Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
1.89 EUR | -5.00% | +6.18% | -73.18% |
Apr. 25 | Atos Extends Deadline for Refinancing Proposals | MT |
Apr. 25 | Atos: financing parameters to be revised | CF |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The stock, which is currently worth 2024 to 0.34 times its sales, is clearly overvalued in comparison with peers.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last four months, EPS estimates made by Standard & Poor's analysts have been revised downwards.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: IT Services & Consulting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-73.18% | 236M | A- | ||
-11.94% | 197B | A- | ||
+3.28% | 169B | B- | ||
+1.55% | 166B | B+ | ||
+5.74% | 101B | A- | ||
+5.50% | 76.87B | A- | ||
+16.72% | 71.98B | C- | ||
-6.77% | 71.09B | A | ||
-23.37% | 51.76B | C | ||
+2.60% | 48.08B | A- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ATO Stock
- Ratings AtoS SE