Energy Metals Limited announced that a JORC-reported Mineral Resource estimate of 2.84Mt at an average grade of 455 ppm eU3O8 for 1,291 tonnes or 2.85Mlb U3O8 (at a grade- thickness cut-off of 250 m*ppm eU3O8) has been defined for the Manyingee East deposit (WA) within its 100% owned tenement E08/1480. The Mineral Resource is based on JORC (2012) definitions and the reported resource is classified as Inferred. The Manyingee East deposit, located 85km south of Onslow, within the West Pilbara region (WA), is a roll-front style of uranium deposit hosted within two domains (North Wing and South Wing) on the margins of a buried, Cretaceous-age palaeochannel. The mineralisation is localised at the interface between oxidised and reduced sediments, and is mainly confined to three stratigraphic horizons at depths between 50 and 80 metres. The project area is located adjacent to, and immediately up-channel of Paladin Energy's Manyingee deposit within a wide part of the main palaeochannel. The Mineral Resource estimate for the Manyingee East deposit was undertaken by consultants CSA Global Ltd. (CSA) based on information supplied by Energy Metals from two EME drilling campaigns and from historical open-file company data pertaining to the area covered by E08/1480 and the immediate surrounds. Mineralised envelopes and wireframe models were constructed using gamma logging data based on the following parameters: minimum thickness 0.3m, maximum internal waste 0.3m, minimum grade-thickness product (GT) 30 m*ppm, and cut-off grade 100 ppm eU3O8. For the construction of the block model, the data were composited into 0.5m intervals and uranium grades were interpolated into the block model using the inverse distance weighted squared method. Grade-thicknesses were estimated after flattening each of the modelled lenses. The completed model for the deposit was checked visually and also by comparison with composites section to section and was found to be of high confidence. Although Paladin Energy determined that a 4% disequilibrium correction was appropriate for Manyingee wing- style mineralisation (i.e. U3O8/eU3O8 = 1.04), in the absence of direct measurements a conservative approach was considered prudent at Manyingee East, and no disequilibrium correction was applied (i.e. U3O8/eU3O8 = 1). A gridded model was generated for the wireframes in order to visualise the uranium grade- thickness (GT) characteristics of the deposit based on the block models. Mineralisation located within the basement and within oxidised sediments, which represents only 0.1 Mlb at an average grade 140ppm eU3O8, was excluded from the Mineral Resource estimation. Lastly, resource areas based on historical data and located outside Energy Metals licence E08/1480 were truncated and excluded from the final estimation table.