onlyuseHighlights:
- RC Drilling has been completed in the Fraser Range targeting primary nickel-copper sulphides below historic1 supergene anomaly which returned:
16m | @ 0.6% Ni, 0.14% Cu and 0.13% Co from 36m in drillhole SFRC0005 | ||
20m | @ 0.57% Ni, 0.17% Cu and 0.08% Co from 28m in drill hole SFRC0006 | ||
personal | • | Samples submitted for assay with results expected in approximately eight weeks | |
• | Approvals in place for further RC and Diamond drilling pending positive results | ||
• | Downhole electromagnetic (DHEM) surveying completed looking for conductive bodies |
which may be caused by sulphide accumulations, and assist with targeting for future drilling programs
Province is pleased to update on drilling activities at the Gnama nickel-copper project in the Fraser Range Province of Western Australia.
ForD illing was safely and successfully completed at both the main Gnama Project and regional targets, with samples submitted for analysis.
Province's drilling programme aimed to test the bedrock below the supergene anomalism identified by Sirius Gold Pty Ltd. Drilling successfully reached depths greater than 250 metres and casing was installed to enable DHEM surveying to take place. In total 870 metres were drilled in 3 RC holes.
See ASX release 3 June 20201
Province Resources Ltd
ABN 83 061 375 442
Suite 8, 110 Hay Street, SUBIACO WA 6008
PH: +61 8 9388 8290
DHEM surveys were carried out post drilling to test for conductive bodies at the Gnama prospect. EM surveys are a key tool in nickel sulphide exploration as they detect conductive bodies in bed rock. Accumulations of sulphide minerals are conductive and accordingly EM anomalies are highly prospective for nickel-copper mineralisation.
Encouragingly no graphitic sediments were noted in drilling, consistent with historical drilling logs, meaning any anomalies identified will be high priority targets for follow up drilling. Province has
onlyapprovals in place for follow up RC and DD drilling at Gnama.
In addition, drilling has also been completed at the Gnama North regional targets. Initially prior to Christmas a total of 29 aircore holes were drilled to bedrock (blade refusal). A further 4 shallow RC holes were drilled as part of the current drilling campaign along one drill line to ensure adequate c verage.
A more detailed summary of the Gnama and Gnama North drilling will be reported when all data has been received and interpreted from both sample analyses and the DHEM survey.
usepersonalThis announcement has been approved by the Board.
For more information contact: David J Frances Managing Director - CEO david.frances@provinceresources.com
Competent Person's Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results and other geological information has been compiled under the supervision of Mr Thomas Langley. Mr Langley is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is an employee of the Company. Mr Langley has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ('the JORC
ForCode')". Mr Langley consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the exploration results contained in this announcement, and that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original reports.
Province Resources Ltd
ABN 83 061 375 442
Suite 8, 110 Hay Street, SUBIACO WA 6008
PH: +61 8 9388 8290
For personal use only
Figure 2. Planned drilling at the Gnama Nickel Project with Ni / Cu RC drill intersections by Sirius Gold Pty.
Province Resources Ltd
ABN 83 061 375 442
Suite 8, 110 Hay Street, SUBIACO WA 6008
PH: +61 8 9388 8290
Appendix 1. Historical Significant Intersections from the Gnama Project
use only
Appendix 2. Supporting tables prescribed under the JORC Code (2012 Edition) for the reporting of Exploration Results from the Gnama Project
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
personal | Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||
Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg | • Historical RC drilling to test for nickel- | |||||
techniques | cut channels, random chips, or | copper mineralisation. | |||||
specific specialised industry | • Drilling was sampled at 1m intervals with | ||||||
standard measurement tools | the entire interval collected at the rig | ||||||
appropriate to the minerals under | then riffle split at the rig to produce | ||||||
investigation, such as down hole | samples. | ||||||
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF | • Initial sampling was done using a scoop | ||||||
instruments, etc). These examples | to collect a composite sample. Samples | ||||||
For | should not be taken as limiting the | were submitted to an external laboratory | |||||
broad meaning of sampling. | where they were dried and pulverised | ||||||
• Include reference to measures taken | before sub sampling for assay. | ||||||
to ensure sample representivity and | • Where anomalous results were returned | ||||||
the appropriate calibration of any | from initial samples the 1m samples from | ||||||
measurement tools or systems used. | the interval were collected and | ||||||
• Aspects of the determination of | submitted to the laboratory for drying, | ||||||
mineralisation that are Material to | pulverising and sub sampling for assay. | ||||||
the Public Report. | |||||||
• In cases where 'industry standard' | |||||||
work has been done this would be | |||||||
relatively simple (eg 'reverse | |||||||
circulation drilling was used to |
Province Resources Ltd
ABN 83 061 375 442
Suite 8, 110 Hay Street, SUBIACO WA 6008
PH: +61 8 9388 8290
For personal use only
Criteria
Drilling techniques
Drill sample recovery
Logging
Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation
JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg | |
was pulverised to produce a 30 g | |
charge for fire assay'). In other cases | |
more explanation may be required, | |
such as where there is coarse gold | |
that has inherent sampling problems. | |
Unusual commodities or | |
mineralisation types (eg submarine | |
nodules) may warrant disclosure of | |
detailed information. | |
• Drill type (eg core, reverse | • RC drilling was carried out using face |
circulation, open-hole hammer, | sampling reverse circulation hammers. |
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | |
sonic, etc) and details (eg core | |
diameter, triple or standard tube, | |
depth of diamond tails, face- | |
sampling bit or other type, whether | |
core is oriented and if so, by what | |
method, etc). | |
• Method of recording and assessing | • RC recoveries were measured |
core and chip sample recoveries | qualitatively and poor recoveries |
and results assessed. | recorded in the sampling sheets. |
• Measures taken to maximise sample | • Standard drilling techniques such as |
recovery and ensure representative | cleaning cyclones each rod and hole |
nature of the samples. | conditioning to maintain good sample |
• Whether a relationship exists | quality were used. |
between sample recovery and | • No recovery issues noted so no |
grade and whether sample bias | relationship between recovery and |
may have occurred due to | grade or sample bias known. |
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse | |
material. | |
• Whether core and chip samples | • All RC chips were geologically logged in |
have been geologically and | their entirety. The logs are sufficiently |
geotechnically logged to a level of | detailed to support Mineral Resource |
detail to support appropriate | estimation. Logged criteria included |
Mineral Resource estimation, mining | lithology, alteration, alteration intensity, |
studies and metallurgical studies. | veining, weathering, grainsize and |
• Whether logging is qualitative or | sulphides. |
quantitative in nature. Core (or | • Geological logging is qualitative in |
costean, channel, etc) | nature, although percentages of veins or |
photography. | sulphides present were estimated. |
• The total length and percentage of | |
the relevant intersections logged. | |
• If core, whether cut or sawn and | • For RC drilling samples were riffle split at |
whether quarter, half or all core | the rig after passing through a |
taken. | conventional cyclone. An initial sample |
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube | was taken by spear sampling the reject |
sampled, rotary split, etc and | piles to form a 4m (FRC series) or 10m |
whether sampled wet or dry. | (SFRC series) composite. |
• For all sample types, the nature, | • All techniques are appropriate for |
quality and appropriateness of the | collecting statistically unbiased samples. |
sample preparation technique. | • Duplicates were collected every 10 |
• Quality control procedures adopted | composite samples to ensure |
for all sub-sampling stages to | representivity, with duplicates also |
maximise representivity of samples. | collected from the 1m split samples. |
Province Resources Ltd
ABN 83 061 375 442
Suite 8, 110 Hay Street, SUBIACO WA 6008
PH: +61 8 9388 8290
This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Province Resources Ltd. published this content on 04 March 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 04 March 2022 06:35:08 UTC.