Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
11.91 USD | -2.22% | -3.80% | -19.47% |
Apr. 26 | Telecoms Climb After Alphabet, Snap Earnings - Communications Services Roundup | DJ |
Apr. 26 | Sector Update: Consumer Stocks Mixed in Late Afternoon Trading | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is good.
Strengths
- The company's profit outlook over the next few years is a strong asset.
- With regards to fundamentals, the enterprise value to sales ratio is at 0.66 for the current period. Therefore, the company is undervalued.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company does not generate enough profits, which is an alarming weak point.
- The group shows a rather high level of debt in proportion to its EBITDA.
- With an expected P/E ratio at 60.88 and 9.18 respectively for both the current and next fiscal years, the company operates with high earnings multiples.
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Broadcasting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-19.47% | 8.53B | C | ||
+24.85% | 207B | B+ | ||
+9.98% | 15.97B | - | ||
-15.67% | 7.98B | C | ||
0.00% | 4.58B | - | ||
+37.01% | 4.26B | B- | ||
+11.41% | 3.49B | B+ | ||
+0.19% | 3.41B | - | - | |
+46.62% | 2.62B | B- | ||
+18.46% | 2.58B | D |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- PARA Stock
- Ratings Paramount Global