ÖZAK GAYRİMENKUL YATIRIM ORTAKLIĞI A.Ş. AND IT'S SUBSIDIARIES
CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2022 TOGETHER WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
(ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN TURKISH)
CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN TURKISH
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the General Assembly of Özak Gayrimenkul Yatırım Ortaklığı A.Ş.
- Audit of the consolidated financial statements
1. Our opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Özak Gayrimenkul Yatırım Ortaklığı A.Ş. (the "Company") and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the "Group") which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2022, the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended and notes to the consolidated financial statements comprising a summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2022, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Turkish Financial Reporting Standards ("TFRS").
2. Basis for opinion
Our audit was conducted in accordance with the Standards on Independent Auditing (the "SIA") that are part of Turkish Standards on Auditing issued by the Public Oversight Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority (the "POA"). Our responsibilities under these standards are further described in the "Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements" section of our report. We hereby declare that we are independent of the Group in accordance with the Ethical Rules for Independent Auditors (including Independence Standards) (the "Ethical Rules") and the ethical requirements regarding independent audit in regulations issued by POA that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Ethical Rules and regulations. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained during the independent audit provides a sufficient and appropriate basis for our opinion.
3. Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. Key audit matters were addressed in the context of our independent audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
PwC Bağımsız Denetim ve Serbest Muhasebeci Mali Müşavirlik A.Ş.
BJK Plaza, Süleyman Seba Caddesi No:48 B Blok Kat:9 Akaretler Beşiktaş 34357 İstanbul-Turkey
T: +90 212 326 6060, F: +90 212 326 6050, www.pwc.com.tr | Mersis Numaramız: 0-1460-0224-0500015 |
Key Audit Matters | How the key audit matter was addressed in | |
the audit | ||
Valuation work related to determining the | ||
fair value of investment properties | ||
As of 31 December 2022, the Group's investment | During our audit, the following audit procedures | |
properties, which have a carrying value of | were used to determine the fair value of investment | |
TRY10,112,732,252 and represent a significant share | properties: | |
of its total assets, consisted of land, office and | ||
commercial units. | • The procedures used by Group management to | |
determine the fair value of investment properties | ||
The accounting policy Group management applies | were evaluated. | |
when recognising these investment properties is the | • As for the expert institution carrying out the | |
"fair value method", as described in detail in Note 2 | valuation work, we performed the following | |
and Note 12. The fair value of these assets are | procedures: | |
determined by an independent valuation institution | - | The expert institution's property valuation |
accredited by the Capital Markets Board and used as | accreditation and licence were checked. | |
the basis for the carrying values in the balance sheet | - | The expert institution's competence, ability |
after being assessed by Group management. When | and neutrality were evaluated. | |
determining the fair value of investment properties, | • We tested the investment properties' title deed | |
methods such as benchmark comparison and | records and ownership rates. | |
reduced cash flow are used, and these methods | • We compared the consistency of the inputs that | |
include inputs based on important assumptions such | have significant impact on the property value | |
as real discount and inflation, which may lead to | determined and stated in the valuation reports, | |
changes when determining fair value. | such as square meter details of areas that can be | |
rented and unit sales value, against observable | ||
The work carried out to determine the fair value of | market prices, and then tested whether the | |
the investment properties was defined as a key audit | appraised values fall within an acceptable range. | |
matter because the book value of investment | • We have also tested inputs such as rental income, | |
properties comprises a significant portion of the | duration of rental contracts, occupancy rates and | |
Group's aggregate assets and the valuations are | expenses used in the valuation reports that have a | |
subjective in nature and include material | significant impact on property value. | |
assumptions and reasoning. | • We evaluated with our experts whether the | |
assumptions used by the valuation experts in | ||
their valuations, the appraised values such as | ||
inflation and the real discount fall within an | ||
acceptable range. | ||
• We checked whether the fair values in the | ||
valuation report complied with the notes and | ||
whether the note explanations are sufficient in | ||
terms of TFRS. | ||
4. Responsibilities of management and those charged with governance for the consolidated financial statements
The Group management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with TFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Group's financial reporting process.
5. Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Responsibilities of independent auditors in an independent audit are as follows:
Our aim is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an independent auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance expressed as a result of an independent audit conducted in accordance with SIA is a high level of assurance but does not guarantee that a material misstatement will always be detected. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. Misstatements are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As part of an independent audit conducted in accordance with SIA, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
- Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
- Assess the internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group's internal control.
- Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.
-
Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our independent auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the
Group to cease to continue as a going concern. - Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
- Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence. We also communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Ozak Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS published this content on 10 April 2023 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 13 April 2023 13:24:09 UTC.