Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
508.4 INR | +0.50% | +4.29% | -13.42% |
Apr. 23 | UPL Limited completed the acquisition of Cortevas Mancozeb Business from Corteva, Inc.. | CI |
Mar. 28 | UPL Limited(NSEI:UPL) dropped from Nifty 50 | CI |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- The group shows a rather high level of debt in proportion to its EBITDA.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Sector: Agricultural Chemicals
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-13.42% | 4.58B | - | ||
+14.61% | 38.38B | C | ||
-.--% | 11.15B | - | B+ | |
-7.28% | 7.3B | A | ||
+7.47% | 6.87B | B- | ||
-3.91% | 5.91B | B+ | ||
-10.44% | 5.6B | - | C- | |
-6.14% | 5.54B | B | ||
+31.35% | 5.19B | B- | ||
+17.77% | 4.4B | - | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- UNITEDPHOS Stock
- UNITEDPHOS Stock
- Ratings UPL Limited