Kin Mining NL : High-Grade Zones of Mineralisation Confirmed at CGP

ASX Announcement

18 February 2020

ASX: KIN

Kin Mining NL

342 Scarborough Beach Road

Osborne Park WA 6017

• [phone] E [e-mail]

kinmining.com.au

NEAR SURFACE, HIGH-GRADE ZONES OF MINERALISATION

CONFIRMED AT CARDINIA GOLD PROJECT

Highlights:

• Assays results from 1m split samples returned from Cardinia Hill and Black Chief, located within 5km of the processing plant site at the Cardinia Gold Project.
• Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at both prospects:

Cardinia Hill	9m at 3.05g/t Au from 46m including 1m at 11.7g/t from 51m
	(CH19AC018)
	8m at 2.17g/t Au from 19m including 1m at 7.80g/t from 19m
	(CH19AC019)
	6m at 1.87g/t Au from 29m (CH19AC010)
Black Chief	3m at 3.47g/t Au from 47m (BC19AC009)
	3m at 2.55g/t Au from 18m (BC19AC004)

• Both prospects contain high grade zones of gold mineralisation within a lower grade halo.
• Assays for the remaining 1m split samples at Comedy King, Lewis East, and Lewis West are expected in the coming weeks.
• Full Interpretation is underway ahead of expected follow-up drilling in March 2020.

Kin Mining NL (ASX: KIN or Company) is pleased to advise of the return of initial assay results from 1m split samples generated from the aircore drilling program completed in December 2019 at the Cardinia Gold Project (CGP) near Leonora, Western Australia. The 1 metre samples were collected from 4m composite samples greater than 0.1g/t Au to allow for better definition of the mineralised zones. Refer ASX announcement 13 January 2020.

The results have confirmed the overall grade of the composite samples and have defined narrow, high grade cores within the wider mineralised zones defined by the 4m composite sampling. A full interpretation of all the recent drilling results in conjunction with previous drilling results is underway. Follow up drilling is expected to be conducted in March 2020.

Commenting on the CGP drill results, Managing Director Andrew Munckton said:

"The aircore drilling program completed in December 2019 was successful at defining three new deposits at Comedy King, Lewis South and Cardinia Hill where wide intersections of mineralisation with areas of high grade were encountered in 4 metre composite sampling.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

"These zones of mineralisation are now being refined with the 1 metre sampling of anomalous zones, resulting is generally narrower and higher grade intersections. The high grade zones are now being used to enhance the targeting for the upcoming RC drilling program and the proposed step out aircore drilling program scheduled for commencement in March 2020.

"The success of this first aircore drilling program at defining very significant mineralisation separate to the know deposits at the CGP indicates the Cardinia contains an abundance of mineralisation that warrants significant drilling. There is strong potential to define additional high grade mineralisation to compliment the Mineral Resources already defined and enhance the economics of the Pre- Feasibility Study completed in August 2019."

Cardinia Hill

The results from the 1m split samples at Cardinia Hill have confirmed the thickness and overall grade of the original composite assays. Refer Table 1 and ASX announcement 13 January 2020 for original drill hole details.

The improved definition available from the 1m split samples has highlighted several higher grade gold mineralised zones within the broader mineralised envelope defined by the original 4m composite assays.

In drill hole CH19AC018 the original 4m composite sampling resulted in a mineralised intersection totalling 24m at 1.64g/t Au from 32m to bottom of hole (56m) using a 0.2g/t Au cut-off grade.

Resampling of the 1m samples resulted in a narrower, higher grade zone of mineralisation totalling 9m at 3.05g/t au from 46m using a 1.0g/t Au cut-off grade. Other lower grade (less than 1.0g/t Au) mineralisation is present from 33m downhole but is not reported.

The high grade zones at Cardinia Hill are associated with a pyritic chert, interpreted to be a continuous feature concordant with stratigraphy. The mineralisation has been confirmed over 250m of strike length and is open and untested by drilling to the NW and SE (Figure 1), as well as at depth (Figure 2). Further drilling is planned to assess the extent of the mineralisation.

		Hole ID	From (m)		To (m)		Width (m)		Gold (g/t)			Comments
		CH19AC004	10		11		1		1.75
		CH19AC005	33		35		2		3.04
		CH19AC007	6		9		3		1.50
		CH19AC010	24		25		1		1.74
		29		35		6		1.87
		CH19AC011	10		11		2		2.15
		CH19AC012	29		31		2		1.84
		CH19AC015	16		17		1		1.15
		CH19AC017	8		9		1		1.17
		CH19AC018	8		9		1		1.32
		46		55		9		3.05			Incl. 1m @ 11.7g/t
			5		6		1		1.90
		CH19AC019	9		11		2		2.39
		15		16		1		2.47
			19		27		8		2.17			Incl. 1m @ 7.80g/t
		CH19AC020	21		22		1		3.21

Table 1: Significant intercepts (>1g/t) for the 1m split samples of the Cardinia Hill aircore drilling program.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

2

Figure 1: One metre split assay results from the Cardinia Hill aircore drilling program.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

3

Figure 2: Cross-section through the Cardinia Hill prospect showing gold mineralisation defined by 1 metre split assays.

Black Chief

Assays from the 1m split samples of the Black Chief aircore program produced intercepts of 3m at 3.47g/t Au from 47m and 3m at 2.55g/t from 18m (refer Table 2 and ASX announcement 13 January 2020 for original drill hole details).

These intercepts are hosted with a ferruginous sediment with significant quartz veining. The geological setting is comparable to the mineralisation at the Black Chief workings located approximately 300m to the north. The mineralisation intersected in the recent aircore drilling is interpreted to represent the southern continuation of this mineralisation. Further drilling is planned to the north and south to assess the extent of the mineralisation and its relationship to the main Black Chief surface workings.

	Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	Gold (g/t)
	BC19AC003	41	42	1	1.13
	BC19AC004	18	21	3	2.55
	BC19AC005	12	13	1	1.13
	BC19AC009	47	50	3	3.47

Table 2: Significant intercepts (>1g/t) for the 1m split samples of the Black Chief aircore drilling program.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

4

Figure 3: One metre split sample assay results from the Black Chief aircore drilling program.

-ENDS-

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

5

For further information, please contact:
Investor enquiries	Media enquiries
Andrew Munckton	Michael Vaughan
Managing Director, Kin Mining NL	Fivemark Partners
[phone]	[phone]

About Kin Mining NL

Kin Mining NL (ASX: KIN) is a West Australian based gold development and exploration company. Kin's key focus is its 100% owned Cardinia Gold Project (CGP) located in the highly prospective North-Eastern Goldfields region of Western Australia. The CGP has an 945koz1 gold Mineral Resource defined in both oxide and deeper primary mineralisation with considerable potential to grow this resource with further drilling.

COMPETENT PERSON'S STATEMENT

The information contained in this report relating to exploration results relates to information compiled or reviewed by Glenn Grayson. Mr. Grayson is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is a full-time employee of the company. Mr. Grayson has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposit under consideration, and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the JORC "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves".

Mr. Grayson consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

6

Appendix A

JORC 2012 TABLE 1 REPORT

Cardinia Gold Project - Section 1 & 2

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

	Criteria		 JORC Code explanation
	Sampling techniques		Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
			channels, random chips, or specific
			specialised industry standard
			measurement tools appropriate to the
			minerals under investigation, such as
			down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
			XRF instruments, etc). These examples
			should not be taken as limiting the
			broad meaning of sampling.
			Include reference to measures taken to
			ensure sample representivity and the
			appropriate calibration of any
			measurement tools or systems used.
			Aspects of the determination of
			mineralisation that are Material to the
			Public Report.
			In cases where 'industry standard' work
			has been done this would be relatively
			simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling
			was used to obtain 1 m samples from
			which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
			30g charge for fire assay'). In other
			cases more explanation may be
			required, such as where there is coarse

Commentary

Diamond

Historic (pre-2014) diamond core (DD) sampling utilised half core or quarter core sample intervals; typically varying from 0.3m to 1.4m in length. 1m sample intervals were favoured and sample boundaries principally coincided with geological contacts.

Recent (2014-2018) diamond core (DD) samples, either HQ3 or NQ2 in size diameter, were either cut in half longitudinally or further cut into quarters, using a powered diamond core drop saw centered over a cradle holding core in place. Core sample intervals varied from 0.2 to 1.25m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries which respected geological contacts.

2019 diamond core samples, either HQ3 or NQ2 in size diameter, were either cut in half longitudinally or a third longitudinally, using an automated Corewise core saw Core was placed in boats, holding core in place. Core sample intervals varied from 0.3 to 1.3m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries which respected geological contacts.

RC

Historic reverse circulation (RC) drill samples were collected over 1m downhole intervals beneath a cyclone and typically riffle split to obtain a sub-sample (typically 3-4kg). 1m sub-samples were typically collected in pre-numbered calico bags and 1m sample rejects were commonly stored at the drill site. 3m or 4m composited interval samples were often collected by using a scoop (dry samples) or spear (wet samples). If composite samples returned anomalous results once assayed, the single metre sub-samples of the anomalous composite intervals were retrieved and submitted for individual gold analysis.

Recent reverse circulation (RC) drill samples were collected by passing through a cyclone, a sample collection box, and riffle or cone splitter. All RC sub-samples were collected over one metre downhole intervals and averaged 3-4kg.

2019 RC drilling samples were collected in 1m downhole intervals by passing through a cyclone, a collection box and then dropping through a cone splitter. All RC sub-samples were collected over one metre downhole intervals and averaged 3-4kg.

AC/RAB

Historic air core (AC) and rotary air blast (RAB) were typically collected at 1 metre intervals and placed on the ground with 3-4kgsub-samples collected using a scoop or spear. Three metre or four metre composited interval samples were often collected by using a scoop (dry samples) or spear (wet samples). If composite samples returned anomalous results once assayed, the single metre sub-samples of the anomalous composite intervals were retrieved and submitted for individual gold analysis.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Drilling techniques	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,
	open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
	auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details
	(eg core diameter, triple or standard
	tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
	sampling bit or other type, whether core
	is oriented and if so, by what method,
	etc).

Assay Methodology

Historic sample analysis typically included a number of commercial laboratories with preparation as per the following method, oven drying (90-110°C), crushing (<-2mm to <-6mm), pulverizing (<-75μm to <-105μm), and riffle split to obtain a 30, 40, or 50gram catchweight for gold analysis. Fire Assay fusion, with AAS finish was the common method of analysis however, on occasion, initial assaying may have been carried out via Aqua Regia digest and AAS/ICP finish. Anomalous samples were subsequently re-assayed by Fire Assay fusion and AAS/ICP finish.

Recent sample analysis typically included oven drying (105-110°C), crushing (<-6mm & <-2mm), pulverising (P90% <-75μm) and sample splitting to a representative 50gram catchweight sample for gold only analysis using Fire Assay fusion with AAS finish.

Multi element analysis was also conducted on approximately 10% of samples, predominantly through ore zones. This was conducted via a 4-acid digest with ICP-MS/OES determination for a 48 element suite.

Rock Chips

All rock chip samples are taken using a pick. The samples are taken from outcrop where possible. Samples are also taken from in situ float material or waste rock around historic workings, where outcrop is not present. Care is taken to ensure all samples are representative of the medium being sampled. For example, if a 1m sediment unit is being sampled, a channel sample will be taken across the entire unit.

All recent drilling, sample collection and sample handling procedures were conducted and/or supervised by KIN geology personnel to high level industry standards. QA/QC procedures were implemented during each drilling program to industry standards.

Drilling carried out since 1986 and up to the most recent drill programs completed by KIN Mining was obtained from a combination of reverse circulation (RC), diamond core (DD), air core (AC), and rotary air blast (RAB) drilling.

Data prior to 1986 is limited due to lack of exploration.

Diamond

Historic DD was carried out using industry standard 'Q' wireline techniques, with the core retrieved from the inner tubes and placed in core trays. Core sizes include NQ/NQ3 (Ø 45-48mm) and HQ/HQ3 (Ø 61-64mm). At the end of each core run, the driller placed core blocks in the tray, marked with hole number and depth. Core recovery was usually measured for each core run and recorded onto the geologist's drill logs.

2017 - 2018 DD was carried out by contractor Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd ("Orbit Drilling") with a Mitsubishi truck-mounted Hydco 1200H 8x4 drill rig, using industry standard 'Q' wireline techniques. 2019 DD was carried out y Topdrill Pty Ltd. With a Sandvick DE840 mounted on a Mercedes Benz 4144 Actros 8x8 Carrier. The rig is fitted with Sandvik DA555 hands free diamond drilling rod handler and Austex hands free hydraulic breakout.

Drill core is retrieved from the inner tubes and placed in plastic core trays and each core run depth recorded onto core marker blocks and placed at the end of each run in the tray. Core sizes include NQ2 (Ø 47mm) and HQ3 (Ø 64mm).

Recent DD core recovery and orientation was obtained for each core run where possible, using electronic core orientation tools (e.g. Reflex EZ-ACT) and the 'bottom of core' marked accordingly.

2017 -18 drilling was measured at regular downhole intervals, typically at 10-15m from surface and then every 30m to bottom of hole, using electronic multi-shot downhole survey tools (i.e. Reflex EZ-TRAC or Camteq Proshot). Independent programs of downhole deviation surveying were also carried out to validate previous surveys. These programs utilised either electronic

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

8

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core
	and chip sample recoveries and results
	assessed.
	Measures taken to maximise sample
	recovery and ensure representative
	nature of the samples.

continuous logging survey tool (AusLog A698 deviation tool) or gyroscopic survey equipment.

2019 DD was surveyed at regular downhole intervals (every 30m with an additional end-of-hole survey) using electronic gyroscopic survey equipment.

RC

Historic RC drilling used conventional reverse circulation drilling techniques, utilising a cross-over sub, or face-sampling hammers with bit shrouds. Drill bit sizes typically ranged between 110-140mm.

2017-18 RC drilling was carried out by Orbit Drilling's truck-mounted Hydco 350RC 8x8 Actross drill rigs with 350psi/1250cfm air compressor, with auxiliary and booster air compressors (when required). Drilling utilised mostly downhole face-sampling hammer bits (Ø 140mm), with occasional use of blade bits for highly oxidized and soft formations. The majority of drilling retrieved dry samples, with the occasional use of the auxiliary and booster air compressors beneath the water table, to maintain dry sample return as much as possible. RC drillhole deviations were surveyed downhole, typically carried out inside a non-magnetic stainless steel (s/s) rod located above the hammer, using electronic multi-shot downhole tool (e.g. Reflex EZ- TRAC). In some instances, drillholes were surveyed later in open hole. Independent programs of downhole deviation surveying were also carried out to validate previous surveys. These programs utilised either electronic continuous logging survey tool (AusLog A698 deviation tool) or gyroscopic survey equipment.

2019 RC drilling was carried out by Swick Mining Services truck-mounted Swick version Schramm 685 RC Drill Rig (Rod Handler

• Rotary Cone Splitter) with support air truck and dust suppression equipment. Drilling utilised downhole face-sampling hammer bits (Ø 140mm). The majority of drilling retrieved dry samples, with the occasional use of the auxiliary and booster air compressors beneath the water table, to maintain dry sample return as much as possible.

2019 RC was surveyed at regular downhole intervals (every 30m with an additional end-of-hole survey) using electronic gyroscopic survey equipment.

AC/RAB

Historic AC drilling was conducted utilising suitable rigs with appropriate compressors (eg 250psi/600cfm). AC holes were drilled using 'blade' or 'wing' bits, until the bit was unable to penetrate ('blade refusal'), often near the fresh rock interface. Hammer bits were used only when it was deemed necessary to penetrate further into the fresh rock profile or through notable "hard boundaries" in the regolith profile. No downhole surveying is noted to have been undertaken on AC drillholes.

Historic RAB drilling was carried out using small air compressors (eg 250psi/600cfm) and drill rods fitted with a percussion hammer or blade bit, with the sample return collected at the drillhole collar using a stuffing box and cyclone collection techniques. Drillhole sizes generally range between 75-110mm. No downhole surveying is noted to have been undertaken on RAB drillholes.

Diamond

Historic core recovery was recorded in drill logs for most of the diamond drilling programs since 1985. A review of historical reports indicates that core recovery was generally good (>80%) with lesser recoveries recorded in zones of broken ground and/or areas of mineralisation. Overall recoveries are considered acceptable for resource estimation.

Recent core recovery data was recorded for each run by measuring total length of core retrieved against the downhole interval actually drilled and stored in the database. KIN representatives continuously monitor core recovery and core presentation quality as drilling is conducted and issues or discrepancies are rectified promptly to maintain industry best standards. Core

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

9

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Logging	Whether core and chip samples have
	been geologically and geotechnically
	logged to a level of detail to support
	appropriate Mineral Resource
	estimation, mining studies and
	metallurgical studies.
	Whether logging is qualitative or
	quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
	channel, etc) photography.
	The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.

recoveries averaged >95%, even when difficult ground conditions were being encountered. When poor ground conditions were anticipated, a triple tube drilling configuration was utilised to maximize core recovery

RC/AC/RAB

Historic sample recovery information for RC, AC, and RAB drilling is limited.

Recent RC drilling samples are preserved as best as possible during the drilling process. At the end of each 1 metre downhole interval, the driller stops advancing, retracts from the bottom of hole, and waits for the sample to clear from the bottom of the hole through to the sample collector box fitted beneath the cyclone. The sample is then released from the sample collector box and passed through either a 3-tiered riffle splitter or cone splitter fitted beneath the sample box.

Drilling prior to 2018 utilised riffle split collection whereas sample collection via a cone splitter was conducted for drilling undertaken since March 2018; cyclone cleaning processes remained the same.

Sample reject is collected in plastic bags, and a 3-4kgsub-sample is collected in pre-marked calico bags for analysis. Once the samples have been collected, the cyclone, sample collector box and riffle splitter are flushed with compressed air, and the splitter cleaned by the off-sider using a compressed air hose at both the end of each 6 metre drill rod and then extensively cleaned at the completion of each hole. This process is maintained throughout the entire drilling program to maximise drill sample recovery and to maintain a high level of representivity of the material being drilled.

RC drill sample recoveries are not recorded in the database however a review by Carras Mining Pty Ltd (CM) in 2017, of RC drill samples stored in the field, and ongoing observations of RC drill rigs in operation by KIN representatives, suggests that RC sample recoveries were mostly consistent and typically very good (>90%).

Collected samples are deemed reliable and representative of drilled material and no material discrepancy, that would impede a mineral resource estimate, exists between collected RC primary and sub-samples.

Logging data coded in the database, prior to 2014, illustrates at least four different lithological code systems, a legacy of numerous past operators (Hunter, MPI, Metana, CIM, MEGM, Pacmin, SOG, and Navigator). Correlation between codes is difficult to establish however, based on historical reports, drill hole logging procedures appear consistent with normal industry practices of the time.

KIN has attempted to validate historical logging data and to standardize the logging code system by incorporating the SOG and Navigator logging codes into one.

Diamond

Historical diamond core logging was recorded into drill logs for most of the diamond drilling programs since 1985. A review of historical reports indicates that logging noted core recovery, fractures per metre and RQD, lithology, alteration, texture, mineralisation, weathering, and other features. Core was then marked up for cutting and sampling.

Navigator's procedure for logging of diamond core included firstly marking of the bottom of the core (for successful core orientations), then recording of core recovery, fractures per metre and RQD, lithology, alteration, texture, mineralisation, weathering, and other features. Core was then marked up for cutting and sampling. Navigator DD logging is predominantly to geological contacts.

Navigator logging information was entered directly into hand held digital data loggers and transferred directly to the database, after validation, to minimize data entry errors.

Drill core photographs, for drilling prior to 2014, are available only for diamond drillholes completed by Navigator.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

10

	Criteria		 JORC Code explanation		Commentary
					KIN DD logging is carried out on site once geology personnel retrieve core trays from the drill rig site. Core is collected from the
					rig daily. The entire length of every hole is logged. Recorded data includes lithology, alteration, structure, texture,
					mineralisation, sulphide content, weathering and other features. Drillhole collar coordinates, azimuth, dip, depth and sampling
					intervals are also recorded. KIN DD logging is to geological contacts.
					Qualitative logging includes classification and description of lithology, weathering, oxidation, colour, texture and grain size.
					Quantitative logging includes percentages of identified minerals, veining, and structural measurements (using a kenometer
					tool). In addition, logging of diamond drilling includes geotechnical data, RQD and core recoveries.
					Drill core is photographed at the Cardinia site, prior to any cutting and/or sampling, and then stored in this location.
					Photographs are available for every diamond drillhole completed by KIN and a selection of various RC chip trays. SG data is also
					collect
					All information collected is entered directly into laptop computers or tablets, validated in the field, and then transferred to the
					database.
					The level of logging detail is considered appropriate for exploration and to support appropriate mineral resource estimation,
					mining studies, and metallurgical studies.
					Diamond drillholes completed for geotechnical purposes were independently logged for structural data by geotechnical
					consultants.
					RC/AC/RAB
					Historical RC, AC, and RAB logging (including Navigator) was entered on a metre by metre basis. Logging consisted of lithology,
					alteration, texture, mineralisation, weathering, and other features
					For the majority of historical drilling (pre-2004) the entire length of each drillhole have been logged from surface to 'end of
					hole'.
					KIN RC logging of was carried out in the field and logging has predominantly been undertaken on a metre by metre basis. KIN
					logging is inclusive of the entire length of each RC drillhole from surface to 'end of hole'.
					Recorded data includes lithology, alteration, structure, texture, mineralisation, sulphide content, weathering and other
					features. Drillhole collar coordinates, azimuth, dip, depth and sampling intervals are also recorded.
					Qualitative logging includes classification and description of lithology, weathering, oxidation, colour, texture and grain size.
					Quantitative logging includes identification and percentages of mineralogy, sulphides, mineralisation, and veining.
					Photographs are available for a selection of recent KIN RC drillholes.
					All information collected is entered directly into laptop computers or tablets, validated in the field, and then transferred to the
					database.
					The level of logging detail is considered appropriate for exploration and to support appropriate mineral resource estimation,
					mining studies, and metallurgical studies.
					Rock Chips
					All rock chip samples are inspected by the sampling geologist and logged for lithology, alteration, mineralisation, veining, and
					structural fabric. This is a combination of qualitative and quantitative data.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

11

	Criteria		 JORC Code explanation
	Sub-sampling techniques and		If core, whether cut or sawn and
	sample preparation		whether quarter, half or all core taken.
			If non-core, whether riffled, tube
			sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
			sampled wet or dry.
			For all sample types, the nature, quality
			and appropriateness of the sample
			preparation technique.
			Quality control procedures adopted for
			all sub-sampling stages to maximise
			representivity of samples.
			Measures taken to ensure that the
			sampling is representative of the in situ
			material collected, including for instance
			results for field duplicate/second-half
			sampling.
			Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
			the grain size of the material being
			sampled.

Commentary

Diamond

Historic diamond drill core (NQ/NQ3 or HQ/HQ3) samples collected for analysis were longitudinally cut in half, and occasionally in quarters for the larger (HQ/HQ3) diameter holes, using a powered diamond core drop saw centered over a cradle holding the core in place. Half core or quarter core sample intervals typically varied from 0.3m to 1.4m in length. 1m sample intervals were favoured and are the most common method of sampling, however sample boundaries do principally coincide with geological contacts. The remaining core was retained in core trays.

2017-18 diamond drill core samples collected for analysis were longitudinally cut in half, with some samples cut into quarters, using a powered diamond core drop saw blade centered over a cradle holding the core in place. Core sample intervals varied from 0.2 to 1.25m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries which respected geological contacts. The remaining core was retained in their respective core trays and stored in KIN's yard for future reference. All KIN diamond drill core is securely stored at the KIN Leonora Yard.

2019 diamond drill core samples collected for analysis were longitudinally cut in half, with some samples cut into thirds, using an automated Corewise powered diamond core saw with the blade centered over a boat holding the core in place. Core sample intervals varied from 0.2 to 1.25m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries which respected geological contacts. The remaining core was retained in their respective core trays and stored in KIN's yard for future reference. All KIN diamond drill core is securely stored at the Cardinia coreyard.

All sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation procedures conducted and/or supervised by KIN geology personnel are to standard industry practice. Sub-sampling and sample preparation techniques used are considered to maximise representivity of drilled material. QA/QC procedures implemented during each drilling program are to industry standard practice.

Samples sizes are considered appropriate for this style of gold mineralisation and as an industry accepted method for evaluation of gold deposits in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.

RC/AC/RAB

Historic sampling was predominantly conducted by collecting 1m samples from beneath a cyclone and either retaining these primary samples or passing through a riffle splitter to obtain a 3-4kgsub-sample for analysis. First pass sampling often involved collecting composite samples by using a scoop (dry samples) or spear/tube (wet samples) to obtain 3m or 4m composited intervals, with the single metre split samples being retained at the drill site as spoil or in sample bags. If composite sample assays returned anomalous results, the single metre samples for this composite were retrieved and submitted for analysis. RC/AC/RAB sampling procedures are believed to be consistent with the normal industry practices at the time.

Samples obtained from conventional RC drilling techniques with cross-over subs often suffered from down hole contamination, especially beneath the water table. Samples obtained from RC drilling techniques using the face sampling hammer suffered less from down hole contamination and were more likely to be kept dry beneath the water table, particularly if auxiliary and booster air compressors were used. These samples are considered to be representative.

The vast majority of Reverse Circulation (RC) drill samples were collected at 1m downhole intervals from beneath a cyclone and then riffle split to obtain a sub-sample (typically 3-4kg). After splitting, 1m sub-samples were typically collected in pre- numbered calico bags, and the 1m sample rejects were commonly stored at the drill site in marked plastic bags, for future reference. First pass sampling often involved collecting composite samples by using a scoop (dry samples) or spear/tube (wet samples) to obtain 3m or 4m composited intervals, with the single metre split sub-samples being retained at the drill site. If the composite sample assays returned anomalous results, single metre sub-samples for the anomalous composite intervals were

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

12

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

retrieved and submitted for analysis.

Navigator included standards, fields duplicate splits (since 2009), and blanks within each drill sample batch, at a ratio of 1 for every 20 samples, with the number of standards being inserted at a ratio of 1 for every 50 samples.

Recent RC sub-samples were collected over 1 metre downhole intervals and retained in pre-marked calico bags, after passing through a cyclone and either a riffle splitter, prior to March 2018, or cone splitter, after March 2018. The majority of RC sub- samples consistently averaged 3-4kg. Sample reject from the riffle splitter were retained and stored in plastic bags, and located near each drillhole site. When drilling beneath the water table, the majority of sample returns were kept dry by the use of the auxiliary and booster air compressors. Very few wet samples were collected through the splitter, and the small number of wet or damp samples is not considered material for resource estimation work.

KIN RC drill programs utilise field duplicates, at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:25, and assay results indicate that there is reasonable analytical repeatability; considering the presence of nuggety gold.

All sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation procedures conducted and/or supervised by KIN geology personnel are to standard industry practice. Sub-sampling and sample preparation techniques used are considered to maximise representivity of drilled material. QA/QC procedures implemented during each drilling program are to industry standard practice.

Samples sizes are considered appropriate for this style of gold mineralisation and as an industry accepted method for evaluation of gold deposits in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.

No duplicates are taken for rock chip sampling. Sample sizes are approximately 3kg, this is considered appropriate for the material being sampled.

Numerous assay laboratories and various sample preparation and assay techniques have been used since 1981. Historical reporting and descriptions of laboratory sample preparation, assaying procedures, and quality control protocols for the samples from the various drilling programs are variable in their descriptions and completeness.

Assay data obtained prior to 2001 is incomplete and the nature of results could not be accurately quantified due to the combinations of various laboratories and analytical methodologies utilised.

Since 1993, the majority of samples submitted to the various laboratories were typically prepared for analysis firstly by oven drying, crushing and pulverizing to a nominal 85% passing 75µm.

In the initial exploration stages, Aqua Regia digest with AAS/ICP finish, was generally used as a first pass detection method, with follow up analysis by Fire Assay fusion and AAS/ICP finish. This was a common practice at the time. Mineralised intervals were subsequently Fire Assayed (using 30, 40 or 50 gram catchweights) with AAS/ICP finish.

Approximately 15-20% of the sampled AC holes may have been subject to Aqua Regia digest methods only, however AC samples were predominantly within the oxide profile, where aqua regia results would not be significantly different to results from fire assay methods.

Limited information is available regarding check assays for drilling programs prior to 2004.

During 2004-2014, Navigator utilised six different commercial laboratories during their drilling programs, however Kalgoorlie Assay Laboratories conducted the majority of assaying for diamond, RC, and AC samples using Fire Assay fusion on 40 gram catchweights with AAS/ICP finish.

Since 2009 Navigator regularly included field duplicates and Certified Reference Material (CRM), standards and blanks, with their

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

13

	Criteria		 JORC Code explanation		Commentary
					sample batch submissions to laboratories at average ratio of 1 in 20 samples. Sample assay repeatability and blank and CRM
					standard assay results were typically within acceptable limits.
					KIN sample analysis from 2014 to 2018 was conducted by SGS Australia Pty Ltd's ("SGS") Kalgoorlie and Perth laboratories. Sample
					preparation included oven drying (105°C), crushing (<6mm), pulverising (P90% passing 75µm) and riffle split to obtain a 50 gram
					catchweight. Analysis for gold only was carried out by Fire Assay fusion technique with AAS finish (SGS Lab Code FAA505).
					 KIN regularly insert blanks and CRM standards in each sample batch at a ratio of 1:50. This allows for at least one blank and
					one CRM standard to be included in each of the laboratory's fire assay batch of 50 samples. Field duplicates are typically
					collected at a ratio of 1:50 samples and test sample assay repeatability. Blanks and CRM standards assay result performance
					is predominantly within acceptable limits for this style of gold mineralisation.
					 KIN requests laboratory pulp grind and crush checks at a ratio of 1:50 or less since May 2018 in order to better qualify sample
					preparation and evaluate laboratory performance. Samples have generally illustrated appropriate crush and grind size
					percentages since the addition of this component to the sample analysis procedure.
					 SGS include laboratory blanks and CRM standards as part of their internal QA/QC for sample preparation and analysis, as well
					as regular assay repeats. Sample pulp assay repeatability, and internal blank and CRM standards assay results are typically
					within acceptable limits.
					From late 2018 samples have been analysed by Intertek Genalysis, with sample preparation either at their Kalgoorlie prep
					laboratory or the Perth Laboratory located in Maddington. Sample preparation included oven drying (105°C), crushing (<6mm),
					pulverising (P90% passing 75µm) and split to obtain a 50 gram catchweight. Analysis for gold only was carried out by Fire Assay
					fusion technique with AAS finish.
					 KIN regularly insert blanks and CRM standards in each sample batch at a ratio of 1:25. Kin accepts that this ratio of QAQC is
					industry standard. Field duplicates are typically collected at a ratio of 1:25 samples and test sample assay repeatability. Blanks
					and CRM standards assay result performance is predominantly within acceptable limits for this style of gold mineralisation.
					 KIN requests laboratory pulp grind and crush checks at a ratio of 1:50 or less since May 2018 in order to better qualify sample
					preparation and evaluate laboratory performance. Samples have generally illustrated appropriate crush and grind size
					percentages since the addition of this component to the sample analysis procedure.
					 Genalysis include laboratory blanks and CRM standards as part of their internal QA/QC for sample preparation and analysis,
					as well as regular assay repeats. Sample pulp assay repeatability, and internal blank and CRM standards assay results are
					typically within acceptable limits.
					The nature and quality of the assaying and laboratory procedures used are considered to be satisfactory and appropriate for use
					in mineral resource estimations.
					Fire Assay fusion is considered to be a total extraction technique. The majority of assay data used for the mineral resource
					estimations were obtained by the Fire Assay technique with AAS or ICP finish. AAS and ICP methods of detection are both
					considered to be suitable and appropriate methods of detection for this style of mineralisation
					Aqua Regia is considered a partial extraction technique, where gold encapsulated in refractory sulphides or some silicate minerals
					may not be fully dissolved, resulting in partial reporting of gold content.
					No other analysis techniques have been used to determine gold assays.
					Ongoing QAQC monitoring program identified one particular CRM returning spurious results. Further analysis demonstrated that

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

14

	Criteria			 JORC Code explanation			Commentary
								the standard was compromised and was subsequently removed and destroyed. A replacement CRM of similar grade was
								substituted into the QAQC program.
								KIN continues to both develop and reinforce best practice QAQC methods for all drilling operations and the treatment and
								analysis of samples. Regular laboratory site visits and audits have been introduced since April 2018 and will be conducted on a
								quarterly basis. This measure will ensure that all aspects of KIN QAQC practices are adhered to and align with industry best
								practice.
								All rock chip samples have been submitted to Intertek Genalysis (Perth) for analysis by 50g Fire assay, with multi-element analysis
								via a 4-acid digest for a 48-element suite. Sample preparation included oven drying (105°C), crushing (<6mm), pulverising (P90%
								passing 75µm). Blanks and standards are inserted by the lab at a minimum rate of 1 in 50. Lab repeats are performed for samples
								with particularly high gold values. Due to the nature and intended uses of this data, this QAQC procedure is intentionally less
								rigorous than that used for drilling samples.
	Verification of sampling and			The verification of significant			Verification of sampling, assay techniques, and results prior to 2004 is limited due to the legacy of the involvement of various
	assaying			intersections by either independent or			companies, personnel, drilling equipment, sampling protocols and analytical techniques at different laboratories.
					alternative company personnel.			During 2009, a selection of significant intersections had been verified by Navigator's company geologists and an independent
					The use of twinned holes.			consultant McDonald Speijers ("MS"). MS were able to validate 92% of the assay records in 50 randomly selected check holes, and
							only 6 assay discrepancies were detected (< 0.2%), only 2 of those were considered significant. MS concluded that the very small
					Documentation of primary data, data			proportion of discrepancies indicated that the assay database was probably reliable at that time.
					entry procedures, data verification, data			In 2009, Runge Ltd ("Runge") completed a mineral resource estimate report for the Cardinia Project area, including the Helens,
					storage (physical and electronic)			Rangoon, Kyte and Bruno_Lewis deposits. Runge's database verification included basic visual validation in Surpac and field
					protocols.			verification of drillhole positions in February 2009. Runge did not report any significant issues with the database.
					Discuss any adjustment to assay data.			Since 2014, significant drill intersections have been verified by KIN company geologists during the course of the drilling programs.
							During 2017, Carras Mining Pty Ltd ("CM") carried out an independent data verification. 38,098 assay records for KIN 2014-2017
								drilling programs were verified by comparing laboratory assay reports against the database. 6 errors were found, which are not
								considered material and which represented only 0.03% of all database records verified for KIN 2014-2017 drilling programs
								No adjustments, averaging or calibrations are made to any of the assay data recorded in the database. QA/QC protocol is
								considered industry standard with standard reference material submitted on a routine basis.
								Recent (2014-2018) RC and diamond drilling by KIN included twinning of some historical holes within the Helens and Rangoon
								resource areas. There is no significant material difference between historical drilling information and KIN drilling information.
								Areas without twinned holes illustrate a drill density that is considered sufficient to enable comparison with surrounding historic
								information. No material difference of a negative nature exists between historical drilling information and KIN drilling
								information.
								KIN diamond holes drilled for metallurgical and geotechnical test work illustrate assay results with adequate correlation to both
								nearby historical and recent drilling results.
								No adjustment or calibration has been made to assay data.
	Location of data points			Accuracy and quality of surveys used to			Several local grids were established and used by previous project owners. During the 1990s, SOG transformed the surface survey
					locate drill holes (collar and down-hole			data firstly to AMG and subsequently to MGA (GDA94 zone51).
		Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP	15

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Data spacing and distribution	Data spacing for reporting of

Navigator recognised errors in the collar co-ordinates resulting from transformations and as a result, a significant number of holes were resurveyed and a new MGA grid transformation generated. Historical collars have been validated against the original local grid co-ordinates and independently transformed to MGA co-ordinates and checked against the database. Navigator's MGA coordinates were checked against the surveyor's reports.

Drilling was carried out using these various local grids. Since 2004, All Navigators drill hole collars were surveyed on completion of drilling in the Australian MGA94, Zone51 grid using RTK-DGPS equipment by licensed surveyors, with more than 80% of the pickups carried out by independent contractors.

Almost all the diamond and at least 70% of Navigator RC holes were downhole surveyed. Pre-Navigator, single shot survey cameras were used, with typical survey intervals of 30-40 metres.

Recent KIN drill hole collars are located and recorded in the field by a contract surveyor using RTK-DGPS (with a horizontal and vertical accuracy of ±50mm). Location data was collected in the GDA94 Zone51 grid coordinate system.

Downhole surveying was predominantly carried out by the drilling contractor which, prior to late 2018, was Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd. This was conducted using a downhole electronic single shot magnetic tool. (Relfex EZ-shot), which is industry standard practice. This is considered sufficiently accurate except where significant magnetic interference is encountered. The magnetic field is recorded on every survey and flagged when likely to interfere with the reading. These surveys are downgraded in the database. In addition, if the downhole survey tool is located within 15 metres of the surface, there is risk of influence from the drill rig affecting the azimuth readings. This was observed for the survey readings, which include total magnetic intensity (TMI) measurements, where TMI is spurious for readings taken at downhole depths less than 20 metres. These spurious readings are included in the database, but are not used.

Downhole surveying in 2019 has been conducted by the drilling contractors (Topdrill Pty Ltd and Swick Mining Services Pty Ltd) utilizing downhole electronic gyroscopic survey tools. These are considered very accurate and not susceptible to magnetic interference. No further surveying required to check drill hole deviation.

A small selection of drillhole collars, which do not have DGPS collar surveys, were picked up with a handheld GPS and individually appraised in regards to their location prior to modelling; the position of these collars is deemed appropriate for the resource estimation work.

Considering the history of grid transformations and surviving documentation, there might be some residual risk of error in the MGA co-ordinates for old drillholes, however this is not considered to be material for the resource estimation.

Azimuth data was historically recorded relative to magnetic north. Much of the historical drilling data was recorded relative to magnetic north. Variation in magnetic declination for the Cardinia Project area is calculated at +0.823° East (1985) to +1.301° East (2017), with a maximum variation of +1.575° in 2005. The difference between true north and magnetic north, and the annual variation in magnetic declination since 1985 is not significant, therefore magnetic north measurements have been used, where true north data is unavailable, for all survey data used in resource estimation processes.

The accuracy of drill hole collars and downhole data are located with sufficient accuracy for use in resource estimation work.

For rock chip samples, locations are recorded at the time of sampling using a handheld GPS in the GDA94 Zone51 grid coordinate system.

Drill hole spacing patterns vary considerably throughout the Cardinia Gold Project area and are deposit specific, depending on the nature and style of mineralisation being tested.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

16

	Criteria			 JORC Code explanation		Commentary
				Exploration Results.		Drill hole spacing within the resource areas is sufficient to establish an acceptable degree of geological and grade continuity and is
				Whether the data spacing and		appropriate for both the mineral resource estimation and the resource classifications applied.
				distribution is sufficient to establish the
				degree of geological and grade
				continuity appropriate for the Mineral
				Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
				procedure(s) and classifications applied.
				Whether sample compositing has been
				applied.
	Orientation of data in relation to			Whether the orientation of sampling		The Cardinia greenstone sequence displays a NNW to NW trend. Drilling and sampling programs were carried out to obtain
	geological structure			achieves unbiased sampling of possible		unbiased locations of drill sample data, generally orthogonal to the strike of mineralisation.
				structures and the extent to which this is		At Helens mineralisation is structurally controlled in sub-vertical shear zones, with supergene components of varying lateral
				known, considering the deposit type.		extensiveness present in the oxide profile.

If the relationship between the drilling	The vast majority of historical drilling, pre-Navigator(pre-2004), and KIN drilling is orientated at -60°/245° (WSW) and -60°/065°
(ENE).
orientation and the orientation of key
At Bruno-Lewis and Kyte, mineralisaton is either stratigraphy parallel (trending NNW, steep to moderately W-dipping) or cross-
mineralised structures is considered to
cutting and dipping shallowly to the NE (striking NW). The vast majority of the drilling is therefore predominantly orientated at -
have introduced a sampling bias, this
60°/225-250° or -60°/090°. Grade Control drillholes were drilled vertically. Since late 2018, Kin's drilling has been largely oriented
should be assessed and reported if
to 070° to target contact lodes and 225-250° to target the NE-dipping potassic lodes.
material.
The chance of sample bias introduced by sample orientation is considered minimal. No orientation sampling bias has been
	identified in data thus far.

Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample
	security.

No sample security details are available for pre-Navigator(pre-2004) drill or field samples.

Navigator drill samples (2004-2014) were collected in pre-numbered calico bags at the drill rig site. Samples were then collected by company personnel from the field and transported to the secure Navigator yard in Leonora. Samples were then batch processed (drillhole and sample numbers logged into the database) and then packed into 'bulkabag sacks'. The bulkabags were tied off and stored securely in the Navigator yard until being transported to the selected laboratory. There was no perceived opportunity for the samples to be compromised from collection of samples at the drill site to delivery to the laboratory.

2017 -18 KIN RC drill samples were collected in pre-numbered calico bags at the drill rig site. The samples were then batch processed (drillhole and sample numbers encoded onto a hardcopy sample register) in the field, and then transported and stacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the secure KIN yard location in Leonora. Bulkabags were tied off and stored securely in the yard until being transported to the laboratory.

2019 RC drill samples were collected in pre-numbered calico bags at the drill rig site. The samples were then batch processed (drillhole and sample numbers encoded onto a hardcopy sample register) in the field, and then transported and stacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the Cardinia office.

2017-18 KIN DD samples were obtained by KIN personnel in pre-numbered calico bags at the KIN yard location in Leonora. Samples were then stacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the yard location and stored securely until being transported to the

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

17

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

	Audits or reviews	The results of any audits or reviews of
		sampling techniques and data.

laboratory.

2019 samples were obtained by KIN personnel in pre-numbered calico bags at the core yard located at the Cardinia office. Samples were then stacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the yard location and stored securely until being transported to the laboratory.

Transport contractors are utilised to transport samples to the laboratory. No perceived opportunity for samples to be compromised from collection of samples at the drill site, to delivery to the laboratory, where they were stored in their secure compound, and made ready for processing is deemed likely to have occurred.

On receipt of the samples, the laboratory independently checked the sample submission form to verify samples received and readied the samples for sample preparation. SGS and Genalysis sample security protocols are of industry standard and deemed acceptable for resource estimation work.

Historic drilling and sampling methods and QA/QC are regarded as not being as thoroughly documented compared to current standards. Inhouse reviews of various available historical company reports of drilling and sampling techniques indicates that these were most likely conducted to industry best practice and standards of the day.

Independent geological consultants Runge Ltd completed a review of the Cardinia Project database, drilling and sampling protocols, and so forth in 2009. The Runge report highlighted issues with bulk density and QA/QC analysis within the supplied database. Identified issues were subsequently addressed by Navigator and KIN.

Carras Mining Pty Ltd (CM), an independent geological consultant, reviewed and carried out an audit on the field operations and database in 2017. Drilling and sampling methodologies observed during the site visits were to industry standard. No issues were identified for the supplied databases which could be considered material to a mineral resource estimation. During the review, Carras Mining logged the oxidation profiles (base of complete oxidation and top of fresh rock) for each of the deposit areas, based on visual inspection of selected RC drill chips from KIN's recent drilling programs, and a combination of historical and KIN drillhole logging. Final adjustments were made with input from KIN geologists. The oxidation profiles were used to assign bulk densities and metallurgical recoveries to the 2017 resource models.

Past bulk density test work has been inconsistent with incorrect methods employed, to derive specific gravity or in-situ bulk density, rather than dry bulk density. Navigator (2009) and recent KIN (2017) bulk density test work was carried out using the water immersion method on oven dried, coated samples to derive dry bulk densities for different rock types and oxidation profiles. This information has been incorporated into the database for resource estimation work. CM conducted site visits during 2017 to the laboratory to validate the methodology.

Drilling, sampling methodologies, and assay techniques used in these drilling programs are considered to be appropriate and to mineral exploration industry standards of the day.

Laboratory site visits and audits were introduced in April 2018 and are conducted on a quarterly basis. This measure ensures that all aspects of KIN QAQC practices are adhered to and align with industry best practice.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

18

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

Mineral tenement and land Type, reference name/number, location and ownership

tenure statusincluding agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The Cardinia Project, 35-40km NE of Leonora is managed, explored and maintained by KIN, and constitute a portion of KIN's Leonora Gold Project (LGP), which is located within the Shire of Leonora in the Mt Margaret Mineral Field of the North Eastern Goldfields.

The Helens and Rangoon area includes granted mining tenements M37/316 and M37/317, The tenements are held in the name of Navigator Mining Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of KIN.

The Bruno-Lewis and Kyte areas includes granted mining tenements M37/86, M37/227, M37/277, M37/300, M37/428 and M37/646. The tenements are held in the name of Navigator Mining Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of KIN. The following royalty payment may be applicable to the areas within the Cardinia Project's Bruno and Lewis areas that comprise the deposits being reported on:

				1. Gloucester Coal Ltd (formerly CIM Resources Ltd and Centenary International Mining Ltd) in respect
					of M37/86 - 1% of the quarterly gross value of sales for gold ounces produced, in excess of 10,000
					ounces.
				There are no known native title interests, historical sites, wilderness areas, national park or environmental
				impediments over the outlined current resource areas, and there are no current impediments to obtaining
				a licence to operate in the area.
	Exploration done by other	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. At Cardinia, from 1980-1985, Townson Holdings Pty Ltd ("Townson") mined a small open pit over selected
	parties		historical workings at the Rangoon prospect. Localised instances of drilling relating to this mining event are
				not recorded and are considered insubstantial and immaterial for resource modelling.. Companies
				involved in the collection of the majority of the gold exploration data since 1985 and prior to 2014 include:
				Thames Mining NL ("Thames") 1985; Mt Eden Gold Mines (Aust) NL (also Tarmoola Aust Pty Ltd "MEGM")
				1986-2003; Centenary International Mining Ltd ("CIM") 1986-1988,1991-1992; Metana Minerals NL
				("Metana") 1986-1989; Sons of Gwalia Ltd ("SOG") 1989, 1992-2004; Pacmin Mining Corporation
				("Pacmin") 1998-2001, and Navigator Resources Ltd ("Navigator") 2004-2014.
				In 2009 Navigator commissioned Runge Limited ("Runge") to complete a Mineral Resource estimate for
				the Bruno, Lewis, Kyte, Helens and Rangoon deposits. Runge reported a JORC 2004 compliant Mineral
				Resource estimate, at a cut-off grade of 0.7g/t Au, totaling 1.45Mt @ 1.3 g/t au (61,700 oz Au) for Helens
				and Rangoon, and totaling 4.34Mt @ 1.2 g/t au (169,700 oz Au) for Bruno, Lewis and Kyte.
				A trial pit (Bruno) was mined by Navigator in 2010, and a 'test parcel' of ore was extracted and transported
				firstly to Sons of Gwalia's processing plant in Leonora, and finally to Navigator's processing plant located at
				Bronzewing, where approximately 100,000 tonnes were processed at an average head grade of 2.33 g/t au
				(7,493 oz Au).
	Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The Cardinia Project area is located in the central part of the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, which
				extends for some 600km on a NNW trend across the Archean Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia.
				The regional geology comprises a suite of NNE-North trending greenstones positioned within the
				Mertondale Shear Zone (MSZ) a splay limb of the Kilkenny Lineament. The MSZ denotes the contact
		Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP	19

	Criteria				JORC Code explanation			Commentary
									between Archaean felsic volcanoclastics and sediment sequences in the west and Archaean mafic volcanics
									in the east. Proterozoic dolerite dykes and Archaean felsic porphyries have intruded the sheared
									mafic/felsic volcanoclastic/sedimentary sequence.
									Locally within the Cardinia Project area, the stratigraphy consists of intermediate, mafic and felsic volcanic
									and intrusive lithologies and locally derived epiclastic sediments, which strike NNW, dipping steep-to-
									moderately to the west. Structural foliation of the areas stratigraphy predominantly dips steeply to the
									east but localised inflections are common and structural orientation can vary between moderately (50-75°)
									easterly to moderately westerly dipping.
									Mineralisation at Helens is controlled by a cross-cutting fault, hosted predominantly in mafic rock units,
									adjacent to the felsic volcanic/sediment contacts. The ore zones are associated with increased shearing,
									intense alteration and disseminated sulphides. Minor supergene enrichment occurs locally within
									mineralised shears throughout the regolith profile.
									Mineralisation at Bruno-Lewis is largely controlled by the stratigraphic contact between basalt and felsic
									volcanics. Gold is associated with significant sulphide mineralisation in the sediments and volcaniclastics
									between the 2 volcanic units. Gold Is also hosted within shallowly NE-dipping lodes, associated with
									increased potassic-sericite alteration and quartz stockwork veining. These lodes also host the
									mineralisation at Kyte. Substantial supergene mineralisation sits above both styles of mineralisation.
	Drill hole Information			A summary of all information material to the understanding of			Material drilling information for exploration results has previously been publicly reported in numerous
					the exploration results including a tabulation of the following			announcements to the ASX by Navigator (2004-2014) and KIN since 2014.
					information for all Material drill holes:
					 easting and northing of the drill hole collar
					 elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level
						in metres) of the drill hole collar
					 dip and azimuth of the hole
					 down hole length and interception depth
						hole length.
					If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
					the information is not Material and this exclusion does not
					detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent
					Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
	Data aggregation methods			In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging			When exploration results have been reported for the resource areas, the intercepts are reported as
					techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg			weighted average grades over intercept lengths defined by geology or lower cut-off grades, without high
					cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material			grade cuts applied. Where aggregate intercepts incorporated short lengths of high grade results, these
					and should be stated.			results were included in the reports.
							Since 2014, KIN have reported RC drilling intersections with low cut off grades of >= 0.5 g/t Au and a
					Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high
							maximum of 2m of internal dilution at a grade of <0.5g/t Au.
		Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP	20

	Criteria			 JORC Code explanation		Commentary
				grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the		There is no reporting of metal equivalent values.
				procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and
				some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown
				in detail.
				The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
				values should be clearly stated.
	Relationship between			These relationships are particularly important in the reporting		The orientation, true width, and geometry of mineralised zones have been primarily determined by
	mineralisation widths and			of Exploration Results.		interpretation of historical drilling and continued investigation and verification of KIN drilling.
	intercept lengths			If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill		Drill intercepts are reported as downhole widths not true widths.
					Accompanying dialogue to reported intersections normally describes the attitude of mineralisation.
				hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
				If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,
				there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole
				length, true width not known').
	Diagrams			Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of		Appropriate maps and sections are included in the main body of this report.
				intercepts should be included for any significant discovery
				being reported These should include, but not be limited to a

plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

Balanced reporting	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
	practicable, representative reporting of both low and high
	grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading
	reporting of Exploration Results.

Public reporting of exploration results by KIN and past tenement holders and explorers for the resource areas are considered balanced.

Representative widths typically included a combination of both low and high grade assay results.

All meaningful and material information relating to this mineral resource estimate is or has been previously reported.

Other substantive exploration Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be

datareported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

Since 2018, a campaign of determining Bulk Densities has been undertaken. The water displacement method is used on drill samples selected by the logging geologist. These measurements are entered into the logging software interface and loaded to the Datashed database.

Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for	KIN intend to continue exploration and drilling activities at in the described area, with the intention to
		lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scalestep-out	increase the project's resources.
		drilling).
	Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP	21

Criteria	 JORC Code explanation	Commentary

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Kin Mining NL - Near surface, high grade zones of mineralisation confirmed at CGP

22