"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act that are based on
management's current expectations, estimates and projections about our business
operations.  Please read "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking
Statements."  Our actual results may differ materially from those currently
anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of
numerous factors, including the known material factors set forth in Item 1A.
"Risk Factors" of this annual report.  You should read the following discussion
and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes
to those statements in Item 8 of this annual report.

This section of this annual report generally discusses key operating and
financial data as of and for the years ended 2020 and 2019 and provides
year-over-year comparisons for such periods. For a similar discussion and
year-over-year comparisons to our 2018 results, please refer to "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in
Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2020.

Description of the Business



We provide hospitality services to the natural resources industry in Canada,
Australia and the U.S. We provide a full suite of hospitality services for our
guests, including lodging, food service, housekeeping and maintenance at
accommodation facilities that we or our customers own. In many cases, we provide
services that support the day-to-day operations of accommodation facilities,
such as laundry, facility management and maintenance, water and wastewater
treatment, power generation, communication systems, security and logistics. We
also offer development activities for workforce accommodation facilities,
including site selection, permitting, engineering and design, manufacturing
management and site construction, along with providing hospitality services once
the facility is constructed. We primarily operate in some of the world's most
active oil, metallurgical (met) coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and iron ore
producing regions, and our customers include major and independent oil
companies, mining companies, engineering companies and oilfield and mining
service companies. We operate in three principal reporting business segments -
Canada, Australia and the U.S.

Reverse Share Split



On November 19, 2020, we effected a reverse share split where each twelve issued
and outstanding common shares were converted into one common share (Reverse
Share Split). Our common shares began trading on a reverse share split adjusted
basis on November 19, 2020. All common share and per common share data included
in this annual report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Reverse
Share Split.

See Note 1 - Description of Business and Basis of Presentation to the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this annual report for further discussion regarding the Reverse Share Split.

Basis of Presentation



Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates: (i) all references
in these consolidated financial statements to "Civeo," "us," "our" or "we" refer
to Civeo Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries; and (ii) all references
in this annual report to "dollars" or "$" are to U.S. dollars.

Overview and Macroeconomic Environment



Demand for our services can be attributed to two phases of our customers'
projects: (1) the development or construction phase; and (2) the operations or
production phase. Historically, initial demand for our hospitality services has
been driven by our customers' capital spending programs related to the
construction and development of natural resource projects and associated
infrastructure, as well as the exploration for oil and natural gas. Long-term
demand for our services has been driven by natural resource production and
operation of those facilities as well as expansion of those sites. In general,
industry capital spending programs are based on the outlook for commodity
prices, economic growth, global commodity supply/demand dynamics and estimates
of resource production. As a result, demand for our hospitality services is
largely sensitive to expected commodity prices, principally related to oil, met
coal, LNG and iron ore. Other factors that can affect our business and financial
results include the general global economic environment and regulatory changes
in Canada, Australia, the U.S. and other markets, including governmental
measures introduced to fight climate change or to help slow the spread or
mitigate the impact of COVID-19.
                                       44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our business is predominantly located in northern Alberta, Canada; British
Columbia, Canada; Queensland, Australia; and Western Australia. We derive most
of our business from natural resource companies who are developing and producing
oil sands, met coal, LNG and iron ore resources and, to a lesser extent, other
hydrocarbon and mineral resources. Approximately 66% of our revenue is generated
by our lodges in Canada and our villages in Australia. Where traditional
accommodations and infrastructure are insufficient, inaccessible or cost
ineffective, our lodge and village facilities provide comprehensive hospitality
services similar to those found in an urban hotel. We typically contract our
facilities to our customers on a fee-per-person-per-day basis that covers
lodging and meals and is based on the duration of customer needs, which can
range from several weeks to several years.
Generally, our core Canadian oil sands and Australian mining customers are
making significant capital investments to develop their prospects, which have
estimated reserve lives ranging from ten years to in excess of 30 years.
Consequently, these investments are primarily dependent on those customers'
long-term views of commodity demand and prices.
The spread of COVID-19 and the response thereto have negatively impacted the
global economy. The actions taken to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and the
risk of infection have altered, and are expected to continue to alter,
governmental and private-sector policies and behaviors in ways that have had a
significant negative effect on oil consumption, such as government-imposed or
voluntary social distancing and quarantining, reduced travel and remote work
policies. Additionally, global oil prices dropped to historically low levels in
March and April 2020 due to severely reduced global oil demand, high global
crude inventory levels, uncertainty around timing and slope of worldwide
economic recovery after COVID-19 related economic shut-downs and effectiveness
of production cuts by major oil producing countries, such as Saudi Arabia,
Russia and the U.S. In mid-April 2020, OPEC+ (the combination of historical OPEC
members and other significant oil producers, such as Russia) announced
production cuts of up to approximately 10 million barrels per day. However, oil
prices remained at depressed levels throughout most of 2020, before modest
improvement late in the year and into early 2021. Prices are expected to remain
relatively volatile throughout 2021.
The economic disruption caused by the spread of COVID-19 and decline in the
price of and demand for oil have impacted the activity in the Canadian oil
sands, and we have seen a decrease in demand for rooms by our oil sands
customers. The reduction in the occupancy at our Canadian oil sands lodges
negatively impacted our business in 2020 and could continue to negatively impact
our business if oil prices continue to remain volatile. Due to lower oil prices
in 2020 and the economic disruption caused by COVID-19, we implemented certain
cost containment initiatives, including salary and total compensation reductions
of 20% for the Board and Chief Executive Officer for 2020 from March levels,
salary reductions for senior management in Canada and the U.S., headcount
reductions in North America of approximately 33% from March through December
2020, and decreases to 2020 capital spending by approximately 25%.
Despite the aforementioned negative impact of COVID-19 on the global economy,
the impact on the Australian mining industry in 2020 was relatively muted. Due
to strong Chinese steel demand, supply disruptions in other countries and
limited COVID-19 cases in Australia, Australian met coal and iron ore activity
was relatively buoyant in 2020.
We continue to closely monitor the COVID-19 situation and have taken measures to
help ensure the health and well-being of our employees, guests and contractors,
including screening of individuals that enter our facilities, social distancing
practices, enhanced cleaning and deep sanitization, the suspension of
nonessential employee travel and implementation of work-from-home policies,
where applicable.
Alberta Canada. In Canada, Western Canadian Select (WCS) crude is the benchmark
price for our oil sands customers. Pricing for WCS is driven by several factors,
including the underlying price for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude, the
availability of transportation infrastructure (consisting of pipelines and crude
by railcar) and recent actions by the Alberta provincial government to limit oil
production from the province. Historically, WCS has traded at a discount to WTI,
creating a "WCS Differential," due to transportation costs and capacity
restrictions to move Canadian heavy oil production to refineries, primarily
along the U.S. Gulf Coast. The WCS Differential has varied depending on the
extent of transportation capacity availability.
Certain expansionary oil pipeline projects have the potential to both drive
incremental demand for mobile assets and to improve take-away capacity for
Canadian oil sands producers over the longer term. While these pipeline
projects, including Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain Pipeline (TMX), have recently
received incremental regulatory approvals, it is still not certain if any of the
proposed pipeline projects will ultimately be completed. Certain segments of the
TMX pipeline have begun construction; however, the construction timeline
continues to be delayed due to the lack of agreement between the Canadian
federal government, which supports the pipeline projects, and the British
Columbia provincial government. The Canadian federal government acquired TMX
pipeline in 2018, approved the expansion of the project and is currently working
through the revised construction timeline. In April 2020, the Alberta provincial
government announced its intent to financially support the construction of the
Keystone XL pipeline (KXL). The construction of this pipeline expansion was
suspended due to the U.S.
                                       45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Supreme Court refusing to renew a water permit for the KXL pipeline in July
2020. After President Biden's inauguration in January 2021, he implemented an
executive order to revoke a necessary cross-border permit, canceling the
project.
WCS prices in the fourth quarter of 2020 averaged $31.34 per barrel compared to
a low of $19.73 in the second quarter of 2020 and a high of $49.93 in the second
quarter of 2018. The WCS Differential decreased from $22.49 per barrel at the
end of the fourth quarter of 2019 to $15.35 at the end of the fourth quarter
2020. In 2018, the Government of Alberta announced it would mandate temporary
curtailments of the province's oil production. However, monthly production
limits were put on hold in December 2020 until further notice, allowing
operators to produce freely at their discretion while the government monitors
production. Should forecasts show storage inventories approaching maximum
capacity, the government may reintroduce production limits. The curtailment
initially resulted in a narrowing WCS Differential in December 2018, which
increased in 2019 before narrowing again in the first quarter of 2020. As of
February 22, 2021, the WTI price was $61.49 and the WCS price was $49.95,
resulting in a WCS Differential of $11.54.
The depressed price levels of both WTI and WCS materially impacted 2020
maintenance and production spending and activity by Canadian operators and,
therefore, demand for our hospitality services. While some of our Canadian oil
sands customers conducted maintenance projects in the third quarter 2020,
activity was negatively impacted by the current environment. Customers began
increasing production activity in the fourth quarter of 2020. Continued
uncertainty, including about the impact of COVID-19, and commodity price
volatility and regulatory complications could cause our Canadian oil sands and
pipeline customers to reduce production, delay expansionary and maintenance
spending and defer additional investments in their oil sands assets.
Additionally, if oil prices do not improve or stabilize, the resulting impact
could continue to negatively affect the value of our long-lived assets.
British Columbia, Canada. Our Sitka Lodge supports the LNG Canada project and
related pipeline projects. From a macroeconomic standpoint, LNG demand continued
to grow despite the COVID-19 pandemic, reinforcing the need for the global LNG
industry to expand access to natural gas. Evolving government energy policies
around the world have amplified support for cleaner energy supply, creating more
opportunities for natural gas and LNG. Accordingly, the current view is
additional investment in LNG supply will be needed to meet the expected
long-term LNG demand growth.
Currently, Western Canada does not have any operational LNG export facilities.
LNG Canada (LNGC), a joint venture among Shell Canada Energy, an affiliate of
Royal Dutch Shell plc (40 percent), and affiliates of PETRONAS, through its
wholly-owned entity, North Montney LNG Limited Partnership (25 percent),
PetroChina (15 percent), Mitsubishi Corporation (15 percent) and Korea Gas
Corporation (5 percent), is currently constructing a liquefaction and export
facility in Kitimat, British Columbia (Kitimat LNG Facility). British Columbia
LNG activity and related pipeline projects are a material driver of activity for
our Sitka Lodge, as well as for our mobile assets, which are contracted to serve
several portions of the related pipeline construction activity. The actual
timing of when revenue is realized from the Costal Gas Link pipeline and Sitka
Lodge contracts could be impacted by any delays in the construction of the
Kitimat LNG Facility or the pipeline, including recent blockades that aim to
delay pipeline construction.
In late March 2020, LNGC announced steps being taken to reduce the spread of
COVID-19, including reduction of the workforce at the project site to essential
personnel only. This resulted in a reduction in occupancy at our Sitka Lodge
during the second quarter of 2020. Occupancy at the Sitka Lodge returned to
expected levels during July 2020 and remained at expected levels thorough the
end of 2020.
Australia. In Australia, 82% of our rooms are located in the Bowen Basin of
Queensland, Australia and primarily serve met coal mines in that region. Met
coal pricing and production growth in the Bowen Basin region is predominantly
influenced by the levels of global steel production, which decreased by 0.9%
during 2020 compared to 2019. As of February 22, 2021, met coal spot prices were
$138.50 per metric tonne. Long-term demand for steel is expected to be driven by
global infrastructure spending and increased steel consumption per capita in
developing economies, such as China and India, whose current consumption per
capita is a fraction of developed countries. In 2020, the impact of the outbreak
of COVID-19 led to a high level of uncertainty for demand of iron ore and met
coal. The impact on the demand for steel with the closure or curtailment of
manufacturing in economies affected by COVID-19, which will only return to
normal levels of consumption once jurisdictions lift quarantine requirements and
manufacturing facilities are reopened, is also uncertain. However, a new round
of stimulus spending in China and recovering steel production in other regions
continues to support demand for raw materials, particularly iron ore.
Currently, China and Australia are in a trade dispute that has led to China
implementing an unofficial trade embargo on Australian coal. China has
historically accounted for approximately 22% of Australia's met coal exports.
The continuing uncertainty in the Chinese demand for Australian met coal led to
a decrease in the met coal spot price to US$103 per tonne at December 31, 2020,
though, as noted above, prices recovered somewhat to $138.50 per metric tonne at
February 22, 2021. The softening of the met coal spot price has been exacerbated
as Chinese mills and traders resell stranded Australian met coal at a discount.
As a result, there is currently a shuffling of global export trade flows,
coupled with growing demand for steel with an
                                       46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

infrastructure led recovery which may lead to near term volatility in Australian
met coal spot pricing. If this dispute continues, it could continue to
negatively impact pricing and demand for Australian met coal.
To date, we have not seen an overall material decline in occupancy at our
Australian villages resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or the Chinese trade
dispute.

Activity in Western Australia is driven primarily by iron ore production, which
is a key steel-making ingredient.  As of February 22, 2021, iron ore spot prices
were $168.48 per metric tonne.
On July 1, 2019, we acquired Action, a provider of integrated services to the
mining industry in Western Australia. Accordingly, we also have contracts in
place to service customer-owned villages in Western Australia which service
primarily iron ore mines in addition to gold, lithium and nickel mines. We
believe prices are currently at a level that may contribute to increased
activity over the long term if our customers view these price levels as
sustainable.
Met coal and iron ore prices to date have remained at levels that should support
the current levels of occupancy in our Australia villages and the customer
locations that we manage under our integrated services business. Accordingly, we
plan to continue focusing on enhancing the quality of our operations,
maintaining financial discipline, proactively managing our business as market
conditions continue to evolve.
U.S. Our U.S. business supports oil shale drilling and completion activity and
is primarily tied to WTI oil prices in the U.S. shale formations in the Permian
Basin, the Mid-Continent, the Bakken and the Rockies. During 2019, the U.S. oil
rig count and associated completion activity decreased due to the oil price
decline in late 2018 and early 2019 coupled with other market dynamics
negatively impacting exploration and production (E&P) spending, finishing the
year at 677 rigs. In 2020, the U.S. oil rig count and associated completion
activity further decreased due to the global oil price decline discussed above.
Only 267 oil rigs were active at the end of 2020. The Permian Basin remains the
most active U.S. unconventional play, representing 66% of the oil rigs active in
the U.S. at the end of 2020. The lower U.S. rig count and decline in oil prices
resulted in decreased U.S. oil production from an average of 12.2 million
barrels per day in 2019 to an average of 11.3 million barrels per day in 2020.
As of February 19, 2021, there were 305 active oil rigs in the U.S. (as measured
by Bakerhughes.com). With the recent volatility in oil prices and a resulting
reduction in spending by E&P companies, we have exited the Bakken and reduced
our presence in the Rockies regions for our U.S. mobile assets. Those assets
have either been sold or transported to our Permian Basin and Mid-Continent
district locations. This process is underway and we expect it to be completed
during the first half of 2021. U.S. oil shale drilling and completion activity
will continue to be dependent on sustained higher WTI oil prices, pipeline
capacity and sufficient capital to support E&P drilling and completion plans. In
addition, consolidation among our E&P customer base in the U.S. has historically
created short-term spending and activity dislocations. Should the current trend
of industry consolidation continue, we may see activity, utilization and
occupancy declines in the near term.

                                       47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recent Commodity Prices. Recent WTI crude, WCS crude and met coal pricing trends
are as follows:

                                                            Average Price (1)
                                                                                  Hard
                Quarter                  WTI Crude       WCS Crude       Coking Coal (Met Coal)
                 ended                   (per bbl)       (per bbl)             (per tonne)
    First Quarter through 2/22/2021     $    54.77      $    42.14      $                133.18
              12/31/2020                     42.63           31.34                       109.37
               9/30/2020                     40.90           31.15                       113.30
               6/30/2020                     27.95           19.73                       120.27
               3/31/2020                     45.38           27.92                       156.17
              12/31/2019                     56.85           37.94                       141.39
               9/30/2019                     56.40           43.88                       160.25
               6/30/2019                     59.89           47.39                       204.78
               3/31/2019                     54.87           44.49                       203.30
              12/31/2018                     59.32           25.66                       223.02
               9/30/2018                     69.61           41.58                       188.46
               6/30/2018                     67.97           49.93                       189.41
               3/31/2018                     62.89           37.09                       228.82
              12/31/2017                     55.28           38.65                       202.33

(1)Source: WTI crude prices are from U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), and WCS crude prices are from Bloomberg and hard coking coal prices are from IHS Markit.



Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. Exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and each
of the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar influence our U.S. dollar
reported financial results. Our business has historically derived the vast
majority of its revenues and operating income (loss) in Canada and Australia.
These revenues and profits/losses are translated into U.S. dollars for U.S. GAAP
financial reporting purposes. The following tables summarize the fluctuations in
the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and each of the Canadian dollar and
the Australian dollar:
                                                                        Year Ended December 31,
                                           2020                      2019                     Change                Percentage
Average Canadian dollar to U.S.
dollar                                         $0.746                    $0.754              (0.008)                  (1.1)%
Average Australian dollar to U.S.
dollar                                         $0.691                    $0.695              (0.004)                  (0.6)%



                                                           As of December 31,
                                         2020           2019          Change          Percentage

    Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar       $0.785         $0.770        0.015              2.0%
    Australian dollar to U.S. dollar     $0.773         $0.700        0.073             10.4%


These fluctuations of the Canadian and Australian dollars have had and will continue to have an impact on the translation of earnings generated from our Canadian and Australian subsidiaries and, therefore, our financial results.



Capital Expenditures. We continue to monitor the COVID-19 global pandemic and
the responses thereto, the global economy, the price of demand for crude oil,
met coal, LNG and iron ore and the resultant impact on the capital spending
plans of our customers in order to plan our business activities. We currently
expect that our 2021 capital expenditures, exclusive of any business
acquisitions, will total approximately $20.0 million to $25.0 million, compared
to 2020 capital expenditures of $10.1 million. See "Liquidity and Capital
Resources" below for further discussion of 2021 and 2020 capital expenditures.

                                       48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results of Operations

Unless otherwise indicated, discussion of results for the year ended December 31, 2020 is based on a comparison with the corresponding period of 2019.



Results of Operations - Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2019

                                                                            Year Ended
                                                                           December 31,
                                                         2020                  2019                 Change

                                                                         ($ in thousands)
Revenues
Canada                                              $    269,649          $    325,651          $    (56,002)
Australia                                                234,542               156,093                78,449
U.S.                                                      25,538                45,811               (20,273)
Total revenues                                           529,729               527,555                 2,174
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales and services
Canada                                                   209,283               239,624               (30,341)
Australia                                                144,709                89,090                55,619
U.S.                                                      28,096                38,100               (10,004)
Total cost of sales and services                         382,088               366,814                15,274
Selling, general and administrative expenses              53,656                59,586                (5,930)
Depreciation and amortization expense                     96,547               123,768               (27,221)
Impairment expense                                       144,120                26,148               117,972
Other operating expense                                      506                   290                   216
Total costs and expenses                                 676,917               576,606               100,311
Operating loss                                          (147,188)              (49,051)              (98,137)

Interest expense and income, net                         (17,050)              (27,305)               10,255
Other income                                              20,823                 7,281                13,542
Loss before income taxes                                (143,415)              (69,075)              (74,340)
Income tax benefit                                        10,635                10,741                  (106)
Net loss                                                (132,780)              (58,334)              (74,446)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest                                                   1,470                   157                 1,313
Net loss attributable to Civeo Corporation              (134,250)              (58,491)              (75,759)
Less: Dividends attributable to Class A preferred
shares                                                     1,887                 1,849                    38

Net loss attributable to Civeo common shareholders $ (136,137) $

(60,340) $ (75,797)





We reported net loss attributable to Civeo for 2020 of $136.1 million, or $9.64
per diluted share. As further discussed below, net loss included (i) a $93.6
million pre-tax loss ($93.6 million after-tax, or $6.63 per diluted share)
resulting from the impairment of goodwill in our Canada segment included in
Impairment expense, (ii) a $38.1 million pre-tax loss ($38.1 million after-tax,
or $2.69 per diluted share) resulting from the impairment of long-lived assets
in our Canada segment included in Impairment expense and (iii) a $12.4 million
pre-tax loss ($12.4 million after-tax, or $0.88 per diluted share) resulting
from the impairment of long-lived assets in our U.S. segment included in
Impairment expense. Net loss was partially offset by $4.7 million pre-tax income
($4.7 million after-tax, or $0.33 per diluted share) associated with the
settlement of a representations and warranties claim related to the Noralta
acquisition included in our Canada segment in Other income.

We reported net loss attributable to Civeo for 2019 of $60.3 million, or $4.33
per diluted share. As further discussed below, net loss included (i) a $19.9
million pre-tax loss ($19.9 million after-tax, or $1.43 per diluted share)
resulting from the impairment of goodwill in our Canada segment included in
Impairment expense, (ii) a $6.2 million pre-tax loss ($6.1 million after-tax, or
$0.44 per diluted share) resulting from the impairment of fixed assets included
in Impairment expense, and (iii) a $0.2 million gain on sale of assets related
to the sale of a village in Australia and related $2.2 million release of an
asset retirement obligation (ARO) liability assumed by the buyer.

Revenues. Consolidated revenues increased $2.2 million, or 0%, in 2020 compared
to 2019. This increase was primarily due to the full year impact in 2020 of our
Australia integrated services business due to the Action acquisition completed
in July 2019, increased occupancy at our Bowen Basin villages in Australia and
increased mobile asset activity from our pipeline
                                       49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

project in Canada. These items were partially offset by lower revenue from
reduced occupancy at our lodges in Canada resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic,
lower oil prices and the global oil market dislocation. Additionally, lower
activity levels in certain markets in the U.S. and weaker Canadian dollars
relative to the U.S. dollar in 2020 compared to 2019 also offset the increased
revenues. See the discussion of segment results of operations below for further
information.

Cost of Sales and Services. Our consolidated cost of sales increased $15.3
million, or 4%, in 2020 compared to 2019. This increase was primarily due to
increased activity at our Australian integrated services business due to the
Action acquisition, increased occupancy at our Bowen Basin villages in Australia
and increased mobile asset activity from our pipeline project in Canada. These
items were partially offset by decreased cost of sales and services due to
reduced occupancy at our oil sands lodges in Canada resulting from the COVID-19
pandemic and lower oil prices. Additionally, lower activity levels in certain
markets in the U.S. and weaker Canadian dollars relative to the U.S. dollar in
2020 compared to 2019 offset the increased cost of sales and services. See the
discussion of segment results of operations below for further information.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expense decreased $5.9
million, or 10%, in 2020 compared to 2019. This decrease was primarily due to
lower share-based compensation expense, travel and entertainment expenses and
compensation expense, partially offset by higher incentive compensation costs.
The decrease in share-based compensation was due to a reduction in the amount of
phantom share awards outstanding and the reduction in our average stock price
during 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease in travel and entertainment expenses
was largely a result of reduced travel due to COVID-19.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense
decreased $27.2 million, or 22%, in 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease was
primarily due to (i) the impairment of certain long-lived assets in Canada and
the U.S. during the first quarter of 2020, (ii) the extension of the remaining
life of certain long-lived accommodation assets in Canada during the fourth
quarter of 2019 and (iii) certain assets and intangibles becoming fully
depreciated during 2019. These items were partially offset by additional
depreciation and intangible amortization expense related to our Action
acquisition in 2019.

Impairment Expense. Impairment expense of $144.1 million in 2020 included the following items:



•Pre-tax impairment expense of $93.6 million related to the impairment of
goodwill in our Canadian reporting unit.
•Pre-tax impairment expense of $38.1 million associated with long-lived assets
in our Canadian segment.
•Pre-tax impairment expense of $12.4 million associated with long-lived assets
in our U.S. segment.

Impairment Expense. Impairment expense of $26.1 million in 2019 included the following items:



•Pre-tax impairment expense of $19.9 million related to the impairment of
goodwill in our Canadian reporting unit.
•Pre-tax impairment expense of $0.7 million associated with long-lived assets in
our Canadian segment.
•Pre-tax impairment expense of $5.5 million associated with long-lived assets in
our Australian segment. This includes $1.0 million of impairment expense related
to an error corrected in the second quarter 2019. We identified a liability
related to an ARO at one of our villages in Australia that should have been
recorded in 2011. We determined that the error was not material to our
previously issued financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, and therefore, corrected the error in
the second quarter of 2019. Specifically, we recorded the following amounts in
our second quarter 2019 unaudited consolidated statements of operations related
to prior periods: (1) additional accretion expense related to the ARO of $0.9
million, (2) additional depreciation and amortization expense of $0.5 million
related to amortization of the asset retirement cost and (3) additional
impairment expense related to the impairment of the asset retirement cost of
$1.0 million offset by recognition of an ARO liability totaling $2.3 million as
of June 30, 2019.

See Note 4 - Impairment Charges to the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report for further discussion.



Operating Loss. Operating loss increased $98.1 million, or 200%, in 2020
compared to 2019 primarily due to impairments of goodwill and long-lived assets,
partially offset by increased operating profit in Australia, as well as lower
depreciation and amortization expense.

Interest Expense and Income, net. Net interest expense decreased $10.3 million,
or 38%, in 2020 compared to 2019 primarily related to lower average debt levels
and lower interest rates on term loan and revolving credit facility borrowings
during 2020 compared to 2019.

                                       50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Income. Other income increased $13.5 million, or 186%, in 2020 compared to
2019, primarily due to $13.0 million of other income related to proceeds from
the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) and $4.7 million of other income
associated with the settlement of a representations and warranties claim related
to the Noralta Acquisition, partially offset by smaller gains on sale of assets
in 2020 compared to 2019. Other income in 2019 also included $2.6 million of
other income related to proceeds from an insurance claim associated with
maintenance-related operational issues and a gain on sale of assets related to
the sale of a village in Australia and related $2.2 million release of an ARO
liability assumed by the buyer.

Income Tax Benefit.  Our income tax benefit for 2020 totaled $10.6 million, or
7.4% of pretax loss, compared to a benefit of $10.7 million, or 15.5% of pretax
loss for 2019.  Our effective tax rate for 2020 was lower than the Canadian
federal statutory rate of 15%, primarily due to a non-deductible Canadian
goodwill impairment charge of $95.3 million, as well as the release of a
valuation allowance of $9.1 million against the net deferred tax assets in
Australia. This was partially offset by a valuation allowance of $6.4 million
established against net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and Canada.

Our effective tax rate for 2019 was lower than the Canadian combined federal and
provincial statutory rate of 26.5%, primarily due to a non-deductible Canadian
goodwill impairment charge of $19.9 million and a release of a valuation
allowance of $2.3 million against the net deferred tax assets in Australia due
to the Action acquisition. This was partially offset by pre-tax losses in
Australia and the U.S. for which no tax benefit was recorded. As a result, a
valuation allowance of $3.2 million was established against net deferred tax
assets in the U.S. and Australia.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Other comprehensive income increased $6.2
million in 2020 compared to 2019 primarily as a result of foreign currency
translation adjustments due to changes in the Canadian and Australian dollar
exchange rates compared to the U.S. dollar. The Canadian dollar exchange rate
compared to the U.S. dollar increased 2% in 2020 compared to a 5% increase in
2019. The Australian dollar exchange rate compared to the U.S. dollar increased
10.4% in 2020 compared to remaining flat in 2019.
                                       51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Results of Operations - Canadian Segment



                                                                Year Ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                  2020             2019            Change
Revenues ($ in thousands)
Accommodation revenue (1)                     $  202,534       $  281,577       $ (79,043)
Mobile facility rental revenue (2)                33,192            9,575   

23,617


Food service and other services revenue (3)       33,923           33,485             438
Manufacturing revenue (4)                              -            1,014          (1,014)
Total revenues                                $  269,649       $  325,651       $ (56,002)

Cost of sales and services ($ in thousands)
Accommodation cost                            $  143,213       $  187,679       $ (44,466)
Mobile facility rental cost                       24,842            7,493   

17,349


Food service and other services cost              30,616           30,595              21
Manufacturing cost                                   611            1,025            (414)
Indirect other cost                               10,001           12,832          (2,831)
Total cost of sales and services              $  209,283       $  239,624

$ (30,341)



Gross margin as a % of revenues                     22.4  %          26.4  

% (4.0) %



Average daily rate for lodges (5)             $       95       $       91

$ 4



Total billed rooms for lodges (6)              2,095,784        3,078,727   

(982,943)

Average Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar $ 0.746 $ 0.754

$ (0.008)





(1)Includes revenues related to lodge rooms and hospitality services for owned
rooms for the periods presented.
(2)Includes revenues related to mobile assets for the periods presented.
(3)Includes revenues related to food service, laundry and water and wastewater
treatment services for the periods presented.
(4)Includes revenues related to modular construction and manufacturing services
for the periods presented.
(5)Average daily rate is based on billed rooms and accommodation revenue.
(6)Billed rooms represents total billed days for owned assets for the periods
presented.

Our Canadian segment reported revenues in 2020 that were $56.0 million, or 17%,
lower than 2019. Excluding the impact of a weaker Canadian dollar exchange rate,
the segment experienced a 16% decrease in revenues. This decrease was driven by
reduced occupancy at our lodges related to lower oil prices and the COVID-19
pandemic. The weakening of the average exchange rate for the Canadian dollar
relative to the U.S. dollar by 1% in 2020 compared to 2019 resulted in a $2.6
million period-over-period decrease in revenues. Partially offsetting these
items, revenue was favorably impacted by increased mobile asset activity from a
pipeline project.

Our Canadian segment cost of sales and services decreased $30.3 million, or 13%,
in 2020 compared to 2019. The weakening of the average exchange rate for the
Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar by 1% in 2020 compared to 2019
resulted in a $2.1 million period-over-period decrease in cost of sales and
services. Excluding the impact of the weaker Canadian exchange rate, the
decreased cost of sales and services was driven by reduced occupancy at our
lodges in the oil sands region and reduced indirect other costs from a continued
focus on cost containment and operational efficiencies. These decreases were
partially offset by increased mobile asset activity from a pipeline project and
increased costs related to the implementation of enhanced measures during the
COVID-19 pandemic.

Our Canadian segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased from 26%
in 2019 to 22% in 2020. This was primarily driven by increased costs related to
the implementation of enhanced safety measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, as
well as reduced operating efficiencies due to lower occupancy.

                                       52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Results of Operations - Australian Segment



                                                               Year Ended
                                                              December 31,
                                                  2020             2019           Change
Revenues ($ in thousands)
Accommodation revenue (1)                     $  144,070       $  126,047       $ 18,023
Food service and other services revenue (2)       90,472           30,046   

60,426


Total revenues                                $  234,542       $  156,093

$ 78,449



Cost of sales ($ in thousands)
Accommodation cost                                63,504           60,045   

3,459


Food service and other services cost              77,358           26,073   

51,285


Indirect other cost                                3,847            2,972   

875


Total cost of sales and services              $  144,709       $   89,090

$ 55,619



Gross margin as a % of revenues                     38.3  %          42.9  

% (4.6) %



Average daily rate for villages (3)           $       73       $       73

$ -



Total billed rooms for villages (4)            1,968,284        1,717,186   

251,098



Australian dollar to U.S. dollar              $    0.691       $    0.695

$ (0.004)





(1)Includes revenues related to village rooms and hospitality services for owned
rooms for the periods presented.
(2)Includes revenues related to food service and other services, including
facilities management for the periods presented.
(3)Average daily rate is based on billed rooms and accommodation revenue.
(4)Billed rooms represents total billed days for owned assets for the periods
presented.

Our Australian segment reported revenues in 2020 that were $78.4 million, or
50%, higher than 2019. The increase in revenue was primarily due to our
integrated services business, acquired July 1, 2019, which contributed $90.5
million in revenues in 2020 compared to the $30.0 million in 2019. The weakening
of the average exchange rates for Australian dollars relative to the U.S. dollar
by 1% in 2020 compared to 2019 resulted in a $0.9 million year-over-over
decrease in revenues. In addition, the revenue increase was driven by increased
occupancy at our Bowen Basin villages, which was partially offset by decreased
occupancy at our Western Australia villages.

Our Australian segment cost of sales increased $55.6 million, or 62%, in 2020
compared to 2019. The increase was primarily due to our integrated services
business. Increases related to increased occupancy at our Bowen Basin villages
were partially offset by decreased occupancy at our Western Australia villages
and the weakening of the Australian dollar.

Our Australian segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 38%
in 2020 from 43% in 2019. This was primarily driven by our integrated services
business, which has a service-only business model and therefore generates a
lower overall gross margin than the accommodation business, partially offset by
improved margins at our Bowen Basin villages as a result of increased occupancy.

Segment Results of Operations - U.S. Segment



                                                     Year Ended
                                                    December 31,
                                        2020           2019           Change
Revenues ($ in thousands)            $ 25,538       $ 45,811       $ (20,273)

Cost of sales ($ in thousands) $ 28,096 $ 38,100 $ (10,004)

Gross margin as a % of revenues (10.0) % 16.8 % (26.8) %

Our U.S. segment reported revenues in 2020 that were $20.3 million, or 44%, lower than 2019. This was primarily due to reduced occupancy at our West Permian, Killdeer and Acadian Acres lodges, reduced U.S. drilling activity in the Bakken,


                                       53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rockies, Mid-Continent and West Permian markets affecting our wellsite business and reduced activity in our offshore rental business.



Our U.S. segment cost of sales decreased $10.0 million, or 26%, in 2020 compared
to 2019.  The decrease was driven by reduced occupancy at our West Permian and
Killdeer lodges, reduced U.S. drilling activity in the Bakken, Rockies,
Mid-Continent and West Permian markets affecting our wellsite business and
reduced activity in our offshore rental business.

Our U.S. segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased from 17% in 2019 to (10)% in 2020, primarily due to reduced activity at our lodges and wellsite markets and reduced operating efficiencies at lower activity levels.

Liquidity and Capital Resources



Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, which in the past
have included expanding and improving our hospitality services, developing new
lodges and villages, purchasing or leasing land, and for general working capital
needs. In addition, capital has been used to repay debt and fund strategic
business acquisitions. Historically, our primary sources of funds have been
available cash, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our Amended Credit
Agreement and proceeds from equity issuances. In the future, we may seek to
access the debt and equity capital markets from time to time to raise additional
capital, increase liquidity, fund acquisitions, refinance debt or retire
preferred shares.

The following table summarizes our consolidated liquidity position as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):


                                                      December 31,
                                                  2020           2019
Lender commitments (1)                         $ 167,300      $ 263,500
Reductions in availability (2)                         -         (6,591)

Borrowings against revolving credit capacity (63,556) (134,117) Outstanding letters of credit

                     (4,487)        (2,031)
Unused availability                               99,257        120,761
Cash and cash equivalents                          6,155          3,331
Total available liquidity                      $ 105,412      $ 124,092



(1)As of December 31, 2020, we had two bank guarantee facilities totaling $3.0
million which mature on March 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2019, we had one bank
guarantee totaling $2.0 million. We had bank guarantees of A$0.8 million and
A$0.7 million under these facilities outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and
2019, respectively.
(2)As of December 31, 2020, there were no reductions in our availability under
the Amended Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2019, $6.6 million of our
borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement could not be utilized in order to
maintain compliance with the maximum leverage ratio financial covenant in the
Credit Agreement.

Cash totaling $117.4 million was provided by operations during 2020 compared to
$74.5 million provided by operations during 2019. The increase in operating cash
flow in 2020 compared to 2019 was primarily due to higher cash provided by
working capital, increased earnings from our Australian operations and proceeds
from the CEWS. Net cash provided by working capital was $19.9 million during
2020 compared to net cash used by working capital of $14.3 million during 2019.
The increase in cash provided by working capital in 2020 compared to 2019 is
largely due to decreased accounts receivable balances in Canada.

Cash was used in investing activities during 2020 and 2019 in the amounts of
$1.8 million and $38.6 million, respectively. The decrease in cash used in
investing activities in 2020 compared to 2019 was primarily due to lower capital
expenditures and $4.7 million of other income associated with the settlement of
a representations and warranties claim in 2020 related to the Noralta
Acquisition. This compares to $16.9 million to fund the Action acquisition in
2019. Capital expenditures totaled $10.1 million and $29.8 million during 2020
and 2019, respectively. The decrease in capital expenditures in 2020 was related
primarily to the completion of the Sitka Lodge expansion, which occurred during
2018 and 2019. In addition, we received proceeds from the sale of property,
plant and equipment of $3.7 million and $5.9 million during 2020 and 2019,
respectively.

We expect our capital expenditures for 2021, exclusive of any business
acquisitions or any growth capital expenditures, to be in the range of $20.0
million to $25.0 million, which excludes any unannounced and uncommitted
projects, the spending for which is contingent on obtaining customer contracts.
Whether planned expenditures will actually be spent in 2021 depends on industry
conditions, project approvals and schedules, customer room commitments and
project and construction timing. We
                                       54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

expect to fund these capital expenditures with available cash, cash flow from
operations and revolving credit borrowings under our Amended Credit Agreement.
The foregoing capital expenditure forecast does not include any funds for
strategic acquisitions, which we could pursue should the economic environment in
our industry improve and the transaction economics are deemed to be attractive
to us. We continue to monitor the COVID-19 global pandemic and the responses
thereto, the global economy, the prices of and demand for crude oil, met coal
and iron ore and the resultant impact on the capital spending plans of our
customers in order to plan our business activities, and we may adjust our
capital expenditure plans in the future.

The table below delineates historical capital expenditures split between
expansionary and maintenance spending on our lodges and villages, mobile asset
spending and other capital expenditures. We classify capital expenditures for
the development of rooms and central facilities at our lodges and villages as
expansion capital expenditures. Other capital expenditures in the table below
relate to routine capital spending for support equipment, upgrades to
infrastructure at our lodge and village properties and spending related to our
manufacturing facilities, among other items.

Based on management's judgment of capital spending classifications, we believe
the following table represents the components of capital expenditures for the
years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in millions):

                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                           2020                                   2019
                             Expansion       Maint      Total       Expansion       Maint      Total
            Lodge/village   $      1.5      $ 5.9      $  7.4      $     17.6      $ 5.1      $ 22.7
            Mobile assets          0.7          -         0.7             1.4          0.5         1.9
            Other                  0.9        1.1         2.0             1.9          3.3         5.2
            Total           $      3.1      $ 7.0      $ 10.1      $     20.9      $ 8.9      $ 29.8



Expansion lodge and village spending in 2020 was primarily related to the
purchase of previously rented rooms for a lodge in the U.S segment. Expansion
lodge and village spending in 2019 was primarily related to the expansion of our
Sitka lodge in British Columbia.

Maintenance lodge and village spending in 2020 and 2019 was primarily related to routine maintenance projects at our major properties.

Other maintenance spending in 2020 and 2019 was primarily related to miscellaneous equipment and supplies to support the day-to-day operations at our accommodation facilities. Other expansion spending in 2020 and 2019 was primarily related to information technology infrastructure to support our business.



Net cash of $114.2 million was used in financing activities during 2020
primarily due to net repayments under our revolving credit facilities of $70.3
million, repayments of term loan borrowings of $39.9 million, $1.5 million used
to settle tax obligations on vested shares under our share-based compensation
plans and debt issuance costs of $2.6 million related to our Amended Credit
Agreement. Net cash of $44.6 million was used in financing activities during
2019 primarily due to net repayments under our revolving credit facilities of
$3.5 million, repayments of term loan borrowings of $34.9 million, $4.3 million
used to settle tax obligations on vested shares under our share-based
compensation plans and debt issuance costs of $2.0 million related to our Credit
Agreement.

The following table summarizes the changes in debt outstanding during 2020 (in
thousands):
                                                  Canada            Australia             U.S.               Total
Balance at December 31, 2019                   $ 359,080          $        -          $        -          $ 359,080
Borrowings under revolving credit facilities     347,520              30,084                   -            377,604
Repayments of borrowings under revolving
credit facilities                               (434,155)            (13,759)                  -           (447,914)
Repayments of term loans                         (39,855)                  -                   -            (39,855)
Translation                                          729               1,442                   -              2,171
Balance at December 31, 2020                   $ 233,319          $   

17,767 $ - $ 251,086





We believe that cash on hand and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to
meet our anticipated liquidity needs in the coming 12 months. If our plans or
assumptions change, including as a result of the impact of COVID-19 or the
decline in the price of and demand for oil, or are inaccurate, or if we make
acquisitions, we may need to raise additional capital. Acquisitions have been,
and our management believes acquisitions will continue to be, an element of our
long-term business
                                       55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

strategy. The timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and the
associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable and uncertain. We may
seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or
equity issuances or may issue equity directly to the sellers. Our ability to
obtain capital for additional projects to implement our growth strategy over the
longer term will depend on our future operating performance, financial condition
and, more broadly, on the availability of equity and debt financing. Capital
availability will be affected by prevailing conditions in our industry, the
global economy, the global financial markets and other factors, many of which
are beyond our control. In addition, any additional debt service requirements we
take on could be based on higher interest rates and shorter maturities and could
impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial
condition, and the issuance of additional equity securities could result in
significant dilution to shareholders.

Amended Credit Agreement



As of December 31, 2019, our Credit Agreement provided for: (i) a $263.5 million
revolving credit facility scheduled to mature on November 30, 2021 for certain
lenders, allocated as follows: (A) a $20.0 million senior secured revolving
credit facility in favor of certain of our U.S. subsidiaries, as borrowers; (B)
a $183.5 million senior secured revolving credit facility in favor of Civeo and
certain of our Canadian subsidiaries, as borrowers; and (C) a $60.0 million
senior secured revolving credit facility in favor of one of our Australian
subsidiaries, as borrower; and (ii) a $285.4 million term loan facility
scheduled to mature on November 30, 2021 for certain lenders in favor of Civeo.

In September 2020, we entered into an amendment to our Credit Agreement, which reduced total lender commitments by $96.2 million.



As of December 31, 2020, our Credit Agreement, (as so amended, the Amended
Credit Agreement) provided for: (i) a $167.3 million revolving credit facility
scheduled to mature on May 30, 2023, allocated as follows: (A) a $10.0 million
senior secured revolving credit facility in favor of certain of our U.S.
subsidiaries, as borrowers; (B) a $122.3 million senior secured revolving credit
facility in favor of Civeo and certain of our Canadian subsidiaries, as
borrowers; and (C) a $35.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility in
favor of one of our Australian subsidiaries, as borrower; and (ii) a $194.8
million term loan facility scheduled to mature on May 30, 2023 for certain
lenders in favor of Civeo.

U.S. dollar amounts outstanding under the facilities provided by the Amended
Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable rate equal to the London Inter-Bank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 3.50% to 4.50% or a base rate plus 2.50%
to 3.50%, in each case based on a ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA
(as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). Canadian dollar amounts
outstanding bear interest at a variable rate equal to a B/A Discount Rate (as
defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) based on the Canadian Dollar Offered
Rate (CDOR) plus a margin of 3.50% to 4.50%, or a Canadian Prime rate plus a
margin of 2.50% to 3.50%, in each case based on a ratio of our total debt to
consolidated EBITDA. Australian dollar amounts outstanding under the Amended
Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable rate equal to the Bank Bill Swap
Bid Rate plus a margin of 3.50% to 4.50%, based on a ratio of our total debt to
consolidated EBITDA. The future transitions from LIBOR and CDOR as interest rate
benchmarks is addressed in the Amended Credit Agreement and at such time the
transition from LIBOR or CDOR takes place, we will endeavor with the
administrative agent to establish an alternate rate of interest to LIBOR or CDOR
that gives due consideration to (1) the then prevailing market convention for
determining a rate of interest for syndicated loans in the United States at such
time for the replacement of LIBOR and (2) any evolving or then existing
convention for similar Canadian Dollar denominated syndicated credit facilities
for the replacement of CDOR.

The Amended Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative
covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict: (i) indebtedness, liens
and fundamental changes; (ii) asset sales; (iii) acquisitions of margin stock;
(iv) specified acquisitions; (v) certain restrictive agreements; (vi)
transactions with affiliates; and (vii) investments and other restricted
payments, including dividends and other distributions. In addition, we must
maintain an interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of consolidated EBITDA
to consolidated interest expense, of at least 3.00 to 1.00 and a maximum
leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of total debt to consolidated EBITDA, of no
greater than 3.50 to 1.00. Following a qualified offering of indebtedness with
gross proceeds in excess of $150.0 million, we will be required to maintain a
maximum leverage ratio of no greater than 4.00 to 1.00 and a maximum senior
secured ratio less than 2.50 to 1.00. Each of the factors considered in the
calculations of these ratios are defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. EBITDA
and consolidated interest, as defined, exclude goodwill and asset impairments,
debt discount amortization, amortization of intangibles and other non-cash
charges.  We were in compliance with our covenants as of December 31, 2020.

Borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of
substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. The
obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our significant
subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2020, we had eight lenders that were parties to
the Amended Credit Agreement, with total commitments (including both revolving
commitments and term commitments) ranging from $22.4 million to $71.1 million.
As of
                                       56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

December 31, 2020, we had outstanding letters of credit of $1.2 million under
the U.S facility, $0.6 million under the Australian facility and $2.7 million
under the Canadian facility.

In addition to the Amended Credit Agreement, we have two bank guarantee facilities totaling $3.0 million which mature March 31, 2021. There were bank guarantees of A$0.8 million under these facilities outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

Dividends



 The declaration and amount of all potential future dividends will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors,
including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, prospects,
industry conditions, capital requirements of our business, covenants associated
with certain debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints,
industry practice and other factors the Board of Directors deems relevant. In
addition, our ability to pay cash dividends on common or preferred shares is
limited by covenants in the Amended Credit Agreement. Future agreements may also
limit our ability to pay dividends, and we may incur incremental taxes if we are
required to repatriate foreign earnings to pay such dividends. If we elect to
pay dividends in the future, the amount per share of our dividend payments may
be changed, or dividends may be suspended, without advance notice. The
likelihood that dividends will be reduced or suspended is increased during
periods of market weakness.  There can be no assurance that we will pay a
dividend in the future.

The preferred shares we issued in the Noralta Acquisition are entitled to
receive a 2% annual dividend on the liquidation preference (initially $10,000
per share), paid quarterly in cash or, at our option, by increasing the
preferred shares' liquidation preference, or any combination thereof. Quarterly
dividends have been paid in-kind for each quarterly period beginning June 30,
2018 through December 31, 2020, thereby increasing the liquidation preference to
$10,563 per share as of December 31, 2020. We currently expect to pay dividends
on the preferred shares for the foreseeable future through an increase in
liquidation preference rather than cash. For further information, see Note 19 -
Preferred Shares to the notes to the consolidated financial statements included
in Item 8 of this annual report for further information.

Effects of Inflation

Our revenues and results of operations have not been materially impacted by inflation in the past three years.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2020, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Contractual Obligations



The following summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2020, and
the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow
over the next five years (in thousands):
                                                                                                                                More
                                                            Less Than 1                                                        Than 5
                                          Total                Year               1 - 3 Years           3 - 5 Years            Years
Total debt                             $ 251,086          $     35,052          $    216,034          $          -          $       -
Interest payments(1)                      21,267                 9,428                11,839                     -                  -
Purchase obligations                       9,286                 9,286                     -                     -                  -
Non-cancelable operating lease
obligations                               28,344                 5,682                 9,745                 7,106              5,811
Asset retirement obligations -
expected cash payments                    79,844                 1,322                   530                 2,989             75,003

Total contractual cash obligations $ 389,827 $ 60,770

$ 238,148 $ 10,095 $ 80,814





(1)Interest payments due under the Amended Credit Agreement, which matures on
May 30, 2023; based on a weighted average interest rate of 4.0% for Canadian
term loan, 4.1% for Canadian revolver borrowings and 3.6% for Australian
revolver borrowings for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2020.

Our debt obligations at December 31, 2020 are reflected in our consolidated
balance sheet, which is a part of our consolidated financial statements in Item
8 of this annual report. We have not entered into any material leases subsequent
to December 31, 2020.
                                       57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Critical Accounting Policies



Our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this annual report have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require that management make
numerous estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those
estimates and assumptions, thus impacting our reported results of operations and
financial position. The critical accounting policies and estimates described in
this section are those that are most important to the depiction of our financial
condition and results of operations and the application of which requires
management's most subjective judgments in making estimates about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. We describe our significant accounting
policies more fully in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to
the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this annual report.

Accounting for Contingencies



We have contingent liabilities and future claims for which we have made
estimates of the amount of the eventual cost to liquidate these liabilities or
claims. We make an assessment of our exposure and record a provision in our
accounts to cover an expected loss when we believe a loss is probable and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These liabilities and claims
sometimes involve threatened or actual litigation where damages have been
quantified. Other claims or liabilities have been estimated based on their fair
value or our experience in these matters and, when appropriate, the advice of
outside counsel or other outside experts. Upon the ultimate resolution of these
uncertainties, our future reported financial results will be impacted by the
difference between our estimates and the actual amounts paid to settle a
liability. Examples of areas where we have made important estimates of future
liabilities include litigation, taxes, interest, insurance claims, warranty
claims, contract claims and obligations.

Impairment of Tangible and Intangible Assets, including Goodwill

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid for acquired
businesses over the allocated fair value of the related net assets after
impairments, if applicable. We evaluate goodwill for impairment, at the
reporting unit level, annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change
to suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. A reporting unit is
the operating segment, or a business one level below that operating segment (the
"component" level) if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly
reviewed by management at the component level. Each segment of our business
represents a separate reporting unit, and all three of our reporting units have
or previously had goodwill.

In connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the three
months ended March 31, 2020, we performed a quantitative goodwill impairment
test as of March 31, 2020, and we reduced the value of our goodwill in our
Canadian reporting unit to zero. Please see Note 4 - Impairment Charges to the
notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this annual report for
further discussion of goodwill impairments recorded in the years ended December
31, 2020 and 2019.

We conduct our annual impairment test as of November 30 of each year. We compare
each reporting unit's carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of
the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, goodwill is impaired.

We are given the option to test for impairment of our goodwill by first
performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than
not (that is, likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. If it is
determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting
unit is greater than its carrying amount, then performing the currently
prescribed quantitative impairment test is unnecessary. In developing a
qualitative assessment to meet the "more-likely-than-not" threshold, each
reporting unit with goodwill is assessed separately and different relevant
events and circumstances are evaluated for each unit. We have the option to
bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and
proceed directly to performing the quantitative goodwill impairment test.

When performing our annual assessment on November 30, 2020, we performed the
qualitative assessment related to our Australia reporting unit. All of our
goodwill resides in our Australia reporting unit as of November 30, 2020.
Qualitative factors that we considered as part of our assessment include
industry and market conditions, macroeconomic conditions and financial
performance of our business. After assessing these events and circumstances, we
determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the Australia
reporting unit was greater than its carrying value. Based on the interim
quantitative testing performed as of March 31, 2020, the fair value of the
Australia reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 127%.

In performing the quantitative goodwill impairment test, we compare each
reporting unit's carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the
reporting unit. Because none of our reporting units has a publicly quoted market
price, we
                                       58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

must determine the value that willing buyers and sellers would place on the
reporting unit through a routine sale process (a Level 3 fair value
measurement). In our analysis, we target a fair value that represents the value
that would be placed on the reporting unit by market participants, and value the
reporting unit based on historical and projected results throughout a cycle, not
the value of the reporting unit based on trough or peak earnings. The fair value
of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of (i) an analysis of
trading multiples of comparable companies (Market Approach) and (ii) discounted
projected cash flows (Income Approach). We also use acquisition multiples
analyses in certain circumstances. The relative weighting of each approach
reflects current industry and market conditions.

Market Approach - This valuation approach utilizes publicly traded comparable
companies' enterprise values, as compared to their recent and forecasted
earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation (EBITDA) information. We use
EBITDA because it is a widely used (1) key indicator of the cash generating
capacity and (2) valuation metric of companies in our industry.

Income Approach - This valuation approach derives a present value of the
reporting unit's projected future annual cash flows over the next five years
with a terminal value assumption. We use a variety of underlying assumptions to
estimate these future cash flows, including assumptions relating to future
economic market conditions, rates, occupancy levels, costs and expenses and
capital expenditures. These assumptions can vary by each reporting unit
depending on market conditions. In addition, a terminal value is estimated,
using a Gordon Growth methodology with a long-term growth rate of 2%. We
discount our projected cash flows using a long-term weighted average cost of
capital based on our estimate of investment returns that would be required by a
market participant. The discount rates used to value our reporting units for the
March 31, 2020 interim goodwill impairment test ranged between 10.5% and 14.0%.

The fair value of our reporting units is affected by future oil, coal and
natural gas prices, anticipated spending by our customers and the cost of
capital. Our estimate of fair value requires us to use significant unobservable
inputs, representative of Level 3 fair value measurements, including numerous
assumptions with respect to future circumstances, such as industry and/or local
market conditions that might directly impact each reporting unit's operations in
the future. We selected these valuation approaches because we believe the
combination of these approaches and our best judgment regarding underlying
assumptions and estimates provides us with the best estimate of fair value for
each of our reporting units. We believe these valuation approaches are proven
valuation techniques and methodologies for our industry and widely accepted by
investors. The fair value of each reporting unit would change if our assumptions
under these valuation approaches, or relative weighting of the valuation
approaches, were materially modified. The following assumptions are significant
to our evaluation process:

Business Projections - We make assumptions about the level of revenues, gross
profit, operating expenses, as well as capital expenditures and net working
capital requirements. These assumptions drive our planning assumptions and
represent key inputs for developing our cash flow projections. These projections
are developed using our internal business plans
over a five-year planning period that are updated at least annually;

Long-term Growth Rates - We also utilize an assumed long-term growth rate
representing the expected rate at which our cash flow stream is projected to
grow. These rates are used to calculate the terminal value and are added to the
cash flows projected during our planning period; and

Discount Rates - The estimated future cash flows are then discounted at a rate
that is consistent with a weighted-average cost of capital that is likely to be
expected by market participants. The weighted-average cost of capital is an
estimate of the overall after-tax rate of return required by equity and debt
holders of a business enterprise.

Definite-Lived Tangible and Intangible Assets. The recoverability of the
carrying values of tangible and intangible assets is assessed at an asset group
level which represents the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are
largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Whenever,
in management's judgment, we review our assets for impairment in step one when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such
asset groups may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows, an
asset impairment evaluation is performed. Indicators of impairment might include
persistent and sustained negative economic trends affecting the markets we
serve, recurring cash flow losses or significantly lowered expectations of
future cash flows expected to be generated by our assets. As part of the initial
step, we also reevaluate the remaining useful lives and salvage values of our
assets when indicators of impairment exist.

Identification of Asset Groups - The following summarizes the asset groups that we have identified in each of our reporting segments.


                                       59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our Canada segment consists of numerous lodges, as well as our mobile assets and
our manufacturing facility. These properties are grouped in the following asset
groups:

•Core Region
•Fort McMurray Village - North Athabasca
•Beaver River Lodge - North Athabasca
•Athabasca Lodge - North Athabasca
•Hudson and Borealis Lodges - North Athabasca
•McClelland Lake Lodge - North Athabasca
•Wapasu Creek Lodge - North Athabasca
•Grey Wolf Lodge - North Athabasca
•Conklin Lodge - South Athabasca
•Anzac Lodge - South Athabasca
•Red Earth Lodge - South Athabasca
•Wabasca Lodge - South Athabasca
•Sitka Lodge - Kitimat, British Columbia
•Geetla camp - British Columbia
•Boundary camp - Saskatchewan
•Antler River camp - Manitoba
•Red Earth camp - Alberta
•Christina Lake camp - Alberta
•Mobile assets
•Noble manufacturing facility
•Various land holdings in British Columbia purchased in anticipation of
potential LNG related projects

In general, the lodges are operated on a lodge by lodge basis. However, for one
set of lodges (the Core Region, including Beaver River, Athabasca, Hudson and
Borealis Lodges and Fort McMurray Village), there are no identifiable cash flows
largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities for such
lodges, and therefore, such lodges are combined into a single asset group.
Factors such as proximity to each other, commonality of customers, common
monitoring by management and operating decisions being made to optimize these
lodges as a group result in these lodges being treated as a single asset group
for the purposes of our impairment assessments.

Our Australia segment consists of nine villages in several regions within the
country, as well as our integrated services assets and land banked assets. These
properties are grouped in the following asset groups:

•Karratha - Pilbara Region, Western Australia
•Integrated services - Assets held on client owned sites in Western Australia
•Kambalda - Kambalda, Western Australia
•Gunnedah Basin
•Narrabri - Gunnedah Basin, New South Wales
•Boggabri - Gunnedah Basin, New South Wales
•Bowen Basin
•Moranbah - Bowen Basin, Queensland
•Dysart - Bowen Basin, Queensland
•Nebo - Bowen Basin, Queensland
•Coppabella - Bowen Basin, Queensland
•Middlemount - Bowen Basin, Queensland
•Various non-operational sites acquired as part of Civeo's land-banking strategy

                                       60
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In general, the villages are operated on a village by village basis, except for
the villages located in the Bowen Basin (Moranbah, Dysart, Nebo, Coppabella and
Middlemount) and the Gunnedah Basin (Narrabri and Boggabri). The villages in the
Bowen and Gunnedah Basins contain significant levels of interdependency that
allow these assets to be combined into cash generating units (asset
groups). Factors such as commonality of customers, location, resource basins
served and common monitoring by management result in the Bowen and Gunnedah
Basins to be treated as single asset groups for the purposes of our impairment
assessments. Integrated services assets provide catering and managed services to
the mining industry in Western Australia.

Our U.S. segment consists of lodges in three geographical areas, mobile assets
in various geographical areas, and a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). These
properties are grouped in the following asset groups:

•West Permian Lodge - TexasKilldeer Lodge - North Dakota
•Acadian Acres Lodge - Louisiana
•Offshore - this asset group includes mobile assets which are utilized in the
Gulf of Mexico
•Wellsites - this asset group includes mobile assets, primarily in the Permian
Basin region, the Mid-Continent and the Rocky mountain corridor
•Killdeer WWTP - this asset group represents a WWTP in Killdeer, North Dakota,
which was constructed in early 2014

Recoverability Assessment - In performing an impairment analysis, the second
step is to compare each asset group's carrying value to estimates of
undiscounted future direct cash flows associated with the asset group over the
remaining useful life of the asset group's primary asset. We use a variety of
underlying assumptions to estimate these future cash flows, including
assumptions relating to future economic market conditions, rates, occupancy
levels, costs and expenses and capital expenditures. The estimates are
consistent with those used for purposes of our goodwill impairment test, as
further discussed in Goodwill, above.

Fair Value Determination - If, based on the assessment, the carrying values of
any of our asset groups are determined to not be recoverable as a result of the
undiscounted future cash flows not exceeding the net book value of the asset
group, we proceed to the third step. In this step, we compare the fair value of
the respective asset group to its carrying value. Our estimate of the fair value
requires us to use significant unobservable inputs, representative of Level 3
fair value measurements, including numerous assumptions with respect to future
circumstances, such as industry and/or local market conditions that might
directly impact each of the asset groups' operations in the future, and are
therefore uncertain.

Our industry is cyclical and our estimates of the period over which future cash
flows will be generated, as well as the predictability of these cash flows and
our determination of whether a decline in value of our investment has occurred,
can have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and, in
periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment losses. If this
assessment indicates that the carrying values will not be recoverable, an
impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of the carrying value over the
fair value of the asset group. The fair value of the asset group is based on
prices of similar assets, if available, or discounted cash flows.

In estimating future cash flows, we make numerous assumptions with respect to
future circumstances that might directly impact each of the asset groups'
operations in the future and are therefore uncertain. These assumptions with
respect to future circumstances include future oil and coal prices, anticipated
customer spending, and industry and/or local market conditions. These
assumptions represent our best judgment based on the current facts and
circumstances. However, different assumptions could result in a determination
that the carrying values of additional asset groups are no longer recoverable
based on estimated future cash flows. Our estimate of fair value is primarily
calculated using the Income Approach, which derives a present value of the asset
group based on the asset groups' estimated future cash flows. We discounted our
estimated future cash flows using a long-term weighted average cost of capital
based on our estimate of investment returns required by a market participant.
The discount rates used during the 2020 Canadian and U.S. segments long-lived
asset impairment analysis ranged between 10.5% and 14.0%.

Please see Note 4 - Impairment Charges to the notes to consolidated financial
statements in Item 8 of this annual report for further discussion of impairments
of definite-lived tangible and intangible assets recorded in the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
                                       61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revenue and Cost Recognition



We generally recognize accommodation, mobile facility rental, food service and
other services revenues over time as our customers simultaneously receive and
consume benefits as we serve our customers because of continuous transfer of
control to the customer. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised
goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects
the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or
services. We transfer control and recognize a sale based on a periodic (usually
daily) room rate each night a customer stays in our rooms or when the services
are rendered. In some contracts, rates may vary over the contract term. In these
cases, revenue may be deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the
contract term. A limited portion of our revenue is recognized at a point in time
when control transfers to the customer related to small modular construction and
manufacturing contracts, minor food service arrangements and optional purchases
our customers make for incidental services offered at our accommodation and
mobile facilities.

For significant projects, manufacturing revenues are recognized over time with
progress towards completion measured using the cost based input method as the
basis to recognize revenue and an estimated profit. Billings on such contracts
in excess of costs incurred and estimated profits are classified as deferred
revenue. Costs incurred and estimated profits in excess of billings on these
contracts are recognized as unbilled receivables. Management believes this input
method is the most appropriate measure of progress to the satisfaction of a
performance obligation on larger modular construction and manufacturing
contracts. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in
the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job
conditions, estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in
revisions to projected costs and revenue and are recognized in the period in
which the revisions to estimates are identified and the amounts can be
reasonably estimated. Factors that may affect future project costs and margins
include weather, production efficiencies, availability and costs of labor,
materials and subcomponents. These factors can significantly impact the accuracy
of our estimates and materially impact our future reported earnings.

Because of control transferring over time, the majority of our revenue is
recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance
obligation. At contract inception, we assess the goods and services promised in
our contracts with customers and identify a performance obligation for each
promise to transfer our customers a good or service (or bundle of goods or
services) that is distinct. Our customers typically contract for hospitality
services under take-or-pay contracts with terms that most often range from
several months to three years. Our contract terms generally provide for a rental
rate for a reserved room and an occupied room rate that compensates us for
services provided. We typically contract our facilities to our customers on a
fee per day basis where the goods and services promised include lodging and
meals. To identify the performance obligations, we consider all of the goods and
services promised in the context of the contract and the pattern of transfer to
our customers.

Revenues exclude taxes assessed based on revenues such as sales or value added taxes.



Cost of services includes labor, food, utility costs, cleaning supplies, and
other costs of operating our accommodations facilities. Cost of goods sold
includes all direct material and labor costs and those costs related to contract
performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools and repairs. Selling,
general and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred.

Estimation of Useful Lives



The selection of the useful lives of many of our assets requires the judgments
of our operating personnel as to the length of these useful lives. Our judgment
in this area is influenced by our historical experience in operating our assets,
technological developments and expectations of future demand for the assets.
Should our estimates be too long or short, we might eventually report a
disproportionate number of losses or gains upon disposition or retirement of our
long-lived assets. We reevaluate the remaining useful lives and salvage values
of our assets when certain events occur that directly impact the useful lives
and salvage values, including changes in operating condition, functional
capability, impairment assessment and market and economic factors. We believe
our estimates of useful lives are appropriate.

Share-Based Compensation



Our historic share-based compensation is based on participating in Civeo's 2014
Equity Participation Plan (the Plan). Our disclosures reflect only our
employees' participation in the Plans. We are required to estimate the fair
value of share compensation made pursuant to awards under the Plans. An initial
estimate of the fair value of each option award, restricted share award or
deferred share award determines the amount of share compensation expense we will
recognize in the future. For stock option awards, which were all granted prior
to our May 30, 2014 spin-off from Oil States, to estimate the value of the
awards under the Plan, Oil States selected a fair value calculation model. Oil
States chose the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value stock options
awarded under the Plan. Oil States chose this model because option awards were
made under
                                       62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

straightforward vesting terms, option prices and option lives. Utilizing the
Black-Scholes option pricing model required Oil States to estimate the length of
time options will remain outstanding, a risk free interest rate for the
estimated period options are assumed to be outstanding, forfeiture rates, future
dividends and the volatility of its common stock. All of these assumptions
affect the amount and timing of future share-based compensation expense
recognition. We have not made any option awards subsequent to May 30, 2014, but,
in the event that we make future awards, we expect to utilize a similar
valuation methodology. We will continually monitor our actual experience and
change assumptions for future awards as we consider appropriate.

We also grant performance share awards under the Plan. Awards are earned in
amounts between 0% and 200% of the participant's target performance share award,
based on the payout percentage associated with Civeo's relative total
shareholder return rank among a peer group of companies. The fair value of the
awards was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model. We chose this
model because the performance awards contain complex vesting terms. Utilizing
the Monte Carlo simulation pricing model required us to estimate the risk-free
interest rate and the expected market price volatility of our common shares as
well as the peer group of companies over a time period equal to the expected
term of the award. The resulting cost is recognized over the period during which
an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the awards, usually
the vesting period. For additional details, see Note 18 - Share-Based
Compensation to the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of this annual report.

Income Taxes



We follow the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with
current accounting standards regarding the accounting for income taxes. Under
this method, deferred income taxes are recorded based upon the differences
between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws in effect at the time the
underlying assets or liabilities are recovered or settled.

When our earnings from foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely
reinvested, no provision for Canadian income taxes is made for these earnings.
If any of the subsidiaries have a distribution of earnings in the form of
dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both Canadian income taxes
(subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable
to various foreign countries. We do not expect to provide Canadian income taxes
on future foreign earnings.

We record a valuation allowance in each reporting period when our management
believes that it is more likely than not that any recorded deferred tax asset
will not be realized. Our management will continue to evaluate the
appropriateness of the valuation allowance in the future, based upon our
operating results. Please see Note 15 - Income Taxes to the notes to
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this annual report for further
discussion.

In accounting for income taxes, we are required to estimate a liability for
future income taxes for any uncertainty for potential income tax exposures. The
calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the
application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated
tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate
of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we
ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we reverse
the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we
determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional
charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the
recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Recent Accounting Pronouncements to the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this annual report for further discussion.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses