Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.6434 USD | +7.23% | -0.08% | -26.45% |
Apr. 24 | S&P, Nasdaq futures advance on tech boost, earnings cheer | RE |
Apr. 11 | M&M Residual Announces Withdrawal of Nomination of Directors to Nikola Board | CI |
Summary
- Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a relative ranking of the company within its sector, comes out particularly poor.
Strengths
- Analysts expect a sharply increasing business volume for the group, with high growth rates in the coming years.
- For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.
- For the past twelve months, EPS forecast has been revised upwards.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
- Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
- Consensus analysts have strongly revised their opinion of the company over the past 12 months.
Weaknesses
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- The company's enterprise value to sales, at 4.86 times its current sales, is high.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-26.45% | 873M | D+ | ||
-32.27% | 537B | C | ||
-33.10% | 26.57B | C- | ||
-50.50% | 9.29B | D+ | ||
-46.26% | 7.4B | B | ||
-68.94% | 6.08B | - | - | |
-41.57% | 5.68B | D+ | ||
0.00% | 3.92B | - | - | |
-30.11% | 4.26B | - | ||
-47.79% | 2.49B | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- NKLA Stock
- Ratings Nikola Corporation