The Achilles VELOSTM Process 2 boosts the dose of highly functional clonal neoantigen-reactive T cells for | 193 |
precision personalized cell therapies
Joseph Robinson1, Amber Rogers1, Daisy Melandri1, Amy Baker1, Anabel Ramirez Aragon1, Sidra Nawaz1, Michael Epstein1, Shreenal Patel1, Jennine Mootien1, Andrew Craig1, Satwinder Kaur-Lally1, Hinal Patel1, Andreas Schmitt2, Farah Islam3, Mariam Jamal-Hanjani3, David Lawrence4, Martin Forster3, Samra Turajlic2, Sergio A. Quezada1, Katy Newton1, Eleni Kotsiou1
- Achilles Therapeutics UK Limited, London, United Kingdom; 2) Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 3) University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; 4) UCLH and Barts NHS Trusts, London, United Kingdom; 5) Corresponding author - for further information please email: s.quezada@achillestx.com
Introduction
Adoptive transfer of ex-vivo expanded Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) has shown promise in the clinic. However, the non-specific expansion of TILs and the lack of understanding of the active component of TIL has resulted in poor correlation between clinical response and dose as well as poor understanding of response and resistance mechanisms. The VELOSTM manufacturing process generates a precision and personalised treatment modality by targeting clonal neoantigens with the incorporation of an antigen-specific expansion step to enrich the product for these specificities. Achilles has developed a second VELOSTM process to boost the neoantigen-reactive cell dose while maintaining key qualitative features associated with function. Here we report the in-depth characterisation of clonal neoantigen-reactive T cells (cNeT) products expanded using the two VELOSTM processes.
Methods
Figure 1: Clonal neoantigen specific TIL can be identified following the culture of tumour fragments in VELOSTM Process 2
A | B | C | |||||||||
10 | 10 | (%)reactivityNeoantigen | 20 | cellsreactiveTotal | 10 | 9 | Pateint 1 | ||||
CD3lTota | |||||||||||
cells | 15 | ||||||||||
Pateint 3 | |||||||||||
Patient 2 | |||||||||||
+ | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | Patient 4 | ||||||
10 | |||||||||||
Patient 5 | |||||||||||
10 | 8 | 10 | 7 | ||||||||
5 | |||||||||||
10 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 6 | |||||||
Proc. 1 | Proc. 2 | Proc. 1 | Proc. 2 | ||||||||
Proc. 1 | Proc. 2 |
Following culture of tumour fragments with IL2, processes 1 and 2 yielded similar numbers of TIL (A; values scaled to tumour mass). Achilles' proprietary potency assay was used to identify the proportion of clonal neoantigen reactive cells within the TIL (B). The total number of clonal neoantigen reactive TIL was similar in processes 1 and 2 (C). Lines at median; n=5.
Figure 2: VELOSTM Process 2 generates a 29 fold greater number of T cells
Results
Figure 4: VELOSTM Process 2 generates a product with multiple clonal neoantigen reactivities
Single peptide reactivities | |||
Patient | Process 1 | Process 2 | Difference |
1 | 1 | 4 | +3 |
2 | 1 | 3 | +2 |
3 | 2 | 5 | +3 |
4 | 2 | 17 | +15 |
5 | No data | 18 | N/A |
The number of individual clonal neoantigen reactivities was determined by ELISpot. VELOSTM Process 2 generated a product with reactivities to multiple clonal neoantigens without loss of reactivities compared to Process 1. For patient 5, insufficient cells were generated by Process 1 to carry out ELISpot.
Figure 5: VELOSTM Process 2 generates a product made up of mainly CD4+ and CD8+ effector memory cells
A | B | CD4+ | CD8+ |
Figure 7: T cells from VELOSTM Process 2 retain sensitivity to IL2
AB
+ | 40 | 10 | |
CD3in | normalizedMFI | ||
+ | |||
5pSTAT% | 20 | 5 | |
0 | rolcontto | ||
0 | |||
PBMC Proc. 1Proc. 2 | PBMC Proc.1 Proc.2 |
T cells were stimulated with low dose IL2 (100IU/ml) and phosphorylation
of STAT5 was measured by flow cytometry. Phosphorylation occurred in similar proportions of CD3+ cells in both processes (A). Geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of pSTAT5 staining was also similar (B). Bars at median; n=4.
Figure 8: T cells from VELOSTM Process 2 retain capacity to secrete cytokines
A | B | C | |||
400 | 30 | 15000 | |||
+ | + | ||||
CD3in FIM | 300 | + | CD3in MFI | ||
CD3in MFI | 10000 | ||||
20 | |||||
200 | 500 | ||||
50 | |||||
• Matched tumours and peripheral blood from patients |
undergoing routine surgery were obtained from patients with |
primary NSCLC (n=3) or metastatic melanoma (n=2) |
(NCT03517917). |
• TIL were expanded from tumour fragments in the presence of |
IL-2. |
• Peptide pools, corresponding to the clonal mutations identified |
using the PELEUSTM bioinformatics platform, were generated. |
A
expansion | 1000 |
100 | |
Fold | 10 |
1 | |
0.1 |
✱
Proc. 1 | Proc. 2 |
B
dose | 10 | 11 | |
cell | 10 | 10 | |
- | |||
CD56 | 10 | 9 | |
+ | |||
D3C | 10 | 8 | |
✱ | C |
Patient 1 | |
Patient 2 | |
Patient 3 | |
Pateint 4 | |
Patient 5 |
Proc. 1 | Proc. 2 |
(%)cells
CD45of +
Proportion
100
50
0
NK (CD3 | - | + | |||
CD56 ) | |||||
+ | + | ||||
CD3 CD56 | - | ||||
+ | |||||
CD3 CD56 | |||||
Proc. 1 | Proc.2 |
CD4 | + | TEMRA | |
+ | |||
Central memory | |||
CD8 | |||
Effector memory | |||
Process 1 | |||
Process 2
+ | + | 10 | + | |||
25 | 250 | |||||
IL2 | αTNF | |||||
γINF | ||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Proc.1 | Proc.2 | Proc. 1 | Proc. 2 | Proc.1 | Proc.2 |
T cells were stimulated with a poly clonal stimulus (Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B) and cytokine production was measured using Achilles proprietary potency assay. CD3+ cells from Process 1 and Process 2 generated similar amounts of INFγ (A), IL2 (B) and TNFα (C). Graphs show geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) normalized to control; bars at median; n=5.
• cNeT were expanded by co-culture of TIL with peptide-pulsed | |
autologous dendritic cells. | |
• For VELOSTM Process 2 additional media supplementation was | |
added throughout the process. Cell expansion was boosted at | |
the end of the co-culture with an optimized stimulation | |
cocktail. | |
• Neoantigen | reactivity |
was assessed using our | |
proprietary | potency |
assay with peptide pool | |
rechallenge followed by | |
intracellular | cytokine |
staining. Single peptide | |
reactivities | were |
identified using ELISpot | |
and flow | cytometric |
analysis for | in-depth |
phenotyping of cNeT was performed.
During the selective expansion phase of the VELOSTM process, Process 2 gave a greater fold expansion of T cells (A; lines at median) and an increase in total T cells generated (B; values scaled to tumour mass; lines at median). The majority of cells generated by both processes were CD3+CD56- (C; bars show means). * p<0.05 one tailed Wilcoxon test, n=5.
Figure 3: VELOSTM Process 2 generates a 18 fold greater number of cNeT
A | B | C | |||||||
reactivityNeoantigen | 100 | reactivityoantigenNe | 80 | 1011 | ✱ | ||||
CD4in | CD8in | dosecellReactive | Patient 1 | ||||||
60 | |||||||||
(%) | (%) | 1010 | Patient 2 | ||||||
40 | Patient 3 | ||||||||
+ | + | 20 | Patient 4 | ||||||
Patient 5 | |||||||||
10 | 109 | ||||||||
10 | |||||||||
5 | 108 | ||||||||
1 | 0 | 10 | 7 | Proc. 2 | |||||
Proc. 1 Proc. 2 | Proc. 1 Proc. 2 | Proc. 1 |
Using Achilles' proprietary potency assay, the active drug component (cNeT) was quantified for both CD4+ (A) and CD8+ (B) cells. No difference in the proportion of cNeT was observed between Process 1 and Process 2. The overall number of cNeT generated by Process 2 was significantly higher than was generated by Process 1. Lines at medians; * p<0.05 one tailed Wilcoxon test; n=5.
Phenotyping was carried out by flow cytometry at the end of the co-culture period. The VELOSTM processes generated products made up of both CD4+ and CD8+ cells (A; n=5). Products were primarily effector memory cells (CD45RA-CD197-) with some TEMRA cells (CD45RA+CD197-) and few central memory cells (CD45RA-CD197+) . The products of Process 2 had a lower proportion TEMRA cells compared to Process 1 (B; n=4). Pie charts show mean frequencies.
Figure 6: cNeT from VELOSTM Process 2 express similar levels of immune checkpoint molecules
100
(%) | Process 1 | |||
TcNe | ||||
Process 2 | ||||
of | ||||
50 | ||||
Proportion | ||||
0 | ||||
CD279+ | CD278+ | TIGIT+ | ||
CD366+ |
Restimulation with clonal neoantigen pareptide pools and staining for cytokine secreting cells enables phenotyping of the active drug component of the product of the VELOSTM process. cNeT from Process 2 showed no increase in immune checkpoint molecules compared to cNeT from Process 1. Bars at median; n=4.
Conclusions
- Achilles proprietary potency assay quantifies cNeT dose facilitating optimization of the VELOSTM process.
- VELOSTM Process 2 generates an increased cNeT dose compared to Process 1
- cNeT generated using VELOSTM Process 2 maintain key phenotypic features associated with function
- This proof of concept data supports the transfer of VELOSTM Process 2 to clinical manufacture for two first in human studies
for treatment of solid cancer.
References
- McGranahan N., et al. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science. 6280: 1463-1469 (2016)
- Robertson J., et al. Adoptive cell therapy with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: the emerging importance of clonal neoantigen targets for next-generation products in non- small cell lung cancer. Immuno-oncology Technology. 3:1-7 (2019)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participating patients and their families for donation of material used in this study.
Disclosures
This study was funded by Achilles Therapeutics UK Limited.
© Achilles Therapeutics UK Ltd. 2021
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Achilles Therapeutics plc published this content on 12 November 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 12 November 2021 12:10:15 UTC.