrinkage or deceleration (Table 3).

Table 2. Best overall response (iRECIST), N=36

Tumor response (iRECIST)*

Overall n (%)

Complete Response

0 (0)

Partial Response Stable Disease Progression Not Evaluable**

2 (5.6)

11 (30.6)

22 (61.1)

1 (2.8)Overall Response Rate (ITT)

2/36 (5.6)Disease Control Rate (ITT)

13/36 (36.1)Overall Response Rate (evaluable pts)Disease Control Rate (evaluable pts)

4

6

8

12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (months)

Table 3. Tumor growth kinetics, N=19#

Tumor dynamics

n (%)

Shrinkage

4 (21.1)

Deceleration

10 (52.6)

Acceleration

5 (26.3)

# ...evaluable set (N=19):1 pre- and post-baseline scan following the same tumors

  • Two confirmed partial responses (5.6%), 36 % disease control rate leading to 26% with long-term (6+ months) disease control in very difficult to treat (PD-X refractory NSCLC) patient population.

    Figure 6. Single case #1

    • 71-year-old female diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC (NSQ) in Sep 2016.

    • Received 1st line carboplatin + pemetrexed + pembrolizumab for 18 months stopped due to PD.

    • At study entry: ECOG 1, non-evaluable PD-L1 TPS, EGFR/ALK negative, ex-smoker

    • Started TACTI-002 in Feb 2020 and is still on therapy (Jan 2022) with confirmedongoing partial response (-87%)

    PRE-STUDY (DEC 2019)

    PD on basis of skeletal metastases.

    2/35 (5.7)

    13/35 (37.1)

    No supraclavicular lymphadenopathy seen at this point

    BASELINE (FEB 2020)

    Further PD confirmed with new left supraclavicular lymph node measuring 1.5cm

    POST 3 CYCLES (APR 2020)

    Left supraclavicular node shrunk to 5mm (-67%)

    Figure 7. Single case #2

    • 67-year-old female diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC (NSQ) in Aug 2019.

    • Received 1st line cisplatin + pemetrexed + pembrolizumab for 8 months. discontinuing after progression.

    • At study entry: ECOG 0, PD-L1 80 %, EGFR/ALK negative, non-smoker, several metastatic sites (lung, lymph nodes).

    • Started TACTI-002 in Apr 2021 and is still on therapy (Jan 2022) with confirmed partial response (-38 %).

    CONCLUSION

    # 11P

    Lymph Node LesionLung LesionPRE-STUDY (Feb 2020)

    BASELINE (APR 2021)

    Safety parameter

    n (%)

    Patients with any TEAE

    35 (97.2)

    Patients with any SAE

    8 (22.2)

    thereof related to efti/pembro

    1 (2.8)/1 (2.8)

    Patients with any grade3 TEAE

    13 (36.1)

    thereof related to efti/pembro

    1 (2.8)/3 (8.3)

    Patients with fatal TEAEs*

    3 (8.3)*

    thereof related to efti /pembro

    0

    Patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of any study treatment

    3 (8.3)

    *... metastatic neoplasm; dyspnea, acute respiratory failure (each occurring once)

    • Pts received a median of 5 (range 2-31) pembrolizumab and 7 (range 2-22) efti administrations.

    • The most common TEAEs were dyspnea (33.3%), decreased appetite (33.3%), and cough (25%) (Table 5). No treatment-related deaths occurred (Table 4).

    Table 5. Frequent treatment-emergent adverse events occurring15% (N=36)

  • Encouraging early OS data with 6-months landmark analysis showed 73 % survival rate.

  • The combination of an APC activator (efti) plus PD-1 antagonist (pembrolizumab) is well-tolerated and shows signs of antitumor activity in PD-X refractory 2nd line NSCLC patients.

    Adverse event (PT)

    Any grade N (%)

    Grade 3 N (%)

    Grade 4/5 N (%)

    Dyspnoea

    12 (33.3)

    2 (5.6)

    -

    Decreased appetite

    12 (33.3)

    -

    -

    Cough

    9 (25.0)

    -

    -

    Asthenia

    8 (22.2)

    1 (2.8)

    -

    Fatigue

    6 (16.7)

    1 (2.8)

    -

    Weight decreased

    6 (16.7)

    -

    -

  • This combination warrants further clinical investigation in this setting.

CYCLES (JAN 2022)POST 12

ALK…Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase APC…antigen-presenting cell ECOG…Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group EGFR…Epidermal growth factor receptor iRECIST…Immune Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors ITT…Intent to treat population

LAG-3...Lymphocyte Activation gene-3 MHC…Major Histocompatibility Complex NSCLC...non-small cell lung cancer PD-L1...Programmed Death ligand-1 PD-X...PD-1 or PD-L1 targeted therapy PFS...progression-free survivalPT...preferred term ORR…objective response rate SAE…serious adverse event TEAE…treatment-emergent adverse event TPS…Tumor Proportion Score TGK…tumor growth kinetics

Attachments

  • Original Link
  • Original Document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

Immutep Ltd. published this content on 29 March 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 29 March 2022 10:15:43 UTC.