TDG Gold Corp. announced assay results from resampling of four additional historical drillholes which further support the concept that the Baker Complex area of its Toodoggone properties may represent a bulk-tonnage, porphyry-style copper-gold target. The geologically related technical content of this new release has been reviewed and approved by Steven Kramar, P.Geo., Vice President, Exploration for TDG and a Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101.

Exploration targets and/or Exploration zones and/or Exploration areas are speculative and there is no certainty that any future work or evaluation will lead to the definition of a mineral resource. Historical Data: This news release includes historical information that has been reviewed by TDG's qualified person (QP). Therefore, any conclusions or interpretations borne from use of this data should be considered too speculative to suggest that additional exploration will result in mineral resource delineation.

TDG encourages readers to exercise appropriate caution when evaluating these data and/or results. Historical Drillcore: The Company has identified approximately 100 complete/nearly complete drillholes for relogging, of which approximately 60 are restacked and ready for relogging, 10 have been fully relogging, and 10 have been submitted for assaying and results have been received from 7. By systematically relogging the historical core, including drillholes where mining is known to have taken place, followed by resampling5 where appropriate, TDG is aiming to assemble the first comprehensive copper-focused drill database for the Baker Complex and to select drill-ready targets for 2024. All B-Vein relogged and modern assayed drillholes continue to support the concept that the Baker B-Vein is a high-grade Au-Ag mineralized core surrounded by a lower grade halo of Cu-Au mineralization and the Cu mineralization in the epithermal veining is likely a function of metal scavenging by hydrothermal fluids from a larger porphyry system at depth.

Historically recorded results for the diamond drillholes (BK87-07, BK86-14, BK86-22 & BK86-17) are presented in Table 2. Composite results were built using the same assay intervals as Table 1, or the closest equivalent interval with the historical data available. These differences could be due to a combination of factors including: (i) nugget effect, (ii) sample selection methodology and/or, (iii) laboratory methodology particularly for assay results generated by the historical Baker mill laboratory.