ECOBANK TRANSNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Consolidated Audited Financial Statements
30 September 2021
CONTENTS
Statement of directors' responsibilities
Report of the independent auditors
Consolidated financial statements:
Consolidated income statement
Consolidated statement of other comprehensive income
Consolidated statement of financial position
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Consolidated statement of cash flows
Notes to the financial statements
ECOBANK TRANSNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Consolidated Audited Financial Statements For the period ended 30 September 2021
Page
1
2-6
7
8
9
10
11
12-119
ECOBANK TRANSNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Consolidated Audited Financial Statements
For the period ended 30 September 2021
Statement of directors' responsibilities
Responsibility for consolidated financial statements
The Directors are responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for each financial period that give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Group as at 30 September 2021 and the results of its operations, statement of cash flow, income statement and changes in equity for the period ended in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). This responsibility includes ensuring that the Group:
- keeps proper accounting records that disclose, with reasonable accuracy, the financial position of the Group;
- establishes adequate internal controls to safeguard its assets and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities; and
- prepares its consolidated financial statements using suitable accounting policies supported by reasonable and prudent judgments and estimates, that are consistently applied.
The Directors accept responsibility for the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared using appropriate accounting policies supported by reasonable and prudent judgments and estimates, in conformity with IFRS.
Nothing has come to the attention of the Directors to indicate that the group will not remain a going concern for at least twelve months from the date of these financial statements'.
The Directors are of the opinion that the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the financial affairs of the Group and of its profit or loss for the period ended 30 September 2021. The Directors further accept responsibility for the maintenance of accounting records that may be relied upon in the preparation of the financial statements, as well as adequate systems of internal financial control.
Approval of consolidated financial statements
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 2 December 2021 and signed on its behalf by:
Alain Nkontchou | Ade Ayeyemi |
Group Chairman | Group Chief Executive Officer |
1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF ECOBANK TRANSNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated and its subsidiaries (together referred to as "the Group") set out on pages 7 to 119 which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 September 2021, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the period then ended, notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated as at 30 September 2021, and its consolidated financial performance and statement of cash flows for the period then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditors' Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the requirements of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' (IESBA) International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA code) and other independence requirements applicable to performing audits of financial statements. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the IESBA Code and other ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of consolidated Financial Statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. The key audit matters noted below relate to the consolidated financial statements.
Key audit matters | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
Impairment of loans and advances to customers | |
Loans and advances to customers constitute a | We focused our testing of the impairment on loans and |
significant portion of the total assets of the Group. At | advances to customers on the key assumptions and |
30 September 2021, gross loans and advances to | inputs made by Management and Directors. Specifically, |
customers was US$ 9,468 million (31 December 2020: | our audit procedures included: |
US$9,798 million) against which total loan impairment | |
amount of US$595 million (31 December 2020: | • Obtaining an understanding of the loan loss |
US$558 million) were recorded, thus leaving a net loan | impairment calculation process within the group; |
balance of US$8,873 million (31 December 2020: | • Testing the design and determining implementation |
US$9,240 million) which represents nearly 35 per cent | of key controls across the processes relevant to the |
(31 December 2020: 36 per cent) of the total assets as | Expected Credit Loss ('ECL') (allocation of assets into |
at the reporting date (see notes 20 and 21). | stages, model governance, data accuracy and |
completeness, credit monitoring, multiple economic | |
The basis of the impairment amount is summarised in | scenarios, post model adjustments, individual |
the Accounting policies in the consolidated financial | impairment and processing of journal entries and |
statements. | disclosures); |
• Assessing the ECL impairment levels by stage to | |
The Directors exercise significant judgement when | determine if they were reasonable considering the |
determining both when and how much to record as | Group's portfolio, risk profile, credit risk |
loan impairment. This is because a number of | |
. |
significant assumptions and inputs go into the | management practices and the macroeconomic | |
determination of expected credit loss impairment | environment. | |
amounts on loans and advances to customers. | • Challenging the criteria used to allocate asset to | |
stage 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with IFRS 9; | ||
The Group has implemented IFRS 9, Financial | • Testing the assumptions, inputs and formulae used | |
Instruments since 1 January 2018. This standard | in a sample of ECL models with the support of our | |
requires the Group to recognise Expected Credit | internal credit risk specialists (including assessing | |
Losses ('ECL') on financial instruments, which involves | the appropriateness of model design and formulae | |
exercise of significant judgement and estimates. The | used, assessing the Group's approach and | |
key areas where we identified greater levels of | methodology of incorporating the impacts of COVID- | |
management judgement and therefore increased | 19 in the ECL models, considering alternative | |
levels of audit focus in the Group's implementation of | modelling techniques and recalculating the | |
IFRS 9 include: | probability of default, loss given default and | |
exposure at default for a sample of models); | ||
i. | Identification and measurement of economic | • Testing the data used in the ECL calculation by |
scenarios to measure ECLs on a forward-looking | reconciling to source systems; | |
basis reflecting a range of future economic | • Assessing the adequacy and appropriateness of | |
conditions. | disclosures for compliance with the accounting | |
ii. | Assessment and measurement of Significant | standards. |
Increase in Credit Risk ('SICR') using different | ||
criteria. | Based on our review, we found that the Group's | |
iii. | Modelling for estimation of ECL parameters - | impairment methodology, including the model, |
assumptions and key inputs used by Management and | ||
• probabilities of default (PDs) - 12-month and | Directors to estimate the amount of loan impairment | |
lifetime, | losses were appropriate in the circumstances. |
- loss given default,
- exposure at default.
- Completeness and accuracy of data used to calculate the ECL;
Because of the significance of these estimates, judgements and the size of loans and advances portfolio, the audit of loan impairment is considered a key audit matter.
Valuation of goodwill
Goodwill carrying value of US$18.7 million (31 | We reviewed the Group's goodwill impairment | |
December 2020: US$18.8 million) was included in | assessment and calculations looking specifically into the | |
intangible assets (note 27) in the Group's statement of | valuation model, inputs and key assumptions made by the | |
financial position as at 30 September 2021. This asset | Management. | |
has been recognised in the consolidated statement of | ||
financial position as part of intangible assets as a | Our audit procedures included: | |
consequence of the acquisitive nature of the Group. | ||
• Testing all relevant controls over the generation of | ||
In line with the requirements of the applicable | the key inputs, e.g. financial forecasts, discount rate, | |
accounting standard, IAS 36, Impairment of Assets, | revenue growth rate, etc. that go into the valuation | |
management conducts annual impairment tests to | calculation. | |
assess the recoverability of the carrying value of | • Engaging our internal valuation specialists to assist | |
goodwill. This is performed using discounted cash flow | with: | |
models. As disclosed in note 26, there are a number of | ||
key sensitive judgements adopted by Management in | ❖ Critically evaluating whether the model used | |
determining the inputs into these models which | by Management to calculate the value in use | |
include: | of the individual Cash Generating Units | |
• | Projected financial information; | complies with the requirements of IAS 36, |
• | Growth rates; and | Impairment of Assets. |
• The discount rates applied to the projected | ||
future cash flows. |
This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
ETI - Ecobank Transnational Inc. published this content on 06 December 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 06 December 2021 13:51:03 UTC.