®
Corporate Presentation
Q2 2024
Developing Biology-Driven Medicines and Expanding the Impact of Targeted Oncology
We develop differentiated therapies for patients in need that target
nodes of cancer growth, spread, and therapeutic resistance in
the Hippo and RAS onco-signaling networks
- Multiple ongoing clinical trials with expected data readouts in the next 12-18 months
- Leaders in Hippo pathway with clinical stage TEAD1 inhibitor IK-930
- Differentiated safety profile emerging from early clinical data & early signs of activity in EHE
- Focused recruitment in mesothelioma and EHE; additional clinical data planned for 2H 2024
- Broad combination potential including in EGFRm and RASm cancers, starting with osimertinib in NSCLC
- Novel MEK/RAF molecular glue IK-595with best in class potential
- Potential for greater therapeutic index
- Broad potential across RAF and RAS mutant cancers where prior MEK and RAF inhibitors have not succeeded
- Cleared safety evaluation of first dosing cohort; dose escalation ongoing
- Closed 2023 with >$175M in cash; Runway into 2H 2026
2
Ikena Wholly-Owned Pipeline and Assets
Development Pipeline Focused on Targeted Oncology
Candidate
Target
IK-930
TEAD
IK-595
MEK-RAF
Interventions | IND Enabling | Phase 1 | Later Stage Development |
Indications
Monotherapy
Hippo-altered cancers including EHE, MPM, other NF2 altered tumors, and additional YAP/TAZ fusion tumors
Combination
IK-930+Osimertinib for EGFRm resistant NSCLC Additional combos combating therapeutic resistance to other targeted agents
Monotherapy
RAS and RAF altered cancers
Combination
Preclinical synergies with multiple agents
3
EHE: Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma | MPM: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma | NSCLC: Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Targeting TEAD & the Hippo Pathway
IK-930
Targeting TEAD Can Address Diverse Patient Populations with High Unmet Need
Two distinct mechanisms: Genetic alterations in Hippo pathway and pathway involvement in therapeutic resistance
GENETIC ALTERATIONS
Hippo Pathway Activity Triggers TEAD Transcription-Dependent Tumor Growth
NF2THERAPEUTIC
RESISTANCE
MST1/2 | |||||||||||
KRAS | |||||||||||
BRAF | CDK | ||||||||||
4/6 | |||||||||||
LATS1/2 | MEK | ||||||||||
EGFR | |||||||||||
ALK | |||||||||||
YAP1/TAZ | |||||||||||
YAP1/TAZ | TEAD DEPENDENT | TUMOR GROWTH |
TRANSCRIPTION | ||
TEAD1 | TEAD2 TEAD3 TEAD4 |
- Multiple genetic alterations lead to pathway activation including NF2 loss of function mutations and YAP/TAZ fusions
- Pathway activated through therapeutic resistance to treatment with other targeted therapies
- Monotherapy clinically validated in the field with a panTEAD inhibitor in mesothelioma
- panTEAD inhibition leads to proteinuria which limits continuous target coverage
- IK-930designed to optimized therapeutic index by selectively targeting TEAD1 paralog
- IK-930demonstrates efficacy equivalent to panTEAD inhibition in mesothelioma models and superior safety in multiple species
5 EHE: Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma; MPM: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. | Confidential |
5
IK-930 Drives TEAD1 Toward a Transcriptional Repressive State
Promotes TEAD1/VGLL4 interaction which broadly blocks oncogenic gene expression
IK-930
Fit with
Cys405 of
TEAD1 C405 M403
TEAD1
IK-930 | Obstructed |
with Phe/Tyr | |
of other |
Y413 | TEADs |
Two Opposing States of TEAD
Activator with YAP1 or | Repressor with VGLL4 |
TAZ (palmitoylation | (palmitoylation |
dependent) | independent) |
IK-930 Leverages TEAD Biology to Gain Repressive Activity from Both States
I411
IK-930 is designed to selectively bind | |
TEAD1 while blocking TEAD oncogenic | IK-930-TEAD1-VGLL4 complex blocks chromatin access |
activity across paralogs | |
for TEADs and other transcriptional activators | |
6 | Confidential |
6
IK-930 Preclinical Data Suggests Similar Efficacy to panTEADi with Differentiated Safety Potential
IK-930 Shows Preclinical Efficacy in
Mesothelioma Models Similar to panTEADi
NF2 Deficient Mesothelioma Model
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
VolumeTumorAverage SEM)-(mm3+/ | 8 | 0 | 0 | Vehicle | |||||
panTEADi | |||||||||
75 mpk IK-930 | |||||||||
6 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
4 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
2 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
0 | |||||||||
0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |||
Days of Treatment |
IK-930 showed efficacy across multiple models with
different Hippo pathway alterations
IK-930 Does Not Result in Proteinuria at All Tested Doses in
Monkeys, in Contrast to panTEADi
IK-930 Monkey 28-day | panTEADi Monkey 28-day |
Average urinary protein-to-creatinine ratios and histopathology in non-
human primates predicted a therapeutic index of less than one for panTEAD inhibitors and a broad therapeutic window for IK-930
7 | Confidential |
7
Current Status of IK-930 Phase 1 Clinical Trial
Dose escalation data from IK-930 phase I trial shows early signs of clinical benefit & safety advantages
Completed | Current |
Next Steps
Expansion Indications
Hippo-altered | ||||
cancers including | ||||
EHE, MPM, other | ||||
NF2 altered tumors, | ||||
and additional | ||||
Formulation B | ||||
YAP/TAZ fusion | Formulation B | |||
tumors | Continued | |||
Bridging cohorts | escalation | |||
Formulation A | Improved PK | |||
confirmed | ||||
Dose Escalation |
Option to backfill dose cohorts with targeted expansion indications
EHE
NF2d MPM
Other MPM
Other NF2 and/or YAP/TAZ tumors
First combination: Osi | Combination Therapy |
Dose Escalation | |
IK-930 is designed to selectively bind TEAD1 while blocking TEAD
oncogenic activity across paralogs
Demonstrated preclinical efficacy equivalent to panTEAD in mesothelioma models and superior safety in multiple species
IK-930 does not result in proteinuria at all tested doses in
monkeys, in contrast to panTEAD inhibition
Favorable clinical safety profile seen in clinical dose escalation
8 | Clinical data update planned for 2H 2024 |
Confidential8
IK-930 First Signs of Clinical Impact in EHE; Ultra Orphan Indication with No Standard of Care
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE)
- 100% defined by Hippo pathway alterations
- 300 patients in the US per year
- No standard treatment
- EHE can range from very indolent to rapidly growing tumors resistant to systemic therapy
- Aggressive clinical symptoms
- RECIST has limited value* in capturing changes to disease related symptoms (e.g. pain) and QOL changes
Additional Analysis to Better Qualify QoL Impact in IK-930 Program
- Centrally confirm YAP/TAZ fusions by RNAseq
- Characterize oncogenic mutations by WES
- Evaluate TEAD dependence and EHE transcriptional signatures by RNAseq
- Characterize ctDNA molecular response by PCR
All 7 EHE Dose Escalation Patients Demonstrating Initial Clinical
Benefit with IK-930 Treatment
7 out of 7 patients reached stable disease (SD)
3 out of 7 patients with SD experienced tumor shrinkage in multiple target and non-target lesions
3 out of 7 patients continue on treatment with time on IK-930 ranging from 18 to 26 weeks and ongoing
4 out of 7 patients had improvement of clinical symptoms and subjective improvement of QoL
4*ESMO 2021; Additional Sources: US IncidenceMS-2,Pg 28 NCCN 2023; EU Incidence Global Cancer Observatory 2020; NCCN Version 1.2023 Mesothelioma: Pleural; NCCN Patients Guidelines; Image 1_Types; Image 2_Location; Image 3_Asbestos; Brcic et al, 2020
9
Hippo Pathway is Implicated in Resistance to Multiple Targeted Therapies
IK-930 has the potential to combat resistance and expand the number of patients that could benefit from targeted therapies
Two Clinical Opportunities in EGFR Resistance | Case Study: Resistance Mechanisms to Osi in EGFRm NSCLC | |
40%+ of patients with Osimertinib resistance have unidentified | ||
mechanisms and represent a significant unmet need | ||
First Line | Post Resistance | Leonetti, et al., Br J Cancer, 2019 |
Combo with Osi | Emergence | |
First line osi combined | Treating with IK-930 | |
with IK-930 to | post the emergence of | |
potentially prevent the | resistance - negatively | |
emergence of | selecting for | |
resistance | actionable mutations |
Exploring both as potential paths in clinical program
Clinical supply agreement with AstraZeneca for osimertinib signed in 2022; first combo planned for clinical program
10 | "The biggest hurdle to targeted cancer therapy is the inevitable emergence of drug resistance." | 10 | |
Lim, et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2019 | Confidential | ||
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Ikena Oncology Inc. published this content on 16 April 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 16 April 2024 13:33:07 UTC.