The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook, our expectations
regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other
non-historical statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties,
including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described under "Risk
Factors" and "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" as discussed
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2019 with the SEC on February 14, 2020 (the "Form 10-K"), in this Report on Form
10-Q and in any other Form 10-Q filed or to be filed by us, and in other
documents we file with the SEC from time to time. Our actual results may differ
materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.

Our Company

Triton International Limited ("Triton", "we", "our" or the "Company") is the
world's largest lessor of intermodal containers. Intermodal containers are
large, standardized steel boxes used to transport freight by ship, rail or
truck. Because of the handling efficiencies they provide, intermodal containers
are the primary means by which many goods and materials are shipped
internationally. We also lease chassis, which are used for the transportation of
containers.

We operate our business in one industry, intermodal transportation equipment,
and have two business segments, which also represent our reporting segments:
•      Equipment leasing - we own, lease and ultimately dispose of containers and

chassis from our lease fleet.

• Equipment trading - we purchase containers from shipping line customers,

and other sellers of containers, and resell these containers to container

retailers and users of containers for storage or one-way shipment.

Operations



Our consolidated operations include the acquisition, leasing, re-leasing and
subsequent sale of multiple types of intermodal containers and chassis. As of
March 31, 2020, our total fleet consisted of 3.6 million containers and chassis,
representing 6.0 million twenty-foot equivalent units ("TEU") or 6.8 million
cost equivalent units ("CEU"). We have an extensive global presence, offering
leasing services through 20 offices and 3 independent agencies located in 16
countries and approximately 420 third-party owned and operated depot facilities
in 44 countries as of March 31, 2020. Our primary customers include the world's
largest container shipping lines. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, our
twenty largest customers accounted for 85% of our lease billings, our five
largest customers accounted for 57% of our lease billings, and our two largest
customers, CMA CGM S.A. and Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A., accounted for
21% and 15% of our lease billings, respectively.

The most important driver of profitability in our business is the extent to
which leasing revenues, which are driven by our owned equipment fleet size,
utilization and average lease rates, exceed our ownership and operating costs.
Our profitability is also driven by the gains or losses we realize on the sale
of used containers in the ordinary course of our business.

We lease five types of equipment: (1) dry containers, which are used for general
cargo such as manufactured component parts, consumer staples, electronics and
apparel, (2) refrigerated containers, which are used for perishable items such
as fresh and frozen foods, (3) special containers, which are used for heavy and
over-sized cargo such as marble slabs, building products and machinery, (4) tank
containers, which are used to transport bulk liquid products such as chemicals,
and (5) chassis, which are used for the transportation of containers. Our
in-house equipment sales group manages the sale process for our used containers
and chassis from our equipment leasing fleet and buys and sells used and new
containers and chassis acquired from third parties.



                                       22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following tables summarize our equipment fleet as of March 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2019 indicated in units, TEU and CEU.


                                        Equipment Fleet in Units                                     Equipment Fleet in TEU
                         March 31, 2020     December 31, 2019     March 31, 2019     March 31, 2020     December 31, 2019     March 31, 2019
Dry                          3,239,306             3,267,624          3,322,723          5,324,756             5,369,377          5,448,267
Refrigerated                   225,026               225,520            229,971            434,263               435,148            443,402
Special                         93,743                94,453             93,361            170,225               171,437            168,755
Tank                            12,469                12,485             12,600             12,469                12,485             12,600
Chassis                         24,319                24,515             24,879             44,828                45,154             45,885
Equipment leasing fleet      3,594,863             3,624,597          3,683,534          5,986,541             6,033,601          6,118,909
Equipment trading fleet         17,549                17,906             17,504             26,185                27,121             27,014
Total                        3,612,412             3,642,503          3,701,038          6,012,726             6,060,722          6,145,923



                                      Equipment Fleet in CEU (1)
                        March 31, 2020    December 31, 2019    March 31, 2019
Operating leases             6,474,701            6,434,434         6,516,357
Finance leases                 338,242              423,638           442,903
Equipment trading fleet         35,632               37,232            42,402
Total                        6,848,575            6,895,304         7,001,662



(1) In the equipment fleet tables above, we have included total fleet count

information based on CEU. CEU is a ratio used to convert the actual number of

containers in our fleet to a figure based on the relative purchase prices of

our various equipment types to that of a 20-foot dry container. For example,

the CEU ratio for a 40-foot high cube dry container is 1.70, and a 40-foot

high cube refrigerated container is 7.50. These factors may differ slightly

from CEU ratios used by others in the industry.

The following table summarizes the percentage of our equipment fleet in terms of units and CEU as of March 31, 2020:


                                                   Percentage of total    Percentage of total
Equipment Type                                        fleet in units          fleet in CEU
Dry                                                         89.7 %                 68.3 %
Refrigerated                                                 6.2                   24.3
Special                                                      2.6                    3.5
Tank                                                         0.3                    1.5
Chassis                                                      0.7                    1.9
Equipment leasing fleet                                     99.5                   99.5
Equipment trading fleet                                      0.5                    0.5
Total                                                      100.0 %                100.0 %


We generally lease our equipment on a per diem basis to our customers under three types of leases: • Long-term leases typically have initial contractual terms ranging from


       three to eight years and provide us with stable cash flow and low
       transaction costs by requiring customers to maintain specific units
       on-hire for the duration of the lease term.

• Finance leases are typically structured as full payout leases and provide


       for a predictable recurring revenue stream with the lowest cost to the
       customer as customers are generally required to retain the equipment for
       the duration of its useful life.

• Service leases command a premium per diem rate in exchange for providing

customers with greater operational flexibility by allowing non-scheduled

pick-up and drop-off of units during the lease term.





We also have expired long-term leases whose fixed terms have ended but for which
the related units remain on-hire and for which we continue to receive rental
payments pursuant to the terms of the initial contract. Some leases have
contractual terms that have features reflective of both long-term and service
leases and we classify such leases as either long-term or service leases,
depending upon which features we believe are predominant.


                                       23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table summarizes our lease portfolio by lease type, based on CEU on-hire as of March 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2019:


                                         March 31,    December 31,    March 31,
Lease Portfolio                             2020          2019           2019
Long-term leases                             71.1 %         69.5 %        64.8 %
Finance leases                                5.5            6.8           6.8
Service leases                                7.7            7.8          11.6
Expired long-term leases (units on-hire)     15.7           15.9          16.8
Total                                       100.0 %        100.0 %       100.0 %



As of March 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2019, our long-term and
finance leases combined had an average remaining contractual term of
approximately 48 months, 48 months, and 49 months, respectively, assuming no
leases are renewed.

COVID-19

The outbreak of COVID-19 is having a meaningful impact on global trade and our
business. In late January 2020, China implemented extensive work restrictions to
control the outbreak, which led to a steep drop in exports from China and
limited container demand. Work restrictions in China started to ease in March,
and export volumes from China increased throughout the month. However, the
spread of COVID-19 to other parts of the world and the strong actions taken by
many countries to reduce exposures have led to a sharp decrease in global
economic activity during the second quarter and a second steep drop in global
containerized trade volumes. We expect demand for leased containers to be
negatively impacted for as long as global economic activity and trade volumes
are weak. A prolonged slowdown in trade volumes due to the pandemic could also
significantly increase the financial challenges facing our customers. We are
closely monitoring our customers' payment performance and expect our customer
credit risk will remain high as long as economic and trade disruptions persist.

Operating Performance

Triton's financial performance was solid during the first quarter of 2020, despite the challenging market conditions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.



Fleet size. As of March 31, 2020, our revenue earning assets had a net book
value of $8.8 billion and our fleet size was 6.8 million CEUs, which represent
decreases of 6.0% and 2.2%, respectively, compared to March 31, 2019. The
decrease in our fleet size was primarily due to limited procurement in 2019. In
2019, global shipping activity was negatively impacted by the trade dispute
between the United States and China, which led to low trade growth, weak leasing
demand, and low new lease transaction activity. In addition, aggressive
competition among leasing companies led to reduced projected returns on new
container investments and caused us to further restrict new container purchases.
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has led to significant reductions in shipping
volumes, and our procurement remains below our target level so far this year.
Through April 17, 2020, we have invested $192.8 million in containers for
delivery in 2020.

Utilization(1). Our utilization averaged 95.4% during the first quarter of 2020,
down 2.3% from the first quarter of 2019 and down 0.4% from the fourth quarter
of 2019. Our utilization decreased throughout 2019 due to limited trade growth,
weak leasing demand and limited container pick-up activity. Our utilization
stabilized in December and January, but has been decreasing again since February
due to the impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the decrease in our
utilization has been gradual. Dry container drop-off volumes have remained
moderate due to protections in our lease portfolio, low levels of new container
production and operational challenges facing our customers that have slowed the
global flow of containers. Demand for our refrigerated containers was also less
affected by the trade dispute in 2019 and the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020. As of
April 17, 2020, our utilization was 95.2%.

                                       24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table summarizes the equipment fleet utilization for the periods
indicated below:
                                                Quarter Ended
                    March 31,     December 31,     September 30,    June 30,    March 31,
                       2020           2019             2019           2019         2019
Average Utilization     95.4 %         95.8 %            96.7 %        97.2 %       97.7 %
Ending Utilization      95.3 %         95.4 %            96.4 %        97.1 %       97.4 %


(1) Utilization is computed by dividing our total units on lease (in CEU) by the

total units in our fleet (in CEU) excluding new units not yet leased and

off-hire units designated for sale.





Average lease rates. Average lease rates for our dry container product line
decreased by 3.5% in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of
2019 and 1.4% from the fourth quarter of 2019, primarily reflecting the impact
of several large lease extensions completed during 2019 at rates below our
portfolio average. Market lease rates were well below our portfolio average
lease rates throughout much of 2019 due to low new container prices, weak lease
demand, a decrease in interest rates and aggressive competition for available
lease transactions. Market lease rates for dry containers increased in the first
quarter of 2020 due to an increase in new container prices, reflecting early
expectations for improved trade growth and actions by container manufacturers to
rationalize shift capacity. Market lease rates for dry containers at the end of
the first quarter were slightly below the average lease rates in our portfolio.

Average lease rates for our refrigerated container product line decreased by
3.3% in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019. The
cost of refrigerated containers has trended down over the last few years, which
has led to lower market lease rates. In addition, we have been experiencing
larger differences in lease rates for older refrigerated containers compared to
rates on new equipment, and we expect our average lease rates for refrigerated
containers to continue to gradually trend down.

The average lease rates for special containers remained flat in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019. Current market lease rates for special containers are below the average lease rates in our lease portfolio, but we experienced limited lease renewal and new lease activity in the first quarter of 2020.



Equipment disposals. Disposal volumes of our used dry containers increased 22.6%
in the first quarter of 2020 from the first quarter of 2019 reflecting an
increased level of inventory available for sale. Average used dry container
disposal prices decreased by 10.4% in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the
first quarter of 2019, mainly reflecting a decrease in sale prices during 2019.
Average used container sale prices decreased gradually throughout 2019
reflecting low new container prices and decreasing leasing company utilizations
and increased inventories of containers held for sale. Our average selling
prices for used containers stabilized in the first quarter of 2020, and we
continue to generate gains on used container disposals as our average used
container selling prices currently are above our residual values. We expect used
container selling prices could come under further pressure in 2020 if trade
volumes and leasing company utilizations are heavily impacted by COVID-19
economic disruptions.

Credit Risk.  We established a $3.9 million reserve in the first quarter against
the receivables of one of our mid-sized customers where we had been experiencing
lengthy payment delays. Historically, we have experienced limited credit losses.
However, our credit risk has been elevated due to the ongoing financial pressure
faced by our shipping line customers as a result of persistent excess vessel
capacity and low freight rates. Many of our customers also have high levels of
leverage and several generated financial losses in 2019.

Credit risk has recently increased further as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
It is widely expected that the aggressive actions taken by many countries to
slow the spread of COVID-19 will lead to a steep drop in global economic and
shipping activity. While our customers' payment performance was generally solid
in the first quarter, many of our customers are taking aggressive actions to
reduce expenses and a number of customers have approached us about extending
payment terms.


                                       25

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows provided by operating activities, proceeds from the sale of our leasing equipment, and borrowings under our credit facilities. Our principal uses of cash include capital expenditures, debt service requirements, paying dividends, and repurchasing our common shares.



For the trailing twelve months ending March 31, 2020, cash provided by operating
activities, together with the proceeds from the sale of our leasing equipment,
was $1,181.0 million. In addition, as of March 31, 2020, we had $417.6 million
of cash and cash equivalents and $1,312.5 million of additional borrowing
capacity under our current credit facilities. We increased our cash balances
during the first quarter to provide greater protection against the increased
level of business and financial market risk and uncertainty caused by the
COVID-19 pandemic.

As of March 31, 2020, our cash commitments in the next twelve months include
$827.2 million of scheduled principal payments on our existing debt facilities
and $163.0 million of committed but unpaid capital expenditures.

We believe that cash provided by operating activities, existing cash, proceeds
from the sale of our leasing equipment, and availability under our borrowing
facilities will be sufficient to meet our obligations over the next
twelve months.

Share Repurchase Program



During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company repurchased a total of
1.4 million common shares at an average price per share of $27.43 for a total of
$37.5 million under its Board authorized share repurchase program. As of
April 17, 2020, the Company has purchased over 10.8 million shares, or 13.4%, of
our common shares since August 2018.

Preferred Share Offering



In January 2020, the Company completed a public offering of 6.875% Series D
preference shares, selling 6,000,000 shares and generating $150.0 million of
gross proceeds. The estimated costs associated with the offering, inclusive of
underwriting discount and other offering expenses, were $5.2 million.

The Company used the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including the purchase of containers, the repurchase of outstanding common shares, the payment of dividends, and the repayment or repurchase of outstanding indebtedness.

For additional information, please refer to Note 5 - "Other Equity Matters" in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Debt Agreements

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, our outstanding indebtedness was comprised of the following (amounts in millions):

March 31, 2020     December 31, 

2019


Institutional notes                    $      1,926.6     $         1,957.6
Asset-backed securitization term notes        2,623.7               2,719.2
Term loan facilities                          1,172.4               1,200.4
Asset-backed securitization warehouse           270.0                 370.0
Revolving credit facilities                     777.5                 410.0
Finance lease obligations                        18.9                  27.0
Total debt outstanding                        6,789.1               6,684.2
Unamortized debt costs                          (36.9 )               (39.8 )
Unamortized debt premiums & discounts            (3.8 )                (4.1 )
Unamortized fair value debt adjustment           (7.6 )                (8.8 )

Debt, net of unamortized costs $ 6,740.8 $ 6,631.5


                                       26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As of March 31, 2020, the maximum borrowing levels for the ABS warehouse and the
revolving credit facility are $800.0 million and $1,560.0 million, respectively.
These facilities are governed by borrowing bases that limit borrowing capacity
to an established percentage of relevant assets. As of March 31, 2020, the
availability under these credit facilities without adding additional container
assets to the borrowing base was approximately $515.8 million.

As of March 31, 2020, we had a combined $5,651.1 million of total debt on
facilities with fixed interest rates or floating interest rates that have been
synthetically fixed through interest rate swap contracts. This accounts for 83%
of total debt.

Pursuant to the terms of certain debt agreements, we are required to maintain
certain restricted cash accounts. As of March 31, 2020, we had restricted cash
of $103.0 million.

For additional information on our debt, please refer to Note 7 "Debt" in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Debt Covenants



We are subject to certain financial covenants related to leverage, interest
coverage and net worth as defined in our debt agreements. The debt agreements
are the obligations of our subsidiaries and all related debt covenants are
calculated at the subsidiary level. Failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under the related credit agreements and the acceleration of
our outstanding debt if we were unable to obtain a waiver from the creditors. As
of March 31, 2020, we were in compliance with all such covenants. The table
below reflects the key covenants for the Company that cover the majority of our
debt agreements:
                                 TCIL                                TAL
    Financial
    Covenant             Covenant         Actual          Covenant            Actual
Fixed charge        Shall not be less                Shall not be less
coverage ratio      than 1.25:1          2.75:1      than 1.10:1          2.10:1
                    Shall not be less    $2,224.3    Shall not be less
Minimum net worth   than $855 million    million     than $500 million    $887.8 million
                    Shall not exceed                 Shall not exceed
Leverage ratio      4.0:1                2.01:1      4.75:1               2.29:1



Cash Flow

The following table sets forth certain cash flow information for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):


                                                            Three Months 

Ended March 31,


                                                              2020          

2019


Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities     $     197,960       $       295,731
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities     $     (13,124 )     $         5,992
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities     $     166,774       $      (283,943 )



Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $97.8 million to $198.0
million in the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $295.7 million in
the same period in 2019. $85.6 million of this decrease was due to the posting
of cash collateral for interest rate swaps, and the timing of collections on
accounts receivable and accounts payable. The remaining decrease was primarily
due to reduced profitability.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $19.1 million to $13.1
million in the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to net cash provided
by investing activities of $6.0 million in the same period in 2019. The change
was primarily due to a $18.4 million increase in payments for leasing equipment.

Financing Activities



Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $450.7 million to $166.8
million in the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to cash used in
financing activities of $283.9 million in the same period in 2019. The change
was primarily due to higher borrowings under our revolving credit facility to
increase our cash balances and provide protection against the increased

                                       27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

level of business and financial market risk and uncertainty caused by the
COVID-19 pandemic. Our preferred share offering generated $62.2 million of
additional proceeds and cash used for common share repurchases was $47.9 million
lower compared to the same period in 2019. Additionally, we used $71.0 million
in the first quarter of 2019 for the purchase of noncontrolling interests that
did not reoccur in 2020.


                                       28

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our comparative results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands).


                                                         Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                       2020          2019        Variance
Leasing revenues:
Operating leases                                    $ 312,804     $ 330,422     $ (17,618 )
Finance leases                                          8,664        10,437        (1,773 )
Total leasing revenues                                321,468       340,859       (19,391 )

Equipment trading revenues                             15,380        17,828        (2,448 )
Equipment trading expenses                            (13,447 )     (14,241 )         794
Trading margin                                          1,933         3,587        (1,654 )

Net gain on sale of leasing equipment                   4,077         8,469        (4,392 )

Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization                         132,695       134,609        (1,914 )
Direct operating expenses                              23,248        16,802         6,446
Administrative expenses                                19,225        18,187         1,038
Provision (reversal) for doubtful accounts              4,279          (142 )       4,421
Total operating expenses                              179,447       169,456         9,991
Operating income (loss)                               148,031       183,459       (35,428 )
Other expenses:
Interest and debt expense                              69,002        83,520       (14,518 )
Realized (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net      (235 )        (704 )         469
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments,
net                                                       297           986          (689 )
Debt termination expense                                   31             -            31
Other (income) expense, net                            (3,646 )      (1,004 )      (2,642 )
Total other expenses                                   65,449        82,798       (17,349 )
Income (loss) before income taxes                      82,582       100,661       (18,079 )
Income tax expense (benefit)                            5,546         7,850        (2,304 )
Net income (loss)                                   $  77,036     $  92,811

$ (15,775 ) Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

                                                    -           592          (592 )
Less: dividend on preferred shares                      9,825           305 

9,520


Net income (loss) attributable to common
shareholders                                        $  67,211     $  91,914     $ (24,703 )



                                       29

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019



Leasing revenues.  Per diem revenue represents revenue earned under operating
lease contracts. Fee and ancillary lease revenue represents fees billed for the
pick-up and drop-off of containers in certain geographic locations and billings
of certain reimbursable operating costs such as repair and handling expenses.
Finance lease revenue represents interest income earned under finance lease
contracts. The following table summarizes our leasing revenue for the periods
indicated below (in thousands):
                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                  2020          2019       Variance
Leasing revenues:
Operating leases
Per diem revenues              $  298,486    $ 315,352    $ (16,866 )

Fee and ancillary revenues 14,318 15,070 (752 ) Total operating lease revenues 312,804 330,422 (17,618 ) Finance leases

                      8,664       10,437       (1,773 )
Total leasing revenues         $  321,468    $ 340,859    $ (19,391 )



Total leasing revenues were $321.5 million, net of lease intangible amortization
of $6.2 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $340.9
million, net of lease intangible amortization of $10.7 million, in the same
period in 2019, a decrease of $19.4 million.

Per diem revenues were $298.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $315.4 million in the same period in 2019, a decrease of $16.9 million. The primary reasons for this decrease are as follows: • $14.5 million decrease due to a decrease in average units on-hire; and

$9.3 million decrease due to a decrease in average per diem rates;
       partially offset by

$4.6 million increase due to a decrease in lease intangible amortization; and

$2.3 million increase due to the reclassification of certain contracts


       from finance leases to operating leases in the first quarter of 2020 as a
       result of the renegotiation of the contracts.



Fee and ancillary lease revenues were $14.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2020 compared to $15.1 million in the same period in 2019, a decrease
of $0.8 million. Although redeliveries increased in the first quarter of 2020
compared to the same period in 2019, repair revenue decreased due to a decrease
in the number of units billed for repairs.

Finance lease revenues were $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2020 compared to $10.4 million in the same period in 2019, a decrease of $1.7
million. The decrease was due to the reclassification of certain finance leases
to operating leases in the first quarter of 2020 as a result of the
renegotiation of certain contracts and the runoff of the existing portfolio.

Trading margin. Trading margin was $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $3.6 million in the same period in 2019, a decrease of $1.7 million. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in per unit margins as a result of a decrease in selling prices and sales volume.



Net gain on sale of leasing equipment.  Gain on sale of equipment was $4.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $8.5 million in
the same period in 2019, a decrease of $4.4 million. The primary reasons for the
decrease are as follows:
•      $2.8 million decrease due to a 10.4% decrease in average used dry

container selling prices, partially offset by a 22.6% increase in selling


       volumes; and


•      $1.5 million decrease due to a gain recognized in 2019 related to units
       declared lost by a customer.



Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization was $132.7 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $134.6 million in the same
period in 2019, a decrease of $1.9 million. The primary reasons for the decrease
are as follows:
•      $2.7 million decrease due to a net decrease in the size of the depreciable

fleet; partially offset by

$1.2 million increase due to the reclassification of certain contracts


       from finance leases to operating leases in the first quarter of 2020 as a
       result of the renegotiation of the contracts.



Direct operating expenses.  Direct operating expenses primarily consist of our
costs to repair equipment returned off lease, to store the equipment when it is
not on lease and to reposition equipment from locations with weak leasing
demand. Direct

                                       30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

operating expenses were $23.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020
compared to $16.8 million in the same period in 2019, an increase of $6.4
million. The increase was primarily due to an increase in storage expense due to
an increase in idle units.

Administrative expenses.  Administrative expenses were $19.2 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $18.2 million in the same period
in 2019, an increase of $1.0 million. The increase was primarily due to a $0.5
million increase in payroll and benefit expenses and a $0.4 million increase in
professional fees.

Provision (reversal) for doubtful accounts.  Provision for doubtful accounts was
a provision of $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared
to a reversal of $0.1 million in the same period in 2019, an increase of $4.4
million. The increase is primarily due to a reserve against customer receivables
as a result of heightened credit risks.

Interest and debt expense.  Interest and debt expense was $69.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $83.5 million in the same period
in 2019, a decrease of $14.5 million. The primary reasons for the decrease are
as follows:
•      $11.2 million decrease due to a decrease in the average debt balance of

$990.6 million; and

$4.3 million decrease due to a decrease in the average effective interest

rate to 4.19% from 4.45%.

Realized (gain) loss on derivative instruments, net. Realized gain on derivative instruments, net was $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2019, a decrease of $0.5 million. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in the average one-month LIBOR rate as well as a reduction of the underlying swap notional amounts due to the amortization of certain interest rate swap contracts.



Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments. Unrealized loss on derivative
instruments, net was $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020
compared to $1.0 million in the same period in 2019. The decrease in unrealized
loss is primarily due to the amortization of the underlying swap notional
amounts.

Income taxes. Income tax expense was $5.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2020 compared to $7.9 million in the same period in 2019, a decrease
in income tax expense of $2.4 million. The decrease in income tax expense was
the result of a decrease in pre-tax income and an increase in the portion of
income generated in lower tax jurisdictions in the three months ended March 31,
2020. Additionally, the Company recorded tax expenses related to uncertain tax
positions in the prior period that did not reoccur in 2020.

Income attributable to noncontrolling interests. There was no income
attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended March 31,
2020 compared to $0.6 million in the same period in 2019. All third-party
partnership interests in Triton Container Investments LLC were acquired during
the first half of 2019.

                                       31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contractual Obligations



We are party to various operating and finance leases and are obligated to make
payments related to our borrowings. We are also obligated under various
commercial commitments, including obligations to our equipment manufacturers.
Our equipment manufacturer obligations are in the form of conventional accounts
payable, and are satisfied by cash flows from operations and financing
activities.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of March 31, 2020:


                                                          Contractual Obligations by Period
                                        Remaining                                                                2025 and
Contractual Obligations:    Total          2020          2021          2022

         2023          2024         thereafter
                                                                (dollars in millions)
Principal debt           $ 6,770.2     $    666.7     $   825.6     $ 1,037.3     $ 1,625.1     $ 1,417.2     $     1,198.3
obligations
Interest on debt             916.7          185.4         218.6         182.5         144.4          83.5             102.3
obligations(1)
Finance lease
obligations(2)                21.4            2.3           3.1           3.1           3.1           9.8                 -
Operating leases (mainly
facilities)                    9.2            2.5           2.9           2.3           1.4           0.1                 -
Purchase obligations:
Equipment purchases
payable                       29.1           29.1             -             -             -             -                 -
Equipment purchase
commitments                  133.9          133.9             -             -             -             -                 -
Total contractual
obligations              $ 7,880.5     $  1,019.9     $ 1,050.2     $ 1,225.2     $ 1,774.0     $ 1,510.6     $     1,300.6

(1) Amounts include actual interest for fixed debt, estimated interest for

floating-rate debt and interest rate swaps which are in a payable position

based on March 31, 2020 rates.

(2) Amounts include interest.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



As of March 31, 2020, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, which are often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. We are, therefore, not
exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if
we had engaged in such relationships.

Critical Accounting Policies



Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts and disclosures reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis.
Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. Our critical accounting policies are discussed in our Form 10-K.

                                       32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses