You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements
and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. Some of the
information contained in this discussion and analysis, including information
with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financings,
includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You
should read the "Risk Factors" section of this Annual Report for a discussion of
important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in
the following discussion and analysis.

Throughout this section unless otherwise noted "we," "us," "our," "its," "Company," or "Romeo" refer to Romeo Power, Inc. (f/k/a RMG Acquisition Corp.) and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Overview



We are an industry leading energy storage technology company focused on
designing and manufacturing lithium-ion battery modules and packs for commercial
electric vehicles. Through our energy dense battery modules and packs, we enable
large-scale, sustainable transportation by delivering safe, longer lasting
batteries that have shorter charge times and longer life. With greater energy
density, we are able to create lightweight and efficient solutions that deliver
superior performance and provide improved acceleration, range, and durability
compared to battery packs provided by our competitors. Our modules and packs are
customizable and scalable and are optimized by our proprietary BMS. We
differentiate ourselves from competitors by leveraging our technical expertise
and depth of knowledge of energy storage systems.

In 2019, Legacy Romeo formed the BorgWarner JV with a subsidiary of BorgWarner,
a global Tier 1 automotive supplier with world-class capabilities in
manufacturing, engineering, and technology development. The BorgWarner JV is
owned 40% by Legacy Romeo and 60% by BorgWarner's subsidiary. Our strategic
alliance with BorgWarner should give the joint venture an opportunity to benefit
from BorgWarner's manufacturing expertise, superior purchasing power with our
existing suppliers, and longstanding relationships with many of our target
customers. We believe that this strategic alliance will also allow us, through
the BorgWarner JV, to accelerate our reach into new markets, particularly in
Europe and Asia, without the need to expend substantial capital developing new
production facilities. We believe partnering with a highly regarded supplier
helps to de-risk our production plan and should allow us, through the BorgWarner
JV, to eventually leverage BorgWarner's global production resources to scale
production operations worldwide, while maintaining the highest levels of product
quality. The rights of Legacy Romeo and BorgWarner with respect to the
BorgWarner JV are set forth in the JV Agreement and the IP License.

Since 2014, we have been designing and manufacturing battery modules and packs
and enabling battery technology for key customers in the automotive industry.
Currently, we primarily focus on two key markets in mobility energy technology:
North American commercial trucks and buses and, through the BorgWarner JV,
commercial and high-performance vehicles outside of North America. We also
formed a collaborative arrangement with HBR, an affiliate of HES, to focus on
sustainability and reuse applications of our battery technologies. In 2021 we
entered a Strategic Alliance Agreement with Republic Services, Inc. to
collaborate on the development of our battery technology for use in their
electric garbage trucks. We also announced that we have entered into an MOU with
Ecellix Inc., to cooperate in the development, validation and launch of
next-generation battery technology.  The MOU outlines the expectations for the
two companies to negotiate in good faith to formalize a material supply
agreement, partnership pricing, and a future equity investment.  The MOU also
forms a Steering Committee that will develop specific technical goals and
objectives that will govern and drive the development of the partnership. These
relationships help us to de-risk our business model, scale our business, and
deliver value to customers.

                                       54

  Table of Contents

Our operations consist of two business segments: Romeo Power North America and
Joint Venture Support. The Romeo Power North America business segment designs
and manufactures industry leading battery modules, battery packs, and BMS
technologies for our customers in North America. The Joint Venture Support
business segment provides engineering and other professional services to the
BorgWarner JV.

We expect our capital and operating expenditures to increase significantly in connection with our ongoing activities, as the Company:

? purchases production equipment and increases the number of production lines

used to manufacture its products;

? commercializes products;

? continues to invest in research and development related to new technologies;

? commits to long-term supply agreements with cell suppliers that may require

substantial advance payment;

? increases its investment in marketing and advertising, as well as the sales and

distribution infrastructure for its products and services;

? maintains and improves operational, financial, and management information

systems;

? hires additional personnel;

? obtains, maintains, expands, and protects its intellectual property portfolio;

and

? enhances internal functions to support its future state as a publicly-traded


   company.


Current Market Conditions

We believe that our performance and future success depend on a number of factors that present significant opportunities for us but also pose risks and challenges, including those discussed below and in the section titled "Risk Factors"

COVID-19



On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. In
addition to existing travel restrictions, some locales may impose prolonged
quarantines and further restrict travel, which may significantly impact the
ability of our employees to get to their places of work to produce products, may
make it such that we are unable to obtain sufficient components or raw materials
and component parts on a timely basis or at a cost-effective price, or may
significantly hamper our products from moving through the supply chain. We have
taken temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the
virus to our employees, including temporarily requiring some employees to work
remotely and implementing social distancing protocols for all work conducted
onsite. We have suspended non-essential travel worldwide for employees, and we
are discouraging employee attendance at other gatherings.

To date, COVID-19 has had a limited adverse impact on our operations, supply
chains, and distribution systems, but has resulted in higher losses on raw
material than previously expected. Our efforts to qualify new suppliers,
particularly in Asia, have been postponed indefinitely, which delay has required
us to continue using higher cost components for our products. Because of travel
restrictions, we are unable to visit many prospective customers in person, which
could delay the sales conversion cycle. Due to these precautionary measures and
resulting global economic impacts, we may experience significant and
unpredictable reductions in demand for certain of our products.  The degree and
duration of disruptions to future business activity are unknown at this time.

                                       55

  Table of Contents

Global Battery Cell Shortage

The cost of battery cells by our suppliers, depends in part upon the prices and
availability of raw materials such as lithium, nickel, cobalt and/or other
metals. Costs for these raw materials have increased due to higher production
costs and demand surges in the EV market. The prices for these materials
fluctuate and their available supply may be unstable, depending on market
conditions and global demand, including as a result of increased global
production of electric vehicles and energy storage products. A rise in the
number of EV start-up companies in the United States that received substantial
funding in initial public offerings via mergers with special purpose acquisition
companies (SPACs) in 2020 has contributed to increases in demand. Any reduced
availability of these materials may impact our access to cells, and any
increases in their prices may reduce our profitability if we cannot recoup the
increased costs through our products or services. The availability and price of
cylindrical cells is particularly sensitive to the demand surge, since most of
the pouch and prismatic cell supply has been allocated previously, in some cases
several years in advance.

Our current products are designed around cylindrical cells because such cells
allow for optimal energy density.  There are only three battery cell suppliers
for cylindrical cells ("Tier 1 Suppliers") whose cells are qualified for use in
electric vehicle applications because of their superior quality, performance,
and safety standards.  Other battery cell suppliers are emerging as potentially
suited for qualification, but until they have been qualified the Tier 1
Suppliers are the only source of battery cells for electric vehicle battery
packs.  Increased demand for electric vehicles globally has outpaced the cell
production capacity of the Tier 1 Suppliers.  While the Tier 1 Suppliers are
increasing their output capacity in Asia and in the United States, electric
vehicle battery pack manufacturers are competing for a severely limited supply
of battery cells in the short and medium term. As a result of the increased
demand and higher raw material costs, battery cell pricing has increased for
cell purchases between 2021 and 2023.  Pricing indications from our cell
suppliers indicate demand will start to stabilize in 2023.

Comparability of Financial Information

Our results of operations and statements of assets and liabilities may not be comparable between periods as a result of the Business Combination.

Business Combination and Public Company Costs



As described in "Note 1 - Description of Business and Basis of Presentation" and
"Note 3 - Business Combination" of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements, we completed the Business Combination on December 29, 2020, with
Legacy Romeo surviving the merger as our wholly owned subsidiary.

Prior to the Business Combination, Legacy Romeo financed its operations
primarily through issuances of term notes and convertible notes (the "Notes"),
as well as private placements of common stock and redeemable convertible
preferred stock. From the date of Legacy Romeo's incorporation in 2014 through
December 29, 2020, the date of the Business Combination, Legacy Romeo raised
aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $235 million from the issuance of
Notes, common stock, and redeemable convertible preferred stock in exchange for
cash.

Upon the consummation of the Business Combination we issued 82,037,151 shares of
Common Stock for all the issued and outstanding equity interests of Legacy
Romeo, inclusive of shares of Common Stock issued in exchange for both Legacy
Romeo's issued and outstanding preferred stock and issued and outstanding
convertible notes (inclusive of interest accrued thereon), as if each had
converted into Legacy Romeo common stock immediately prior to the Business
Combination. In connection with the Business Combination, 16,000,000 shares of
Common Stock (the "PIPE Shares") also were sold and issued for a purchase price
of $10.00 per share, or an aggregate purchase price of $160.00 million, pursuant
to the Subscription Agreements entered into on October 5, 2020. The net cash
received from the Business Combination after underwriter and transaction costs
was $345.83 million.

Notwithstanding the legal form of the Business Combination pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, the Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse
recapitalization in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  Under this method of accounting,
we are treated as the acquired company for financial reporting purposes, and
Legacy Romeo is treated as the accounting acquiror.  In accordance with this
accounting, the Business Combination is treated as the equivalent of Legacy

                                       56

Table of Contents



Romeo issuing stock for the net assets of RMG, accompanied by a
recapitalization. The net assets of RMG are stated at historical cost, with no
goodwill or other intangible assets recorded, and the operations prior to the
Business Combination will be those of Legacy Romeo.  Legacy Romeo is the deemed
accounting acquiror for purposes of the Business Combination based on the
evaluation of the following facts and circumstances:

? Legacy Romeo's former stockholders hold a majority ownership interest in the

combined company;

? Legacy Romeo's senior management team comprise senior management of the

combined company;

? Legacy Romeo is the larger of the companies based on historical operating

activity and employee base; and

? Legacy Romeo's operations comprise the ongoing operations of the combined

company.

Legacy Romeo became the successor to an SEC-registered and New York Stock Exchange listed company, which requires us to hire additional personnel and implement processes and procedures to address public company regulatory requirements and customary practices. We expect to incur incremental annual expenses as a public company for, among other things, increased directors' and officers' liability insurance; director fees; and additional internal and external accounting, legal, and administrative resources.

Components of Operating Results

The following discussion describes certain line items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Revenues



We primarily generate revenues from the sale of battery modules, battery packs,
and BMS, as well as the performance of engineering services, inclusive of the
development of prototypes. Revenues generated from the sale of our battery
modules, battery packs, and BMS under standard production contracts are
presented as product revenue on our statements of operations. Revenues generated
from the production of prototypes are included in services revenue on our
statements of operations, as prototypes are developed as a part of broader
engineering services contracts, which are commonly entered into prior to signing
a full production contract with a customer. Related party service revenues
relate entirely to revenues earned for engineering services provided to the
BorgWarner JV.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Loss


Cost of revenues are comprised primarily of product costs, personnel costs,
logistics and freight costs, and depreciation and amortization of manufacturing
and test equipment. Our product costs are impacted by technological innovations,
such as advances in battery controls and battery configurations, new product
introductions, economies of scale that result in lower component costs, and
improvements in and automation of our production processes.

Gross profit or loss may vary between periods and is primarily affected by average selling prices, product costs, product mix, customer mix, production volumes, production personnel costs, and warranty costs.

Operating Expenses


Operating expenses primarily consist of research and development costs and
selling, general, and administrative costs. Personnel-related costs are the most
significant component of each of these expense classifications and include
salaries, benefits, payroll taxes, sales commissions, incentive compensation,
and stock-based compensation.

Research and Development Expense



Research and development expense includes personnel-related costs, third-party
design and development costs, testing and evaluation costs, and other indirect
costs. Research and development employees are primarily engaged in the design

                                       57

  Table of Contents

and development of cell science design and engineering, modular technology and
electro-mechanical engineering, thermal engineering, and BMS engineering. We
devote substantial resources to research and development programs that focus on
both enhancements to, and cost efficiencies in, existing products and the timely
development of new products that utilize technological innovation to drive down
product costs, improve product functionality, and enhance product safety and
reliability. We intend to continue to invest appropriate resources in research
and development efforts, as we believe that this investment is critical to
maintaining our competitive position.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense



Selling, general, and administrative expense includes both sales and marketing
costs and general and administrative costs associated with back-office
functions. Sales and marketing expense includes personnel-related costs, as well
as travel, trade show, marketing, customer support, and other indirect costs. We
expect to continue to make the necessary sales and marketing investments to
enable the execution of our strategy, which includes increasing market
penetration geographically, and entering into new markets through the expansion
of our customer base and strategic partners. We currently offer products
targeting the North American market for commercial trucks, buses, and through
the BorgWarner JV, the European market for commercial and high-performance
vehicles. Through the BorgWarner JV, we expect to continue to expand the
geographic reach of our product offerings and explore new revenue channels in
addressable markets in the future.

General and administrative expense includes personnel-related costs attributable
to our executive, finance, human resources, and information technology
organizations; certain facility costs; and fees for professional services. Fees
for professional services consist primarily of outside legal, accounting, and
information technology consulting costs.

Legal Settlement Expense



In November 2019, Legacy Romeo entered into a settlement agreement with a
pre-existing holder of Legacy Romeo common stock to resolve a dispute related to
a share purchase transaction. As a result of the settlement agreement, Legacy
Romeo rescinded the share purchase transaction and made a cash payment to the
former stockholder. The amount paid in excess of the estimated fair value of the
shares that were rescinded resulted in the recognition of legal settlement
expense.

Interest Expense



Interest expense primarily consists of interest incurred under the Notes,
inclusive of non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of fees and
debt discounts associated with beneficial conversion features and detachable
warrants issued with the Notes. As Legacy Romeo's outstanding Notes were
converted or extinguished upon consummation of the Business Combination, we do
not expect to incur material interest expense subsequent to the Business
Combination.

Interest Income

Interest income includes interest earned on our cash balances.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

Loss on extinguishment of debt reported for the year ended December 31, 2019 is attributable to losses incurred upon the extinguishment of certain debt instruments.

Other Expense

During 2020, Legacy Romeo forgave certain stockholder notes receivable balances outstanding as of December 31, 2019. As a result, we recorded the amounts forgiven in Other Expense as of December 31, 2020.



                                       58

Table of Contents

Loss in Equity Method Investments



Loss in Equity Method Investments reflects the recognition of our proportional
share of the net losses of our equity method investments.  For the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019, these losses relate to the BorgWarner JV, in which
we hold a 40% ownership interest.

Change in Fair Value of Public and Private Placement Warrants


In February 2019, RMG issued 7,666,648 warrants (the "Public Warrants") to
purchase shares of Common Stock at $11.50 per share. Simultaneously, RMG issued
4,600,000 warrants (the "Private Placement Warrants" and, together with the
Public Warrants, the "Public and Private Placement Warrants") to purchase shares
of Common Stock at $11.50 per share, to RMG Sponsor, LLC and certain funds and
accounts managed by subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc. and certain funds and
accounts managed by Alta Fundamental Advisers LLC. All of the Public and Private
Placement Warrants were outstanding as of December 31, 2020. For the year ended
December 31, 2020, the change in fair value of the Public and Private Placement
Warrants was $34.17 million. The Company re-measures the fair value of the
Public and Private Placement Warrants at each reporting period. The decrease in
the fair value of the Public and Private Placement Warrants was primarily due to
the decreases in the price of our Common Stock and the Public Warrants over

the
period.

Income Tax Expense

For the periods presented, income tax expense primarily consists of franchise
and other state and local taxes, as we are currently incurring losses and have
recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets.

                                       59

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019






                                                             Years Ended
                                                    December 31,      December 31,         $           %
$ in thousands                                          2020              2019          Change      Change
Revenues
Product revenues                                   $        2,910    $        4,847    $ (1,937)     (40.0)
Service revenues                                            2,922             1,665        1,257       75.5

Related party service revenues                              3,142          

  1,976        1,166       59.0
Total revenues                                              8,974             8,488          486        5.7
Cost of revenues
Product cost                                                9,997            12,703      (2,706)     (21.3)
Service cost                                                5,337             2,877        2,460       85.5

Related party service cost                                  2,631          

  1,657          974       58.8
Total cost of revenues                                     17,965            17,237          728        4.2
Gross loss                                                (8,991)           (8,749)        (242)        2.8
Operating expenses

Research and development                                    7,995            11,242      (3,247)     (28.9)
Selling, general and administrative                        17,338            13,890        3,448       24.8
Legal settlement expense                                        -             4,586      (4,586)    (100.0)
Total operating expenses                                   25,333            29,718      (4,385)     (14.8)
Operating loss                                           (34,324)          (38,467)        4,143     (10.8)
Interest expense                                          (1,111)          (10,954)        9,843     (89.9)
Interest income                                                 -               269        (269)    (100.0)
Loss on extinguishment of debt                                  -           (9,181)        9,181    (100.0)
Change in fair value of Public and Private
Placement Warrants                                         34,168                 -       34,168          -
Other expense                                             (3,868)                 -      (3,868)          -
Net loss before income taxes and loss in equity
method investments                                        (5,135)          (58,333)       53,198     (91.2)
Loss in equity method investments                         (2,480)          

(1,520)        (960)       63.2
Income tax expense                                            (2)               (1)          (1)      100.0
Net loss                                           $      (7,617)    $     (59,854)    $  52,237     (87.3)




Revenues


                                           Years Ended
                                  December 31,     December 31,
$ in thousands                        2020             2019
Product revenues                  $       2,910    $       4,847
% of total revenues                        32.4 %           57.1 %

Service revenues                          2,922            1,665
% of total revenues                        32.6 %           19.6 %

Related party service revenues            3,142            1,976
% of total revenues                        35.0 %           23.3 %

Total revenues                    $       8,974    $       8,488




Product revenues

Product revenues decreased approximately $1.94 million, or 40.0%, for the year
ended December 31, 2020, as compared to product revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2019. The decrease in product revenues relates to decreased
deliveries of commercial vehicle products following the completion of a large
contract in April 2020.  Average selling prices per unit did not have a
significant impact on revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared
to the year ended December 31, 2019.

                                       60

Table of Contents



The decrease in our commercial vehicle pack and module production and delivery
activity was offset by an increased focus on the execution and delivery against
new engineering and prototype development agreements with both new and
prospective module and pack customers, as subsequently discussed.  Under our
typical sales cycle, these engineering and prototype agreements are expected to
be precursors to future product supply agreements, for which product revenues
are recognized as products are delivered.

The primary driver of decreased product revenues was a contract completed during
April 2020 for which a significant portion of the $4.56 million product revenue
was recognized in 2019 and not subsequently replaced in 2020, partially offset
by a new contract that was started and completed in 2020 for $2.37 million.
Additional contracts in 2020 increased by $0.25 million further offsetting the
product revenue decrease. We expect to report lower product revenues until we
begin to produce and deliver modules and packs in accordance with our more
recently signed customer supply contracts, certain of which provide for minimum
take or pay order commitments. Minimum quantity commitments related to contracts
signed through February of 2021 exceed $555 million of backlog. While the
delivery of modules and packs and recognition of the associated product revenues
under certain of these supply contracts will not commence until after completion
of the delivery of engineering and prototype services, we expect to recognize
approximately 4% of this backlog revenue over the twelve-month period following
December 31, 2020.

Service revenues

Service revenues increased approximately $1.26 million, or 75.5%, for the year
ended December 31, 2020, as compared to service revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2019. The increase is related to the timing of deliveries against
engineering and prototype contracts for which revenue is deferred until all
engineering services are complete and all prototypes have been delivered. Upon
completion of a significant engineering and prototype contract during the final
fiscal quarter of 2020, $2.54 million of revenue, inclusive of amounts that had
been previously deferred in accordance with our accounting policy, was
recognized as of the point in time at which delivery of the final developed
prototype occurred. The impact of recognizing $2.54 million of revenues upon
completion of the significant engineering and prototype contact in the fourth
quarter of 2020, in addition to $0.38 million in other service revenues
contracts, was partially offset by $0.71 million of deferred costs in 2018 that
were recognized in 2019 and $0.96 million of service revenues related to
contracts that were completed in 2019 and did not reoccur in 2020.

Related party service revenues



Related party service revenues increased approximately $1.17 million, or 59.0%,
for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to related party service
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019. Related party service revenues
relate to engineering services that we provided to the BorgWarner JV during each
respective period. As our joint venture with BorgWarner was not formed until
June 28, 2019, and did not commence operations until the third quarter of 2019,
related party service revenues earned during the year ended December 31, 2020
exceeded the related party service revenues earned during the portion of the
twelve month-period ended December 31, 2019 during which Romeo provided
engineering services to the BorgWarner JV. On an annualized basis, related party
service revenues were down primarily due to a contract ending in 2019 that

did
not reoccur in 2020.

                                       61

  Table of Contents

Cost of Revenues




                                                           Years Ended
                                                  December 31,      December 31,
$ in thousands                                        2020              2019

Cost of revenues - product cost                  $        9,997    $      

12,703


% of cost of revenues                                      55.6 %          

73.7 %


Cost of revenues - service cost                           5,337            

2,877


% of cost of revenues                                      29.7 %          

16.7 %


Cost of revenues - related party service cost             2,631            

1,657
% of cost of revenues                                      14.6 %             9.6 %

Total cost of revenues                           $       17,965    $       17,237

Cost of revenues - product cost



Cost of revenues associated with product revenues decreased approximately $2.71
million, or 21.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to cost of
revenues associated with product revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.
On a period-over-period basis, labor costs decreased $1.27 million and material
costs decreased $0.89 million which was attributable to a decrease of
approximately 40% in the production of commercial vehicle products under supply
contracts, due to a significant shift in the concentration of our plant's
production activities to the manufacturing of prototypes under a significant
engineering and prototype service contract during 2020. As a result, for
the year ended December 31, 2020, a significantly greater portion of our raw
material inventory and production line labor were dedicated to delivering upon
prototype service contracts.

The significant decrease in labor and material costs due to lower module and
pack production under supply contracts was offset by a $1.37 million increase in
expense related to the write-down of obsolete inventory primarily due to
obsolescence of certain raw materials and work-in-progress as a result of
technological advances and excess inventory from final purchase orders differing
from our estimates. Expense attributable to inventory write-downs totaled
approximately $3.11 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to
$1.74 million for the period ended December 31, 2019.

The decrease in labor and material costs attributable to lower production levels
also resulted in a decrease of approximately $0.55 million in overhead costs.  A
significant portion of the overhead costs we incurred include facility rent,
utilities, and depreciation of manufacturing equipment, which are fixed in
nature and allocated between product and service costs based on production
levels. Accordingly, these costs are still incurred when we experience a
reduction in production volume. The increase in service revenue resulted in an
increased allocation of overhead to service revenue. As manufacturing activities
under our supply contracts increase to a normalized production volume, we expect
our fixed and semi-fixed overhead costs to be absorbed through the production of
our modules and packs.

Cost of revenues - service cost



Cost of revenues associated with service revenues increased approximately $2.46
million, or 85.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to cost of
revenues associated with service revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Costs recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020 include amounts incurred
in connection with delivery against a significant engineering and prototype
service contract, inclusive of $2.36 million of costs that had been deferred as
a contract asset prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020. These
previously deferred costs, as well as incremental costs incurred during the
fourth quarter of 2020, were recognized contemporaneously with the recognition
of the associated revenue, which occurred upon completion of production and
delivery of the prototypes specified in the customer contract during the quarter
ended December 31, 2020.

                                       62

  Table of Contents

The impact of the recognition of costs attributable to the significant
engineering and prototype service contract was partially offset by costs in 2019
related to four smaller engineering services contracts that were completed in
2019 and did not reoccur in 2020.

Cost of revenues - related party service cost



Cost of revenues associated with related party service revenues increased
approximately $0.97 million, or 58.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as
compared to the cost of revenues associated with related party service revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2019. Costs incurred for the year ended December
31, 2020 primarily relate to personnel costs attributable to employees that
provided engineering services to the BorgWarner JV during the period. Our joint
venture with BorgWarner was not formed until June 28, 2019, and did not commence
operations until the third quarter of 2019. We provided increased services to
the joint venture and, accordingly, incurred increased engineering labor costs
during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December
31, 2019. On an annualized basis, related party service costs were down
primarily due to a contract ending in 2019 that did not reoccur in 2020.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense decreased approximately $3.25 million, or 28.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to research and development expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to the following drivers:






Primary Drivers ($ in thousands)                                     Increase / (Decrease)
Compensation and benefit costs                                      $      

(4,230)


Materials and consumables                                                               812
Primary drivers of the total decrease in research and
development expense                                                 $               (3,418)




The decrease in research and development expense for the year ended December 31,
2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily
attributable to a $4.23 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs as a
result of employees' executing on services contracts and BorgWarner JV services
resulting in less time being spent on research and development activities. In
addition, there was an 8.4% reduction in department headcount when we paused
development of our stationary storage product line in May 2019 to focus
development efforts solely on mobility products. The decrease in compensation
and benefits costs was offset by materials and consumables increasing $0.81
million due to an increased focus on product development and testing.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense


Selling, general, and administrative expense increased approximately $3.45
million, or 24.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to selling,
general, and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. The
increase was primarily attributable to the following drivers:




Primary Drivers ($ in thousands)                                     Increase / (Decrease)
Compensation and benefit costs                                      $      

            286
Professional fees                                                                     2,844
Warranty expense                                                                        363
Primary drivers of the total increase in selling, general and
administrative                                                      $                 3,493




The increase in selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended
December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, was
primarily a result of $2.02 million of stock-based compensation expense for
incentive and nonqualified stock options. This expense was offset by a 15.0%
decrease in departmental headcount. In addition, professional fees increased
$2.84 million primarily as a result of audit and accounting fees associated with
the Business Combination and warranty expense increased $0.36 million primarily
as a result of increased reserves for estimated warranty expense and returned
products covered under warranty. As discussed in the 'Overview' section, we
expect selling, general, and administrative expense to increase for future
periods now that the Business Combination has been completed, including
increased investment in marketing, advertising, and the sales and distribution
infrastructure for our products and services; increased personnel in internal
functions such as operations, finance, and information

                                       63

Table of Contents

technology to support our current state as a publicly traded company; and substantial investment in management information systems.

Legal Settlement Expense



The amount reported for the year ended December 31, 2019 relates to a settlement
agreement that we entered into in November 2019 to resolve a dispute related to
a share purchase transaction with a pre-existing holder of our common stock. As
a result of the settlement agreement, we rescinded the share purchase
transaction and made a cash payment to the former stockholder. The amount paid
in excess of the estimated fair value of the shares that were rescinded resulted
in the recognition of $4.59 million of settlement expense. All amounts due in
connection with the settlement agreement were paid in 2019. We did not incur
comparable material legal settlement expense during 2020.

Interest Expense



Interest expense decreased $9.84 million, or 89.9%, for the year ended
December 31, 2020, as compared to interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2019. The decrease was partially attributable to the absence of
comparable non-cash interest expense related to the amortization of debt
discounts associated with beneficial conversion features and detachable warrants
in the current period. We incurred $5.59 million of non-cash interest expense
during the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to no non-cash interest
expense during the year ended December 31, 2020. This decrease was due to the
conversion and/or extinguishment of the debt instruments to which the non-cash
interest expense was related during 2019.

Additionally, interest expense decreased $4.25 million as a result of a decrease
in debt outstanding during the period, accompanied by a reduction in the average
interest rate charged for debt instruments outstanding. During the year ended
December 31, 2019, we had approximately $50 million in outstanding debt
obligations, prior to extinguishment and conversion in May 2019, as compared
with $3.34 million in outstanding debt obligations at December 31, 2020.

Interest Income



We did not earn any interest income during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was approximately $0.27
million, which was earned on our cash balances.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt


The loss on extinguishment of debt was attributable to $9.18 million in net
losses incurred upon the extinguishment of debt during the year ended
December 31, 2019. The extinguishment losses recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2019 were incurred in connection with (1) entering into amendments
to extend certain outstanding Notes payable arrangements while pursuing the 2019
preferred stock subscription and (2) the extinguishment of certain Notes at the
time of the 2019 preferred stock subscription. No losses were incurred on the
debt that we modified or extinguished during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Change in Fair Value of Public and Private Placement Warrants



For the year ended December 31, 2020, the change in fair value of the Public and
Private Placement Warrants was $34.17 million. The Company re-measures the fair
value of the Public and Private Placement Warrants at each reporting period. The
decrease in the fair value of the Public and Private Placement Warrants was
primarily due to the decreases in the price of our Common Stock and the Public
Warrants subsequent to the Business Combination.

Other Expense



In April and December 2020, we agreed to cancel $1.79 million and $2.02 million,
respectively, of $9.12 million stockholder notes receivable balances outstanding
as of December 31, 2019. Additionally, we determined that $0.05 million of
additional stockholder notes receivable balances outstanding as of December 31,
2019 were uncollectable. As a result, we recorded $3.87 million in Other expense
for the year ended December 31, 2020, which represents the amounts

                                       64

Table of Contents

forgiven as of December 31, 2020. The stockholders repaid $5.31 million and, as of December 31, 2020, no additional stockholder notes receivable remain outstanding.

Loss in Equity Method Investments


We account for the investment in the BorgWarner JV under the equity method of
accounting and, accordingly, we recognize our proportionate share of the joint
venture's earnings and losses. Loss in equity method investments increased $0.96
million, or 63.2%, for year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to loss in
equity method investments for the year ended December 31, 2019. The loss in
equity method investments recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020 and
2019 represents our 40% share of the losses recognized by the joint venture for
the corresponding period. The increase in the loss in equity method investments
for the current period is due to our joint venture with BorgWarner not being
formed until June 28, 2019 and not commencing operations until the third quarter
of 2019. Accordingly, the loss in equity method investments amount incurred for
the year ended December 31, 2019 did not relate to a full twelve months of
operations of the BorgWarner JV.

Income Tax Expense



The effective tax rate of 0.0% realized for each period was significantly below
the Federal statutory rate of 21.0%, as we incurred significant losses during
each reporting period and did not recognize an income tax benefit associated
with these losses because a full valuation allowance is maintained against our
net deferred income tax assets. Any amounts reflected in income tax expense
represent various state and local tax obligations and consist primarily of
California franchise tax.

Net Loss



We reported a net loss of $7.62 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as
compared to a net loss of $59.85 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The decrease in the net loss recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020 was
due to the factors discussed above but primarily driven by the $34.17 million
gain from the change in fair value of the Public and Private Placement Warrants.

Business Segment Results of Operations



We operate in two business segments: Romeo Power North America and Joint Venture
Support. We have organized our business segments based on the customers served.
Romeo Power North America sells our products and services to unrelated external
customers; whereas, the Joint Venture Support segment provides engineering
services exclusively to the BorgWarner JV, which was formed in June 2019 and
commenced operations in the third quarter of 2019. Segment results for the years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:

Business Segment Revenue




                                                           Years Ended
$ in thousands                               December 31, 2020      December 31, 2019      $ Change     % Change
Revenue
Romeo Power North America                   $             5,832    $             6,512    $    (680)      (10.4) %
Joint Venture Support                                     3,142                  1,976         1,166        59.0
Total revenue                               $             8,974    $             8,488    $      486         5.7 %




                                       65

  Table of Contents

Romeo Power North America
The Romeo Power North America segment's revenues consist of all product and
service revenues, with the exception of our related party service revenues
earned from providing services to the BorgWarner JV. Accordingly, the $0.68
million, or 10.4% decrease in Romeo Power North America revenues includes the
$1.94 million decrease in product revenue earned from sales of our commercial
vehicle battery modules and packs, which is primarily attributable to the
completion of delivery under a large supply contract in April 2020 and not
subsequently replaced. The decrease in Romeo Power North America revenues was
attributable to lower product sales which was offset by the $1.26 million
increase in service revenues. The increase in service revenues was primarily
driven by the recognition of revenue upon delivery of the final prototypes under
a significant engineering and prototype development contract during the fourth
quarter of 2020. Revenue recognized under this significant engineering and
prototype development contract during the fourth quarter of 2020 included $2.54
million that had been deferred during prior reporting periods in accordance with
our revenue recognition policy. The impact of the revenue from the significant
engineering and prototype development contract was partially offset by lesser
engineering services revenue earned from certain contracts that were completed
in 2019. Average selling prices did not have a significant impact on product
sales during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to year ended
December 31, 2019.

Joint Venture Support


The Joint Venture Support segment's reported revenue for each of the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019 relates to engineering services provided to the
BorgWarner JV during each annual period. The Joint Venture Support revenue
increased $1.17 million, or 59.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as
compared to the Joint Venture Support segment's revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2019. The Joint Venture Support segment did not commence providing
services to the BorgWarner JV until the third quarter of 2019 and, consequently,
this segment recognized substantially less revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.

Business Segment Gross Profit (Loss)






                                                           Years Ended
$ in thousands                               December 31, 2020      December 31, 2019      $ Change     % Change

Business segment gross loss
Romeo Power North America                   $           (9,502)    $           (9,068)    $    (434)         4.8 %
Joint Venture Support                                       511                    319           192        60.2

Total business segment gross loss           $           (8,991)    $       

   (8,749)    $    (242)         2.8 %




Romeo Power North America

The Romeo Power North America segment's gross loss reflects product and service
revenue generated from all customers except the BorgWarner JV, less the
associated costs of sales. The Romeo Power North America segment's gross loss
was consistent, period-over-period. The Romeo Power North America segment's
revenues decreased 10.4%, but margins remained similar to the prior year due to
improved pricing and the improved ability to absorb costs. The offset to this
improvement is the increase in expense related to the write-down of excess and
obsolete inventory $1.37 million.

As our production levels and revenues scale, the Romeo Power North America
segment's performance is expected to benefit from cost savings attributable to
(1) advanced product design maturity, (2) a reduction in direct materials costs
for significant components of our battery modules and packs - for example, as we
shift from customized production to more standardized production for key
components that make up a significant portion of each unit's materials cost, (3)
a reduction in the costs of inventory purchases driven by larger quantity
purchases that will be supported by firm customer orders, and (4) lower
unabsorbed labor and overhead costs.

                                       66

  Table of Contents

Joint Venture Support

The Joint Venture Support segment's gross profit is reflective of revenues
earned from engineering services provided to the BorgWarner JV, less our
internal costs to deliver those services - primarily consisting of personnel
costs. The Joint Venture Support segment's gross profit increased $0.19 million,
or 60.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the segment's
income for the year ended December 31, 2019. We did not commence providing
services to the BorgWarner JV until the third quarter of 2019 and, consequently,
the recognized gross profit of $0.32 million for the year ended December 31,
2019 does not reflect a full twelve months of operating activity. On an
annualized basis joint venture support gross profit was down primarily due to a
contract ending in 2019 that did not reoccur in 2020. This was partially offset
by certain startup costs that occurred in 2019 that did not reoccur in 2020.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures



In addition to our results determined in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), our management
utilizes certain non-GAAP performance measures, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, for
purposes of evaluating our ongoing operations and for internal planning and
forecasting purposes. We believe that these non-GAAP operating measures, when
reviewed collectively with our GAAP financial information, provide useful
supplemental information to investors in assessing our operating performance.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA


"EBITDA" is defined as earnings before interest income and expense, income tax
expense or benefit, and depreciation and amortization. "Adjusted EBITDA" has
been calculated using EBITDA adjusted for losses on the extinguishment of debt,
stock-based compensation, settlement of certain legal matters, and forgiveness
of a portion of stockholder notes receivable and a gain on the change in fair
value of the Public and Private Placement Warrants. We believe that both EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA provide additional information for investors to use in
(1) evaluating our ongoing operating results and trends and (2) comparing our
financial performance with those of comparable companies, which may disclose
similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors. These non-GAAP measures
provide investors with incremental information for the evaluation of our
performance after isolation of certain items deemed unrelated to our core
business operations.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented as supplemental measures to our GAAP
measures of performance. When evaluating EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, you should
be aware that we may incur future expenses similar to those excluded when
calculating these measures. In addition, our presentation of these measures
should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be
unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. Furthermore, our computation of
Adjusted EBITDA may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures
computed by other companies, as the nature of the adjustments that other
companies may include or exclude when calculating Adjusted EBITDA may differ
from the adjustments reflected in our measure. Because of these limitations,
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, nor should
these measures be viewed as a substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP
measure, which is net loss. We compensate for the limitations of our non-GAAP
measures by relying primarily on our GAAP results. You should review the
reconciliation of our net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely
on any single financial measure to evaluate our performance.

                                       67

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:






                                                                           Years Ended
                                                                  December 31,      December 31,
$ in thousands                                                        2020              2019
Net loss                                                         $      (7,617)    $     (59,854)
Interest expense                                                          1,111            10,954
Interest income                                                               -             (269)
Income tax expense                                                            2                 1
Depreciation and amortization expense                                     1,988             1,871
EBITDA                                                                  (4,516)          (47,297)
Loss on debt extinguishment                                                   -             9,181
Stock-based compensation                                                  3,567             1,566
Settlement of certain legal matters                                           -             4,586

Change in fair value of Public and Private Placement Warrants (34,168)

                 -
Forgiveness of portion of stockholder notes receivable                    3,868                 -
Adjusted EBITDA                                                  $     (31,249)    $     (31,964)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

From our inception in June 2014 through December 31, 2020, we generated an accumulated deficit of $177.44 million, while pursuing substantial research and development activities to bring the products in its lithium-ion battery technology platform to market on a mass production scale.



Between 2016 and April 2019, Legacy Romeo's operations were funded by the
issuance of convertible notes, two classes of equity, and term notes. During
this period, Legacy Romeo issued a total of $22.6 million in convertible notes,
borrowed $51.33 million under term notes, sold $7.23 million in Series Seed
preferred shares (2016 only), and sold $44.6 million in common stock. During the
year ended December 31, 2019, Legacy Romeo issued $19.0 million of the term
notes described above and repaid a total of $25.62 million of term notes. In
December 2019, Legacy Romeo issued $5.2 million in new convertible notes.

In June 2019, Legacy Romeo closed a Series A preferred stock round of financing
that included cash investments of $56.49 million and the conversion of
outstanding debt and interest totaling $31.85 million in exchange for the
issuance of an aggregate of 315,286,937 shares of newly authorized Series A
preferred stock. Also, in connection with the Series A preferred stock
financing, Legacy Romeo redeemed approximately 35.4% of each Series Seed
holder's shares of Series Seed preferred stock issued and outstanding. Each
Series Seed stockholder received a payment in cash equal to $0.33 per share. The
Series Seed preferred stock was not mandatorily redeemable in advance of the
Series A preferred stock sale. In connection with the execution of the Series A
preferred stock purchase agreement, the Series Seed holders agreed to the
redemption.

The June 2019 Series A preferred stock raise was led by BorgWarner. In
conjunction with BorgWarner's investment of $50 million into Legacy Romeo,
BorgWarner and Legacy Romeo created a global joint venture, the BorgWarner JV,
on June 28, 2019, which is intended to accelerate both companies' reach into the
European market in a capital efficient way. Legacy Romeo's capital contribution
for its 40.0% ownership interest in the joint venture was $4.0 million, which
amount was funded through BorgWarner's direct transfer of $4.0 million of the
$50.0 million that was due to Legacy Romeo for the purchase of Series A
preferred stock to the BorgWarner JV.

Between March and May 2020, Legacy Romeo closed a round of financing that included the issuance of 32.0 million shares of newly authorized Series A-5 preferred stock. Legacy Romeo issued Series A-5 preferred shares at a purchase price of $0.1250 per share for a total raise of $4.0 million.

In June 2020, we received loan proceeds in the amount of $3.34 million under the U.S. Small Business Administration's ("SBA") Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). The PPP, established as part of the CARES Act,



                                       68

Table of Contents


provides for loans to qualifying businesses for amounts up to 2.5 times of the
average monthly payroll expenses. The loans and accrued interest are forgivable
after 24 weeks as long as the borrower uses the loan proceeds for eligible
purposes, including payroll, benefits, rent and utilities, and maintains its
payroll levels. We currently believe that our use of the loan proceeds through
the forgiveness period has been in compliance with the conditions for
forgiveness of the loan. Per the terms of the PPP loan, payments are deferred
for borrowers who apply for loan forgiveness until the SBA makes a determination
on the loan amount to be forgiven. We applied for forgiveness of the loan
following the covered period of the loan.

Between October 2020 and December 2020, Legacy Romeo borrowed approximately $2.03 million in debt, to provide additional financing until the closing of the Business Combination described below.

In addition, in December 2020, Legacy Romeo collected $5.31 million in notes receivable from stockholders.


On December 29, 2020, the consummation of the Business Combination resulted in
net cash proceeds of $345.83 million of cash available to fund our future
operations, potential future obligations to contribute cash to the BorgWarner
JV, our $35.00 million initial contribution for a profit sharing interest in the
HBR System, and our long-term business plan for the next twenty-four to
thirty-six months. The net proceeds received reflect the receipt of gross
proceeds of $394.20 million from the Business Combination, inclusive of cash
from the PIPE Shares, offset by the following: (i) settling all of Legacy
Romeo's issued and outstanding term notes, inclusive of accrued and unpaid
interest, (ii) payment of transaction costs incurred by both RMG and Legacy
Romeo, and (iii) payments of deferred legal fees, underwriting commissions, and
other costs incurred in connection with the initial public offering of RMG.

Our current business plan through 2025 includes substantial investments into
expanded research and development capacity, as well as an allocation of capital
for new factories or strategic acquisitions, which activities are expected to be
funded using the cash available to the Company resulting from the Business
Combination and long-term revenues through multi-year supply agreements for our
products and services. These activities are currently planned to occur even
while we are in the process of achieving positive free cash flow from our
existing business segments. The current business plan does not factor any type
of working capital financing that, if needed, could extend our cash reserves
until we become self-sustaining.

Our continuing short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are expected to be impacted by the following, among other things:

? the timing and the costs involved in bringing our products to market;

? the expansion of production capacity;

? our ability to manage the costs of manufacturing;

? the scope, progress, results, costs, timing and outcomes of our research and

development for our battery modules and battery packs;

? the costs of maintaining, expanding and protecting our intellectual property

portfolio, including potential litigation costs and liabilities;

the costs of additional general and administrative personnel, including

? accounting and finance, legal and human resources, as a result of becoming a

public company;

? our ability to collect revenues from start-up companies operating in a

relatively new industry;

? the global battery cell shortage;

? our obligation to fund our proportional share of the operating expenses,

working capital, and capital expenditures of the BorgWarner JV; and




                                       69

  Table of Contents

? other risks discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors."

COVID-19



As discussed in the 'Overview' section, we have taken temporary precautionary
measures intended to help minimize the risk of the COVID-19 virus to our
employees including temporarily requiring some employees to work remotely and
implementing social distancing protocol for all work conducted onsite. We have
suspended non-essential travel worldwide for employees and we discourage
employee attendance at other gatherings. To date, COVID-19 has had a limited
adverse impact on our operations, supply chains and distribution systems, and
has resulted in sustaining higher losses on raw material than previously
expected. The degree and duration of disruptions to future business activity are
unknown at this time.

Short-Term Liquidity Requirements



As of December 31, 2020, our current assets were approximately $305.49 million,
consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents, inventory, and insurance
receivables. As of December 31, 2020, our current liabilities were approximately
$16.05 million, consisting primarily of accounts payable, accrued expenses, a
legal settlement amount, and current debt obligations. The Business Combination
resulted in an increase of $345.83 million in cash that will be sufficient to
fund both our liquidity needs over the near-term and the execution of our
business strategy over the next 24 to 36-month period, which we expect will
include (1) expanding and scaling our production capabilities, (2) investing in
research and development activities, (3) expanding sales and marketing
activities, and (4) pursuing strategic partnerships.

Long-Term Liquidity Requirements



Management anticipates that our most significant long-term liquidity and capital
needs will relate to capital expenditures and the expansion of production
capacity, working capital to support increased production volume, and general
overhead and personnel expenses to support continued growth and scale. We
believe the cash available to us from the consummation of the Business
Combination, including the sale of the PIPE Shares, will be sufficient to cover
forecasted capital needs and operating expenditures for fiscal year 2021 through
fiscal year 2022. Beginning in 2023, we anticipate that we will be able to
generate sufficient free cash flow from the sale of our products and services to
cover operating expenses, working capital, and capital expenditures. If adequate
funds are not available to accomplish our anticipated long-term growth, we plan
to fund future cash needs through debt financing. If we raise funds by issuing
debt securities, these debt securities would have rights, preferences, and
privileges senior to those of holders of our Common Stock. The availability and
the terms under which we can borrow additional capital could be disadvantageous,
and the terms of debt securities or borrowings could impose significant
restrictions on our operations. Macroeconomic conditions and credit markets
could also impact the availability and cost of potential future debt financing.

                                       70

  Table of Contents

Cash Flow Analysis

The following table provides a summary of cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:






                                                                         Years Ended
                                                                December 31,      December 31,
$ in thousands                                                      2020              2019
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of
period                                                         $        1,929    $        1,511
Operating activities:
Net losses                                                            (7,617)          (59,854)
Non-cash adjustments                                                 (18,639)            21,664
Changes in working capital                                            (3,623)           (8,774)
Net cash used for operating activities                               (29,879)          (46,964)
Net cash used for investing activities                               (36,325)           (1,171)
Net cash provided by financing activities                             358,217            48,553
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash             292,013               418
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of
period                                                         $      293,942    $        1,929

Cash Flows from Operating Activities


Net cash used for operating activities was approximately $29.88 million for the
year ended December 31, 2020. The most significant contributor to the cash used
during this period was $18.64 million of non-cash adjustments consisting
primarily of the $34.17 million gain from the change in fair value of the Public
and Private Placement Warrants and partially offset by $3.87 million of
forgiveness of a  portion of stockholder notes receivable, $1.99 million related
to depreciation and amortization, $3.11 million related to a write-down of
inventory, $2.48 million related to losses on our equity method investment,
$3.57 million related to stock-based compensation, and $0.51 million related to
operating and financing lease expense. Additional drivers include a net loss of
approximately $7.61 million and cash outflows of $3.62 million attributable to
changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Net cash outflows attributable to changes in operating assets and liabilities
totaled approximately $3.62 million. These net cash outflows were primarily the
result of a decrease in accounts payable of $2.56 million due to a focused
effort to paydown outstanding invoices after the consummation of the Business
Combination, an increase in prepaid expense of $1.69 million related to a
reduction of purchases from certain vendors requiring prepayment as a result of
delivery of a significant engineering and prototype development contract during
the fourth quarter of 2020, payments for inventory purchases of $1.37 million to
support fulfillment of our agreements and a decrease in our lease liabilities of
$0.22 million related to ongoing payments. The cash outflows were partially
offset by an increase in accrued expenses of $1.74 million primarily due to the
timing of payments for materials and professional fees, an increase in contract
liabilities of $0.53 million due to the timing of advance payments received in
connection with new contract awards, $0.47 million related to interest accrued
and paid on notes payable and an increase in accounts receivable of $0.53
million related to timing of payments received.

Net cash used for operating activities was approximately $46.96 million for the
year ended December 31, 2019. The most significant contributor to the cash used
during this period was a net loss of approximately $59.85 million, partially
offset by $21.66 million of non-cash expenses consisting primarily of $9.18
million related to debt extinguishment losses recorded upon modification of
outstanding convertible notes, $5.59 million of interest expense attributable to
the amortization of debt discounts, $1.87 million related to depreciation and
amortization, $1.74 million related to a write-down of inventory, $1.57 million
related to stock-based compensation, and $1.52 million related to losses on our
equity method investment.

Net cash outflows attributable to changes in operating assets and liabilities
totaled $8.77 million. These net cash outflows were primarily the result of an
increase in inventory of $2.57 million due to the purchase of raw materials in
advance of production activities and an increase to prepaid expenses of $1.43
million as a result of purchases from certain vendors that required prepayment,
partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $2.13 million due to

a
focused

                                       71

  Table of Contents

effort to paydown outstanding invoices and reduce costs with vendors, a decrease
in accrued expenses of $1.77 million due to a reduction in commissions, bonuses,
and vacation accruals, and a decrease in contract liabilities of $0.90 million
due to the liquidation of advance payments related to non-recurring engineering
and prototype services contracts upon performance on the contact and recognition
of sales.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities



For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used for investing activities was
approximately $36.32 million and was primarily related to our contribution of
$35.00 million to our strategic collaborator HBR, to fund operating activities
under the terms of our Battery Recycling Arrangement (as defined below). The
remaining net cash used for investing activities of $1.34 million was related to
purchases of property and equipment.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used for investing activities was
$1.17 million, primarily driven by our capital expenditures for property and
equipment.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities



For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash provided by financing activities
of approximately $358.22 million was primarily related to $345.83 million of
proceeds from the Business Combination, $6.48 million from the issuance of term
notes, $1.92 million of proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes, $3.30
million of proceeds from a PPP loan, $5.31 million of proceeds from stockholder
note receivable, $5.03 million from the issuance of common stock and $2.21
million from the exercise of stock options and warrants. These cash inflows were
partially offset by $11.58 million of cash paid to reduce outstanding term and
convertible note balances and $0.28 million related to the principal portion of
finance lease liabilities.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by financing activities
of approximately $48.55 million was primarily reflective of approximately $56.49
million of proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock, approximately $19.00
million from the issuance of term notes, approximately $5.45 million from the
issuance of convertible notes, and approximately $2.57 million from the exercise
of stock warrants. These cash inflows were partially offset by approximately
$25.62 million of cash paid to reduce outstanding term and convertible note
balances and approximately $4.05 million of cash paid to redeem preferred stock,
and approximately $4.09 million of cash paid in dividends to preferred
stockholders.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments



The following table describes our contractual obligations and commitments as of
December 31, 2020:




                                                       2023       2025
                                                        and        and
$ in thousands       Total       2021       2022       2024       2026       Thereafter
Operating leases    $  9,998    $   901    $   902    $ 1,804    $ 1,804    $      4,587
Finance leases           314        295         19          -          -               -
PPP Loans              3,342      2,259      1,053         24          6               -
Total*              $ 13,654    $ 3,455    $ 1,974    $ 1,828    $ 1,810    $      4,587


*Amounts exclude a $6.00 million legal settlement payable related to an employee
liability matter. Our business and umbrella insurance carriers have agreed to
cover the cost of damages owed, and we have recorded a $6.00 million insurance
receivable to reflect that commitment.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting



In the course of preparing the consolidated financial statements, we and our
independent registered public accounting firm has determined that we have a
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.   Despite
not conducting a formal assessment regarding ICFR, management identified the
following material weaknesses in its internal controls: (i) inadequate
segregation of duties, including review and approval of journal entries; and
(ii) lack of sufficient

                                       72

  Table of Contents

technical accounting resources.  Control deficiencies relating to a lack of
sufficient technical accounting resources also included insufficient resources
for the timely review of certain accounting analyses and associated journal
entries, and of the financial statement and disclosure preparation process. In
aggregate we have deemed these deficiencies to be a material weakness.

In order to remediate this material weakness, we plan to take the following actions:

? hiring new accounting personnel;

? transitioning oversight of financial reporting to a principal financial

officer;

engaging a national accounting advisory firm to assist with the documentation,

? evaluation, remediation and testing of our internal control over financial

reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated

Framework (2013) issued by COSO;

? implementation of additional review controls and processes; and

? implementation of process and controls to better identify and manage risks.




In accordance with the provisions of the JOBS Act, we and our independent
registered public accounting firm were not required to, and did not, perform an
evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2020, nor any period subsequent in accordance with the provisions of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we have identified
all, or that we will not in the future have additional, material weaknesses.
Material weaknesses may still exist when we report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the completion of this offering.

Critical Accounting Policies


The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related notes
requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Management has
based its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

For a description of our significant accounting policies see Note 2 - "Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies," of the notes to consolidated financial
statements. An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an
accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are
highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates
that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates
that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the
consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical
accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Equity Method Investments

Heritage Battery Recycling Arrangement


On October 2, 2020, we entered into a Battery Recycling Agreement with HBR, an
affiliate of HES (the "Battery Recycling Arrangement"). Under the Battery
Recycling Arrangement, HBR has agreed to design, build and operate a System for
redeploying, recycling or disposing of lithium-ion batteries to be located at
HES's facility in Arizona. Immediately following the Business Combination on
December 29, 2020, we contributed $35.00 million to HBR, a related party to an
investor in Legacy Romeo and an investor of $25.00 million in the PIPE Shares.
Our investment in HBR is intended to fund the building, operation, maintenance,
and repair of the System.  The terms of the Battery Recycling

                                       73

Table of Contents


Arrangement require us to fund 30% of any operating shortfall of the System for
the duration of the agreement with HBR and gives us the right to receive 30% of
the profit generated by the System. The initial contract duration is for a
period of ten years from December 29, 2020, and the agreement automatically
extends for one-year renewal periods indefinitely.  While the arrangement is in
effect, it establishes a strategic arrangement with HES for the collection of
our battery packs for recycling, and it gives our customers priority at the
recycling facility. We also have agreed to fund, in principal, up to $10.00
million for a pilot that, if successful, could lead to the purchase of
commercial vehicles containing Romeo batteries by HBR's affiliate. The
participants in the Pilot Program have been selected and the parties are
beginning to work towards an agreement to support the Pilot Program.

We have determined that the Battery Recycling Arrangement should be accounted
for as an equity method investment. We have not consolidated our interest in the
System or HBR in our consolidated financial statements as we lack the ability to
direct the activities that most significantly impact HBR's or the System's
economic performance and are therefore not the primary beneficiary and we do not
exercise control over HBR.  We evaluated the characteristics of the arrangement
to determine if it is more similar to a financial instrument, a loan, or an
investment to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The
classification of the contribution and subsequent accounting considerations
involves significant judgment and relies on various factors including, the
significance of HBR's equity in the project, the amount and timing of expected
profits, our requirement to fund 30% of the System's operating shortfall, our
ability to share in 30% of its operating profits, and the estimated fair value
of the arrangement at inception.  Based on the facts and circumstances
surrounding the Battery Recycling Arrangement we concluded that it constitutes
an arrangement that should be accounted for as an equity method investment.

We


recorded our $35.00 million equity method investment in our consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2020, which we believe represents the fair value of the
Battery Recycling Arrangement at inception.

Revenue Recognition



We primarily generate revenue from the sale of battery packs, battery modules,
and the performance of engineering services, inclusive of the development of
prototypes. We account for a contract when it has approval and commitment from
both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are
identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of
consideration is probable.

We determine the amount, timing, and pattern of revenue recognition by applying
the following steps outlined in accounting standards codification (ASC) Topic
606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers:

1. identifying the contract with a customer;

2. identifying the performance obligations in the contract;

3. determining the transaction price;

4. allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations; and

5. recognizing revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied.




Identifying the performance obligations contained in a contract, determining
transaction price, allocating transaction price, and determining when
performance obligations are satisfied can require the application of significant
judgment, as further discussed below.

Identifying the Performance Obligations in a Contract


We evaluate the products or services promised in each contract at inception to
determine whether the contract should be accounted for as having one or more
performance obligations. The prototypes and services in our contracts with our
customers are typically not distinct from one another due to their complex
integrated relationships and functions required to perform under the contract.
Accordingly, our contracts are typically accounted for as one performance
obligation. In

                                       74

  Table of Contents

limited cases, our contracts have more than one distinct performance obligation,
which occurs when we perform activities that are not highly complex or
interrelated or involve different products. Significant judgment is required in
determining performance obligations, and these decisions could change the amount
of revenue and profit or loss recorded in each period. We classify revenue as
products or services on our consolidated statements of operations based on the
predominant attributes of the performance obligations.

Customer arrangements that include the provision of developed or customized
products that require the bundling of promises, such as providing non-recurring
engineering and development services that lead to a prototype, are combined into
a single performance obligation because the individual products and services
that are required to fulfill the customer requirements do not meet the criteria
for a distinct performance obligation. These customized products generally have
no alternative use to us and are recognized over time or at a point in time
depending on whether the terms and conditions of these arrangements give us the
enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, including a
reasonable profit margin.

Determination of and Allocation of Transaction Price



Each customer purchase order sets forth the transaction price for the products
and services purchased under the arrangement. For contracts with multiple
performance obligations, we evaluate whether the stated selling prices for the
products or services represent their standalone selling prices. We may sell
customized solutions unique to a customer's specifications. When it is necessary
to allocate the transaction price to multiple performance obligations, we
typically use the expected cost plus a reasonable profit margin to estimate the
standalone selling price of each product or service. We also sell standard
products or services with observable standalone revenue transactions. In these
situations, the observable standalone revenue transactions are used to determine
the standalone selling price.

Some customer arrangements include variable consideration, such as volume
discounts, some of which depend upon the customers meeting specified performance
criteria, such as a purchasing level over a period. We use judgment to estimate
the most likely amount of variable consideration at each reporting date. When
estimating variable consideration, we also apply judgment when considering the
probability of whether a reversal of revenue could occur and only recognize
revenue subject to this constraint.

Determination of when Performance Obligations are Satisfied



For arrangements which give an enforceable right to payment, control transfers
over time and we measure progress towards completion by selecting the input or
output method that best depicts the transfer of control of the underlying goods
and services to the customer for each respective arrangement. Methods we use to
measure progress toward completion include estimating the percentage of
completion using a cost-to-cost measure of progress because it best depicts the
transfer of control to the customer as we incur costs on our contracts. Under
the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost measure of progress, the extent of
progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to
date to the total estimated costs to complete the performance obligation(s). For
arrangements where no enforceable right to payment exists, we will recognize
revenue at a point in time based on the title transfer of the final prototype or
specified product.

Equity Valuations

As there was not a market for Legacy Romeo's equity, valuations of Legacy
Romeo's equity instruments required the application of significant estimates,
assumptions, and judgments. These valuations impact various amounts reported in
our consolidated financial statements, inclusive of the recognition of
equity-based compensation, debt discounts, and beneficial conversion features
associated with convertible financial instruments. The following discussion
provides additional details regarding the significant estimates, assumptions,
and judgments that impact the determination of the fair values of equity-based
compensation awards, warrants, and the preferred stock and common stock that
comprised Legacy Romeo's capital structure prior to the Business Combination.
The following discussion also explained why these estimates, assumptions, and
judgments could be subject to uncertainties and future variability.

                                       75

Table of Contents

Equity-Based Compensation and Warrants



Legacy Romeo estimated its grant date fair value of stock options, warrants, and
restricted stock awards granted to employees, non-employees and directors and
used the estimated fair values to measure and recognize the costs for services
received in exchange for the grants. Legacy Romeo also estimated the grant date
fair value of warrants issued in connection with debt instruments, as a portion
of the debt proceeds must be allocated to the warrants.

Legacy Romeo used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model in order to estimate
the fair values of both time-based stock option awards and warrants. Estimating
the fair value of stock options and warrants using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model required the application of significant assumptions, such
as the fair value of Legacy Romeo's underlying common stock, the estimated term
of the option, the risk-free interest rates, the expected volatility of the
price of Legacy Romeo's common stock and the expected dividend yield. Each of
these assumptions were subjective, required significant judgment, and were based
upon management's best estimates. If any of these assumptions were to change
significantly in the future, equity-based compensation for future awards may
differ significantly, as compared with awards previously granted.

The assumptions and estimates applied by Legacy Romeo to derive the inputs for inclusion in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model are as follows:

? Fair value of common stock - see "Preferred Stock and Common Stock Valuations"

discussion below.

Expected Term - This is the period that the options or warrants that have been

? granted are expected to remain unexercised. Legacy Romeo employed the

simplified method to calculate the average expected term.

Volatility - This is a measure of the amount by which a financial variable,

such as a share price, has fluctuated (historical volatility) or is expected to

? fluctuate (expected volatility) during a period. As Legacy Romeo did not have

sufficient history of its own volatility, management identified several

guideline comparable companies and estimated volatility based on the volatility

of those companies.

? Risk-Free Interest Rate - This is the U.S. Treasury rate, having a term that

most closely resembles the expected life of the stock option or warrant.

? Dividend Yield - Legacy Romeo did not and does not expect to pay dividends on

its common stock in the foreseeable future.

Preferred Stock and Common Stock Valuations



In connection with the Business Combination each issued and outstanding share of
Legacy Romeo preferred stock was exchanged for Common Stock, as if each had
converted into Legacy Romeo Class A common stock immediately prior to the
Business Combination. Subsequent to the issuance of the Series A-5 preferred
stock and in connection with the Business Combination, the conversion price for
the Series Seed conversion price adjusted to $0.2123. As of December 31, 2020
the Company no longer had any authorized, issued or outstanding shares of
preferred stock. Additionally, as of December 29, 2020 there is a public market
for our equity instruments.

Prior to the Business Combination Legacy Romeo used valuations of its preferred
stock and common stock for various purposes, including, but not limited to, the
determination of the exercise price of stock options, inclusion in the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, and assessing whether convertible
instruments included a beneficial conversion feature. As a privately held
company, the lack of an active public market for Legacy Romeo's common stock
required Legacy Romeo's management and board of directors to exercise reasonable
judgment and consider a number of factors in order to make the best estimate of
fair value of Legacy Romeo's equity. As Legacy Romeo's capital structure
consisted of multiple classes of equity, Legacy Romeo, with the assistance of a
third-party valuation specialist, utilized an option pricing model ("OPM") to
determine the fair value of each class of equity. Under this approach, Legacy
Romeo first estimated the fair value of Legacy Romeo's total enterprise value
and total equity value using a combination of the income

                                       76

Table of Contents


approach, guideline public company method, and guideline transaction method and
subsequently used the OPM model to allocate values to each individual equity
class by creating a series of call options on Legacy Romeo's equity value, with
exercise prices based on the liquidation preferences, participation rights, and
exercise prices of the equity instruments. Estimating Legacy Romeo's total
enterprise value and total equity value required the application of significant
judgment and assumptions. Factors considered in connection with estimating these
values:

? Recent arms-length transactions involving the sale or transfer of Legacy

Romeo's common stock;

? The rights, preferences and privileges of Legacy Romeo's Series A preferred

stock relative to those of Legacy Romeo's common stock;

? Legacy Romeo's historical financial results and future financial projections;

? The market value of equity interests in substantially similar businesses, which

equity interests can be valued through nondiscretionary, objective means;

? The lack of marketability of Legacy Romeo's common stock;

? The likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public

offering or business combination, given prevailing market conditions;

? Industry outlook; and

? General economic outlook, including economic growth, inflation and

unemployment, interest rate environment and global economic trends.


The fair value ultimately assigned to Legacy Romeo's common stock took into
account any number or combination of the various factors described above, based
upon their applicability at the time of measurement. Determination of the fair
value of Legacy Romeo's common stock also involved the application of multiple
valuation methodologies and approaches, with varying weighting applied to each
methodology as of the grant date. Application of these approaches involved the
use of estimates, judgment, and assumptions that are highly complex and
subjective, such as those regarding Legacy Romeo's expected future revenue,
expenses, and future cash flows; discount rates; market multiples; the selection
of comparable companies; and the probability of possible future events. Changes
in any or all of these estimates and assumptions or the relationships between
those assumptions impact Legacy Romeo's valuations as of each valuation date and
may have a material impact on the historical valuation of Legacy Romeo's common
stock.

Following the Business Combination, it is not necessary for our management and
our board of directors to estimate the fair value of our Common Stock, as the
Common Stock of the combined company is traded in the public market.

Public and Private Placement Warrants



We classify the Public and Private Placement Warrants as a long-term liability
on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. Each Public and
Private Placement Warrant is initially recorded at fair value on the date of the
Business Combination.  The Public Warrants were traded on the NYSE prior to
their redemption and are recorded at fair value using the closing stock price as
of the measurement date.  The Private Placement Warrants are recorded at fair
value using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The Public and Private
Placement Warrants are re-measured to fair value at each subsequent reporting
date. We will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value for the
Public and Private Placement Warrants until the warrants are exercised, redeemed
or cancelled.

The fair value of the Private Placement warrants is established using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires inputs such as the fair value of our Common Stock, the risk-free interest rate, expected term, expected dividend yield and expected volatility. The fair value of our Common Stock is the closing stock



                                       77

Table of Contents



price on the NYSE as of the measurement date. The risk-free interest rate
assumption is determined by using the U.S. Treasury rates of the same period as
the expected term of the Private Placement Warrants, which is 5 years.  The
dividend yield assumption is based on the dividends expected to be paid over the
expected life of the stock option.  Our volatility is derived from several
publicly traded peer companies. Changes in these assumptions can materially
affect the estimate of the fair value of these instruments and ultimately change
in fair value of Private Placement Warrants. The Company has historically been a
private company and lacked sufficient company-specific historical and implied
volatility information. Therefore, it estimated its expected stock volatility
based on the historical volatility of a publicly traded set of peer companies.

Leases



We evaluate whether our contractual arrangements contain leases at the inception
of such arrangements. Specifically, management considers whether we can control
the underlying asset and have the right to obtain substantially all of the
economic benefits or outputs from the asset.

Right-of-use (ROU) lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset
for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease
payments. Both the ROU lease asset and liability are recognized as of the lease
commencement date based on the present value of the lease payments over the
lease term. Most of our leases do not provide an implicit borrowing rate that
can readily be determined. Therefore, we apply a discount rate based on the
incremental borrowing rate as of the lease commencement date. The incremental
borrowing rate is determined by using credit rating models, including
adjustments to derive a borrowing rate reflective of our secured borrowings, as
well as other information available as of the lease commencement date. These
credit rating models require us to make judgments related to inputs such as its
credit quality or comparable credit rating.

Our lease agreements may include options to extend the lease term or to
terminate the lease early. We include options to extend or terminate leases upon
determination of the ROU lease asset and liability when it is reasonably certain
we will exercise these options. Determination of whether a lease is reasonably
certain to be extended or terminated is a judgment made by management. For
leases that include such options, we make a determination as to whether it is
reasonably certain to exercise the options as of the lease commencement date. If
facts and circumstances change such that we are no longer reasonably certain we
will exercise our option, where it had previously concluded that it was
reasonably certain to exercise the option as of the lease commencement date, we
will re-measure the ROU lease asset and liability.

Inventory

Our inventory primarily consists of raw materials and, to a lesser extent, work-in-process, and finished goods. We report inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard costing, which approximates the value of inventory on a first-in, first-out method.



We write down the carrying value of inventory when the carrying value exceeds
its net realizable value. We estimate write-downs for inventory obsolescence by
continuously examining our inventories to determine if and when there are
indicators that carrying values exceed net realizable values. Write-downs for
excess or obsolete inventories are primarily based upon a comparison of our
inventory on hand to assumptions about current and future product demand. If
actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management,
additional write-downs may be required. Factors such as the age of inventory,
acceptance of our products in the markets in which we participate, the length of
product life cycles, production volumes, production lead times, technological
advancements of our products and those of our competitors, and changes in
technical standards of our products may impact the demand for our products, the
amount of inventory that we carry on hand, and the ultimate net realizable value
of inventory items. Accordingly, these factors can be expected to impact if and
when inventory write-downs may be required. When there is a write-down of
inventory, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established and
subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration
or increase in that newly established cost basis. If we ultimately sell
inventory that has been previously written down, net income or loss reported in
future periods would be impacted positively.

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we recorded write-downs of inventory of $3.11 million and $1.74 million, respectively. These write-downs were primarily due to obsolescence of certain raw materials



                                       78

Table of Contents


and work-in-progress, due to technological advances. While we believe that
adequate write-downs for inventory obsolescence have been made in the
consolidated financial statements, actual demand could be less than forecasted
demand for our products, and we could experience additional material inventory
write-downs in the future.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See "Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses