Ampol : 2021 APCO Ampol Annual Report

2022

Page 1/15

APCO Performance Summary

Company Name: Ampol Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd

Trading As:

ABN:17000032128

Overall Performance 41% - Advanced

The score above and chart below indicate your organisation's overall performance in the 2022 APCO Annual Report. With your chosen reporting period of January, 2021 - December, 2021, you have achieved a Advanced overall performance level.

1 Getting Started	2 Good Progress	3 Advanced	4 Leading	5 Beyond Best Practice

Criteria Performance Levels

The chart below indicates your organisation's performance against each of the Packaging Sustainability Framework criteria in the 2022 APCO Annual Report. Each band represents a performance level with the green indicating your level of performance for each.

Criteria 7		Criteria 1
Problematic Materials	5	Governance & Strategy
	4
	3
	2
	1
Criteria 6		Criteria 2
On-site Waste		Design & Procurement

Criteria 5	Criteria 3
Disposal Labelling	Recycled Content

Criteria 4

Recoverability

Performance Level Your Score

DISCLAIMER: All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any material form or transmitted to any other person without the prior written permission of the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation Ltd. (APCO) except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (as amended) or unless expressly permitted in writing by APCO and all authorised material must at all times be acknowledged.

Contact

1. Suite 1102, Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000

1. [e-mail]

2022

APCO Performance Summary

Page 2/15

About APCO Annual Reporting

Understanding APCO Annual Reporting performance levels:

• Getting Started:

• Good Progress:

• Advanced:

• Leading:

• Beyond Best Practice:

You are at the start of your packaging sustainability journey.

You have made some first steps on your packaging sustainability journey.

You have taken tangible action on your packaging sustainability journey.

You have made significant progress on your packaging sustainability journey.

You have received the highest performance level and have made significant progress on your packaging sustainability journey.

Packaging Sustainability Framework criteria

Criteria 1:	This criteria considers actions to integrate packaging sustainability into business
Governance & Strategy	strategies.
Criteria 2:	This criteria considers actions taken to ensure that sustainability principles are
Design & Procurement	considered in the design or procurement of both new and existing packaging
	through use of the Sustainable Packaging Guidelines (SPGs).
Criteria 3:	This criteria considers actions taken to increase or optimise the amount of
Recycled Content	recycled material used by your organisation.
Criteria 4:	This criteria considers actions taken to improve the recovery of packaging at
Recoverability	end-of-life and increase use of reusable packaging.
Criteria 5:	This criteria considers the extent to which packaging has been labelled to help
Disposal Labelling	consumers determine what to do with packaging at end-of-life.
Criteria 6:	This criteria considers progress in increasing the amount of on-site solid waste
On-site Waste	being diverted from landfill.
Criteria 7:	This criteria considers the extent to which organisations are actively phasing out
Problematic Materials	problematic and unnecessary single-use plastic packaging and
	preventing/reducing litter.

A: Suite 1102, Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000 E: [e-mail]

2022

APCO Performance Summary

Page 3/15

APCO Annual Report Criteria Performance & Responses

Provided below are your organisation's responses to the questions within the APCO Annual Report as well as a performance level for each criteria.

Criteria 1:

Governance & Strategy: 3 Advanced

1 Getting Started	2 Good Progress	3 Advanced	4 Leading	5 Beyond Best Practice

Does your organisation have a documented strategy that includes goals (objectives) and	Yes	No
targets for packaging sustainability that addresses the Sustainable Packaging Guidelines
(SPGs) or equivalent?
Does your organisation's strategy include a commitment to achieving the 2025 National
Yes	No
Packaging Targets?
Is this strategy integrated within your business processes and has it been approved by an
Yes	No
executive or board of directors?
Do you regularly communicate and promote packaging sustainability objectives and
Yes	No
targets within your organisation?
Do you regularly engage or communicate with external stakeholders (suppliers, final
Yes	No
consumers, community groups etc.) about the environmental impacts of your packaging?
Do you actively participate in any other initatives to promote packaging sustainability
Yes	No
outside of your organisation?
Supporting Evidence

In 2019 Ampol developed a 3-year Sustainability Strategy (2019-2021) which involves making sustainability core to our decision-making at all levels in our business. A pillar of our Sustainability Strategy is 'Continuous Improvement and Optimisation of Assets' which focuses on delivering operational excellence and utilising resources efficiently. As part of this we commit to SPG equivalent principles to reduce waste

Your full response can be found towards the end of this document.

Criteria 2:

Design & Procurement: 2 Good Progress

	1 Getting Started	2 Good Progress	3 Advanced	4 Leading	5 Beyond Best Practice

A: Suite 1102, Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000 E: [e-mail]

2022	APCO Performance Summary		Page 4/15
How many of your 833 SKUs have had their packaging reviewed against the Sustainable
	196
Packaging Guidelines (or equivalent) in the last 5 years?
Please indicate the accuracy of this response.
	Medium
Do you require your suppliers to use the Sustainable Packaging Guidelines (SPGs) or
Yes	No N/A
equivalent for your packaging?

Please tell us about any positive outcomes from your packaging reviews.

Do you believe applying the SPGs delivers business value to your organisation?	Yes No

Which of the following Sustainable Packaging Principles have been considered in reviews of your organisation's packaging against the Sustainable Packaging Guidelines (SPGs)?

Design for recovery

Optimise material efficiency

Design to reduce product waste

Eliminate hazardous materials

Use of renewable materials

Use recycled materials

Design to minimise litter

Design for transport efficiency

Design for accessibility

Provide consumer information on environmental sustainability

How many of the 833 SKUs have packaging that has been optimised for material efficiency in the last 5 years?

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

393

A: Suite 1102, Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000 E: [e-mail]

2022 APCO Performance Summary Page 5/15

Please indicate the accuracy of this response.	Medium

If yes, please tell us about any material savings you have made.

96% of SKUs have had a review of Packaging has achieved a reduction in material weight or has been optimised for material efficiency

Supporting Evidence

Criteria 3:

Recycled Content: 3 Advanced

1 Getting Started	2 Good Progress	3 Advanced	4 Leading	5 Beyond Best Practice

Do you have a policy or procedure to buy products and/or packaging made from	Yes No
recycled materials?

Which of the following products that you either purchase or sell contain recycled materials?

Primary packaging that you use to sell your products

Secondary packaging that you use to sell your products

Tertiary Packaging that you use to sell your packaging

Your products

Other items which you purchase

(e.g. office stationary & supplies, building materials such a bollards etc.) None of the above

How many 833 SKUs has at least some packaging that is made from recycled material?	776

A: Suite 1102, Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000 E: [e-mail]