ASX Announcement
9 December 2021
For personal use only
Warralong Exploration Update
- Assay results have been received from the two aircore drill programs completed over parts of Sipa's two granted Warralong tenements
- First pass reconnaissance drilling was designed to gather geological information from initial target areas and more broadly to enable an updated geological interpretation of the project area
- No significant gold or other metal anomalism observed across the target areas drilled to date, however it is noted that drilling over each area was restricted to a single traverse.
- Refinement of existing targets and new targets will be generated from the basement interpretation currently in progress
- Assay results from soil samples collected over an extensive area not tested by the recent drilling are expected in January.
Sipa Resources Limited (ASX: SRI) ("Sipa" or "the Company") has received assay results from aircore drilling completed in September and October at its 100% owned Warralong project in the Pilbara region of WA.
Two wide-spaced reconnaissance style aircore drill programs were completed in September and October over tenements E45/5687 and E45/5740 (ASX: SRI 20/10/2021, Figure 1). Traverses of 100m and 200m spaced holes were completed over first round targets associated with splay structures adjacent to the Lalla Rookh Shear, interpreted from the detailed aeromagnetic survey flown by Sipa in late 2020 (e.g., ASX: SRI 23/12/2020). Bottom of hole samples of fresh bedrock were collected in 291 holes, and assayed to identify potential mineralisation, and assist in building a basement geology interpretation in this area where the underlying geology is completely obscured by shallow sand cover.
No gold or other key metal (copper, nickel, lithium) mineralisation was identified in the samples. The multi- element data will now be incorporated with existing information to complete the basement geology interpretation and assist in the identification of follow up drill targets for testing in 2022. Samples from the recently completed soil sampling program are progressing through laboratory analysis with results expected in January 2022.
A number of existing drill targets along the major Lalla Rookh shear are located within ungranted tenure and will be tested in 2022 as these tenements are granted.
Unit 5, 12-20 Railway Rd Subiaco 6008 Western Australia • +61 (0) 8 9388 1551 • reception@sipa.com.au
www.sipa.com.au
ASX: SRI
For personal use only
Figure 1: Warralong Project tenements showing the location of the completed drilling in green. Pink outlines are granted tenements and brown outlines are ungranted tenements. Lalla Rookh Shear and associated splays are indicated in black.
Competent Person's Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Pip Darvall, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Darvall is a full-time employee of Sipa Resources Limited, and has sufficient experience relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activities being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Darvall consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Unit 5, 12-20 Railway Rd Subiaco 6008 Western Australia • +61 (0) 8 9388 1551 • reception@sipa.com.au
www.sipa.com.au
About Sipa
For personal use only
Sipa Resources Limited (ASX: SRI) is an Australian-based exploration company focused on the discovery of gold and base metal deposits primarily in Western Australia. The Paterson North Copper-Gold Project is being progressed in partnership with Rio Tinto Exploration, and the Barbwire Terrace Base Metals Project involves an innovative joint venture with petroleum explorer and operator Buru Energy Limited.
At Wolfe Basin, the first drill program intersected base metals up to 2.9% Pb, and 0.5% Cu, with extensive areas remaining to be tested along a >40km long prospective horizon. The Warralong Project is prospective for intrusion hosted gold in the north Pilbara region in a 'look-alike' structural setting to recent discoveries in the district.
The Skeleton Rocks project covers outcropping and interpreted greenstone units prospective for gold and nickel-copper-platinum group element (Ni-Cu-PGE) deposits with limited to no drilling ever completed in these areas. Sipa's Murchison Project covers major structures and prospective geology in prolific greenstone belts within WA's northern goldfields.
The 100%-owned Uganda Base Metals Project contains an intrusive-hostedNi-Cu sulphide discovery with significant scale potential, and Sipa is continuing to hold discussions with potential partners to fund further exploration at this location.
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Sipa Resources Limited.
More Information:
Pip Darvall, Managing Director | Victoria Humphries, Investor and Media Inquiries |
Sipa Resources Limited | NWR Communications |
+61 (0) 8 9388 1551 | +61 (0) 431 151 676 |
reception@sipa.com.auvictoria@nwrcommunications.com.au
Unit 5, 12-20 Railway Rd Subiaco 6008 Western Australia • +61 (0) 8 9388 1551 • reception@sipa.com.au
www.sipa.com.au
use only
ASX Announcement
9 December 2021
JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut channels, random chips, or specific | • Aircore drilling was used to obtain 4 metre composite | |
techniques | specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals | samples. | |
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF | • Samples of fresh basement rocks were submitted to | ||
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad | the laboratory for assay. | ||
meaning of sampling. | |||
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the | |||
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. | |||
• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation Material to the Public Report. | |||
Drilling | • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, | • | Aircore drilling utilised an 88mm aircore blade and |
techniques | auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard | where needed a 108mm face-sampling hammer bit., | |
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is | • Drill holes were oriented vertically. | ||
oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | |||
Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing sample recoveries and results. | • | The quality of drill samples (wet, damp, dry) was |
recovery | • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature | recorded by the supervising geologist with a visual | |
of the samples. | estimate of the quantity of sample. All the samples | ||
• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether | were dry. | ||
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse | • No relationship was identified between sample | ||
material. | recovery and grade. | ||
Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically | • The entirety of all drill holes was geologically logged by | |
logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, | the supervising geologist electronically, with chip trays | ||
mining studies and metallurgical studies. | preserved for future review. | ||
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. | |||
• The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
r personal
Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
techniques | • If non-core, split type, and whether sampled wet or dry. |
and sample | • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample |
preparation | preparation technique. |
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise | |
representivity of samples. | |
• Measures to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material | |
collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. | |
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material sampled. |
- 4 metre composite samples were obtained via a ~10% split from a fixed cone splitter. The sample size is appropriate to the grain size.
r personal use only
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||||
Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory | • | 49 element assays were completed by ALS | ||||
assay data | procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. | Laboratories, Perth. Gold via fire assay and ICP-AES | |||||
and | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | other elements using a four-acid digest from a 25g | |||||
laboratory | parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and | sub-sample, and ICP-MS. | |||||
tests | model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. | • | Lab internal blanks and standards were within | ||||
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, | accepted norms. | ||||||
external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack | |||||||
of bias) and precision have been established. | |||||||
Verification | • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative | • | No significant intersections were observed. | ||||
of sampling | company personnel. | • | No twinned holes were drilled. | ||||
and assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | • | Data entry is checked by the geologist and by the | ||||
• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data | supervising geologist. A second geologist verified the | ||||||
storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | lithological assessments of the supervising geologist. | ||||||
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | • | Assay results have not been adjusted. | |||||
Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | • | Drill hole collar locations were located via a hand-held | ||||
data points | surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource | GPS with approximate accuracy of +/- 3m in eastings | |||||
estimation. | and northings, and +/- 5m in RL. | ||||||
• Specification of the grid system used. | • | Downhole surveys were not completed | |||||
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | • | Grid system used is GDA2020 Zone 50. | |||||
Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | • | Drill hole locations were designed to test targets | ||||
and | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of | • | generated from a detailed aeromagnetic survey | ||||
distribution | geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore | Samples across intervals of interest were submitted in | |||||
Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. | 4m increments. | ||||||
• Whether sample compositing has been applied. | |||||||
Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible | • | All holes were drilled vertically to intersect fresh | ||||
data in | structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. | basement rocks as shallowly as possible. | |||||
relation to | • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key | ||||||
geological | mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this | ||||||
structure | should be assessed and reported if material. | ||||||
Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • | Samples were sent via 3rd party contractor in sealed, | ||||
security | uniquely numbered bags direct to the laboratory. | ||||||
Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | • | No audits done. | ||||
reviews | |||||||
This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Sipa Resources Limited published this content on 09 December 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 09 December 2021 02:51:02 UTC.