The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes and other financial information included
elsewhere in this Form 10-K. In addition to historical financial information,
the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results and timing of
selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those
discussed under the "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K,
which are incorporated herein by reference.



Business Overview



We are a nanotechnology company specializing in the design, development,
production and supply of nanomaterials, including quantum dots ("QDs"), tetrapod
quantum dots ("TQDs"), and other nanoparticles for a range of applications in
televisions, displays and other optoelectronics, photovoltaics, solid state
lighting, life sciences, security ink, battery, and sensor sectors of the
market. Our wholly owned operating subsidiary, Solterra Renewable Technologies,
Inc. ("Solterra"), is focused on the next generation photovoltaic (solar cell)
market, using quantum dot semiconductors.



QDs are nanoscale semiconductor crystals typically between 10 and 100 atoms in
diameter. Approximately 10,000 would fit across the diameter of a human hair.
Their small size makes it possible for them to exhibit certain quantum
mechanical properties. QDs emit either photons or electrons when excited. In the
case of photons, the wavelength (color) of light emitted varies depending on the
composition and size of the quantum dot. As such, the photonic emissions can be
tuned by the creation of QDs of different types and/or sizes. Their unique
properties as highly efficient, next generation semiconductors have led to the
use of QDs in a range of electronic and other applications, in the display and
lighting industries. QDs also have applications in solar cells, where their
characteristics enable conversion of light energy into electricity with the
potential for significantly higher efficiencies and lower costs than existing
technologies, thereby creating the opportunity for a step change in the solar
energy industry through the use of QDs in printed photovoltaic cells.



QDs were first discovered in the early 1980s and the industry has developed to
the point where QDs are now being used in an increasing range of applications,
including televisions and displays, light emitting diode ("LED") lighting (also
known as solid-state lighting), and in the biomedical industry. LG, Samsung, and
other companies have recently launched new televisions using QDs to enhance the
picture color quality and power efficiency. A number of major lighting companies
are developing product applications using QDs to create a more natural light for
LEDs. The biomedical industry is using QDs in diagnostic and therapeutic
applications; and applications are being developed to print highly efficient
photovoltaic solar cells in mass quantities at a low cost.



A key challenge for the quantum dot industry has been and may continue to be its
ability to scale up production volumes sufficiently to meet growing demand for
QDs while maintaining product quality and consistency and reducing the overall
costs of supply to stimulate new applications.



Plan of Operation



We currently operate from a leased facility in San Marcos, Texas at the STAR
Park Technology Center, an extension of Texas State University (the "San Marcos
Facility"). This location provides us with convenient access to university
faculty and specialized laboratory facilities that can support joint research
and development efforts with Texas State University. Located approximately 30
miles south of Austin, Texas, this location is also in close proximity to a
number of leading companies in the electronics, lighting, solar, and life
sciences markets. We intend to relocate the operations to a larger facility
capable of accommodating the manufacturing of QD processing equipment once
sustained revenues are achieved.



The Company has established commercial-scale manufacturing equipment at the San
Marcos facility and now through process optimizations has the capacity to
produce more than four metric tons (4,000kg) per year of quantum dots and other
nanomaterials for supply to its customers. The Company has continuously improved
the Quantum Dot production process and have designed new reactors from the
ground up. The Company is in the process is building 4 new reactors in-house
using its own design and I.P. In order to preserve this I.P. the Company has
determined that it will be manufacturing micro-reactors in-house for the
foreseeable future.



  27







We expect to commence generating revenues from the production of materials at
the San Marcos facility. Such revenues are expected to be modest at first and
will be dependent upon our ability to generate purchase orders from development
partners and licensees.



Our marketing strategy is to engage in strategic arrangements with
manufacturers, distributors, and others to jointly develop applications using
its patented continuous production process. Such joint collaborations will
involve us working closely with its industry counterparts to optimize the
performance of our materials in each application or device and to use the
results from product development and testing to further enhance product
specifications. We continue to collaborate with a number of partners in the Life
Science, consumer goods, Pharma and designer products industries. We have signed
a licensing agreement to establish quantum dot production in Asia and to date,
we have not entered into any formal commercial supply agreements.



We believe these collaborations will support our internal research and
development activities which will continue to be a primary part our business.
Our principal revenue streams are expected to come from (i) Licensing agreements
for our quantum dot enabled end to end solutions. (ii) sales of quantum dots and
other nanomaterials, (ii) royalties from manufacture and/or sales of products
and components by third parties incorporating the Company's products or
technology, (iii) milestone payments under joint development arrangements with
product developers and manufacturers, and (iv) fees where we engage in
licensing/sub-licensing arrangements for our owned and/or licensed technology.
(v) Fees from app deployment and usage.



Our ongoing research and development functions are considered key to maintaining
and enhancing its competitive position in the growing nanomaterials and quantum
dot market. Nanomaterial and quantum dot technology continues to evolve, with
new discoveries and refinements being made on an ongoing basis. We intend to be
at the forefront of technological development and intend to focus a significant
part of our efforts on this, as we have done historically. Continuing R&D
activities at the San Marcos facility and our collaboration with Texas State
University, and the numerous other research centers and departments with which
we have relationships will be important aspects of our strategy.



Solterra plans to utilize QMC's patented low-cost, high-volume quantum dot production combined with the Bayer quantum dot solar cell patents to commercialize quantum dot solar cells at a cost that is competitive with conventional fossil fuel generation on an unsubsidized basis.





Our business is subject to various types of government regulations, including
restrictions on the chemical composition of nanomaterials used in life sciences
and other sensitive applications, the manufacture, transportation and export of
chemical substances, and the regulation of hazardous materials used in or
produced by the manufacture or use of QDs. Management believes the patented
(owned and licensed) processes and proprietary manufacturing equipment employed
allow us to comply with current regulations. However, new regulations or
requirements may develop which could adversely affect the Company or its
products in the future. See "Risk Factors" section.



Critical Accounting Policies



Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. We continually evaluate our judgments and estimates in
determining our financial condition and operating results. Estimates are based
upon information available as of the date of the consolidated financial
statements and, accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates,
sometimes materially. Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as
those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition
and operating results and require management's most subjective judgments often
as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters inherently
uncertain. The most critical accounting policies and estimates are described
below.



  28







Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant
inter-company transactions and account balances have been eliminated upon
consolidation.



Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue when its customer obtains
control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the
consideration which we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or
services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company
determines are within the scope of ASC 606, we perform the following five steps:
(i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance
obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv)
allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract;
and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation. The
five-step model is applied to contracts when it is probable that we will collect
the consideration we are entitled to in exchange for the goods or services
transferred to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is
determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, we assess the goods or services
promised within each contract and determine those that are performance
obligations and assess whether each promised good or service is distinct. We
then recognize revenue in the amount of the transaction price that is allocated
to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation
is satisfied.



Title and risk of loss generally pass to our customers upon shipment. In limited
circumstances where either title or risk of loss pass upon destination, we defer
revenue recognition until such events occur. The transaction price is allocated
to the separate performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price
basis. Standalone selling prices are typically estimated based on observable
transactions when these services are sold on a standalone basis. For the years
ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 our revenue was immaterial.



Contract liabilities are presented on our consolidated balance sheet and consist
of advanced payments. As of June 30, 2019, and 2018 contract liabilities were
$500,000 and $0, respectively.



Financial Instruments: Financial instruments consist of cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, payables, and convertible debentures. The carrying
value of these financial instruments approximates fair value due to either their
short-term nature or interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates
unless otherwise disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.



Asset Impairment: In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
360-10-35 "Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", the Company evaluates
the recoverability of property and equipment if facts and circumstances indicate
that any of those assets might be impaired. If an evaluation is required, the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared
to the asset's carrying amount to determine if an impairment of such property is
necessary. The effect of any impairment would be to expense the difference
between the fair value of such property and the carrying value. There were no
impairment charges in the consolidated statements of operations during the years
ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.



Debt Issuance Costs: The costs related to the issuance of debt are presented on
the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the related debt and
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the
maturity period of the related debt.



Income Taxes: The Company follows ASC 740 "Income Taxes" regarding the
accounting for deferred tax assets and liabilities. Under the asset and
liability method required by this guidance, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A
deferred tax asset will be reduced by a valuation allowance when, based on the
Company's estimates, it is more likely than not that a portion of those assets
will not be realized in a future period.



  29







The Company follows ASC 740 "Income Taxes" regarding the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance clarifies the accounting for income
taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold that an income tax
position is required to meet before recognizing in the consolidated financial
statements and applies to all income tax positions. Each income tax position is
assessed using a two-step process. A determination is first made as to whether
it is more likely than not that the income tax position will be sustained, based
upon technical merits, upon examination by the taxing authorities. If the income
tax position is expected to meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit
recorded in the consolidated financial statements equals the largest amount that
is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement.
Additionally, the Company recognizes income tax related penalties and interest
in the provision for income taxes.



Beneficial Conversion: Debt and equity instruments that contain a beneficial
conversion feature are recorded as a deemed dividend to the holders of the
convertible notes. The deemed dividend associated with the beneficial conversion
is calculated as the difference between the fair value of the underlying common
stock less the proceeds that have been received for the equity instrument
limited to the value received. The beneficial conversion amount is recorded as
beneficial conversion expense and an increase to additional paid-in-capital.



Derivative Instruments: The Company enters into financing arrangements which may
consist of freestanding derivative instruments or hybrid instruments that
contain embedded derivative features. The Company accounts for these
arrangements in accordance with ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, as well as related interpretation of this standard. In
accordance with this standard, derivative instruments are recognized as either
assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and are measured at
fair values with gains or losses recognized in earnings. Embedded derivatives
that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract are bifurcated and
are recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized as either a
gain or loss in earnings. The Company determines the fair value of derivative
instruments and hybrid instruments based on available market data using
appropriate valuation models, considering all of the rights and obligations

of
each instrument.



The Company estimates fair values of derivative financial instruments using
various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered consistent
with the objective measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate
technique, the Company considers, among other factors, the nature of the
instrument, the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of
settlement. For less complex derivative instruments, such as freestanding
warrants, the Company generally uses the Black-Scholes model, adjusted for the
effect of dilution, because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions
(including trading volatility, estimated terms, dilution and risk-free rates)
necessary to fair value these instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative
financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective
estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the
instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In
addition, option-based techniques (such as Black-Scholes model) are highly
volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company's
common stock. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and
subsequently carried at fair values, income (expense) going forward will reflect
the volatility in these estimates and assumption changes. Increases in the
trading price of the Company's common stock and increases in fair value during a
given financial quarter result in the application of non-cash derivative
expense. Conversely, decreases in the trading price of the Company's common
stock and decreases in trading fair value during a given financial quarter
result in the application of non-cash derivative income.



Liquidity and Capital Resources





Going Concern



The Company recorded losses from continuing operations in the current period
presented and has a history of losses. The ability of the Company to continue as
a going concern is dependent upon its ability to reverse negative operating
trends, obtain revenues from operations, raise additional capital, and/or obtain
debt financing.



In conjunction with anticipated revenue streams, management is currently
negotiating equity and debt financing, the proceeds from which would be used to
settle outstanding debts, to finance operations, and for general corporate
purposes. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
raise capital, obtain debt financing, or improve operating results sufficiently
to continue as a going concern.



  30






The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.





As of June 30, 2019, we had a working capital deficit of $7,141,117, with total
current assets and liabilities of $20,069 and $7,161,186 respectively. Included
in the liabilities are $757,569 owed to our officers, directors and employees
for services rendered and accrued through June 30, 2019, $2,605,042 of
convertible debentures, net of unamortized discount and $25,130 of notes payable
that are due within one year. As a result, we have relied on financing through
the issuance of common stock and convertible debentures.



As of June 30, 2019, we have cash and cash equivalent assets of $478. We
continue to incur losses in operations. Over the past five years we have
primarily relied on sales of common stock and debt instruments to support
operations as well as employees and consultants agreeing to defer payment of
wages and fees owed to them and/or converting such wages and fees into
securities of the Company. Management believes it may be necessary for the
Company to rely on external financing to supplement working capital to meet the
Company's liquidity needs in the fiscal years ended 2020 and 2021; the success
of securing such financing on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all, cannot
be assured. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our
plan of operations, our stockholders may lose their entire investment in the
Company.


The following table summarizes the net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated:





                               Years Ended
                                June 30,
                          2019            2018

Operating activities $ (515,233 ) $ (1,090,821 ) Investing activities

            -           (1,877 )

Financing activities $ 513,686 $ 1,042,112






Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities was $515,233 for the
year ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1,090,821 for the same period of 2018, a
decrease in cash used of $575,591. The decrease was primarily driven by
decreased in operating costs, decreased payments on accounts payable, the
increase in contract liabilities, and an increase in services in exchange for
stock.



Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $0 for the year
ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1,877 for the year ended June 30, 2018. The
decrease is related to fewer purchases of equipment in fiscal year 2019.



Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $513,686 for
the year ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1,042,112 for the same period of 2018,
a decrease of $528,426. The decrease is primarily due to fewer issuances of
convertible debentures, offset by an increase in sales of common stock for cash,
and fewer principal payments on our long-term debt during the year ended June
30, 2019.



Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which
assumes we will be able to meet our obligations and continue our operations for
the next fiscal year. Realization values may be substantially different from
carrying values as shown and these consolidated financial statements do not give
effect to adjustments that would be necessary to reflect the carrying value and
classification of assets and liabilities should we be unable to continue as a
going concern. As of June 30, 2019, we had not yet achieved profitable
operations, had a working capital deficit of $7,141,117, and expect to incur
further losses in the development of the business, all of which casts
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.



  31







Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to
generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing
to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business
operations when they come due. We continue to explore available financing
options, including, without limitation, the sale of equity, debt borrowing
and/or the receipt of product licensing fees and royalties. We can provide no
assurances that future financing, if needed, will be obtained on terms
satisfactory to us, if at all. In this respect, see Note 1 in our notes to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information as to the
possibility that we may not be able to continue as a going concern.



Financing Arrangements



As of June 30, 2019, we had the following convertible debentures outstanding.



                                                                                            No. of Shares
                   Outstanding                                                               Exercisable          Warrants           Warrant
                    Principal                             Conversion                        Under Related       Strike Price        Exercise

 Issuance Date    Amount ($) (1)      Interest Rate        Price ($)       Maturity Term       Warrants              ($)             Period
                                                                             September
                                                                              2019 -
    Sep-14                25,050                   6 %            0.15     October 2019           3,333,667               0.3        Sep-19
 April - June                                                              March 2018 -
 2016 (2) (2)          1,218,772                   8 %            0.01       July 2019            5,686,590              0.15        Aug-21
August 2016 (3)
      (2)                200,000                   8 %            0.01        Aug-18                833,200              0.15        Aug-21
January - March                                                              January -                                            January 2022
 2017 (3) (2)             60,000                   8 %            0.12      March 2019           10,831,600              0.15     - March 2022
  Jun-17 (2)             100,000                   8 %            0.12        Feb-19                250,000              0.12        Jun-20
  Jul-17 (2)             100,000                   8 %            0.12        Feb-19                250,000              0.12        Jul-20
  Sep-17 (2)             150,000                   8 %            0.12        Feb-19                375,000              0.12        Sep-20
    Nov-17                27,000                   8 %            0.12        Nov-19                416,600              0.15        Nov-22
  Dec-17 (2)              75,000                   8 %            0.12        Mar-19                250,000              0.12        Dec-20
  Feb-18 (2)              45,000                   8 %            0.12        Feb-19                500,000              0.12        Dec-20
  Mar-18 (2)              65,000                   8 %            0.12        Mar-19                500,000              0.12        Mar-21
  Apr-18 (2)              60,000                   8 %            0.12        Mar-19                500,000              0.12        Mar-21
    Apr-18                70,000                   8 %            0.12        Apr-21                200,000              0.12        Apr-21
    Apr-18                20,000                   8 %            0.12        Apr-20              1,166,660              0.15        Apr-23
    Jun-18                40,000                   8 %            0.12        Dec-18              1,000,000              0.12        Jun-21
    Jul-18                45,000                   8 %            0.12        Jan-19              1,000,000              0.12        Jun-21
    Aug-18                30,000                   8 %            0.12        Mar-19              1,000,000              0.12        Aug-21
    Sep-18                25,000                   8 %            0.12        Apr-19              1,000,000              0.12        Sep-21
    Dec-18                52,000                   8 %            0.12        Dec-20                262,458              0.15        Dec-23



(1) This table does not include $222,350 of promissory notes held by SBI

Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC issued as consideration for an

equity line of credit that did not close in the form of promissory notes,

which bear interest at 8% per annum, matured on December 29, 2017 and are

considered past due at the time of this report. The promissory notes are

convertible into unregistered and restricted shares of shares of the

Company's common stock only if there is an Event of Default, as defined in

the notes. These amounts are subject to ongoing litigation, and the Company

does not intend to pay the balances or honor a conversion until the

litigation has concluded. See Note 15 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated

Financial Statements. (2) These debentures are past due as of the date of this report (3) See Note 11 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.






  32






Results of Operations - Year Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2018





The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations for the
periods indicated:



                                           Years Ended
                                            June 30,                Increase/
                                      2019            2018          (Decrease)          %
Statement of Operations
Information:

Revenues                           $       400     $    20,120     $    (19,720 )        -98.0 %
General and administrative           5,840,807       6,093,075         (252,268 )         -4.1 %
Research and development                92,996         188,274          (95,278 )        -50.6 %
Beneficial conversion expense          143,778       1,303,078       (1,159,300 )        -89.0 %
Interest expense, net                1,262,150       1,023,989          238,161           23.3 %
Change in value of derivative
liability                              148,719        (514,969 )        663,688          128.9 %
Accretion of debt discount             318,070       1,327,742       (1,009,672 )        -76.0 %
Loss on shares unauthorized            712,695               -          712,695            N/A
Loss on debt extinguishment            438,589               -          438,589            N/A




Revenues



During the year ended June 30, 2019 we recognized revenue of $400 compared to
$20,120 for the year ended June 30, 2018, a decrease of $19,720, or 98.0%. At
the Company's stage of product development, our revenues are derived from funded
product development agreements, and product testing agreements, and are not
significant for fiscal years 2019 or 2018 as the Company has focused on product
development.


General and Administrative Expenses





During the year ended June 30, 2019 the Company incurred $5,840,807 of general
and administrative expenses, a decrease of $252,268, or 4.1%, from the
$6,093,075 recorded for the year ended June 30, 2018. The decrease in general
and administrative expenses breaks down as follows:



                                           Years Ended
                                            June 30,                Increase/
                                      2019            2018         (Decrease)          %

Compensation                       $   508,148     $   864,345     $  (356,197 )        -41.2 %
Stock-based compensation             1,748,075       1,580,012         168,063           10.6 %
Legal and audit expenses               281,109         597,004        (315,895 )        -52.9 %
Corporate expenses                   1,108,717         539,813         568,904          105.4 %
Other professional fees              2,067,152       2,379,264        (312,112 )        -13.1 %
Depreciation                           100,009          99,589             420            0.4 %
Amortization                            27,597          33,048          (5,451 )        -16.5 %

Total General and Administrative
Expenses                             5,840,807       6,093,075     $  (252,268 )         -4.1 %




The increase in corporate expenses was due primarily to various consultants that
provided services throughout the year ended June 30, 2019. A portion of the
increased corporate expenses was offset by having a lower headcount, and thus
compensation being reduced. Stock-based compensation increased in 2019 due to
some employees electing to be paid in stock or options, in lieu of cash, as well
as the Company electing to extend the term of certain option grants, resulting
in additional modification expense. Other legal and audit expenses, and
professional fees were reduced for the fiscal year ended as less cost were
incurred relating to litigation in process, along with less equity-based
consulting incurred.



Research and Development Expenses





During the year ended June 30, 2019 the Company incurred $92,996 of research and
development expenses ("R&D"), a decrease of $95,278, or 50.6%, from the $188,274
recorded for the year ended June 30, 2018. The primary reasons for the decrease
are, in fiscal year 2019, the Company has reduced its focus on quantum dot
process enhancement and focusing on product creation. Projects are being
evaluated and this slows the process of R&D until product evaluation and proof
of concept has been attained.



  33






Beneficial Conversion Feature on Convertible Debenture





The beneficial conversion expense for the year ended June 30, 2019 was $143,778
compared to $1,303,078 during the year ended June 30, 2018, a decrease of
$1,159,300, or 89.0%. The decrease was due primarily to issuance of new
convertible debentures, and two triggering events creating down-round features
in certain debentures to be recognized during the year ended March 31, 2018.
Similar triggering events did not occur during the year ended June 30, 2019.



Interest Expense



Interest expense for the year ended June 30, 2019 was $1,262,150 compared to
$1,023,989 during the year ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $238,161, or
23.2%. The increased interest expense recorded in the fiscal year 2019 was
primarily related to default interest being charged for debentures that are

past
due at June 30, 2019.


Change in value of derivative liability





During the year ended June 30, 2019 the Company recorded an expense of $148,719
related to the change in value of derivative liability. The expense is related
to the change in value of the derivative related to the "make-whole" provision
issued in relation to certain debenture extensions during prior quarters that
results in the revaluation of the liability at quarter, and year ends.



Accretion of Debt Discount



During the year ended June 30, 2019 the Company recorded $318,070 of accretion
of debt discount expense, a decrease of $1,009,672, or 76.0% from the $1,327,742
recorded for the year ended June 30, 2018. The decrease in accretion of debt
discount expense is primarily related to the issuance of the convertible
debentures during the fiscal year, which were lower compared to the year end
June 30, 2018.


Loss on shares unauthorized





During the year ended June 30, 2019 the Company recorded $712,695 of loss on
shares unauthorized due to the contractual agreements for convertible debt,
options and warrants for common stock, which exceeded the company's authorized
shares in the aggregate by approximately 23,756,000 shares.



Loss on debt extinguishment



During the year ended June 30, 2019 the Company recorded $438,589 of loss on
debt extinguishment due to extensions of debentures of $825,000 in principal
being extended, and the extensions of these maturity extensions created an
effective extinguishment pursuant to the Debt Modification guidance, ASC 470-50.
The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of $438,589 in connection with
these extensions.


Off-balance sheet arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements





In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11-Earnings Per Share (Topic 260),
Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging
(Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round
Features and II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily
Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain
Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. ASU
2017-11 eliminates the requirement that a down round feature precludes equity
classification when assessing whether an instrument is indexed to an entity's
own stock. A freestanding equity-linked financial instrument no longer would be
accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the
existence of a down round feature. The Company elected to adopt ASU 2017-11
early, effective July 1, 2017, and implemented the pronouncement retrospectively
with a cumulative effect adjustment to outstanding financial instruments. The
adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on its financial statements. In
the fiscal year 2018, the Company had three triggering events related to a down
round feature which resulted in recording a charge for beneficial conversion
expense of $1,021,500 during the year ended June 30, 2018.



  34







In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU guidance related to stock-based compensation.
The new guidance simplifies the accounting for stock-based compensation
transactions, including income tax consequences, statement of cash flows
presentation, estimating forfeitures when calculating compensation expense, and
classification of awards as either equity or liabilities.



The new standard requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be
recognized as income tax benefit (expense) in the income statement. The new
guidance also requires presentation of excess tax benefits as an operating
activity on the statement of cash flows rather than a financing activity and
requires presentation of cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld
to satisfy the employer's statutory income tax withholding obligation as a
financing activity. The new guidance also provides for an election to account
for forfeitures of stock-based compensation.



The Company adopted the guidance effective July 1, 2017. With respect to the
forfeiture election, the Company will continue its current practice of
estimating forfeitures when calculating compensation expense. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements or related disclosures.



In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740) -
Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.
The amendment provides guidance on accounting for the impact of the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") and allows entities to complete the accounting under
ASC 740 within a one-year measurement period from the Tax Act enactment date.
This standard is effective upon issuance. The Tax Act has several significant
changes that impact all taxpayers, including a transition tax, which is a
one-time tax charge on accumulated, undistributed foreign earnings. We will
continue to evaluate this area and expect to finalize our conclusions by the
first quarter of fiscal 2019.



In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation
(Topic 718) - Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments included in this
update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a
share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting.
The amendments in this update will be applied prospectively to an award modified
on or after the adoption date. The amendments in this update are effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact, if
any, of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation:
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies
several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions,
including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax
withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash
flows. The Company adopted the guidance effective July 1, 2017. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements or related disclosures.



In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which updates guidance on
accounting for leases. The update requires that a lessee recognize in the
statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a
right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the
lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted
to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to
recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Similar to current guidance, the
update continues to differentiate between finance leases and operating leases;
however, this distinction now primarily relates to differences in the manner of
expense recognition over time and in the classification of lease payments in the
statement of cash flows. The standards update is effective for interim and
annual periods after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. Entities
are required to use a modified retrospective adoption, with certain relief
provisions, for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the
earliest comparative period in the financial statements when adopted. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of
this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.



In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15 Preparation of Financial
Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about
an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under GAAP, continuation of
a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing
financial statements unless and until the entity's liquidation becomes imminent.
Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred
to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity's liquidation
becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation
basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of
Financial Statements-Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity's
liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise
substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. In
those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the
going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this update should be
followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant
conditions and events. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will continue to
evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU, however, at this time,
the Company has not adopted this standard. The Company does not anticipate or
expect adoption of this ASU will have a material effect to the consolidated

financial statements.



  35







In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606), which amends the existing revenue recognition requirements and
guidance. The core principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue that
reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive for goods or services
when or as the promised goods or services are transferred to customers. Topic
606 requires more judgment than current guidance, as management will now be
required to: (i) identify each performance obligation in contracts with
customers, (ii) estimate any variable consideration included in the transaction
price and (iii) allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation.
The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period
presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the
date of adoption. We adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and it did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.



Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses