Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

MarketScreener Homepage  >  Equities  >  Johannesburg Stock Exchange  >  Shoprite Holdings Ltd    SHPJ   ZAE000012084

SHOPRITE HOLDINGS LTD

(SHPJ)
My previous session
Most popular
  Report  
SummaryChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsOfficial PublicationsSector newsAnalyst Recommendations

Shoprite : Soda tax takes toll on stores near the city's edge

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
01/12/2019 | 06:53am EDT

Once again, Philadelphia’s soda tax has hit the news.

This time, the broadside against the tax came from one of Philadelphia’s leading supermarket entrepreneurs, Jeff Brown. He announced that he was going to close one of his stores because of the impact of the tax on business at that store. While only Brown knows why the supermarket will be shuttered, it should surprise nobody that a business located near the edge of the city would bear the brunt of the soda tax’s effect.

Several years ago, I did research for the American Beverage Association on this issue. When it came to business impacts, it was clear that the negative effects would be felt most by firms located on the edge or borders of Philadelphia. Their suburban competitors could sell beverages at lower prices because they were not subject to the tax.

The ShopRite supermarket fits the profile of a firm most susceptible to harm: Beverages are a staple of its business and it is located near the city border.

The tax’s impact on a border supermarket is amplified because it is broadly based. The 1.5-cent-per-ounce tax is not just on sugar-sweetened beverages. Artificially sweetened products 2019-- diet products -- are also taxed. This raised prices throughout the beverage aisle.

Though the city argued the tax was not being placed on consumers because it was levied on wholesalers, it is being passed through to retailers. In reality, it is nothing more than a consumption tax.

The tax did what taxes do: It raised prices. That reduced the demand for the taxed product, in this case sweetened beverages.

The problem facing edge businesses is twofold: First, total sales declined because of the higher costs. Border stores had little ability to absorb the tax as it could approach the sale price of the product.

But it was the second reason that likely made the major difference. Since beverages are often “loss leaders,” sold cheaply to attract shoppers, by raising the price of the product the tax reduced the value of beverages as an attractive force. In contrast, suburban stores, which are not taxed, could undercut the edge store prices and attract their customers. That would reduce demand for all products sold in the border stores, not just beverages.

Did that happen with the ShopRite store? Without financial statements, it is hard to know, but it would be surprising if a store so close to the suburbs did not see a decline in both beverage sales and overall sales.

And the decline did not have to be massive to make a difference. Supermarkets operate on a very narrow profit margin, generally estimated to be between 1 percent and 3 percent. A decline in general shopping could reduce that margin to close to zero or even push it into the red.

With the growing trend of meals being delivered directly to homes, either to be cooked or from restaurants, supermarkets have been coming under greater pressure. Add to that the preference of millennials to eat out rather than cook in and it becomes clear that relatively small changes in demand at supermarkets could lead to a store becoming unprofitable.

(As for the health benefits of the tax, those are not the focus of this column. But it should be noted that a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the tax did little to change child consumption patterns for sweetened beverages. The consumption of soda by adults was lowered, but it will be many years before the health impacts will be known.)

Put simply, it is quite possible that the beverage tax negatively impacted the financial position of the ShopRite near Philadelphia’s suburban border. Given that Jeff Brown owns seven supermarkets in Philadelphia and is closing only one of them, it is very likely that the store being shuttered has suffered the most.

Was the beverage tax the straw that broke the ShopRite’s back? Again, without the data, that cannot be determined. But is it reasonable to believe that the beverage tax played a role, maybe even a major one, in forcing ownership to close the store? Absolutely.

Finally, we know about the ShopRite closing because it is a major store and the owner made a very public statement about the reason. How many other, smaller stores have closed quietly because of the tax? We will likely never know, but you can be sure there have been some.

Tax increases come with a price.

___

(c)2019 Philly.com

Visit Philly.com at www.philly.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

© Tribune Content Agency, source Regional News

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on SHOPRITE HOLDINGS LTD
03/20SHOPRITE : makes donating to drought relief efforts that much easier
PU
03/15SHOPRITE : New Private Barrel Co. Irish whiskey unveiled in time for St. Patrick..
PU
03/13SHOPRITE HOLDINGS LTD : Ex-dividend day for interim dividend
FA
03/12SHOPRITE : Socially conscious' manufacturer lands major contract with the Shopri..
AQ
03/12SHOPRITE : Socially conscious' manufacturer lands major contract with the Shopri..
AQ
03/11SHOPRITE : Husband and wife team lands multi-million rand Shoprite contract
AQ
03/11SHOPRITE : Giant pumpkin of 601.8kg wins in Heidelberg
PU
03/08SHOPRITE : ‘We are treated like sewage'
AQ
03/07SHOPRITE : How SA's biggest supermarkets measure up in customer satisfaction
AQ
03/07SHOPRITE : ‘Socially conscious' manufacturer lands major contract
PU
More news
Financials (ZAR)
Sales 2019 149 B
EBIT 2019 7 040 M
Net income 2019 4 787 M
Debt 2019 5 436 M
Yield 2019 2,83%
P/E ratio 2019 18,45
P/E ratio 2020 16,05
EV / Sales 2019 0,65x
EV / Sales 2020 0,60x
Capitalization 91 113 M
Chart SHOPRITE HOLDINGS LTD
Duration : Period :
Shoprite Holdings Ltd Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends SHOPRITE HOLDINGS LTD
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishBearishBearish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 11
Average target price 185  ZAR
Spread / Average Target 20%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Pieter Christiaan Engelbrecht Chief Executive Officer & Executive Director
Christoffel F. Hendrik Wiese Chairman
Anton de Bruyn Chief Financial Officer & Executive Director
B. Ram Harisunker Executive Director & Divisional Manager
Edward Christian Kieswetter Lead Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
SHOPRITE HOLDINGS LTD-18.93%6 288
SEVEN & I HOLDINGS CO., LTD.-9.37%34 925
SYSCO CORPORATION4.63%33 663
AHOLD DELHAIZE7.02%31 601
TESCO22.67%30 179
WOOLWORTHS GROUP LTD3.71%28 474