Introduction

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") should be read together with other information, including our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report (the "Interim Financial Statements"). Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report contains certain information that may constitute forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and under Canadian securities laws (collectively, "Forward-Looking Statements") which are based upon the Company's current internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "expect", "likely", "may", "will", "should", "intend", "anticipate", "potential", "proposed", "estimate" and other similar words, including negative and grammatical variations thereof, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" happen, or by discussions of strategy. Forward-Looking Statements include estimates, plans, expectations, opinions, forecasts, projections, targets, guidance, or other statements that are not statements of fact. Forward-Looking Statements in this Quarterly Report include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to:

• the performance of the Company's business and operations;

• the Company's expectations regarding revenues, expenses, liquidity and

anticipated cash needs;

• the Company's ability to complete future strategic alliances and the expected

impact thereof;

• the Company's ability to source investment opportunities and complete future


     acquisitions, including in respect of entities in the United States, the
     ability to finance such acquisitions, and the expected impact thereof;


• expected future sources of financing;

• the expected future business strategy, competitive strengths, goals,


     expansion and growth of the Company's business, including operations and
     plans, new revenue streams and cultivation and licensing assets;


• the Company's ability to grow revenue and reach long-term profitability;

• the implementation and effectiveness of the Company's distribution platform;

• expectations with respect to future production costs;

• the expected methods to be used by the Company to distribute cannabis;

• the competitive conditions of the industry;

• laws and regulations and any amendments thereto applicable to the business

and the impact thereof;

• the competitive advantages and business strategies of the Company;

• the application for additional licenses and the grant of licenses or renewals

of existing licenses that have been applied for;

• the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing and social

acceptance of cannabis;

• the Company's future product offerings;

• the anticipated future gross margins of the Company's operations;

• the Company's ability to source and operate facilities in the United States;

• expansion into additional U.S. and international markets;

• expectations of market size and growth in the United States and the states in

which the Company operates or contemplates future operations;

• expectations for regulatory and/or competitive factors related to the


     cannabis industry generally; and



                                       27

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

• general economic trends.

Certain of the Forward-Looking Statements contained herein concerning the cannabis industry and the general expectations of the Company concerning the cannabis industry are based on estimates prepared by the Company using data from publicly available governmental sources as well as from market research and industry analysis and on assumptions based on data and knowledge of the cannabis industry which the Company believes to be reasonable. However, although generally indicative of relative market positions, market shares and performance characteristics, such data is inherently imprecise. While the Company is not aware of any misstatement regarding any industry or government data presented herein or information presented herein which is based on such data, the cannabis industry involves risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on various factors, which factors are described further below.

Forward-Looking Statements contained in this Quarterly Report reflect management's current beliefs, expectations and assumptions and are based on information currently available to management, management's historical experience, perception of trends and current business conditions, expected future developments and other factors which management considers appropriate. With respect to the Forward-Looking Statements contained in this Quarterly Report, the Company has made assumptions regarding, among other things

(i) its ability to generate cash flows from operations and obtain any necessary financing on acceptable terms; (ii) general economic, financial market, regulatory and political conditions in which the Company operates; (iii) the output from the Company's operations; (iv) consumer interest in the Company's products; (v) competition; (vi) anticipated and unanticipated costs; (vii) government regulation of the Company's activities and products and in the areas of taxation and environmental protection; (viii) the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; (ix) the Company's ability to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; (x) the Company's ability to conduct operations in a safe, efficient and effective manner; (xi) the Company's ability to meet its future objectives and priorities; (xii) the Company's access to adequate capital to fund its future projects and plans; (xiii) the Company's ability to execute on its future projects and plans as anticipated; (xiv) industry growth rates; and (xv) currency exchange and interest rates.



Readers are cautioned that the above list of cautionary statements is not
exhaustive. Known and unknown risks, many of which are beyond the control of the
Company, could cause actual results to differ materially from the
Forward-Looking Statements in this Quarterly Report. Such lists include, without
limitation, those discussed under the heading "Risk Factors" in Company's Annual
Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2022 (our
"2021 Form
10-K")
and in the Company's periodic reports subsequently filed with the SEC and in the
Company's filings on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The purpose of Forward-Looking
Statements is to provide the reader with a description of management's
expectations, and such Forward-Looking Statements may not be appropriate for any
other purpose. You should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Statements
contained in this Quarterly Report. Although the Company believes that the
expectations reflected in such Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, it can
give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.
Forward-Looking Statements contained herein are made as of the date of this
Quarterly Report and are based on the beliefs, estimates, expectations and
opinions of management on the date such Forward-Looking Statements are made. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any Forward-Looking
Statements, whether as a result of new information, estimates or opinions,
future events or results or otherwise or to explain any material difference
between subsequent actual events and such Forward-Looking Statements, except as
required by applicable law. The Forward-Looking Statements contained in this
Quarterly Report are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary
statement.

Results for First Quarter of 2021 Do Not Reflect Complete Quarterly Period

Our financial results for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2021 ("Q1 2021") did not include operating results form January 1, 2021 to January 15, 2021 due to the fact that our qualifying transaction, pursuant to which the Company's business operations began, closed on January 15, 2021. Accordingly, our results of operations are not necessarily comparable between those two periods.



                                       28

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Part 1 - Business Overview



The Company is a consumer-focused cannabis company based in the United States
focused on the recreational and wellness markets. The Company's high quality
integrated
seed-to-sale
operations in California are focused on building winning brands supported by its
omni-channel ecosystem. The Company's platform was designed to create one of the
most socially responsible and culturally impactful companies in the United
States, producing consistent, well-priced products and culturally relevant
brands that are distributed to third-party retailers as well as
direct-to-consumer
via the Company's delivery service and strategically located storefront retail
locations across California. A full portfolio of products and brands that appeal
to a broad range of user groups, need-states and occasions, offered at all price
points, and with various brand value propositions, are produced at low cost and
high caliber of quality through integrated cultivation and manufacturing. The
Company believes its delivery and storefront retail outlets will allow it to
achieve high gross-margins on many of its products, forge
one-on-one
relationships between its brands and consumers and collect proprietary consumer
data and insights.

The Company's operational footprint spans cultivation, extraction,
manufacturing, distribution, brands, retail and delivery. The management team
and directors of the Company bring together deep expertise in cannabis, consumer
packaged goods, investing and finance from
start-ups
to publicly traded companies. The Company aims to leverage the collective
industry experience of its management and directors.

As at March 31, 2022, the Company views its business as having the following two sales channels:



    1)   Omni-channel retail (retail, pick up and, delivery): the Company
         currently operates eleven omni-channel retail locations: three in
         northern California, three in central California, five in southern
         California and six consumer delivery hubs.



    2)   Wholesale: the Company directly sells first party (i.e. produced
         in-house)
         and selected third party products into 450 dispensaries across
         California. Additional wholesale revenue comes from sales of sourced bulk
         flower and oil produced
         in-house.

Revenues from these two sales channels were as follows:



                      Three-months      Three-months

                          ended             ended

                        March 31,         March 31,
                          2022              2021
Omni-channel retail   $  19,087,337     $   9,698,133
Wholesale                14,143,854        30,219,255

                      $  33,231,191     $  39,917,388

As the Company continues to scale and integrate its business, it is incurring operating losses. The Company's loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 totaled $32,431,061 and $113,959,101, respectively. The comparative period results include impairment charges of $58,030,387, while no impairment charges were incurred in our first quarter ended March 31, 2022. The Company is focused on reducing operating losses as it scales and integrates its businesses.



Through a combination of (i) professional leadership, including the addition of
Troy Datcher on September 8, 2021, (ii) omni-channel operations,
(iii) technology and data driven practices, (iv) brand and product expertise,
and (v) social justice and equity advocacy, the Company intends to set the
example globally as the
best-in-class
cannabis operation. The Company is actively evaluating cost reductions and
business optimization to reduce its cash burn in the near term.

First Quarter Highlights

Operations

During the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022 ("Q1 2022") the Company focused on optimizing its operations and leveraging the assets it acquired in 2021 to achieve higher gross margins and reduce cash burn. The Company aggressively changed its product mix in Q1 2022 by shifting its focus to higher margin omni-channel retail business from lower gross margin wholesale business and has demonstrated substantial gross margin improvement: Q1 2022 realized gross margin of 24.6% compared with 17.6% in Q1 2021. Gross profit also improved in absolute dollars terms: $8,184,382 in Q1 2022 compared with $7,043,120 in Q1 2021, despite a reduction in top line revenue.



                                       29

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



To further improve operating results, the Company is evaluating options
including: subleasing excess real estate, combining operations for lower
performing locations, closing or disposing of
non-core
assets, a strategic review of its wholesale business, and general &
administrative cost reductions.

The Company has also changed its mergers & acquisitions strategy going forward to be more opportunistic and selective rather than as a core function to achieve rapid growth.

Senior Leadership Changes

During the first quarter of 2022, the Company strengthened the senior management team with the appointments of Tanisha Robinson as Chief Transformation Officer, Esther Song as Chief Marketing Officer and Mindi Basha as Vice-President of Retail.

On February 7, 2022, the Company announced that Dennis O'Malley, the Company's Chief Operating Officer elected to step down with a March 15, 2022 effective date. Troy Datcher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, has assumed Mr. O'Malley's duties and responsibilities. On April 27, 2022, Desiree Perez resigned from the Company's Board of Directors.

Sale and Leaseback of Pullman Property

During the first quarter of 2022, the Company completed the sale and leaseback of its property on Pullman Avenue, San Jose, California. The Company received $6,000,000 up front and a $500,000 promissory note receivable over five years. The Company leased back the space for a ten year term with an option to terminate early after five years and with two five-year options to extend the term at a base rent of $552,500.

Social Equity

During the first quarter of 2022, the Company entered into a 50/50 agreement with Peakz NFT, LLC, an entity formed by social equity entrepreneur Jessie Grundy, to develop and launch a collection of cannabis-focused non-fungible token's ("NFT's") referred to as "Digistrains". The Company invested $150,000 to seed the initiative (the "Initial Capital Contribution") and expects the Digistrain NFT collection to be launched in the near future. Any distributions from this initiative must first be utilized to repay the Initial Capital Contribution before being shared amongst members of the joint venture.



                                       30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Table of Contents

Results of Operations

TPCO Holding Corp.

Interim condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income (Unaudited, in United States dollars)



                                                                 Three-months ended
                                                         March 31, 2022       March 31. 2021
Sales, net of discounts                                 $     33,231,191      $    39,917,388
Cost of sales                                                 25,046,809           32,874,268

Gross profit                                                   8,184,382            7,043,120

Impairment loss                                                       -            58,030,387
Operating expenses                                            40,615,443           62,971,834

Loss from operations                                         (32,431,061 )       (113,959,101 )
Other income (expense)
Interest expense                                              (1,250,568 )         (1,173,872 )
Loss on disposal of assets                                      (254,473 )                 -
Change in fair value of investments                              297,864                   -
Change in fair value of contingent consideration                 388,622          131,093,854
Other income                                                     307,956             (110,249 )

                                                                (510,599 )        129,809,733

(Loss) income before income taxes                            (32,941,660 )         15,850,632
Income tax (recovery) expense                                   (594,872 )          3,210,622

(Loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income                            )
                                                        $    (33,536,532      $    19,061,254

(Loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income                            )
attributable to controlling shareholders                     (33,691,877           19,061,254
(Loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income
attributable to non-controlling shareholders                     155,345                   -

                                                                         )
                                                             (33,536,532           19,061,254


On January 15, 2021 the Company closed its qualifying transaction (the "Qualifying Transaction"), pursuant to which the Company acquired CMG Partners, Inc. ("Caliva") and Left Coast Ventures, Inc. ("LCV"). Concurrent with the completion of the Qualifying Transaction, LCV acquired SISU Extraction, LLC ("SISU").

During 2021, the Company acquired (or acquired the right to operate, with closing of the acquisition subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions) several higher margin omni-channel retail businesses as part of its growth strategy including: Martian Delivery, LLC ("Martian Delivery") (during Q3 2021), Kase's Journey Inc. ("Kase's Journey") (during Q3 2021), Calma and Coastal (both during Q4 2021). The results of these operations are consolidated in the Q1 2022 reported results and have contributed to a substantially higher realized gross margin compared to Q1 2021.



The lower sales revenue reported in Q1 2022 ($33,231,191) compared to Q1 2021
($39,917,388) reflect the
re-focus
onto the higher gross margin omni-channel retail as opposed to higher revenue
but lower margin wholesale business. This shift in business mix is evidenced by
the significantly higher gross margin of 24.6% in Q1 2022 compared to 17.6% in
Q1 2021. Gross profit realized in absolute dollars terms also increased to
$8,184,382 in Q1 2022 from $7,043,120 in Q1 2021 on a lower revenue base
reflecting the higher margin nature of the business.

                                       31

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Sales Revenue

Revenue by sales channel for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to March 31, 2021 was as follows:



                        Three-months         Three-months

                           ended                ended

                       March 31, 2022       March 31, 2021
Omni-channel retail   $     19,087,337     $      9,698,133
Wholesale                   14,143,854           30,219,255

                      $     33,231,191     $     39,917,388

Our financial results for the quarterly period ended Q1 2021 did not include the operating results from January 1, 2021 to January 15, 2021 due to the fact that our qualifying transaction, pursuant to which the company's business operations began did not occur until January 15, 2021. Accordingly, our results of operations are not necessarily comparable between those two periods.

Omni-channel retail (Retail, Pick up, Delivery)

As of March 31, 2022, the Company operated eleven retail locations and six consumer delivery hubs. We have four store brands, Caliva, Deli by Caliva, Coastal and Calma.

Revenues earned from omni-channel retail sales in the three months ended March 31, 2022 totaled $19,087,337 compared with $9,698,133 in the three months ended March 31, 2021 for an increase of $9,389,204 or 96.8% growth.



The Company achieved this very strong omni-channel retail growth as the
comparative period did not include the financial results contributed by Kase's
Journey, Martian Delivery, Coastal and Calma all of which were acquired
subsequent to March 31, 2021.
Further, the Company changed the product mix to increase sales of first party
in-house
branded product revenues at its acquired dispensaries which generates higher
gross margins over third party product offerings.

During Q1 2022, the Company launched Limited Harvest, new exclusive Caliva strains available only through its retail and delivery locations: Moto OG 28% THC, Durban Poison 35% THC, Wedding Cake 36% THC, GMO 42% THC and Gush Mints 36% THC.

Calma and "Deli by Caliva" (Bellflower) were named among the best dispensaries in the Los Angeles area by Thrillist as published on March 30, 2022.

Wholesale

The Company directly sells first party and selected third party products into 450 dispensaries across California, leveraging in-house sales teams, as well as the two wholesale distribution centers in San Jose and Costa Mesa, respectively. Our Wholesale segment also includes the bulk business and consists primarily of distillate oil manufacturing, and bulk flower sales.

Revenues earned from the Wholesale sales channel in Q1 2022 totaled $14,143,854 compared with $30,219,255 in Q1 2021 for a decrease of $16,075,401 or 53.2%. As noted above, Q1 2021 had 14 fewer days of operations than Q1 2022. The decrease is primarily due to the Company dropping very low margin products and a significant price compression in flower and distillate oil in the California market over this one year period. The Company has commenced a strategic review of its wholesale business with the aim of improving margins. It is evaluating outsourcing wholesale products distribution as a way to simplify its business and improve margins. It is also evaluating selective divestments within this sales channel.

During Q1 2022, in an effort to reduce costs in this sales channel, the Company consolidated its bulk wholesale business to one location to reduce operating costs. It has also no longer offered flower trimming services and is focusing primarily on distillate oil manufacturing and bulk flower sales going forward.



                                       32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Gross Profit reflects our revenue less our cost of sales costs primarily consisting of labor, materials, consumable supplies, overhead, amortization on production equipment, shipping, packaging and other expenses required to produce cannabis products.

The Company's gross profit for Q1 2022 was $8,184,382 (24.6% as a percentage of revenue), an increase of $1,141,262 from gross profit of $7,043,120 (17.6% as a percentage of revenue) for Q1 2021.

The increase in gross profit in both absolute dollars terms and as a percentage of revenue is due to the shift to higher margin omni-channel retail business from lower margin wholesale as described above.



Operating Expenses

                                             Three-months ended
                                     March 31, 2022       March 31, 2021

General and administrative $ 13,630,882 $ 9,360,832 Allowance for doubtful accouts

             2,249,706              174,111
Sales and marketing                        3,415,737           28,995,745
Salaries and benefits                     10,705,503            7,817,117
Share based compensation expense           2,242,077            8,127,779
Lease expense                              1,897,827            1,168,987
Depreciation                               1,099,199              993,921
Amortization of intangible assets          5,374,512            6,333,342

                                    $     40,615,443     $     62,971,834

Operating expenses primarily include salaries and benefits, professional fees, rent and facilities expenses, travel-related expenses, advertising and promotion expenses, licenses, fees and taxes, office supplies and pursuit expenses related to outside services, stock-based compensation and other general and administrative expenses.

The Company recorded operating expenses of $40,615,443 in Q1 2022 compared to $62,971,837 in Q1 2021. The majority of the decrease in operating expenses is due to the comparative period including a $25,000,000 sales and marketing payment to ROC Nation, LLC ("Roc Nation") that was settled in common shares of the Company. In Q1 2022, ROC Nation was paid $1,875,000 in common shares of the Company as consideration pursuant to the Roc Binding Heads of Terms (as defined below).

General and administrative costs increased to $13,630,882 in Q1 2022 from $9,360,832 in Q1 2021. The increase in general administrative expenses is due mainly to higher professional fees associated with the year-end audit and the integration of the Coastal acquisition, as well as the fact that the results of Q1 2022 represented our operations for 14 additional days than Q1 2021.

The allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,249,706 in Q1 2022 (March 31, 2021: $Nil) reflects additional provisioning on notes receivable.

Salaries and benefits totaled $10,705,503 in Q1 2022 compared to $7,817,117 in Q1 2021 reflecting primarily additional staff acquired with Coastal that were not present in Q1 2021, as well as the fact that the results of Q1 2022 represented our operations for 14 additional days than Q1 2021.

Lease expense increased to $1,897,827 in the three months ended March 31, 2022 from $1,168,987 in the comparative period reflect the numerous acquisitions made during 2021 whereby the Company increased the number of lease properties and its California footprint, as well as the fact that the results of Q1 2022 represented our operations for 14 additional days than Q1 2021.

Share based compensation expense decreased to $2,242,077 in Q1 2022 from $8,127,779 in Q1 2021. Share based compensation is a non-cash expense and fluctuates with the number of restricted stock units ("RSUs") granted in a period and the stock price. The decrease in stock-based



                                       33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

compensation expense was primarily attributable to significant number of RSUs granted in connection with the Qualifying Transaction, as well as the fact that the market price of our common shares was lower in Q1 2022 than it was in Q1 2021.

Depreciation of property, plant & equipment of $1,099,199 and amortization of intangible assets of $5,374,512, respectively, were incurred during Q1 2022, are comparable to amounts in Q1 2021 of $993,921 and $6,333,342, respectively.

Non-Cash

Impairment

In accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) Topic 350, the Company is required to assess its goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually or in between tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of its assets may not be recovered. Further, under ASC 360, the Company is required to assess definite lived-intangible assets and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.

In Q1 2022, the Company did not observe any triggers suggesting impairment and thus an impairment test was not performed. In Q1 2021, the Company recorded impairment of $58,030,387 associated with the disposal of its non-THC business. The impairment charge is an adjustment that did not affect the Company's cash position.



Other Items

Interest (expense)

In Q1 2022 the Company recorded interest expense of $1,250,568 compared with $1,173,872 for Q1 2021, the majority of which relates to interest expense on lease accounting for the Company's right of use assets.

Contingent consideration



In Q1 2022, the Company recorded a gain on the change in the fair value of
contingent consideration of $388,622 compared to $131,093,854 in Q1 2021. The
Company agreed to pay certain contingent consideration in connection with its
Qualifying Transaction. This contingent consideration will be fair valued at
each
quarter-end
and the gain or loss recorded in the statement of operations and comprehensive
income (loss) will be inversely related to the movement in the price of the
Company's common shares.

Net Income (loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

In Q1 2022, the Company recorded net loss of $33,536,532 compared with income of $19,061,254 in Q1 2021. The net income recorded by the Company in Q1 2021 was due primarily to the recognition of a $131,093,854 non-cash revaluation gain on certain contingent consideration.



Management's Use of
Non-GAAP
Measures

This MD&A contains certain financial performance measures, including "EBITDA"
and "Adjusted EBITDA," that are not recognized under generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") and do not have a
standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP. As a result, these measures may not be
comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. For a
reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable financial
information presented in the Interim Financial Statements in accordance with
GAAP, see the section entitled "Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP
Measures" of this MD&A.

EBITDA

We believe EBITDA is a useful measure to assess the performance of the Company
as it provides more meaningful operating results by excluding the effects of
expenses that are not reflective of our underlying business performance and
other
one-time
or
non-recurring
expenses. We define "EBITDA" as net income (loss) before (i) depreciation and
amortization; (ii) income taxes; and (iii) interest expense and debt
amortization.

Adjusted EBITDA



We believe Adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure to assess the performance of the
Company as it provides more meaningful operating results by excluding the
effects of expenses that are not reflective of our underlying business
performance and other
one-time
or
non-recurring
expenses. We define "Adjusted EBITDA" as EBITDA adjusted to exclude
extraordinary items,
non-recurring
items and, other
non-cash
items, including, but not limited to (i) stock-based compensation expense,
(ii) fair value change in contingent consideration and investments measured at
Fair Value Through Profit and Loss
(iii) non-recurring
legal and professional fees, human-resources, inventory and collections-related
expenses, (iv) intangible and goodwill impairments and loss on disposal of
assets, and (v) transaction costs related to merger and acquisition activities

                                       34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Table of Contents

Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP
Measures

A reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable measure determined under GAAP is set out below.



                                                               Three-months ended
                                                      March 31, 2022        March 31. 2021
Net (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income    $    (33,536,532 )     $    19,061,254
Income taxes                                                  594,872            (3,210,622 )
Depreciation and amortization                               6,473,711             7,327,263
Interest expense                                            1,250,568             1,173,872
EBITDA                                                    (25,217,381 )          24,351,767
Adjustments:
Share based compensation expense                            2,242,077             8,127,779
Other non-recurring items:
Fair value change of contingent consideration                (388,622 )        (131,093,854 )
Change in fair value of investments at fair value
through profit or loss                                       (297,864 )                  -
Provision for notes receivable                              2,249,706                    -
Impairment loss                                                    -             58,030,387
De-SPAC costs                                               2,178,536             2,618,240
Restructuring costs                                                -                544,616
Sales and marketing expense                                        -             27,247,039

Adjusted EBITDA                                      $    (19,233,548 )     $   (10,174,026 )



EBITDA

The Company's EBITDA loss for Q1 2022 was $25,217,381, a decrease of $52,597,786 from Q1 2021 when the Company recorded positive EBITDA of $24,351,767 due to the $131,093,854 revaluation gain on contingent consideration recognized in Q1 2021.

Adjusted EBITDA

The Company's Adjusted EBITDA loss for Q1 2022 was $19,233,548, an increase of $9,059,522 from the $10,174,026 loss for Q1 2021. The increased loss is primarily due the various businesses acquired in 2021 being integrated. The Company is undertaking several initiatives to improve profitability and reduce cash burn as described in this MD&A.

The Company's management views Adjusted EBITDA as the best measure of its underlying operating performance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We manage liquidity risk by reviewing, on an ongoing basis, our sources of liquidity and capital requirements. As at March 31, 2022, The Parent Company had restricted cash and cash equivalents of $152,231,994 compared with restricted cash and cash equivalents of $174,892,298 as at December 31, 2021.

Cash and restricted cash equivalents are predominately invested in liquid securities issued by the United States government.



In evaluating our capital requirements, including the impact, if any, on our
business from the
COVID-19
pandemic, and our ability to fund the execution of our strategy, we believe we
have adequate available liquidity to enable us to meet our working capital and
other operating requirements, fund growth initiatives and capital expenditures,
settle our liabilities and repay scheduled principal and interest payments on
debt for at least the next twelve months.

Our objective is to generate sufficient cash to fund our operating requirements
and expansion plans. Since the closing of the Qualifying Transaction on
January 15, 2021, we have incurred net operating losses. However, management is
confident in the Company's ability to grow revenue and reach long term
profitability. We also expect to have access to public capital markets through
our listing on the NEO Exchange, and continue to review and pursue selected
external financing sources to ensure adequate financial resources. These
potential sources include, but are not limited to (i) obtaining financing from
traditional or
non-traditional
investment capital organizations; (ii) obtaining funding from the sale of our
common shares or other equity or debt instruments; and (iii) obtaining debt
financing with lending terms that more closely match our business model and
capital needs. There can be

                                       35

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

no assurance that we will gain adequate market acceptance for our products or be able to generate sufficient positive cash flow to achieve our business plans, that additional capital or other types of financing will be available when needed, or that these financings will be on terms favorable to the Company or at all.

We expect to continue funding operating losses as we ramp up our operations with our available cash. Therefore, we are subject to risks including, but not limited to, our inability to raise additional funds through debt and/or equity financing to support our continued development, including capital expenditure requirements, operating requirements and to meet our liabilities and commitments as they come due.



Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements

As of the date hereof the Company does not have any
off-balance
sheet financing arrangements and has not guaranteed any debt or commitments of
other entities or entered into any options on
non-financial
assets.

Contractual Obligations

The Company leases real estate used for dispensaries, production plants, and corporate offices. Lease terms for real estate generally range from 1 to 16.5 years. Most leases include options to renew for varying terms at the Company's sole discretion. Lease terms for these assets generally range from 1 to 2 years. Certain leases include escalation clauses or payment of executory costs such as property taxes, utilities, or insurance and maintenance. Rent expense for leases with escalation clauses is accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company's lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

The following table provides the components of lease cost:



                                                         Three-months ended
                                                 March 31, 2022       March 31, 2021
Operating lease costs                           $      1,824,078     $      1,118,088
Short term lease expense                                  73,749               50,899

Lease expense                                          1,897,827            1,168,987
Finance lease cost:
Depreciation and amortization of lease assets            393,534              456,556
Interest on lease liabilities                          1,104,601              931,079

Finance lease cost                                     1,498,135            1,387,635

Total lease costs                               $      3,395,962     $      2,556,622

The following table provides the maturity of the Company's contractual undiscounted lease liabilities as of March 31, 2022:



                                                     Operating Lease         Finance Lease
Remainder of 2022                                   $       5,884,559        $    3,376,939
2023                                                        6,294,684             4,625,156
2024                                                        5,878,102             4,763,910
2025                                                        5,690,149             4,906,828
2026                                                        5,274,121             5,054,033
Thereafter                                                 23,622,067            64,884,896

Total undiscounted lease liabilities                       52,643,682            87,611,762
Interest on lease liabilities                             (20,141,069 )         (50,835,243 )

Total present value of minimum lease payments              32,502,613            36,776,519
Lease liability - current portion                           3,538,466                45,945

Lease liability                                     $      28,964,147        $   36,730,574




                                       36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Roc Binding Heads of Terms

On November 24, 2020, the Company entered into a binding heads of terms agreement (the "Roc Binding Heads of Terms") with Roc Nation, pursuant to which, during the Roc Term (as defined below), (a) the Company is Roc Nation's "Official Cannabis Partner," and (b) Roc Nation provides strategic and promotional services to the Company and its brands including the promotion of the Company's brand portfolio, and the provision of artist and influencer relationship services, as well as various other services specifically described therein.

The Roc Binding Heads of Terms became effective on January 19, 2021 following consummation of the Qualifying Transaction and shall remain in effect for an initial period of three (3) years therefrom (the "Roc Term"); provided, that following the expiration of the Roc Term, Roc Nation's exclusivity and non-competition obligations shall continue to remain in effect for a period of six (6) months during which period the parties may elect to extend the period of the Roc Binding Heads of Terms upon terms to be mutually agreed.

Pursuant to the terms of the Roc Binding Heads of Terms, the Company issued to Roc Nation 2,376,425 common shares following consummation of the Qualifying Transaction in settlement of the initial $25,000,000 payment owed pursuant to the terms of the Roc Binding Heads of Terms.

The full amount of the $25,000,000 was recognized as an expense in operating expenses during Q1 2021.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Roc Binding Heads of Terms the Company is obligated to issue common shares with a value of $1,875,000 quarterly over the second and third year of the agreement based on the price per share equal to the average of the volume-weighted average prices of the common shares for each of the 15 trading days in advance of the date of issuance. During Q1 2022, the Company issued 1,348,921 common shares to settle the first quarterly payment. Following the end of Q1 2022, the Company issued an additional 1,441,093 common shares to Roc Nation in satisfaction of the second quarterly payment.

The Company recognized an expense of $1,363,636 during Q1 2022 (Q1 2021 - $1,075,758) in operating expenses as a sales and marketing expense. As at March 31, 2022, the cash-settled liability is $4,655,302 (December 31, 2021 - $5,166,666).

The arrangement can be terminated by the counterparty in certain circumstances, one of which is any change of control of the Company. In that case, the Company is required to settle the agreement in a lump sum payment that consists of all unpaid amounts. As at March 31, 2022, the amount that the Company would be liable for if the contract is terminated is $13,125,000.

Brand Strategy Agreement

On November 24, 2020, the Company entered into a brand strategy agreement with SC Branding, LLC (the "Brand Strategy Agreement") for the services of Shawn C. Carter p/k/a JAY-Z pursuant to which, during the BSA Term (as defined below), (a) SC Branding, LLC granted the Company the right and license to use JAY-Z's approved name, image and likeness rights in approved content for the purposes of advertising, promoting, marketing, publicizing and otherwise commercializing the Company's products and brands, (b) JAY-Z serves as the Chief Visionary Officer of the Company and (c) SC Branding, LLC and JAY-Z promote the Company's brand portfolio and provide the various services specifically described therein, which include certain enhanced obligations with respect to the Company's "MonoGram" brand.



The Brand Strategy Agreement (a) became effective as of consummation of the
Qualifying Transaction and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) years
therefrom (the "BSA Term"); provided, that either the Company or SC Branding,
LLC are permitted to terminate the Brand Strategy Agreement without any further
liability to either party at any time after the date that is six (6) years after
the consummation of the Qualifying Transaction. The Company is committed to
settle $21,500,000 in either cash or common shares at the option of SC Branding,
LLC over the remaining
non-cancellable
period of 5 years.

The Company is recognizing the cost associated with the arrangement over the same period it is receiving services.

During Q1 2022, the Company recognized an expense of $1,104,167 (Q1 2021 - $871,065) in operating expenses related to this arrangement and $287,731 accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at March 31, 2022 (December 31, 2021 - $2,183,565). During Q1 2022, the Company made a cash payment of $3,000,000 (Q1 2021- $2,000,000).

The Brand Strategy Agreement can be terminated in certain circumstances, including a change in control of the Company or an involuntary de-listing. In these circumstances, the Company will be obligated to pay damages equal to $18,500,000 less the amount already paid under the arrangement. As at March 31, 2022, the amount of damages that the Company would be liable for if the contract is terminated was $13,500,000.

Mosaic.Ag

On May 16, 2021, the Company entered into a membership interest purchase agreement (the "Membership Interest Purchase Agreement") to obtain leasehold interests of approximately 10 years duration in each of four one-acre parcels of land that are licensed for outdoor cannabis grow (collectively, the "Outdoor Grow Properties"). On May 21, 2021 (the "Effective Date"), the Company entered into series of cultivation and supply agreements with each of the leaseholders of the Outdoor Grow Properties and Mosaic. AG, Inc. ("Mosaic.Ag"), pursuant to which Mosaic.Ag agreed to cultivate cannabis on each of the Outdoor Grow Properties on the Company's behalf for a period commencing on the Effective Date of and ending at least three years from the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, with options to extend for up to five years (the "Cultivation and Supply Agreements"). Under the terms of the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, as of the Effective Date, the Company and Mosaic.Ag obtained access to the Outdoor Grow Properties and began to commence cannabis cultivation activities under the Cultivation and Supply Agreements. The purchase price under the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement is $6,000,000 in cash, $2,500,000 in common shares of the Company payable on the closing date (with the number of shares issued based on the volume-weighted average price per common share for the ten consecutive trading days prior to the closing date) and up to 1,309,263 common shares of the Company subject to an earnout based on the production value of cannabis grown on the Outdoor Grow Properties over the twenty-four months following the Effective Date. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement are dependent on the satisfaction of various closing conditions, which have not been met to date and are not expected to be met by the end of the second quarter of 2022 as required by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement. Further, Mosaic.Ag was unable to produce sufficient quantities of biomass according to Company quality standards and pursuant to the Cultivation Supply Agreements. For the foregoing reasons, the parties are currently in dialogue and may restructure the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, on the Effective Date, the Company advanced to the seller $5,650,000 secured by a promissory note. In the event that the transaction does not close, the promissory note is contractually obligated to be repaid to the Company. There can be no assurance the promissory note will be repaid in full.



                                       37

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates



For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to
Part II, Item 7, Critical Accounting Estimates in our 2021 Form
10-K.
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting estimates from
the information provided in our 2021 Form
10-K.

Cash Flow

The table below highlights our cash flows for the periods indicated:



                                                                 Three-months ended
                                                         March 31, 2022      March 31. 2021
Cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities
Net (loss) income                                                        )
                                                        $    (33,536,532     $    19,061,254
Adjustments for items not involving cash
Impairment loss                                                       -           58,030,387
Change in fair value of investments                                      )
                                                                (297,864                  -
Interest expense                                               1,250,568           1,173,872
Interest income                                                          )
                                                                 (26,932                  -
Allowance for accounts receivable and notes
receivable                                                     2,249,706             174,111
Loss on disposal of assets                                       254,473                  -
Depreciation and amortization                                  6,473,711           7,327,263
Shares issued for long-term strategic contracts                       -           25,000,000
Stock compensation expense, net of settlement of
withholding tax                                                2,037,275           8,127,779
Non-cash marketing expense                                     1,363,636           1,075,758
Non-cash operating lease expense                               1,824,078           1,118,088
Fair value change of contingent consideration                            )
                                                                (388,622        (131,093,854 )
Deferred income tax recovery                                             )
                                                              (1,083,787          (3,405,622 )
Repayment of lease liabilities                                           )
                                                              (1,614,967            (865,071 )
Net changes in non-cash working capital items                            )
                                                              (4,345,366         (38,931,471 )

Total operating                                                          )                   )
activities                                                   (25,840,623         (53,207,506

Financing activities
Proceeds from notes receivable                                   186,106                  -
Proceeds from private placement                                       -           51,635,000
Redemption of Class A restricted voting shares                        -         (264,318,686 )
Repayment of finance lease liabilities                                   )
                                                              (1,116,504            (722,700 )
Repayment of consideration payable                                       )
                                                                (383,333
Repayment of line of credit                                           -           (1,000,000 )

Total financing                                                          )                   )
activities                                                    (1,313,731     $  (214,406,386

Investing activities
Advances for investments                                                 )
                                                                (150,000                  -
Net cash paid in business combinations                                -          (28,143,886 )
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment                   5,769,040
Purchases of property and equipment                                      )
                                                              (1,124,990            (532,208 )

Total investing                                                                              )
activities                                                     4,494,050         (28,676,094
Net change in cash during the period                                     )                   )
                                                             (22,660,304        (296,289,986

Cash
Beginning of year                                       $    174,892,298     $   582,622,025

End of year                                             $    152,231,994     $   286,332,039



Operating Activities

Cash used in operating activities in Q1 2022 totaled $25,840,623 as compared to
cash used in operating activities of $53,207,506 in Q1 2021. In the current
period, this represents an average operating cash burn rate during Q1 2022 of
$7,165,086 month excluding changes in
non-cash
working capital. In Q1 2021, the Company settled significant payables related to
its Qualifying Transaction which closed on January 15, 2021. The Company is
evaluating a number of options to improve operating results, including:
subleasing excess real estate, combining operations for lower performing
locations, closing or disposing of
non-core
assets, a strategic review of its wholesale business, and general &
administrative cost reductions.

                                       38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities totaled $1,313,731 in Q1 2022 compared with cash used of $214,406,386 in Q1 2021. In Q1 2022, the Company mainly settled lease liabilities associated with its real estate. Q1 2021 includes a payment of $264,318,686 in connection with the redemption of Class A restricted voting shares on closing the Qualifying Transaction.

Investing Activities

Cash provided by investing activities in the Q1 2022 totaled $4,494,050 as compared to cash used of $28,676,094 in Q1 2021. In Q1 2022, the Company recorded proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment primarily associated with the sale and leaseback transaction at its 90-92 Pullman property. Q1 2021 includes $28,143,886 of cash paid as part of the Qualifying Transaction acquisitions.

Commitments and Contingencies

California Operating Licenses

The Company's primary activity is the cultivation and sale of adult use cannabis pursuant to California law. However, this activity is not in compliance with the United States Controlled Substances Act (the "CSA"). The Company's assets are potentially subject to seizure or confiscation by governmental agencies and the Company could face criminal and civil penalties for noncompliance with the CSA. Management of the Company believes the Company is in compliance with all California and local jurisdiction laws and monitor the regulatory environment on an ongoing basis along with counsel to ensure the continued compliance with all applicable laws and licensing agreements.



The Company's operation is sanctioned by the State of California and local
jurisdictions. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the Company's noncompliance
with the CSA, the potential liability from any
non-compliance
cannot be reasonably estimated, and the Company may be subject to regulatory
fines, penalties or restrictions in the future.

Effective January 1, 2018, the State of California allowed adult use cannabis sales. Beginning on January 1, 2018, the State began issuing temporary licenses that expired 120 days after issuance for retail, distribution, manufacturing and cultivation permits. Temporary licenses could be extended in 90- day increments by the State upon submission of an annual license application. All temporary licenses had been granted extensions by the State during 2018.

In September 2019, Senate Bill 1459 (SB 1459) was enacted which enabled state licensing authorities to issue provisional licenses through 2021. A provisional license could be issued if an applicant submitted a completed annual license application to the California Bureau of Cannabis Control. A completed application for purposes of obtaining a provisional license is not the same as a sufficient application to obtain an annual license. The provisional cannabis license, which is valid for 12 months from the date issued, is said to be in between a temporary license and an annual license and allows a cannabis business to operate as they would under local and state regulations. Licensees issued a provisional license are expected to be diligently working toward completing all annual license requirements in order to maintain a provisional license. The Company obtained its provisional licenses in 2019 and continues to work with the State to obtain annual licensing.

The Company's prior licenses obtained from the local jurisdictions it operated in have been continued by such jurisdictions and are necessary to obtain state licensing.

The Company has received annual licenses from its local jurisdiction in which it actively operates. Although the Company believes it will continue to receive the necessary licenses from the State of California to conduct its business in a timely fashion, there is no guarantee its clients will be able to do so and any failure to do so may have a negative effect on its business and results of operations.



Additional regulations relating to testing that came into effect on July 1, 2018
(Phase II testing requirements) required the clients to sell products that would
be
non-compliant
prior to that date, causing a loss of margin due to discounts that had to be
provided to ensure that such products were sold prior to July 1. Due to the
additional

                                       39

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

testing requirements effective July 1, 2018, the California market and the clients experienced a shortage in supply of compliant cannabis products.

Other Legal Matters

From time to time in the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to legal matters such as threatened or pending claims or proceedings. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings or claims, nor are we aware of any pending or threatened litigation or claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition should such litigation or claim be resolved unfavorably.

Social Equity Fund

The Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary to serve as its social equity fund during the during 2021 with an initial commitment of $10 million and planned annual contributions of at least 2% of the Company's net income. To March 31, 2022, the Company has invested approximately $1,150,000 in three investments being Stanton Brands (dba Josephine & Billie's), Peakz LLC and Digistrains.

Share Capital and Capital Management

As of March 31, 2022, the Company had 99,185,332 common shares and 35,837,500 common share purchase warrants (the "Warrants") issued and outstanding. The Warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $11.50 and will expire on January 15, 2026. The Company may accelerate the expiry date of the outstanding Warrants (excluding the Warrants held by Subversive Capital Sponsor LLC in certain circumstances) by providing 30 days' notice, if and only if, the closing price of the Company's common shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per common share (as adjusted for stock splits or combinations, stock dividends, extraordinary dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period.



The Company has an equity incentive plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan") that
permits the grant of stock options, RSUs, deferred share units, performance
share units and stock appreciation rights to
non-employee
directors and any employee, officer, consultant, independent contractor or
advisor providing services to the Company or any affiliate. As of March 31,
2022, a total of 2,850,643 RSUs were outstanding under the Equity Incentive
Plan.

Prior to closing of the Qualifying Transaction, Caliva maintained the CMG Partners, Inc. 2019 Stock Option and Grant Plan (the "Caliva EIP"), which permitted awards of common stock in Caliva. In connection with the Qualifying Transaction, Caliva and the Company agreed that the Company would maintain the Caliva EIP and that outstanding awards thereunder will entitle the holder to receive common shares of the Company. There are currently 641,456 options to purchase up to 641,456 common shares under the Caliva EIP outstanding. No further awards will be granted under the Caliva EIP.

Prior to closing of the Qualifying Transaction, LCV maintained the Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the "LCV Equity Plan") which authorized LCV to grant to its employees, directors and consultants stock options and other equity-based awards. In connection with the Qualifying Transaction, LCV and the Company agreed that the Company would maintain the LCV Equity Plan and that outstanding awards thereunder will entitle the holder to receive common shares of the Company. There are currently 16,950 options to purchase up to 16,950 common shares under the LCV Equity Plan outstanding. No further awards will be granted under the LCV Equity Plan.

The Company manages its capital with the following objectives:



     •    To ensure sufficient financial flexibility to achieve the ongoing
          business objectives including of future growth opportunities, and pursuit
          of accretive acquisitions; and



  •   To maximize shareholder return through enhancing the share value.

The Company considers its capital to be total equity. The Company manages capital through its financial and operational forecasting processes. The Company reviews its working capital and forecasts its future cash flows based on operating expenditures, and other investing and financing activities. Selected information is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company's capital management objectives, policies and processes have remained unchanged during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021. The Company is not subject to any external capital requirements.



                                       40

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

The Company has a portfolio of industry leading products and brands. As part of the Company's brand strategy, it strives to protect its proprietary products and brand elements and its brand as California's premier consumer cannabis product company. Intellectual property ("IP") protection is pursued both in its ability to sell products and brands through first "Freedom to Operate" searches and subsequently, reviewing proprietary and protectable claims, branding, technology, or design assets. The Company evaluates opportunities for IP protection from cultivation and strain development, in manufacturing and processes, and for its portfolio of finished goods. The Company's IP protection ranges from trademarks to patents to trade secrets and covers anything from cultivation, genetics, product development, packaging development, claims, operations, information technology, and branding.

Additionally, the Company partners from time to time with other companies and pursues further IP protection through licensing and collaboration with those partners.

The Company seeks to protect its proprietary information, in part, by executing confidentiality agreements with third parties and partners and non-disclosure and invention assignment agreements with its employees and consultants. These agreements are designed to protect its proprietary information and ensure ownership of technologies that are developed through its relationship with the respective counterparty. The Company cannot guarantee, however, that these agreements will afford it adequate protection of its intellectual property and proprietary information rights.

Competitive Conditions

As the Company is vertically integrated it competes on multiple fronts, from manufacturing to retail to delivery, and experience competition in each of these areas. From a retail perspective, the Company competes with other licensed retailers and delivery companies in the geographies where retail and delivery services are located. These other retailers range from small local operators to more significant operators with a presence throughout the State of California and other states in the United States. From a product perspective, the Company competes with other manufactures of brands for shelf space in third-party owned dispensaries throughout California. Similar to certain competitors in the retail space, the Company competes with manufacturers ranging in size from small local operators to significant operators with a larger presence. Indirectly, the Company competes with the illicit market, including many illegal dispensaries.

Specialized Knowledge, Skills, Resources & Equipment

Knowledge with respect to cultivating and growing cannabis is important in the medical cannabis industry. The nature of growing cannabis is not substantially different from the nature of growing other agricultural products. Variables such as temperature, humidity, lighting, air flow, watering and feeding cycles are meticulously defined and controlled to produce consistent product and to avoid contamination.

The Company grows or procures the primary component of its finished products, namely cannabis. The Company's cultivation operations are dependent on a number of key inputs and their related costs including raw materials and supplies related to its growing operations, as well as electricity, water and other utilities.

Staff with suitable horticultural and quality assurance expertise are generally available on the open market. The Company also requires client care staff, which will grow as its business grows. Customer care staff are also generally available on the open market.

Equipment used is specialized but is readily available and not specific to the cultivation of cannabis. Subject to available funding, the Company does not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining equipment.

The Company anticipates an increased demand for skilled manpower, energy resources and equipment in connection with the Company's expected continued growth.



                                       41

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

Cannabis Industry Regulation



On February 8, 2018, the Canadian Securities Administrators revised their
previously released Staff
Notice 51-352
-
Issuers with U.S.
 Marijuana-Related Activities
("
Staff Notice
 51-352

"), which provides specific disclosure expectations for issuers that currently have, or are in the process of developing, cannabis-related activities in the United States as permitted within a particular state's regulatory framework. All issuers with U.S. cannabis-related activities are expected to clearly and prominently disclose certain prescribed information in prospectus filings and other required disclosure documents. As a result of the Company's existing operations in California, the Company is providing the following disclosure pursuant to Staff Notice 51-352.



The Company derives a substantial portion of its revenues from state legalized:
(i) cannabis, and products containing cannabis, used by someone 21 or older that
is not a medical cannabis patient (where use may include inhalation,
consumption, or application) ("
Adult-Use
Cannabis
") and (ii) to a lesser extent, cannabis and products containing cannabis used
by medical cannabis patients in accordance with applicable state law, but for
which no drug approval has been granted by the United States Food and Drug
Administration (where use may include inhalation, consumption, or application)
("
Medical-Use
Cannabis
") ((i) and (ii) collectively "
Regulated Cannabis
"). The Regulated Cannabis industry is illegal under U.S. Federal Law. The
Parent Company is directly involved (through its licensed subsidiaries) in both
the
Adult-Use
Cannabis and
Medical-Use
Cannabis industry in the State of California which has legalized and regulated
such industries.

The United States federal government regulates certain drugs through the
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§
801-971)
(the "
CSA
") and through the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. §§
301-392)
(the "
FDCA
"). The CSA schedules controlled substances, including "marihuana" (defined as
all parts of the plant
cannabis sativa L.
containing more than 0.3 percent THC), based on their approved medical use and
potential for abuse. Marihuana (also referred to as cannabis) and THC ("except
for tetrahydrocannabinols in hemp") are each classified as Schedule I controlled
substances (21 U.S.C. § 812(c)). The Drug Enforcement Administration ("
DEA
"), an agency of the U.S. Department of Justice (the "
DOJ
") defines Schedule I drugs, substances or chemicals as "drugs with no currently
accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse." The United States Food and
Drug Administration (the "
FDA
"), which implements and enforces the FDCA, regulates, among other things, drugs
used for the diagnosis or treatment of diseases. The FDA has not approved
cannabis as a safe and effective treatment for any medical condition, and
regularly issues
cease-and-desist
letters to manufacturers of CBD products making health claims to consumers in
contravention of the FDCA. The FDA has approved drugs containing THC and CBD,
individual cannabinoids in the plant
cannabis sativa L.
, for a narrow segment of medical conditions.

State laws that permit and regulate the production, distribution and use of
Medical-Use
Cannabis or
Adult-Use
Cannabis are in direct conflict with the CSA, which makes cannabis and THC
distribution and possession federally illegal. Although certain states and
territories of the U.S. authorize Medical- Use Cannabis or
Adult-Use
Cannabis production and distribution by licensed or registered entities, under
U.S. federal law, the possession, cultivation, and/or transfer of cannabis and
THC is illegal and any such acts are criminal acts under any and all
circumstances under the CSA. Additionally, any manufacture, possession,
distribution and/or sale of cannabis accessories, in states without laws
expressly permitting such activity, are also federally illegal activity under
the CSA. Although the Company's activities are believed to be compliant with
applicable California state and local law, strict compliance with state and
local laws with respect to cannabis does not absolve the Company of liability
under United States federal law, nor does it provide a defense to any federal
proceeding which may be brought against the Company.

As of the filing of March 1, 2022, 37 U.S. states, and the District of Columbia
and the territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the
Northern Mariana Islands have legalized the cultivation and sale of
Medical-Use
Cannabis, with at least six of the remaining states expected to pass such
legalization measures within the next 12 months. In 18 U.S. states, the sale and
possession of both
Medical-Use
Cannabis and
Adult-Use
Cannabis has been legalized, though due to the time period between a state's
legalization of commercial cannabis activities and the completion of its
regulatory framework and marketplace launch, the purchase of
Adult-Use
Cannabis is currently possible in 12 states, with the remainder of the
currently-legal states to commence sales activities in 2022 or 2023. The
District of Columbia has legalized
Adult-Use
Cannabis but has not yet permitted the commercial sale of Adult Use Cannabis,
however,
Adult-Use
sales are expected to commence in 2022. Eleven states have also enacted
low-THC
/
high-CBD
only laws for medical cannabis patients. The sale and possession of both
Medical-Use
Cannabis and
Adult-Use
Cannabis is legal in the State of California, subject to applicable licensing

                                       42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



requirements and compliance with applicable conditions. Included in the numbers
above are ballot initiatives to legalize
Adult-Use
Cannabis which passed in November 2020, with Arizona commencing
Adult-Use
sales in January 2021, New Jersey and Montana to commence
Adult-Use
sales in 2022, South Dakota to commence
Adult-Use
sales in 2023, and Mississippi enacting
Medical-Use
cannabis legislation in January 2022, following a successful ballot initiative
and subsequent invalidation on technical grounds by the Mississippi State
Supreme Court.

Under President Barack Obama, the U.S. administration attempted to address the
inconsistencies between federal and state regulation of cannabis in a memorandum
which then-Deputy Attorney General James Cole sent to all United States
Attorneys on August 29, 2013 (the "
2013 Cole Memorandum
") outlining certain priorities for the DOJ relating to the prosecution of
cannabis offenses. The 2013 Cole Memorandum noted that in jurisdictions that
have enacted laws legalizing or decriminalizing Regulated Cannabis in some form
and that have also implemented strong and effective regulatory and enforcement
systems to control the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale and
possession of Regulated Cannabis, conduct in compliance with those laws and
regulations is less likely to be a priority at the federal level. The DOJ did
not provide (and has not provided since) specific guidelines for what regulatory
and enforcement systems would be deemed sufficient under the 2013 Cole
Memorandum. In light of limited investigative and prosecutorial resources,
the 2013 Cole Memorandum concluded that the DOJ should be focused on addressing
only the most significant threats related to cannabis, a
non-exhaustive
list of which was enumerated therein.

On January 4, 2018, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions formally issued a new
memorandum (the "
Sessions Memorandum
"), which rescinded all "previous nationwide guidance specific to marijuana
enforcement," including the 2013 Cole Memorandum. The Sessions Memorandum
stated, in part, that current law reflects "Congress' determination that
Cannabis is a dangerous drug and Cannabis activity is a serious crime", and
Mr. Sessions directed all U.S. Attorneys to enforce the laws enacted by Congress
by following well-established principles when pursuing prosecutions related to
cannabis activities. There can be no assurance that the federal government will
not enforce federal laws relating to cannabis in the future. As a result of the
Sessions Memorandum, federal prosecutors are now free to utilize their
prosecutorial discretion to decide whether to prosecute cannabis activities
despite the existence of State-level laws that may be inconsistent with federal
prohibitions. No direction was given to federal prosecutors in the Sessions
Memorandum as to the priority they should ascribe to such cannabis activities,
and resultantly it is uncertain how active U.S. federal prosecutors will be in
relation to such activities.

The Company believes it is still unclear what prosecutorial effects will be
created by the rescission of the 2013 Cole Memorandum. The Company believes that
the sheer size of the Regulated Cannabis industry, in addition to participation
by state and local governments and investors, suggests that a large- scale
enforcement operation would more than likely create unwanted political backlash
for the DOJ and the Biden administration in certain states that heavily favor
decriminalization and/or legalization. Regardless, cannabis and THC remain
Schedule I controlled substances at the federal level, and neither the 2013 Cole
Memorandum nor its rescission has altered that fact. The federal government of
the United States has always reserved the right to enforce federal law in regard
to the manufacture, distribution, sale and disbursement of
Medical-Use
Cannabis or
Adult-Use
Cannabis, even if state law permits such manufacture, distribution, sale and
disbursement. The Company believes, from a purely legal perspective, that the
criminal risk today remains similar to the risk on January 3, 2018. It remains
unclear whether the risk of enforcement has been altered. Additionally, under
United States federal law, it is a violation of federal money laundering
statutes for financial institutions to take any proceeds from the sale of
Regulated Cannabis or any other Schedule I controlled substance. Canadian banks
are likewise hesitant to deal with cannabis companies, due to the uncertain
legal and regulatory framework of the industry. Banks and other financial
institutions, particularly those that are federally chartered in the United
States, could be prosecuted and possibly convicted of money laundering for
providing services to Regulated Cannabis businesses. While Congress is
considering legislation that may address these issues, there can be no assurance
that such legislation passes.

Despite these laws, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network ("
FinCEN
") issued a memorandum on February 14, 2014 (the "
FinCEN Memorandum
") outlining the pathways for financial institutions to bank state-sanctioned
Regulated Cannabis businesses in compliance with federal enforcement priorities.
The FinCEN Memorandum echoed the enforcement priorities of the 2013 Cole
Memorandum and stated that in some circumstances, it is possible for banks to
provide services to cannabis-related businesses without risking prosecution for
violation of federal money laundering laws. Under these guidelines, financial
institutions must submit a Suspicious Activity Report ("
SAR
") in connection with all cannabis-related banking activities by any client of
such financial institution, in accordance with federal money laundering laws.
These cannabis-related SARs are divided into three categories-cannabis limited,
cannabis priority, and cannabis

                                       43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

terminated-based on the financial institution's belief that the business in question follows state law, is operating outside of compliance with state law, or where the banking relationship has been terminated, respectively. On the same day that the FinCEN Memorandum was published, the DOJ issued a memorandum (the " 2014 Cole Memorandum ") directing prosecutors to apply the enforcement priorities of the 2013 Cole Memorandum in determining whether to charge individuals or institutions with crimes related to financial transactions involving the proceeds of cannabis-related conduct. The 2014 Cole Memorandum has been rescinded as of January 4, 2018, along with the 2013 Cole Memorandum, removing guidance that enforcement of applicable financial crimes against state-compliant actors was not a DOJ priority.



However, former Attorney General Sessions' rescission of the 2013 Cole
Memorandum and the 2014 Cole Memorandum has not affected the status of the
FinCEN Memorandum, nor has the Department of the Treasury given any indication
that it intends to rescind the FinCEN Memorandum itself. Though it was
originally intended for the 2014 Cole Memorandum and the FinCEN Memorandum to
work in tandem, the FinCEN Memorandum is a standalone document which explicitly
lists the eight enforcement priorities originally cited in the 2013 Cole
Memorandum. As such, the FinCEN Memorandum remains intact, indicating that the
Department of the Treasury and FinCEN intend to continue abiding by its
guidance. However, FinCEN issued further guidance on December 3, 2019, in which
it acknowledged that the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (the "
Farm Bill
") removed hemp as a Schedule I controlled substance and authorized the United
States Department of Agriculture ("
USDA
") to issue regulations governing, among other things, domestic hemp production.
The guidance states that because hemp is no longer a controlled substance under
federal law, banks are not required to file SARs on these businesses solely
because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations. The guidance further notes that for
hemp-related customers, banks are expected to follow standard SAR procedures,
and file a SAR if indicia of suspicious activity warrants. FinCEN noted in its
December 2019 guidance that the 2014 SAR reporting structure for cannabis
remains in place even with the passage of the Farm Bill and this additional
guidance related to hemp. FinCEN confirmed this point in guidance issued on
June 29, 2020, and clarified that, if proceeds from cannabis-related activities
are kept separate, a SAR filing is only required for the cannabis-related part
of a business that engages in both cannabis and hemp activity.

Although the 2013 Cole Memorandum has been rescinded, one legislative safeguard
for the
Medical-Use
Cannabis industry has historically remained in place: Congress adopted a
so-called
"rider" provision to the fiscal years 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018, 2019 and 2020
and 2021. Consolidated Appropriations Acts (currently referred to as the "
Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment
") to prevent the federal government from using congressionally appropriated
funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated
Medical-Use
Cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law. On March 15,
2022, the Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment was renewed through the signing of
the fiscal year 2022 omnibus bill, which extended the protections of the
Amendment through September 30, 2022. The Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment may
or may not be included in a subsequent omnibus appropriations package or a
continuing budget resolution. Should the Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment not be
renewed upon expiration in subsequent spending bills, there can be no assurance
that the federal government will not seek to prosecute cases involving medical
cannabis businesses that are otherwise compliant with State law. Such potential
proceedings could involve significant restrictions being imposed upon the
Company.

The United States Congress has passed appropriations bills each of the last four years that have not appropriated funds for prosecution of cannabis offenses of individuals who are in compliance with state medical cannabis laws. American courts have construed these appropriations bills to prevent the U.S. federal government from prosecuting individuals when those individuals comply with state law relating to approved medical uses. However, because this conduct continues to violate U.S. federal law, American courts have observed that should Congress at any time choose to appropriate funds to fully prosecute the CSA, any individual or business - even those that have fully complied with state law - could be prosecuted for violations of U.S. federal law. And if Congress restores funding, the government will have the authority to prosecute individuals for violations of the law that took place before received funding under the CSA's five-year statute of limitations.



In recent years, certain temporary federal legislative enactments that protect
the
Medical-Use
Cannabis and industry have also been in effect. For instance, cannabis
businesses that are in strict compliance with state law receive a measure of
protection from federal prosecution by operation of a temporary appropriations
measures that has been enacted into law as an amendment (or "
rider
") to federal spending bills passed by Congress and signed by Presidents Obama,
Trump and Biden. First adopted in the Appropriations Act of 2015, Congress has
included in successive budgets since a "rider" that prohibits the DOJ from
expending any funds to enforce any law that interferes with a state's
implementation of its own medical cannabis laws. The rider, discussed above, is
known as the "
Rohrbacher-Blumenauer
" Amendment, and now known colloquially as the "
Joyce-

                                       44

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

Amendment

" after its most recent sponsors. The rider was renewed on March 15, 2022 through the signing of the FY 2022 omnibus spending bill, which extended the protections of the Amendment through September 30, 2022.

Despite the legal, regulatory, and political obstacles the Regulated Cannabis industry currently faces, the industry has continued to grow. Under certain circumstances, the federal government may repeal the federal prohibition on cannabis and thereby leave the states to decide for themselves whether to permit Regulated Cannabis cultivation, production and sale, just as states are free today to decide policies governing the distribution of alcohol or tobacco. Until that happens, the Company faces the risk of federal enforcement and other risks associated with the Company's business.

To the knowledge of management of the Company, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in California.



The Company's objective is to capitalize on the opportunities presented as a
result of the changing regulatory environment governing the cannabis industry in
the United States. Accordingly, there are a number of significant risks
associated with the business of the Company. Unless and until the United States
Congress amends the CSA with respect to
Medical-Use
Cannabis or
Adult-Use
Cannabis, there is a risk that federal authorities may enforce current federal
law, and the business of the Company may be deemed to be producing, cultivating,
extracting, or dispensing "marihuana" or aiding or abetting or otherwise
engaging in a conspiracy to commit such acts in violation of U.S. federal law.

The Company has received and continues to receive legal input, in verbal and written form (including opinions when required), regarding (a) compliance with applicable state and local regulatory frameworks and (b) potential exposure and implications arising from U.S. federal law in certain respects.



The 2013 Cole Memorandum and the Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment gave
Medical-Use
Cannabis operators and investors in states with legal regimes greater certainty
regarding federal enforcement as to establish Regulated Cannabis businesses in
those states. While the Sessions Memorandum has introduced some uncertainty
regarding federal enforcement, the Regulated Cannabis industry continues to
experience growth in legal
Medical-Use
Cannabis and
Adult-Use
Cannabis markets across the United States. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions
resigned on November 7, 2018. Nonetheless, there is no guarantee that state laws
legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed or
overturned, even under a Biden Administration's DOJ or that local governmental
authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their
respective jurisdictions. Unless and until the United States Congress amends the
CSA with respect to cannabis and THC (and as to the timing or scope of any such
potential amendments there can be no assurance), there is a risk that federal
authorities may enforce current U.S. federal law.

Despite the expanding market for Regulated Cannabis, traditional sources of financing, including bank lending or private equity capital, are lacking which can be attributable to the fact that cannabis remains a Schedule I substance under the CSA. These traditional sources of financing are expected to remain scarce unless and until the federal government legalizes cannabis cultivation and sales.

Exposure to U.S. Marijuana Related Activities

The Company operates in the United States through various subsidiaries and other entities pursuant to arrangements with third-parties on arm's length terms as more specifically described herein. As of the date hereof, a majority of the Company's business was directly derived from U.S. cannabis-related activities. As such, a majority of the Company's balance sheet and operating statement for periods following closing of the Qualifying Transaction will reflects exposure to U.S. cannabis related activities.

California Regulatory Landscape

In 1996, California was the first state to legalize Medical-Use Cannabis through Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. This legislation legalized the use, possession and cultivation of cannabis by patients with a physician recommendation for treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which cannabis provides relief.



In 2003, Senate Bill 420 was signed into law establishing
not-for-profit
medical cannabis collectives and dispensaries, and an optional identification
card system for
Medical-Use
Cannabis patients.

                                       45

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents



In September 2015, the California legislature passed three bills collectively
known as the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act ("
MCRSA
"). The MCRSA established a licensing and regulatory framework for
Medical-Use
Cannabis businesses in California. The system created multiple license types for
dispensaries, infused products manufacturers, cultivation facilities, testing
laboratories, transportation companies, and distributors. Edible infused product
manufacturers would require either volatile solvent or
non-volatile
solvent manufacturing licenses depending on their specific extraction
methodology. Multiple agencies would oversee different aspects of the program
and businesses would require a state license and local approval to operate.
However, in November 2016, voters in California passed Proposition 64, the Adult
Use of Marijuana Act ("
AUMA
"), creating an
Adult-Use
Cannabis program for adults 21 years of age or older. In June 2017, the
California State Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 94, known as Medicinal and
Adult-Use
Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act ("
MAUCRSA
"), which amalgamated MCRSA and AUMA and provided for a set of regulations to
govern a medical and
adult-use
licensing regime for cannabis businesses in the State of California. The four
agencies that regulate cannabis at the state level are the Bureau of Cannabis
Control ("
BCC
"), CalCannabis at the California Department of Food and Agriculture ("
CalCannabis
"), and the Manufactured Cannabis Safety Branch California Department of Public
Health ("
MCSB
"), and California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. MAUCRSA went into
effect on January 1, 2018. MAUCRSA was then amended and restated in July 2021
through the annual budget trailer bill process to, among other things,
consolidate the three state licensing
agencies-BCC,
CalCannabis and MCSB-into a single licensing authority known as the Department
of Cannabis Control ("
DCC
"). Subsequent to the agency consolidation, the newly formed DCC consolidated
the three separate sets of BCC, CalCannabis, and MCSB regulations into a single
set of state regulations, which regulations went into effect as of September 27,
2021.

To legally operate a
Medical-Use
Cannabis or
Adult-Use
Cannabis business in California, the operator must generally have both a local
and state license. This requires license holders to operate in cities with
cannabis licensing programs. Therefore, counties and cities in California are
allowed to determine the number of licenses they will issue to cannabis
operators, or can choose to outright ban the siting of cannabis operations in
their jurisdictions.

California Licensing Requirements



A storefront retailer license with an
"M-designation"
permits (i) the purchase of cannabis goods that are "For Medical Use Only" from
licensed distributors (ii) the sale of such medicinal cannabis goods to
medicinal cannabis patients in California who possesses a physician's
recommendation. Only certified physicians may provide medicinal cannabis
recommendations. A storefront retailer license with an
"A-designation"
permits the sale of cannabis and cannabis products to any individual age 21
years of age or older regardless of whether they possess a physician's
recommendation. A storefront retailer license with both the
M-
and
A-designations
is permitted to do all of the above described in this paragraph. Where the local
jurisdiction permits, a state storefront retailer license allows the retailer to
engage in delivery of cannabis goods to retail customers. A
non-storefront
license permits the same delivery activity, but does not permit the licensee to
operate a retail storefront.

A distribution license permits the license holder to engage in the procurement, sale, and transport of cannabis and cannabis products between licensees.

An

adult-use


or medicinal cultivation license permits cannabis cultivation which means any
activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading or
trimming of cannabis. Such licenses further permit the production of a limited
number of
"non-manufactured
cannabis products" and the sales of cannabis to certain licensed entities within
the State of California for resale or manufacturing purposes.

An

adult-use

or medical manufacturing license permits the manufacturing of "manufactured cannabis products". Manufacturing includes the compounding, blending, extracting, infusion, packaging or repackaging, labeling or relabeling, or other preparation of a cannabis product in the State of California, only cannabis that is grown in the state by a licensed operator can be sold in the state. California neither mandates or prohibits integration, and the state allows licensees to make wholesale purchase of cannabis from, or a distribution of cannabis and cannabis product to, another licensed entity within the state.

Holders of cannabis licenses in California are subject to a detailed regulatory scheme encompassing security, staffing, transport, sales, manufacturing standards, testing, inspections, inventory, advertising and marketing, product packaging and labeling, white labeling, records and reporting, and more. As with all jurisdictions, the full regulations, as promulgated by each applicable state agency, should be consulted for further information about any particular operational area.



                                       46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

California Reporting Requirements



The State of California uses METRC as the state's
track-and-trace
system used to track commercial cannabis activity and movement across the
distribution chain for all state-issued licensees. The system allows for other
third-party system integration via application programming interface. Only
licensees have access to METRC.

California Storage and Security

To ensure the safety and security of cannabis business premises and to maintain adequate controls against the diversion, theft, and loss of cannabis or cannabis products, California's retail cannabis businesses are generally required to do the following:



     •    limit access to dispensary premises to medical cannabis patients at
          least 18 years and older, and adults 21 and over maintain a fully
          operational security alarm system;



  •   contract for professionally-certified security guard services;



     •    maintain a video surveillance system that records continuously 24 hours a
          day;



  •   ensure that the facility's outdoor premises have sufficient lighting;



  •   not dispense from its premises outside of permissible hours of operation;



     •    limit the amount of cannabis goods dispensed to individual customers to
          prevent diversion;



     •    store cannabis and cannabis product only in areas per the premises
          diagram submitted to the State of California during the licensing
          process;



     •    store all cannabis and cannabis products in a secured, locked room or a
          vault; report to local law enforcement within 24 hours after being
          notified or becoming aware of the theft, diversion, or loss of cannabis;
          and



     •    ensure the safe transport of cannabis and cannabis products between
          licensed facilities, maintain a delivery manifest in any vehicle
          transporting cannabis and cannabis products. Only vehicles registered
          with the BCC that meet BCC distribution requirements are to be used to
          transport cannabis and cannabis products.

California Home Delivery Requirements

California law allows certain licensed retailers to deliver cannabis to adult customers at any private address within the state, including within those jurisdictions that have land use and zoning ordinances prohibiting the establishment of commercial cannabis businesses. At least 25 local jurisdictions where cannabis sales are banned sued the state, seeking to overturn the rule allowing home deliveries statewide. As of the date hereof, the suit was dismissed on procedural grounds, and the state regulation stands. To the knowledge of management, there have been no significant enforcement efforts mounted by local governments.

The State of California requires the satisfaction of various regulatory compliance obligations in order to operate a cannabis delivery service. The cannabis license that permits the operation of a storefront dispensary in the State of California (also referred to as a retail license) currently permits that entity to also establish a delivery operation. If an entity does not wish to set up and operate a storefront dispensary location at which it can sell products to customers in person, California has established a separate license which allows for a retail delivery operation (also referred to as a non-storefront retail license). California regulations regarding the delivery of cannabis products include the following requirements:



     •    All deliveries of cannabis goods must be performed by a delivery employee
          (at least 21 years of age) who is directly employed by a licensed
          retailer.



     •    All deliveries of cannabis goods must be made in person to a physical
          address that is not on public land.



     •    Prior to providing cannabis goods to a delivery customer, a delivery
          employee must confirm the identity and age of the delivery customer (as
          is required if such customer was purchasing the product in the physical
          dispensary) and ensure that all cannabis goods sold comply with the
          regulatory requirements.



     •    A licensed cannabis entity is permitted to contract with a service that
          provides a technology platform to facilitate the sale and delivery of
          cannabis goods, in accordance with all of the



                                       47

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Table of Contents

        following: (1) the licensed cannabis entity does not allow for delivery
        of cannabis goods by the technology platform service provider; (2) the
        licensed entity does not share in the profits of the sale of cannabis
        goods with the technology platform service provider, or otherwise provide
        for a percentage or portion of the cannabis goods sales to the technology
        platform service provider; (3) the licensed cannabis entity does not
        advertise or market cannabis goods in conjunction with the technology
        platform service provider, outside of the technology platform, and
        ensures that the technology platform service provider does not use the
        licensed cannabis entity's license number or legal business name on any
        advertisement or marketing that primarily promotes the services of the
        technology platform; and (4) provides various disclosures to customers
        about the source of the delivered cannabis goods.

Laws Applicable to Financial Services for Regulated Cannabis Industry

All banks are subject to federal law, whether the bank is a national bank or state-chartered bank. At a minimum, most banks maintain federal deposit insurance which requires adherence to federal law. Violation of federal law could subject a bank to loss of its charter. Financial transactions involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related conduct can form the basis for prosecution under the federal money laundering statutes, unlicensed money transmitter statutes and the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of


 1970
(31 U.S.C. § 5311
et seq
) (commonly known as the "
Bank Secrecy Act
"). For example, under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks must report to the federal
government any suspected illegal activity, which would include any transaction
associated with a Regulated Cannabis-related business. These reports must be
filed even though the business is operating in compliance with applicable state
and local laws. Therefore, financial institutions that conduct transactions with
money generated by Regulated Cannabis-related conduct could face criminal
liability under the Bank Secrecy Act for, among other things, failing to
identify or report financial transactions that involve the proceeds of
cannabis-related violations of the CSA.

FinCEN issued guidance in February 2014 which clarifies how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses consistent with their obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. Concurrently with the FinCEN guidance, the DOJ issued supplemental guidance directing federal prosecutors to consider the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the 2013 Cole Memorandum with respect to federal money laundering, unlicensed money transmitter and Bank Secrecy Act offenses based on cannabis-related violations of the CSA. The FinCEN guidance sets forth extensive requirements for financial institutions to meet if they want to offer bank accounts to cannabis-related businesses, including close monitoring of businesses to determine that they meet all of the requirements established by the DOJ, including those enumerated in the 2013 Cole Memorandum. This is a level of scrutiny that is far beyond what is expected of any normal banking relationship. Under the 2019 FinCEN guidance discussed above, banks are not required to file SARs on businesses solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. However, the 2014 guidance remains in place with respect to Regulated Cannabis businesses. FinCEN confirmed this point in guidance issued on June 29, 2020, and clarified that, if proceeds from cannabis-related activities are kept separate, a SAR filing is only required for the cannabis- related part of a business that engages in both cannabis and hemp activity.

As a result, many banks are hesitant to offer any banking services to Regulated Cannabis-related businesses, including opening bank accounts. While the Company currently has bank accounts, its inability to maintain these accounts or the lack of access to bank accounts or other banking services in the future, would make it difficult for the Company to operate its business, increase its operating costs, and pose additional operational, logistical and security challenges. Furthermore, it remains unclear what impact the rescission of the 2013 Cole Memorandum and 2014 Cole Memorandum will have, but federal prosecutors may increase enforcement activities against institutions or individuals that are conducting financial transactions related to cannabis activities.



Ongoing Compliance

Overview

The Company is subject to the general licensing and regulatory framework in
California set out under the heading "
United States Regulatory Environment
-
California
". The Company has developed a compliance program designed to achieve its
strategic business goals while protecting the organization and operations. The
Company's compliance program integrates external regulations with internal rules
and procedures to effectively lay out expectations for employee duties and
behaviors; this aligns the goals of its employees with those of the Company

                                       48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

and helps the Company's operations run smoothly. The Company focuses on upholding policies and procedures that ensure the organization and its employees comply with applicable laws and regulations.

Employee Training

The Company is in process of training employees, and in completing development of and instituting a robust online training center for employees, in connection with its compliance program's objectives, relevant policies and procedures, and the basic components of the compliance program. Such training includes additional specialized training for various policies and procedures that are applicable to specific job functions and/or departments where needed to properly perform their jobs. Training is tracked, attested to, and documented. Training is tracked, attested to, and documented.

Inventory and Security Policies

Maintaining security and inventory control is important to the Company and it has adopted a number of policies, procedures, and practices in these areas:



Security: The Company has taken extensive security measures including
implementing professionally vetted policies, procedures, and systems to provide
comprehensive protection, not only for its physical plant and inventory, but
also for its employees, customers, and the surrounding public. Every licensed
facility has strict access controls, thorough video surveillance coverage, and
burglar alarms linked directly to local police departments. These controls are
supported by professionally certified
on-site
security personnel in certain instances.

Inventory: The Company maintains inventory control and reporting systems that
document the present location, amount, and a description of all cannabis and
cannabis products at all facilities. The traceability of cannabis goods is
maintained using the California's
"Track-and-Trace"
system, METRC, and the Company's integrated enterprise resource planning system
("
ERP
"). The Company conducts regular continuous cycle counts in addition to both
quarterly and annual manual inventory reconciliations, in accordance with
regulations and best practices.

Operational Compliance

Internal audits are conducted quarterly in the normal course. These audits allow us to identify and monitor the Company's strengths and weaknesses, highlighting continuous opportunities for improvement. These internal audits also provide us an opportunity to reinforce best practices and to institute changes in areas that are identified as opportunities for improvement. The information discovered and obtained during these internal audits is used to improve the compliance programs, when necessary, by revising policies, strengthening training, and establishing better reporting processes. The focus of the Company's internal compliance audit is to ensure it is compliant with both state and local laws and regulations and internal policies and procedures. Internal audits may be delayed or completed remotely by video from time to time as a result of COVID-19 precautions.



Big Data Analysis

The Company has invested in a highly scalable data architecture and platform built using leading technologies and tools. By extracting data from its ERP software and the California METRC track and trace system and subsequently organizing it in its data warehouse, the Company has enabled critical data and insights for its compliance efforts. The Company's data warehouse secures and stores all data and transactions at frequent intervals, allowing extensive access and analysis to information that is current. The Company has the ability to understand precise movement of inventory or dollars, past or present, required for review or due diligence as related to compliance requirements or inquiries. The Company is using this data infrastructure proactively to track, monitor and reconcile inventory levels and for ongoing reconciliation with METRC.

Ongoing Compliance

The Company prides itself on a robust internal compliance program encompassing both the compliance measures described above as well as monitoring compliance with U.S. state law on an ongoing basis. Key to those compliance efforts is the employment of individuals dedicated to monitoring California law for changes and updates to statutes and regulations, both at the state level and the local level, that impact business operations. Currently, the Company employs five individuals whose job function includes some aspect of compliance. Further, the Company employs a government relations employee whose primary job function is to monitor the



                                       49

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

changing landscape of state and local law while employing an external consultant and two external law firms that assist in the monitoring, notification, and interpretation of any changes. Additionally, the Company currently implements and maintains standard operating procedures ("SOPs") that are designed for monitoring compliance with California law on an ongoing basis. These SOPs include regular review of current and anticipated statutes, regulations, and ordinances and the training of employees to maintain compliance with California law.

In addition to the internal compliance team and the consultants and law firms described above, the Company also engages local regulatory compliance counsel and consultants in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Such counsel regularly provides legal advice to the Company regarding compliance with state and local laws and regulation and the Company's legal and compliance exposures under United States federal law.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses