Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.

(FDS)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

FactSet Research : The ABCs of ESG Data

04/07/2021 | 11:08am EDT
The ABCs of ESG Data ESG

By FactSet Insight| April 7, 2021

FactSet's Vanessa Barnett, Global Head of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), recently spoke with Compliance Solutions Strategies (CSS) to discuss the latest news on the European Union (EU) Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the new details on the Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for Level 2 SFDR, and how financial firms can manage their ESG data for Level 1.

Q: What did you notice about the changes in the final version of the Level 2 RTS?

There has been major pushback on having to first of all source all of their ESG data, report on it at an aggregated level, and then track it over time.

Step one is that all of the timelines have been pushed back. Companies now need to be able to start tracking this data, at least not even reporting on it, from beginning of 2022. It's really 2023 when the first actual reports have to come out and will look at impact at an aggregate level for the portfolio, continuing to track it over time, hopefully getting those adverse impacts ultimately down to 0. The primary pushback has been around getting access to data from their investee companies.

But first and foremost, there were 32 indicators, and now they're down to 14. Technically it's 18, but there are two additional if the fund is investing in Sovereign, and then two for Real Estate. But if it's normal companies, it's the 14, and really now focused most specifically on the environment, but a lot of the trickier environmental ones have been become optional, as well as a few on the social side that are focused especially on gender.

Q: Do you think that the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) have responded to the industry feedback by reducing the number of mandatory metrics? Is there still a significant degree of complexity involved in disclosing this data?

Absolutely. It's going to be interesting to see how the non-financial disclosure directive is going to help with having companies' incentive to make these disclosures. A fund can be invested in companies all over the world, so this is still going to be a major problem as many companies are not disclosing this data. Coming from a financial data provider, a lot of the emphasis is really on how to model some of this data in a way that is defensible, and how to find proxy data.

There's still one indicator in particular, the share of non-renewable energy consumption and production, that is very tricky to get. Companies are not disclosing this data and I think we're going to have a hard time even finding proxies for it. Until the non-financial reporting directive is a little bit more pinned down, prescriptive, and it's adopted more globally, some of these numbers are just going to be hard to find.

Q: We seem to be at a point in the EU where a typical or conventional ESG rating is becoming much less significant. Is there a waning role for conventional credit-style ESG ratings?

From a benchmarking perspective, I don't see them going away any time soon. That said, we are really hearing across the board that our clients want to get behind the rating and underlying data.

I see the future of ESG data falling into a few different categories. The biggest one will be what companies are saying about themselves. There's always the prospect of greenwashing, but the more transparency that we have and the more light that's being shined onto this data and the use of it will discourage people from misleading because ultimately there will be ramifications. But I do believe that you're going to see more and more good quality disclosure from companies.

The other major pillar still will be what is being observed about these companies, and we'll see more and more sophistication there. Right now, it's looking at lots and lots of news and government reports. You'll likely start to see more satellite- and science-led data that's observing how companies are actually behaving and what stakeholders across the board are saying about these companies.

The third we see is physical asset data. That's going to be particularly important as we really focus on climate-related value at risk (VaR) and understanding the dual materiality piece of it. This can be based on where a company is operating (e.g., what impacts are they having on the environment?) as well as the environment itself, climate change, and the climate regulation happening (e.g., are companies impacted by these things and what are the risks?).

Being able to do that modeling is really critical, but you need really all three of those datasets-especially around the geolocation of physical assets-to be able to match that up with various climate models and more traditional climate data.

Q: How is FactSet helping firms comply with the EU regulations, not just the SFDR, but also the taxonomy? What does the model look like?

We are a technology company first and foremost as well as a platform for the ingestion of many different content sets, so we've heard loud and clear about the SFDR from our clients. It's absolutely the hottest topic and what everyone wants to understand, whether it's learning more about the regulation itself, or how we can partner with our clients to help them comply.

It's really about the data itself and the fact in addition to Truvalue Labs, we are open to other datasets, whether it's proprietary datasets from our clients or other third-party ESG datasets that can help fill in gaps. While we aim to have a full solution ourselves in the coming years, it's practical to expect that our clients will need to have content coming from a variety of sources and different niche providers, along with the piece we're really bringing to the table, which is real-time monitoring, especially with the principal adverse indicators. They're very prescriptive and there are specific data points as should be reported by companies. We know from a practical perspective that companies are only going to be reporting maybe on an annual basis, so this data is going to be fairly static and somewhat old. When looking at how we can help our clients be on top of emerging issues and understand where the true risks are, we believe that having a more real-time alerting system essentially will be key.

To hear the full conversation, listen to the CSS podcast.

Disclaimer

FactSet Research Systems Inc. published this content on 07 April 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 07 April 2021 15:07:02 UTC.


© Publicnow 2021
All news about FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.
10:04aFACTSET RESEARCH  : Core Risk Strategy Moves for Asset Owners and Managers
PU
08:12aFACTSET RESEARCH  : Taps Helen Shan for Revenue Chief
MT
04/19FACTSET RESEARCH  : Lower Provisions for Loan Losses Are Boosting Earnings for S..
PU
04/16S&P 500 EARNINGS SEASON UPDATE : April 16, 2021
PU
04/15FACTSET RESEARCH  : Empowering Traders with Technology
PU
04/14HUMAN CAPITAL : Investing in Diversity and Inclusion
PU
04/13FACTSET RESEARCH  : Three Ways Asset Managers and Owners Can Strengthen Their St..
PU
04/12FACTSET RESEARCH  : Leveraging Smart Datasets and Technology to Uncover New Oppo..
PU
04/09FACTSET RESEARCH  : S&P 500 Likely to Report Highest Earnings Growth in More Tha..
PU
04/08LEVERAGE, RISK, AND RETURN IN EUROPE : An Analysis of the Last 20 Years
PU
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 1 581 M - -
Net income 2021 397 M - -
Net cash 2021 10,6 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 30,8x
Yield 2021 0,97%
Capitalization 12 012 M 12 012 M -
EV / Sales 2021 7,59x
EV / Sales 2022 7,22x
Nbr of Employees 10 660
Free-Float 91,5%
Chart FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.
Duration : Period :
FactSet Research Systems Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus UNDERPERFORM
Number of Analysts 15
Average target price 303,75 $
Last Close Price 317,34 $
Spread / Highest target 10,6%
Spread / Average Target -4,28%
Spread / Lowest Target -18,1%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
NameTitle
Frederick Philip Snow Chief Executive Officer & Director
Helen L. Shan Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
Robin Ann Abrams Chairman
Gene D. Fernandez Executive VP, Chief Technology & Product Officer
Demetry Zilberg Chief Technology Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.-3.98%12 012
S&P GLOBAL INC.14.51%90 679
RELX PLC7.39%51 876
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION10.63%45 568
MSCI INC.4.87%38 750
WOLTERS KLUWER11.18%24 065