CHERRY SE |
Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
| 2.295 EUR | +14.75% |
|
+15.21% | -27.94% |
| Apr. 02 | Upheaval at keyboard manufacturer Cherry | DP |
| Mar. 11 | Cherry SE Launches Disinfectable Mouse and Keyboard Set for Hygiene-Sensitive Areas at HIMSS | CI |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- The company shows low valuation levels, with an enterprise value at 0.46 times its sales.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- According to forecast, a sluggish sales growth is expected for the next fiscal years.
- The company's profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization characterizes fragile margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Sector: Computer Hardware
| 1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -27.94% | 56.82M | - | ||
| +29.68% | 5.77B | A- | ||
| +15.71% | 4.5B | B- | ||
| -10.50% | 1.44B | B+ | ||
| -3.85% | 1.42B | - | - | |
| +29.10% | 1.24B | B | ||
| +10.64% | 1.2B | B- | ||
| +6.26% | 1.07B | - | ||
| +102.67% | 805M | - | ||
| +1.01% | 652M | - |
Investor Rating
Trading Rating
ESG Refinitiv
-
Financials
Sales growth
Earnings Growth
-
EBITDA / Sales
Profitability
Finances
Valuation
P/E ratio
-
EV / Sales
Price to Book
Price to Free Cash Flow
-
Yield
-
Momentum
1 year Revenue revision
4 months Revenue revision
7 days Revenue revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Potential Price Target
4m Target Price Revision
4m Revision of opinion
12m Revision of opinion
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
Divergence of Estimates
Divergence of analysts' opinions
Divergence of Target Price
Earnings quality
Technical analysis
ST Timing
MT Timing
LT Timing
RSI
Bollinger Spread
Unusual volumes
- Stock Market
- Equities
- C3RY Stock
- Ratings Cherry SE
