Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Kimberly-Clark Corporation    KMB

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION

(KMB)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener StrategiesAnalyst Recommendations

Fraud Class Actions: Ninth Circuit Vacates $24 Million Class Judgment On Standing And Predominance Grounds

11/04/2020 | 01:16am EST

Takeaway:  Class actions present significant risk, because a certified class exposes a class defendant to class-wide liability.  Most defendants agree to settle rather than face the risk of a class verdict.  But sometimes a class defendant will roll the dice, hoping it will prevail either at trial or on appeal.  In a recent case, Bahamas Surgery Center, LLC v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, --- Fed.Appx. ---, Nos. 18-55478, No. 18-55483, & No. 18-55558, 2020 WL 4218313 (9th Cir. July 23, 2020), the class defendants did just that.  Although the district court entered judgment against the class defendants in the amount of $24 million, they were ultimately saved on appeal by a split panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

By way of background, Bahamas Surgery Center, LLC (Bahamas), sued Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KC) and Halyard Health, Inc. (Halyard), for fraud, asserting that KC and Halyard misrepresented the efficacy of surgical gowns in terms of blocking the spread of pathogens.  Bahamas presented evidence that the surgical gowns had been labeled as compliant with a specific standard going to that efficacy - the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) Liquid Barrier Level 4 standard - when in fact the gowns did not meet that standard. 

In a case tried in the Central District of California, a jury agreed that the class defendants had defrauded the class and awarded the class compensatory and punitive damages in the whopping amount of $450 million.  But the district court later substantially reduced that award, entering judgment in the amount of $24 million.  See Bahamas Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., et al., No. 14-8390-DMG (PLAx), Am. Order re Defs.' Mot. for a New Trial, Remittitur, or Amendment of J., etc., Dkt. 577 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2018).  Both Halyard and KC appealed, prevailing on separate grounds.

The panel agreed with Halyard that Bahamas lacked standing to pursue either individual or class claims against Halyard, given that Bahamas did not purchase any surgical gowns from Halyard.  According to the panel, "[e]ven if other class members have valid claims against Halyard, that cannot retroactively cure the district court's improper certification of a class wherein the named plaintiff (Bahamas) lacked standing to pursue those claims."  2020 WL 4218313, at *1.

The panel agreed with KC that the district court abused its discretion by refusing the decertify the "fraudulent concealment class" that prevailed at trial.  In most of the purchases by the class, the AAMI rating was not displayed on the packaging.  In those transactions, according to the majority, there was "no evidence that a reasonable person would attach importance to AAMI test failures."  Id. at *2.  Moreover, the evidence on which the district court relied (to demonstrate the essential fraud element of materiality under California law) "applied only to the subset of transactions in which class purchasers had seen representations about the Gowns' AAMI rating."  Id.  The majority concluded:  "Because the record does not support the conclusion that common questions regarding the materiality of the omissions predominated in the defined class, the district court abused its discretion in failing to decertify the class."  Id.

Judge Fletcher concurred in part and dissented in part, concluding that he would have affirmed the judgment against KC.  Id. at *2 (Fletcher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).  According to Judge Fletcher, California law does not require a fraud plaintiff to be exposed to a fraudulent representation to succeed on a claim of fraudulent concealment.  In Judge Fletcher's view, "[t]he trial record contains ample evidence from which a reasonable juror could have found, as the jury found here, that a reasonable purchaser of the surgical gowns in question would have considered it important that the gowns had failed industry-standard strike-through tests."  Id.

The panel vacated the judgment, remanding with instructions that the claims against Halyard be dismissed, and remanding for further proceedings against KC, presumably to adjudicate claims against KC on an individual and not a class basis.  So the defendants' gamble paid off, although the odds may have been longer had they drawn a different panel.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr James F. Bogan III
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
1100 Peachtree Street NE Suite 2800
Atlanta
GA 30309-4528
UNITED STATES

© Mondaq Ltd, 2020 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
01/11KIMBERLY CLARK : to Webcast Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Earnings Conferenc..
PR
2020KIMBERLY CLARK : Morgan Stanley Adjusts Kimberly-Clark PT to $136 From $146, Mai..
MT
2020KIMBERLY CLARK : Start 2021 with a Refreshingly Clean Slate, thanks to Cottonell..
PR
2020Adam Gerhart Named Global CEO of Media Agency Mindshare
DJ
2020Wells Fargo Starts Kimberly-Clark at Underweight With $130 Price Target
MT
2020Correction to Journal Report article on stock buybacks, Dec. 5 -- Journal Rep..
DJ
2020STOCK BUYBACKS : What Every Investor Needs to Know -- Journal Report
DJ
2020KIMBERLY CLARK : Scary Mommy And Huggies® Partner To Launch New Series "Up Early..
PR
2020KLEENEX : ® Brand Partners with Dr. Contessa Metcalfe to Help Everyone Prepare f..
PR
2020KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION : Ex-dividend day for
FA
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2020 19 023 M - -
Net income 2020 2 279 M - -
Net Debt 2020 8 030 M - -
P/E ratio 2020 19,8x
Yield 2020 3,27%
Capitalization 44 657 M 44 657 M -
EV / Sales 2020 2,77x
EV / Sales 2021 2,69x
Nbr of Employees 40 000
Free-Float 89,6%
Chart KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Duration : Period :
Kimberly-Clark Corporation Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishBearishNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 16
Average target price 150,00 $
Last Close Price 131,29 $
Spread / Highest target 34,8%
Spread / Average Target 14,3%
Spread / Lowest Target -5,55%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
NameTitle
Michael D. Hsu Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Maria G. Henry Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
Robert William Decherd Independent Director
Mae Carol Jemison Independent Director
Abelardo E. Bru Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION-2.63%44 657
UNICHARM CORPORATION2.19%28 841
ESSITY AB0.30%22 324
HENGAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP COMPANY LIMITED1.64%8 538
VINDA INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED15.84%3 790
ONTEX GROUP NV-0.18%1 073