Excellent Metallurgical Results from Preliminary Testwork

MT CHALMERS

Highlights

Initial metallurgical testwork indicates high recoveries from all concentrates and relatively simple flotation process;

Initial rougher concentrates from the stringer and massive sulphide mineralisation include:

  • Stringer: Copper concentrate with recoveries of 97% copper and 87% gold, which represents the bulk of the resource;

  • Massive Sulphide: Copper-lead concentrate with recoveries of 89% copper, 77% zinc and 43% gold; and

  • Massive Sulphide: Zinc concentrate with recoveries of 84% zinc and 43% gold.

Additional gold recovery from zinc concentrate tail using cyanide leach generated 98.4% total gold recovery; and

Further work remains ongoing with significant potential to improve overall recoveries.

Overview

QMines Limited (ASX:QML)(QMines or Company) is pleased to announce excellent preliminary metallurgical testwork results from an initial sighter study completed on its Mt Chalmers copper and gold project, located 17km north-east of Rockhampton, Queensland (Figure 1).

This metallurgical testwork program was designed to establish a preliminary flowsheet and assess the ability to recover these metals into separate flotation concentrates.

"It is very pleasing to see such excellent results from this initial study for the Mt Chalmers project. Although further work is required, these initial results demonstrate the development potential of the project. I would like to thank Como Engineers and ALS for all their efforts in delivering these results in a timely manner. Further work is now being undertaken to improve overall recoveries, develop a cleaner flotation and improve flowsheet optimisation."

QMines Executive Chairman, Andrew Sparke, comments:

Management Comment

The testwork was undertaken by ALS Metallurgy at their laboratory in Balcatta, Western Australia with Como Engineers engaged to supervise the program.

Figure 1: Location of Mt Chalmers Project, tenure, geology and infrastructure.

Stringer Mineralisation

A composite of stringer mineralisation with a head grade of 1.22% Cu, 0.2% Pb, 0.02% Zn and 1.05 g/t Au was subjected to two preliminary open circuit flotation tests. Sequential flotation was successful in producing a copper rougher concentrate. The lead and zinc grade in this composite were low and therefore a copper only circuit flowsheet can be considered for this mineralisation type.

Rougher grades of up to 12.3% Cu and 4.6g/t Au were produced with excellent recoveries of 97.1% copper and less than 0.14% lead and zinc, see figure 2. Gold predominantly reported to the copper concentrate, grading as high as 4.6g/t gold. There is an opportunity to further improve recoveries in subsequent testwork programs.

These results were particularly encouraging as lithologically, the stringer mineralisation makes up the bulk of the

Figure 2: Copper recovery from stringer mineralisation vs time at Mt Chalmers. resource.

Massive Sulphide Mineralisation

A composite of massive sulphide (copper, lead and zinc exhalite) with a head grade of 1.28% Cu, 1.42% Pb, 3.51% Zn and 4.31 g/t Au was subjected to ten preliminary open circuit flotation tests. Sequential flotation was successful in producing rougher concentrates of copper/lead and zinc.

Rougher grades of up to 15.6% Cu, 15.1% Pb and 16.6% Zn were produced with acceptable recoveries of 88.8% copper, 76.6% lead and 83.6% zinc. Gold predominantly reported to the copper/lead concentrate, grading as high as 46.9g/t gold. There is an opportunity to further improve recoveries in subsequent testwork programs.

Figure 3: Location of diamond drill hole MCDD017 which was used for the testwork.

Figure 4: Selected pieces of diamond drill core used for the metallurgical testwork at Mt Chalmers.

Testwork Details

Sample Assay¹

Two composites were prepared from select drill core intervals from MCDD017 (Table 1 and 2). The samples represent the different domains of mineralisation encountered at Mt Chalmers.

The composite head grade (Table 3), determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), is representative of the average grade of the mineralisation expected in the mineral

resource.

Hole ID

From (m)

To (m)

Mass (kg)

MCDD017

60.85

62.29

2

MCDD017

62.29

63.00

2

MCDD017

63.00

64.00

2

MCDD017

64.00

65.00

2

MCDD017

65.00

65.90

2

MCDD017

65.90

67.00

2

MCDD017

67.00

68.00

2

MCDD017

68.00

69.00

2

MCDD017

69.00

69.65

2

Total:

18

Table 1: Metallurgical composite core selection, stringer mineralisation composite.

¹ ASX Announcement -Multiple Wide High-Grade Intersections Outside Resource, 6 October 2021.

Hole ID

From (m)

To (m)

Mass (kg)

MCDD017

22.00

23.40

0.50

MCDD017

23.40

24.40

2.60

MCDD017

24.40

25.40

1.50

MCDD017

25.40

26.40

1.50

MCDD017

26.40

27.30

1.50

MCDD017

27.30

28.30

0.50

MCDD017

28.30

29.30

1.50

MCDD017

29.30

30.30

1.20

MCDD017

30.30

31.50

1.28

MCDD017

31.50

32.30

1.28

MCDD017

32.30

33.00

1.28

MCDD017

33.00

33.80

1.28

MCDD017

33.80

35.00

1.28

MCDD017

35.00

36.00

0.50

MCDD017

36.00

37.30

0.50

MCDD017

37.30

38.00

0.50

MCDD017

38.00

39.00

0.50

MCDD017

39.00

40.00

0.50

MCDD017

40.00

41.00

0.50

MCDD017

41.00

42.00

0.50

MCDD017

42.00

43.00

0.50

MCDD017

43.00

43.80

0.50

MCDD017

23.40

24.40

0.80

MCDD017

39.00

40.00

0.50

MCDD017

40.00

41.00

0.50

MCDD017

41.00

42.00

0.50

MCDD017

42.00

43.00

0.50

MCDD017

43.00

43.80

0.50

MCDD017

43.80

45.00

1.00

MCDD017

45.00

46.00

1.00

MCDD017

46.00

47.00

1.00

MCDD017

47.00

48.46

1.00

MCDD017

48.46

49.20

3.62

MCDD017

49.20

50.00

1.00

MCDD017

52.00

52.65

1.00

MCDD017

52.65

53.50

1.00

MCDD017

53.50

54.50

1.00

MCDD017

54.50

55.50

1.00

MCDD017

55.50

56.50

1.00

MCDD017

56.50

57.50

1.00

MCDD017

58.67

60.00

1.00

MCDD017

60.00

60.85

1.00

MCDD017

69.65

70.10

1.00

MCDD017

70.10

71.00

1.00

MCDD017

71.00

72.00

1.00

MCDD017

75.00

76.35

1.00

MCDD017

76.36

76.80

1.00

MCDD017

76.80

78.00

1.00

Total:

50.42

Table 2: Metallurgical composite core selection, massive sulphide mineralisation composite.

Metallurgical Composite

Cu (%)

Pb (%)

Zn (%)

Fe (%)

S (%)

Si (%)

Au (g/t)

Massive Sulphide Mineralisation

1.28

1.72

3.51

8.55

9.48

49.2

4.31

Stringer Mineralisation

1.22

0.02

0.02

6.58

3.66

75.6

1.05

Table 3: Composite head grade.

Stringer Flotation Summary

A total of two flotation tests have been conducted on the stringer composite core selection to date. All tests were conducted on 1kg batch flotation tests. Tests were conducted using Perth tap water at a primary grind size of P80 150 and 75μm.

Results from tests on the two grind sizes showed improved copper recovery was achieved from the finer grind composite.

Considering this phase of work was only a preliminary testwork program focused on producing a copper rougher concentrate, some excellent results were produced (refer Table 4).

Test Number

Wt (%)

Copper

Grade (%) Recovery (%)

Lead

Grade (%) Recovery (%)

Zinc

Grade (%) Recovery (%)

Gold

Grade (%) Recovery (%)

Copper Rougher Concentrate 1-4

MN2967

8.22

8.84

54.20

11.20

64.00

16.40

38.30

35.00

45.50

MN2968

14.10

9.18

96.60

8.99

85.10

19.60

77.10

30.00

80.20

Zinc Rougher Concentrate 1-4

MN2967

24.10

2.48

44.70

1.97

33.20

8.65

59.40

12.00

43.70

MN2968

17.90

0.18

2.41

1.01

12.10

4.25

21..20

3.30

11.20

Table 4: Flotation summary data - stringer sulphide mineralisation

Massive Flotation Summary

A total of ten flotation tests have been conducted on the composite core selection to date. All tests were conducted on 1kg batch flotation tests. Tests were conducted using Perth tap water at a primary grind size of P80 150 and 75μm.

The overall copper and zinc performance of both tests were marginally different at the grind sizes tested. Based on results achieved, a primary grind size of P80 75µm was chosen as the preferred grind size for the majority of the testwork.

Considering this phase of work was only a preliminary testwork program focused on producing separate rougher concentrates, some excellent results were produced (refer Table 5).

This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.

Attachments

  • Original Link
  • Original Document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

QMines Ltd. published this content on 29 March 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 30 March 2022 00:14:03 UTC.