Genesis Minerals Limited (ASX: GMD)
ASX Announcement - 19 December 2019
ULYSSES MINERAL RESOURCE UPDATE
Ulysses Resource increased to 867,000oz following highly successful 2019 drilling program, marking
another step towards Genesis' objective of becoming a substantial new gold miner
Key Points:
- The total Mineral Resource (Measured, Indicated and Inferred) for the 100%-owned Ulysses Gold Project near Leonora in WA now stands at:
8.5Mt @ 3.2g/t gold for 867,000 ounces of contained gold
- 14% increase (107,000 ounces) in total contained ounces from the previously announced October 2018 Mineral Resource.
- Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource increased by 22% (103,000 ounces) to 574,000 ounces.
- Importantly, the Measured Mineral Resource has increased significantly from 4,000 ounces to 133,000 ounces as a result of recent drilling.
- High-gradeportion of Resource estimated to contain:
4.8Mt @ 4.5g/t gold for 695,000 ounces
- Includes high-grade shoots containing:
1.73Mt @ 6.5g/t gold for 360,000 ounces
- Resource remains open both at depth and along strike.
- Drilling will continue in the New Year to test a number of new areas for further Resource growth.
- Feasibility work progressing.
Genesis Minerals Limited (ASX: GMD) is pleased to advise that it has taken another step towards its objective of developing a substantial new Australian gold mine at its 100%-ownedUlysses Gold Project near Leonora in WA, with the announcement of a 107,000oz increase in the Mineral Resource for the Ulysses deposit from 760,000oz to 867,000oz of contained gold.
The updated Mineral Resource incorporates the results of the highly successful drilling program completed at Ulysses over the past four months, which has returned numerous high-grade intersections that confirmed and extended a number of high-grade gold zones.
The updated Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource now totals 8.5Mt @ 3.2g/t gold for 867,000 ounces of contained gold (refer to Table 1 for full details), which represents a 14% increase in contained ounces when compared with the October 2018 Mineral Resource. Importantly, the higher- confidence Measured and Indicated component has increased by 103,000 ounces (22%) to 574,000 ounces, with the Measured Resource increasing significantly from 4,000 to 133,000 ounces.
The high-grade portion of the Mineral Resource, reported at a cut-off of 2g/t gold (refer to Table 1 for full details), which will form part of the mining evaluation for the Feasibility Study, is estimated to contain 4.8Mt @ 4.5g/t gold for 695,000 ounces.
ABN: 72 124 772 041 | ASX Code: GMD |
Unit 6, 1 Clive St | www.genesisminerals.com.au |
West Perth, WA, Australia, 6005 | T: +61 8 9322 6178 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
The high-grade shoots which form part of the overall Mineral Resource are estimated to contain 1.73Mt @ 6.5g/t gold for 360,000 ounces.
The Mineral Resource extends over a strike length of more than 2.5km and sits immediately below and along strike from the Ulysses Open Pits (see Figures 1 and 2).
The Resource envelope currently extends to ~500m below surface at its deepest point and is estimated to an average depth of ~320m below surface, with a gold endowment of +2,700 ounces per vertical metre (ovm) for the 260m interval from the 360mRL (base of the open pits) to the 100mRL (interval of highest drill density).
The base of the Indicated portion of the Resource is shown in Figure 1 below.
Commenting on the Mineral Resource upgrade, Genesis Managing Director, Michael Fowler, said:
"We are continuing to grow at Ulysses, with this latest Resource update both expanding and upgrading the Mineral Resource.
"Importantly, recent drilling has delivered a major uplift in the high-confidence Measured Resource category - which now stands at 133,000 ounces - providing a robust foundation from which to progress ongoing Feasibility Studies for the mine development.
"Our goal is to deliver a long-life standalone mining and processing operation, with a multi-pronged strategy in place to continue to expand the Resource base at Ulysses. This includes infill and extensional drilling in and around the existing Resource area, drilling for new discoveries within our tenement package and looking at potential project acquisition and consolidation opportunities in the surrounding area.
"In parallel with our studies for a standalone operation, we are also evaluating the potential for near term production to take advantage of the strong Australian dollar gold price. However, this path would only be progressed in the event that it delivers strong, long-term cash flow to the Company that would set the Company up for the future.
"Ulysses continues to demonstrate its credentials as a robust, high-grade asset with all of the attributes, including a Tier-1 location, to enable us to advance it towards development in the near term."
Next Steps
The next steps for the Ulysses Project in the New Year will include:
- Continued infill and extensional drilling in and around the existing Resource area;
- Drilling for new discoveries within the greater Ulysses project area;
- Continuing to look at potential project acquisition and consolidation opportunities in the surrounding area; and
- Progressing Feasibility Studies on the Ulysses mine development, including toll treatment options, with a view to making a decision on developing a long-term mine in 1HCY2020.
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 2 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
Figure 1. Projected Long Section in local grid showing the new Ulysses Mineral Resource (moderate red outline) with the high-grade portion of the resource showing in magenta. Limit of Indicated Mineral Resource shown.
Figure 2. View looking towards the south-east showing the showing the modelled resource.
Listing Rule 5.8.1
Pursuant to ASX listing rule 5.8.1, and in addition to the information contained in JORC tables, the Company provides the following in respect of the Ulysses Mineral Resource.
Mineral Resource Statement Overview
A Mineral Resource update for the Ulysses deposit was completed in November 2019 by Payne Geological Services Pty Ltd ("PayneGeo"). The update was required to incorporate the results of the major infill and extension drilling program carried out by Genesis during 2019. The program has provided increased confidence in the tenor and continuity of the interpreted high grade mineralisation at Ulysses, as well as defining further extensions to the deposit.
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 3 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
The Ulysses Project area has been held by a number of operators and has been drilled in several phases since initial discovery. Drilling has been focussed on the Ulysses deposit, with more regional exploration also completed.
Open pit mining was carried out in 2002 by a previous operator and Genesis carried out two phases of open pit mining in 2016 and 2017.
The high-grade shoots within the deposit are visually identifiable due to the strong pyrite-albite-biotite alteration that is present and they have been separately modelled and estimated to properly quantify the higher grade mineralisation within the overall Mineral Resource estimate. The Ulysses East mineralisation has been substantially extended since the last estimate. A summary of the updated 2019 Ulysses Mineral Resource is provided in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Ulysses Gold Deposit December 2019 Mineral Resource (0.75g/t cut-off grade above 200mRL, 2.0g/t cut-off below 200mRL)
Measured | Indicated | Inferred | Total | ||||||||||||
Domain | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Au | ||||||
Mt | g/t | Mt | g/t | Mt | g/t | Mt | g/t | Ounces | |||||||
HG Shoots | 0.66 | 6.0 | 0.89 | 6.5 | 0.19 | 8.2 | 1.73 | 6.5 | 360,600 | ||||||
Shear Zone | 0.14 | 1.3 | 3.20 | 2.2 | 1.88 | 3.2 | 5.21 | 2.5 | 426,100 | ||||||
Ulysses East | 0.53 | 1.8 | 1.00 | 1.6 | 1.53 | 1.6 | 80,500 | ||||||||
Total | 0.80 | 5.2 | 4.61 | 3.0 | 3.07 | 3.0 | 8.48 | 3.2 | 867,200 | ||||||
November 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate 2.0g/t Global Cut-off | |||||||||||||||
Measured | Indicated | Inferred | Total | ||||||||||||
Type | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Au | ||||||
Mt | g/t | Mt | g/t | Mt | g/t | Mt | g/t | Ounces | |||||||
Total | 0.66 | 6.0 | 2.42 | 4.4 | 1.70 | 4.1 | 4.78 | 4.5 | 695,900 | ||||||
NB. Rounding errors may occur
Geology and Geological Interpretation
The Ulysses deposit lies within the Archaean-aged Norseman to Wiluna greenstone belt. Host rocks comprise a sequence of dolerite and basalt units. Gold mineralisation is associated with a strongly altered, distinctive assemblage of biotite-sericite-albite-pyrite ± carbonate alteration and quartz veining located within a regionally extensive WNW trending shear zone termed the Ulysses Shear. Depth of complete oxidation is approximately 30m to 40m with depth to fresh rock approximately 45 to 60m.
Within the shear zone, discrete zones of mineralisation are typically 2-8m in thickness and dip at 30- 50o to the north. A number of horizons of magnetic dolerite sills occur within the mafic stratigraphy at Ulysses. Where the main shear cuts through these units, local thickening and increased grade are evident and form plunging shoots with good continuity of grade and thickness over considerable plunge lengths. The zones are visually distinct and typically display sharp boundaries to the mineralisation.
Drilling at Ulysses extends to a maximum depth of 520m below surface. The mineralisation has been interpreted and estimated to that depth and the mineralisation remains open over much of the 2.7km strike length of the deposit.
Drilling Techniques
The Ulysses drill database includes records for 12,100 drill holes for a total of 565,000m of drilling. The Mineral Resource is defined by 592 RC and 122 diamond drill holes for a total of 92,900m, the majority of which were angled at -60o to grid south. The upper part of the deposit has been drilled at
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 4 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
25m by 25m spacings, with local in-fill to 12.5m spacings. Grade control drilling at Ulysses West has been carried out at 6.25m by 12.5m spacings. The lower portion of the deposit has been drilled at hole spacings of 40m to 80m on 25m to 50m spaced cross sections.
The initial, shallow resource drilling was completed by previous operators between 1993 and 2002. Genesis drilling since 2015 has been concentrated on infill drilling in the Ulysses West pit area and on defining and infilling the major strike and depth extensions of the deposit.
Drill hole collars were surveyed in MGA coordinates using RTK GPS and were transformed to local grid for interpretation and modelling. Down hole surveys were recorded for the majority of holes using electronic multi-shot survey instruments.
Sampling and Sub-sampling Techniques
For RC drilling, a face-sampling hammer was used with samples collected at 1m intervals from mineralised zones with composite sampling of 4m or 5m in unmineralised rocks. Samples were collected through rig-mounted or free standing riffle or cone splitters. Samples were reported to have been kept dry throughout the mineralised zones and visually determined recoveries were good.
Diamond drilling was completed using a HQ or NQ drilling bit for all diamond holes. Core selected from geological observation was cut in half for sampling, with a half core sample sent for assay at measured geological intervals.
Sample Analysis Method
Samples from all resource drilling were assayed at contract laboratories using a fire assay technique. The recent Genesis drilling was assayed at Intertek using a 50g fire assay.
Quality control data was collected from Genesis drilling and included the use of blanks, certified standards and field duplicates. Detailed review of the QAQC data determined that the results were satisfactory and that the drilling database was suitable for resource estimation. The Genesis infill drilling supports the previous drill hole data suggesting that there is no problem with the spatial location and tenor of mineralisation defined in the historic drilling.
Estimation Methodology
The deposit was estimated using ordinary kriging ("OK") grade interpolation of 1m composited data within wireframes prepared using nominal 0.3g/t Au envelopes. In areas where consistent zones of high grade mineralisation were present, high grade shoots were interpreted using either visually identified alteration boundaries or 2g/t assay boundaries. These were modelled as five discrete shoots and lenses within the broader mineralisation envelopes and were estimated separately using hard boundaries.
Interpolation parameters were based on geostatistical analysis and considered the geometry of the individual lodes. A first pass search of 30m with a minimum of 10 samples and a maximum of 22 samples was used which resulted in 14% of the blocks being estimated. A second pass with a search range of 60m filled a further 40% of the blocks. The majority of the remaining blocks were filled with a 120m search and minimum of 2 samples.
High grade cuts were applied to different lodes and ranged from 10g/t to 35g/t. These had negligible impact on the estimated grade.
A Surpac block model was used for the estimate with a block size of 10m EW by 10m NS by 5m vertical with sub-cells of 2.5m by 1.25m by 1.25m.
Bulk density values used in the resource estimate were based on determinations from drill core. Values applied to the model were 2.7t/m3 for duricrust, 2.0t/m3 for Oxide, 2.25t/m3 for Transition and 2.90t/m3 for Primary mineralisation and 2.95t/m3 for Primary waste rock.
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 5 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
Mineral Resource Classification
The recent infill drilling has confirmed the continuity and extent of the high grade shoots within the deposit with the majority of holes intersecting mineralisation exactly where planned.
The portion of the deposit defined by detailed drilling at 25m by 12.5m to 25m spacing and displaying excellent continuity of grade and structure has been classified as Measured Mineral Resource.
The portions of the deposit with drill hole spacings of 25m to 50m and displaying reasonable continuity of mineralisation and predictable geometry were classified as Indicated Mineral Resource. Indicated Mineral Resource was also assigned to areas drilled at a spacing of up to 60m where they were extensions of well drilled areas and where the geometry and grade distribution were consistent.
The peripheral areas of a number of the lodes were sparsely drilled and variably mineralised and were classified as Inferred Mineral Resource. This was generally extrapolated to a distance of up to 40m past drill hole intersections.
Cut-off Grades
The shallow, sub-cropping nature of the deposit and previous mining studies suggests that good potential remains for open pit mining at the project. The maximum depth potential for open pit is considered to be approximately 200m, so above 200mRL (220m vertical) the Mineral Resource has been reported at a 0.75g/t Au lower cut-off to reflect potential exploitation by open pit mining.
The deeper mineralisation shows excellent continuity of high grade gold mineralisation of sufficient tenor and thickness to have potential for underground mining. To reflect the higher cut-offs expected with potential underground mining, the portion of the deposit below 200mRL has been reported at a cut-off grade of 2.0g/t Au.
Metallurgy
Metallurgical test work has been carried out for each phase of mining at Ulysses confirming that the ore is amenable to conventional cyanide leaching. Ongoing test work by Genesis has confirmed gold recoveries from primary ore to be ~88% to 91%. Further test work is ongoing.
Modifying Factors
No modifying factors were applied to the reported Mineral resources. Parameters reflecting mining dilution, ore loss and metallurgical recoveries will be considered during the planned mining evaluation of the project.
The reported Mineral Resource has been depleted to account for existing open pit mining.
ENDS | |
For further information, visit: www.genesisminerals.com.auor please contact | |
Investors: | Media: |
Michael Fowler | Nicholas Read |
Managing Director | Read Corporate |
Genesis Minerals Limited | |
T: +61 8 9322 6178 | T: +61 8 9388 1474 |
E:mfowler@genesisminerals.com.au | E:nicholas@readcorporate.com.au |
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 6 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
COMPETENT PERSONS' STATEMENTS
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. Michael Fowler who is a full-time employee of the Company, a shareholder of Genesis Minerals Limited and is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Fowler has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr. Fowler consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The Information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Paul Payne, a Competent Person who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Payne is a full-time employee of Payne Geological Services and is a shareholder of Genesis Minerals Limited. Mr Payne has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Mr Payne consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 7 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||
JORC Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data | ||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary | ||||||||
Sampling | • | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut | • Drill holes used in the estimate include 122 | |||||||
techniques | channels, random | chips, or | specific | diamond holes (DD) and 592 reverse circulation | ||||||
specialised industry standard measurement | holes. In addition a large amount of regional | |||||||||
RAB (Rotary Air Blast) and air-core (AC) drilling | ||||||||||
tools appropriate to | the minerals under | |||||||||
has been completed; | ||||||||||
investigation, such as down hole gamma | ||||||||||
• The shallow RC and DD drilling was completed | ||||||||||
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). | in 2000 and 2001 by Sons of Gwalia Limited | |||||||||
These examples should not be taken as | (SGW); | |||||||||
limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | • Genesis RC and diamond drilling has included | |||||||||
infill and extensional drilling as well as grade | ||||||||||
• | Include reference to | measures | taken to | |||||||
control RC drilling in the Ulysses West pit area; | ||||||||||
ensure sample representivity and the | ||||||||||
• In the deposit area, holes were generally | ||||||||||
appropriate calibration of any measurement | angled at -60o south to optimally intersect the | |||||||||
tools or systems used. | mineralised zones; |
- Aspects of the determination of • RC samples were collected in one metre intervals from a rig mounted cyclone and cone
mineralisation that are Material to the Public | or riffle splitters; | ||||||||||||||
Report. In cases where 'industry standard' | |||||||||||||||
• For RAB drilling, chips from each 1m interval | |||||||||||||||
work has been done this would be relatively | |||||||||||||||
were dumped on the ground and samples | |||||||||||||||
simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was | scooped from the chip piles; | ||||||||||||||
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg | • For AC, RAB and some RC drilling, samples | ||||||||||||||
was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for | were composited into 2m or 3m intervals for | ||||||||||||||
assay with anomalous intervals resubmitted at | |||||||||||||||
fire assay'). In other cases more explanation | |||||||||||||||
1m intervals. The majority of RC holes were | |||||||||||||||
may be required, such as where there is | |||||||||||||||
sampled and assayed at 1m intervals; | |||||||||||||||
coarse gold that has inherent sampling | • DD core was cut using a diamond saw and half | ||||||||||||||
problems. | Unusual | commodities | or | core samples submitted for analysis. | |||||||||||
mineralisation | types | (eg | submarine | ||||||||||||
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed | |||||||||||||||
information. | |||||||||||||||
Drilling | • | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open- | • RC drilling used a face sampling bit; | ||||||||||||
techniques | hole | hammer, | rotary | air blast, | auger, | • Diamond drilling was carried out with HQ and | |||||||||
Bangka, sonic, | etc) and | details | (eg | core | NQ sized equipment with standard tube; | ||||||||||
• Conventional equipment was used for RAB and | |||||||||||||||
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of | |||||||||||||||
AC drilling. | |||||||||||||||
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | |||||||||||||||
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by | |||||||||||||||
what method, etc). | |||||||||||||||
Drill sample | • | Method of recording and assessing core | • | Recoveries from historical drilling are not | |||||||||||
recovery | and | chip | sample | recoveries | and | results | documented but for the SGW holes, drilling | ||||||||
assessed. | conditions, recoveries and sample size were | ||||||||||||||
reported to be good; | |||||||||||||||
• | Measures | taken | to | maximise | sample | ||||||||||
• Diamond core recovery was recorded in the drill | |||||||||||||||
recovery and ensure representative nature | |||||||||||||||
logs and was good; | |||||||||||||||
of the samples. | • Genesis RC and DD drilling reported excellent | ||||||||||||||
• | Whether | a | relationship | exists | between | • | sample recoveries; | ||||||||
sample recovery and grade and whether | There appears to be no relationship between | ||||||||||||||
sample recovery and sample grades. | |||||||||||||||
sample bias may have occurred due to | |||||||||||||||
preferential | loss/gain | of | fine/coarse | ||||||||||||
material. | |||||||||||||||
Logging | • | Whether core and chip samples have been | • | All diamond drill holes were logged for | |||||||||||
geologically and geotechnically logged to a | recovery, RQD, geology and structure; | ||||||||||||||
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral | • RC, AC and RAB drilling was logged for various | ||||||||||||||
geological attributes; | |||||||||||||||
Resource | estimation, | mining | studies | and | |||||||||||
• All drill holes were logged in full. | |||||||||||||||
metallurgical studies. | |||||||||||||||
• Whether | logging | is | qualitative | or | |||||||||||
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, | |||||||||||||||
channel, etc) photography. | |||||||||||||||
• | The total length and percentage of the | ||||||||||||||
relevant intersections logged. |
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 8 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-sampling | • | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | • Genesis RC samples were collected from a rig | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
techniques | quarter, half or all core taken. | mounted cyclone and cone splitter in one metre | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and sample | • | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, | intervals; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• For historic RC and DD drill programs, samples | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
preparation | rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
were assayed at the Amdel laboratory in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dry. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kalgoorlie. Genesis samples were assayed at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and | the Intertek laboratory in Perth. Samples were | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
appropriateness of the sample preparation | dried and a 1kg split was pulverized to 80% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
passing 75 microns; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
technique. | • | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No QAQC reports have been located for the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Quality control procedures adopted for all | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
historic drilling data; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sub-sampling | stages | to | maximise | • | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genesis drilling included extensive QAQC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
representivity of samples. | protocols including blanks, standards and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling | duplicates. Results were satisfactory and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
is representative of the | in | situ material | supported | the | use | of | the | data in resource | ||||||||||||||||||||||
estimation; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collected, including for instance results for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Sample | sizes | are considered | appropriate | to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
field duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
correctly represent the gold mineralisation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the | based on: the style of mineralisation, the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
grain size of the material being sampled. | thickness and consistency of the intersections, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the sampling methodology and assay value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ranges for Au. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quality of | • | The nature, quality and appropriateness of | • | For SGW RC and DD drilling, analysis was | by | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
assay data | the | assaying | and | laboratory | procedures | fire assay and atomic absorption spectrometry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and | used | and | whether | the | technique | is | (AAS) | finish | at | the | Amdel | laboratory | in | |||||||||||||||||
Kalgoorlie; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
laboratory | considered partial or total. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• For Genesis drilling, analysis was by fire assay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tests | • | For | geophysical | tools, | spectrometers, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | finish at the Intertek laboratory in Perth; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
parameters | used | in | determining | the | • The analytical technique used approaches total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
analysis | including | instrument | make | and | • | dissolution of gold in most circumstances. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genesis drilling | included | extensive | QAQC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
model, | reading times, | calibrations factors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
protocols | including | blanks, | standards | and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
applied and their derivation, etc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
duplicates. | Results | were | satisfactory | and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Nature | of | quality | control | procedures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
supported the use of the data in resource | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, | estimation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external laboratory checks) and whether | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bias) and precision have been established. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verification | • | The verification of significant intersections | • | Visual verification of significant intersections | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of sampling | by | either | independent | or | alternative | has been carried out by the Competent Person. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and assaying | company personnel. | The mineralisation is visually distinct and scan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
logging | of | 14 | diamond | holes | confirmed | the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• The use of twinned holes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thickness and approximate tenor of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Documentation of primary data, data entry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mineralisation; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
procedures, data verification, data storage | • Multiple phases of drilling have confirmed the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(physical and electronic) protocols. | overall tenor and distribution of mineralisation; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Primary data documentation is electronic with | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
appropriate verification and validation; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Data is well organized and securely stored in a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
relational database; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Assay values that were below detection limit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
were adjusted to equal half of the detection limit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
value. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of | • | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | • Drill hole collar coordinates used MGA Zone 51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
data points | locate | drill | holes (collar | and | down-hole | datum with transforms to a local grid; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
surveys), | trenches, | mine | workings | and | • Drill hole collars have been accurately surveyed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
either by licenced surveyors or using differential | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
other locations used in Mineral Resource | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GPS; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
estimation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Topographic | control | is | from | detailed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Specification of the grid system used. | topographic survey in the vicinity of the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Quality | and | adequacy | of | topographic | resource and from drill hole collar surveys | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
control. | elsewhere. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data spacing | • | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration | • For RAB and AC drilling, the drill hole spacing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and | Results. | • | is variable and up to 400m by 100m; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
distribution | • | Whether the data spacing and distribution is | For RC and DD drilling, the hole spacing is | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
largely 25m by 25m in the upper part of the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sufficient | to | establish | the | degree | of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
deposit | with some | 12.5m | infill. The | deeper | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 9 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary | ||||||||
geological and grade continuity appropriate | portion of the deposit has been drilled at 40m to | |||||||||
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve | 80m hole spacings on 25m spaced cross | |||||||||
estimation procedure(s) and classifications | sections; | |||||||||
• During 2016/17, grade control drilling was | ||||||||||
applied. | ||||||||||
undertaken at 6.25m by 12.5m drill spacing | ||||||||||
• | Whether sample compositing has been | |||||||||
over a strike length of 140m in the western | ||||||||||
applied. | • | portion of the deposit; | ||||||||
The drilling has demonstrated sufficient | ||||||||||
continuity in both geological and grade | ||||||||||
continuity to support the definition of Mineral | ||||||||||
Resources, and the classifications applied | ||||||||||
under the 2012 JORC Code; | ||||||||||
• Samples used in the Mineral Resource were | ||||||||||
based largely on 1m samples without | ||||||||||
compositing. Compositing of DD holes was | ||||||||||
required to provide equal support during | ||||||||||
estimation. | ||||||||||
Orientation of | • | Whether the orientation of sampling | • | Holes were generally angled to grid south or to | ||||||
data in | achieves unbiased sampling of possible | optimize the intersection angle with the | ||||||||
relation to | structures and the extent to which this is | interpreted structures; | ||||||||
• No orientation based sampling bias has been | ||||||||||
geological | known, considering the deposit type. | |||||||||
identified in the data. | ||||||||||
structure | • | If the relationship between the drilling | ||||||||
orientation and the orientation of key | ||||||||||
mineralised structures is considered to have | ||||||||||
introduced a sampling bias, this should be | ||||||||||
assessed and reported if material. | ||||||||||
Sample | • | The measures taken to ensure sample | • | Genesis samples were carefully identified and | ||||||
security | security. | bagged on site for collection and transport by | ||||||||
commercial or laboratory transport. | ||||||||||
Audits or | • | The results of any audits or reviews of | • | Sampling and data procedures were audited by | ||||||
reviews | sampling techniques and data. | PayneGeo as part of the estimation program. | ||||||||
• All work was carried out by reputable | ||||||||||
companies using industry standard methods. |
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 10 |
19 December 2019Genesis Minerals Limited
JORC Table 1 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||||||||||||
Mineral | • | Type, | reference | name/number, | location | • | The deposit is located within Mining Lease | ||||||||
tenement and | and ownership including agreements or | M40/166 which is owned by Ulysses Mining Pty | |||||||||||||
land | tenure | material issues with third parties such as | • | Ltd | |||||||||||
status | joint | ventures, | partnerships, | overriding | The Mining Lease was granted for a term of 21 | ||||||||||
royalties, native title interests, historical | • | years and expires 28 January 2022 | |||||||||||||
sites, wilderness or national park and | The tenements are in good standing. | ||||||||||||||
environmental settings. | |||||||||||||||
• The security of the tenure held at the time of | |||||||||||||||
reporting along with any known impediments | |||||||||||||||
to obtaining a license to operate in the area. | |||||||||||||||
Exploration | • | Acknowledgment | and | appraisal | of | • | The tenement was previously held in a joint | ||||||||
done by other | exploration by other parties. | venture between Sons of Gwalia Limited | |||||||||||||
parties | ("SWG") and Dalrymple Resources NL. The | ||||||||||||||
majority of drilling was completed by SWG | |||||||||||||||
between 1999 and 2001. | |||||||||||||||
• The project was acquired by St Barbara Limited | |||||||||||||||
("SMB") in 2004. SBM work was limited to | |||||||||||||||
resource modelling and geological review. | |||||||||||||||
Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of | • | Ulysses is an orogenic, lode-style deposit | ||||||||||||
mineralisation. | hosted within mafic rocks of the Norseman- | ||||||||||||||
Wiluna greenstone belt | |||||||||||||||
• | Gold mineralisation occurs within a strong zone | ||||||||||||||
of shearing and biotite-sericite-pyrite alteration | |||||||||||||||
typically 5-10m true width. | |||||||||||||||
• | High grade shoots have developed at the | ||||||||||||||
intersection of the Ulysses shear and magnetic | |||||||||||||||
dolerite sills within the mafic stratigraphy. | |||||||||||||||
• | The shear zone strikes east-west and dips 30- | ||||||||||||||
40o to the north. | |||||||||||||||
Drill | hole | • A summary of all information material to the | • | Results of previous exploration at the project are | |||||||||||
information | under-standing of the exploration results | provided in numerous previous ASX releases. | |||||||||||||
including a tabulation of the following | The most recent release is dated 19 November | ||||||||||||||
information for all Material drill holes: | • | 2019. | |||||||||||||
• easting | and | northing | of the | drill | hole | Drill hole locations are shown on the map within | |||||||||
collar | the body of this ASX release. | ||||||||||||||
• elevation or RL (Reduced Level - | |||||||||||||||
elevation above sea level in metres) of | |||||||||||||||
the drill hole collar | |||||||||||||||
• dip and azimuth of the hole | |||||||||||||||
• down hole length and interception depth | |||||||||||||||
• hole length | |||||||||||||||
• If the exclusion of this information is justified | |||||||||||||||
on the basis that the information is not | |||||||||||||||
Material and this exclusion does not detract | |||||||||||||||
from the understanding of the report, the | |||||||||||||||
Competent Person should clearly explain | |||||||||||||||
why this is the case. | |||||||||||||||
Data | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | • | Length weighted average grades have been | |||||||||||
aggregation | averaging | techniques, | maximum | and/or | reported; | ||||||||||
methods | minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of | ||||||||||||||
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually | • | No high-grade cuts have been applied to | |||||||||||||
Material and should be stated. | reported exploration results; | ||||||||||||||
• Where | aggregate | intercepts incorporate | |||||||||||||
short lengths of high grade results and | • | Metal equivalent values are not being reported. | |||||||||||||
longer lengths of low grade results, the | |||||||||||||||
procedure used for such aggregation should | |||||||||||||||
be stated and some typical examples of | |||||||||||||||
such aggregations should be shown in | |||||||||||||||
detail. | |||||||||||||||
• The assumptions used for any reporting of | |||||||||||||||
metal equivalent values should be clearly | |||||||||||||||
stated. | |||||||||||||||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 11 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||||||
Relationship | • | These | relationships | are | particularly | • Drill holes are angled to local grid south which is | ||||||||
between | important in the reporting of Exploration | approximately perpendicular to the orientation of | ||||||||||||
mineralisation | Results. | the mineralised trend. | ||||||||||||
widths | and | • | If the geometry of the mineralisation with | |||||||||||
intercept | respect to the drill hole angle is known, its | |||||||||||||
lengths | nature should be reported. | |||||||||||||
• | If it is not known and only the down hole | |||||||||||||
lengths are reported, there should be a clear | ||||||||||||||
statement to this effect (e.g.'down hole | ||||||||||||||
length, true width not known'). | ||||||||||||||
Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) | • A plan showing the Ulysses drilling is included | |||||||||||
and tabulations of intercepts should be | within this ASX release. | |||||||||||||
included for any significant discovery being | ||||||||||||||
reported. These should include, but not be | ||||||||||||||
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar | ||||||||||||||
locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||||||||||||||
Balanced | • | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | • Drill hole collars were accurately surveyed using | |||||||||||
Reporting | locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | electronic instruments or differential GPS; | ||||||||||||
surveys), trenches, mine workings and | • The majority of resource holes had down hole | |||||||||||||
other locations used in Mineral Resource | surveys. Genesis holes and many historic holes | |||||||||||||
estimation. | were surveyed by gyro or EMS, but for many | |||||||||||||
• | Where | comprehensive | reporting of all | other holes, the method is not known | ||||||||||
Exploration | Results | is | not | practicable, | • The significant results of all resource drill holes | |||||||||
have been previously reported. | ||||||||||||||
representative reporting of both low and high | ||||||||||||||
• Results of RAB and AC holes are not material to | ||||||||||||||
grades and/or widths should be practiced to | ||||||||||||||
the project | ||||||||||||||
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration | ||||||||||||||
Results. | ||||||||||||||
Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • | Regional exploration programs have been | ||||||||||
substantive | material, should be reported including (but | conducted including RAB drilling and | ||||||||||||
exploration | not limited to): geological observations; | geochemical sampling. The results have not | ||||||||||||
data | geophysical | survey | results; | geochemical | been used in the Mineral Resource estimate. | |||||||||
survey results; bulk samples - size and | ||||||||||||||
method of treatment; metallurgical test | ||||||||||||||
results; | bulk | density, | groundwater, | |||||||||||
geotechnical | and | rock | characteristics; | |||||||||||
potential | deleterious | or | contaminating | |||||||||||
substances. | ||||||||||||||
Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further | • | Further work at the deposit will include | ||||||||||
work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or | extensional and infill drilling in the high grade | |||||||||||||
depth extensions or large- scale step-out | portions of the deposit. | |||||||||||||
drilling). | • Along strike and down dip lode extensions are | |||||||||||||
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | ||||||||||||||
possible extensions, including the main | likely targets for further exploration. | |||||||||||||
geological interpretations and future drilling | ||||||||||||||
areas, provided this information is not | • Regional exploration results will be assessed to | |||||||||||||
commercially sensitive. | identify other targets. | |||||||||||||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 12 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||
JORC Table 1 Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources | ||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||
Mineral | • | Type, reference name/number, location | • | The deposit is located within Mining Lease | ||||
tenement and | and ownership including agreements or | M40/166 which is owned by Ulysses Mining Pty | ||||||
land | tenure | material issues with third parties such as | • | Ltd; | ||||
status | joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | The Mining Lease was granted for a term of 21 | ||||||
royalties, native title interests, historical | • | years and expires 28 January 2022; | ||||||
sites, wilderness or national park and | The tenements are in good standing. | |||||||
environmental settings. |
- The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the area.
Exploration | • | Acknowledgment and | appraisal | of | • | The tenement was previously held in a joint | |||
done by other | exploration by other parties. | venture between Sons of Gwalia Limited | |||||||
parties | ("SWG") and Dalrymple Resources NL. The | ||||||||
majority of drilling was completed by SWG | |||||||||
between 1999 and 2001; | |||||||||
• The project was acquired by St Barbara Limited | |||||||||
("SMB") in 2004. SBM work was limited to | |||||||||
resource modelling and geological review. | |||||||||
Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of | • | Ulysses is an orogenic, lode-style deposit | ||||||
mineralisation. | hosted within mafic rocks of the Norseman- | ||||||||
Wiluna greenstone belt; | |||||||||
• | Gold mineralisation occurs within a strong zone | ||||||||
of shearing and biotite-sericite-pyrite alteration | |||||||||
typically 5-10m in true width; | |||||||||
• | High grade shoots have developed at the | ||||||||
intersection of the Ulysses shear and magnetic | |||||||||
dolerite sills within the mafic stratigraphy; | |||||||||
• | The shear zone strikes east-west and dips 30- | ||||||||
40o to the north. | |||||||||
Drill | hole | • A summary of all information material to the | • | Results of previous exploration at the project are | |||||
information | under-standing of the exploration results | provided in numerous previous ASX releases. | |||||||
including a tabulation of the following | The most recent release is dated 19 November | ||||||||
information for all Material drill holes: | • | 2019; | |||||||
• easting | and northing | of the drill | hole | Drill hole locations are shown on the map within | |||||
collar | the body of this ASX release. | ||||||||
• elevation or RL (Reduced Level - | |||||||||
elevation above sea level in metres) of | |||||||||
the drill hole collar | |||||||||
• dip and azimuth of the hole | |||||||||
• down hole length and interception depth | |||||||||
• hole length | |||||||||
• If the exclusion of this information is justified | |||||||||
on the basis that the information is not | |||||||||
Material and this exclusion does not detract | |||||||||
from the understanding of the report, the | |||||||||
Competent Person should clearly explain | |||||||||
why this is the case. | |||||||||
Data | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | • | Length weighted average grades have been | |||||
aggregation | averaging | techniques, | maximum and/or | reported; | |||||
methods | minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of | ||||||||
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually | • | No high-grade cuts have been applied to | |||||||
Material and should be stated. | reported exploration results; | ||||||||
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate | |||||||||
short lengths of high grade results and | • | Metal equivalent values are not being reported. | |||||||
longer lengths of low grade results, the | |||||||||
procedure used for such aggregation should | |||||||||
be stated and some typical examples of | |||||||||
such aggregations should be shown in | |||||||||
detail. | |||||||||
• The assumptions used for any reporting of | |||||||||
metal equivalent values should be clearly | |||||||||
stated. | |||||||||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 13 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||||||
Relationship | • | These | relationships | are | particularly | • Drill holes are angled to local grid south which is | ||||||||
between | important in the reporting of Exploration | approximately perpendicular to the orientation of | ||||||||||||
mineralisation | Results. | the mineralised trend. | ||||||||||||
widths | and | • | If the geometry of the mineralisation with | |||||||||||
intercept | respect to the drill hole angle is known, its | |||||||||||||
lengths | nature should be reported. | |||||||||||||
• | If it is not known and only the down hole | |||||||||||||
lengths are reported, there should be a clear | ||||||||||||||
statement to this effect (e.g.'down hole | ||||||||||||||
length, true width not known'). | ||||||||||||||
Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) | • A plan showing the Ulysses drilling is included | |||||||||||
and tabulations of intercepts should be | within this ASX release. | |||||||||||||
included for any significant discovery being | ||||||||||||||
reported. These should include, but not be | ||||||||||||||
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar | ||||||||||||||
locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||||||||||||||
Balanced | • | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | • Drill hole collars were accurately surveyed using | |||||||||||
Reporting | locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | electronic instruments or differential GPS; | ||||||||||||
surveys), trenches, mine workings and | • The majority of resource holes had down hole | |||||||||||||
other locations used in Mineral Resource | surveys. Genesis holes and many historic holes | |||||||||||||
estimation. | were surveyed by gyro or EMS, but for many | |||||||||||||
• | Where comprehensive | reporting | of all | other holes, the method is not known; | ||||||||||
Exploration | Results | is | not | practicable, | • The significant results of all resource drill holes | |||||||||
have been previously reported; | ||||||||||||||
representative reporting of both low and high | ||||||||||||||
• Results of RAB and AC holes are not material to | ||||||||||||||
grades and/or widths should be practiced to | ||||||||||||||
the project. | ||||||||||||||
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration | ||||||||||||||
Results. | ||||||||||||||
Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • Regional exploration programs have been | |||||||||||
substantive | material, should be reported including (but | conducted including RAB drilling and | ||||||||||||
exploration | not limited to): geological observations; | geochemical sampling. The results have not | ||||||||||||
data | geophysical | survey | results; | geochemical | been used in the Mineral Resource estimate. | |||||||||
survey results; bulk samples - size and | ||||||||||||||
method of treatment; metallurgical test | ||||||||||||||
results; | bulk | density, | groundwater, | |||||||||||
geotechnical | and | rock | characteristics; | |||||||||||
potential | deleterious | or | contaminating | |||||||||||
substances. | ||||||||||||||
Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further | • Further work at the deposit will include mining | |||||||||||
work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or | studies to determine the potential for | |||||||||||||
depth extensions or large- scale step-out | development of the deposit; | |||||||||||||
drilling). | • Along strike and down dip lode extensions are | |||||||||||||
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | likely targets for further exploration; | |||||||||||||
possible | extensions, including the | main | • Regional exploration results will be assessed to | |||||||||||
geological interpretations and future drilling | identify other targets. | |||||||||||||
areas, provided this information is not | ||||||||||||||
commercially sensitive. |
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 14 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||||||||||||||||
JORC Table 1 Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Database | • | Measures taken to ensure that data has | • | Data was captured electronically to prevent | ||||||||||||||||||||
integrity | not been corrupted by, for example, | transcription errors. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
transcription or keying errors, between its | • | Validation included comparison of gold results to | ||||||||||||||||||||||
initial collection and its use for Mineral | logged geology to verify mineralised intervals. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Resource estimation purposes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Data validation procedures used. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site visits | • | Comment on any site visits undertaken by | • | Numerous site visits were undertaken by the | ||||||||||||||||||||
the Competent Person and the outcome | Competent Person between 2015 and 2019 to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
of those visits. | verify the extent of mining operations, locate drill | |||||||||||||||||||||||
• | If no | site | visits | have | been | undertaken | collars from previous drilling, review drilling and | |||||||||||||||||
indicate why this is the case. | mining operations and to confirm that no obvious | |||||||||||||||||||||||
impediments to future project exploration or | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
development were present. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geological | • | Confidence in (or conversely, the | • | The confidence in the geological interpretation is | ||||||||||||||||||||
interpretation | uncertainty | of) | the | geological | considered to be good, with highly continuous | |||||||||||||||||||
interpretation of the mineral deposit. | mineralised structures defined by good quality | |||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Nature of the data used and of any | • | drilling. | |||||||||||||||||||||
assumptions made. | The deposit consists of moderate dipping | |||||||||||||||||||||||
• | The | effect, | if | any, | of | alternative | mineralised lodes which have been interpreted | |||||||||||||||||
interpretations | on | Mineral | Resource | based on logging and assay data from samples | ||||||||||||||||||||
estimation. | taken at regular intervals from angled drill holes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
• | The use of geology in guiding and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
controlling Mineral Resource estimation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | The | factors | affecting | continuity | both | of | ||||||||||||||||||
grade and geology. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions | • | The extent and variability of the Mineral | • | The Ulysses Mineral Resource area extends over | ||||||||||||||||||||
Resource expressed as length (along | a strike length of 2,700m and has a vertical extent | |||||||||||||||||||||||
strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth | of 520m from surface at 420mRL to -100mRL. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
below surface to the upper and lower | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
limits of the Mineral Resource. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimation | • | The nature and appropriateness of the | • | Using parameters derived from modelled | ||||||||||||||||||||
and modelling | estimation technique(s) applied and key | variograms, Ordinary Kriging (OK) was used to | ||||||||||||||||||||||
techniques | assumptions, | including | treatment | of | • | estimate average block grades within the deposit. | ||||||||||||||||||
extreme grade values, domaining, | Surpac software was used for the estimation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
interpolation parameters | and maximum | • | High grade cuts of between 10g/t and 35g/t were | |||||||||||||||||||||
distance of extrapolation from data | • | applied to 1m composite data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
points. If a computer assisted estimation | The parent block dimensions used were 10m NS | |||||||||||||||||||||||
method was chosen include a description | by 10m EW by 5m vertical with sub-cells of 1.25m | |||||||||||||||||||||||
of computer software and parameters | by 2.5m by 1.25m. The parent block size was | |||||||||||||||||||||||
used. | selected on the basis KNA and were | |||||||||||||||||||||||
• | The | availability | of | check | estimates, | approximately 50% of the average drill hole | ||||||||||||||||||
previous | estimates | and/or | mine | spacing in the deposit area beneath the existing | ||||||||||||||||||||
pit. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
production | records | and | whether | the | ||||||||||||||||||||
• Historical production records were available for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mineral | Resource | estimate | takes | |||||||||||||||||||||
an open pit completed in 2002 and a portion of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
appropriate account of such data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
historic grade control data was available which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | The | assumptions | made | regarding | ||||||||||||||||||||
largely confirms the current interpretations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
recovery of by-products. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Production from the GMD mining in 2016 and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Estimation | of | deleterious | elements | or | |||||||||||||||||||
2017 compared well with the resource model. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
other non-grade | variables | of economic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Previous | resource | estimates | have | been | |||||||||||||||||||
significance | (eg | sulphur | for | acid | mine | |||||||||||||||||||
completed | and compare well with the | current | ||||||||||||||||||||||
drainage characterisation). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
estimate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• In the case of block model interpolation, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• No assumptions have been made regarding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
the block size in relation to the average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
recovery of by-products. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sample | spacing | and | the | search | ||||||||||||||||||||
• No estimation of deleterious elements was | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
employed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
carried out. Only Au | was interpolated into the | |||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Any | assumptions behind | modelling | of | ||||||||||||||||||||
block model. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
selective mining units. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• An orientated ellipsoid search was used to select | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Any | assumptions | about | correlation | ||||||||||||||||||||
data and was based on parameters derived from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
between variables. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
the variography. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | Description | of | how | the | geological | |||||||||||||||||||
• An initial interpolation pass was used with a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
interpretation | was used | to | control | the | ||||||||||||||||||||
maximum | range of | 30m which | filled | 14% of | ||||||||||||||||||||
resource estimates. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
blocks. A second pass radius of 60m filled 40% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Discussion of basis for using or not using | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
of the blocks and a third pass range of 120m filled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
grade cutting or capping. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 15 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | |||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||||
• The process of validation, the checking | the majority of the remaining blocks. | |||||||||||
process used, the comparison of model | • A minimum of 10 samples was used for the first | |||||||||||
data to drill hole data, and use of | pass, and this was reduced to six and then 2 for | |||||||||||
reconciliation data if available. | the subsequent passes. A maximum of 22 | |||||||||||
samples was used for all passes. | ||||||||||||
• Selective mining units were not modelled in the | ||||||||||||
Mineral Resource model. The block size used in | ||||||||||||
the model was based on KNA, drill sample | ||||||||||||
spacing and lode orientation. | ||||||||||||
• Only Au assay data was available, therefore | ||||||||||||
correlation analysis was not possible. | ||||||||||||
• The deposit mineralisation was constrained by | ||||||||||||
wireframes constructed using a 0.3g/t Au cut-off | ||||||||||||
grade in association with logged geology. | ||||||||||||
• Internal high grade shoots were interpreted | ||||||||||||
based on logged geology or a 2.0g/t cut-off | ||||||||||||
grade. | ||||||||||||
• The wireframes were applied as hard boundaries | ||||||||||||
in the estimate. | ||||||||||||
• For validation, trend analysis was completed by | ||||||||||||
comparing the interpolated blocks to the sample | ||||||||||||
composite data within 25m easting intervals and | ||||||||||||
by 10m vertical intervals. | ||||||||||||
Moisture | • Whether the tonnages are estimated on a | • Tonnages and grades were estimated on a dry in | ||||||||||
dry basis or with natural moisture, and the | situ basis. No moisture values were reviewed. | |||||||||||
method of determination of the moisture | ||||||||||||
content. | ||||||||||||
Cut-off | • The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) | • The Mineral Resource above 200mRL has been | ||||||||||
parameters | or quality parameters applied. | reported at a 0.75g/t Au cut-off based on | ||||||||||
assumptions about economic cut-off grades for | ||||||||||||
open pit mining. | ||||||||||||
• Below 200mRL, the Mineral Resource has been | ||||||||||||
reported at a cut-off grade of 2.0g/t Au to reflect | ||||||||||||
potential underground mining. | ||||||||||||
Mining factors | • | Assumptions | made | regarding | possible | • The deposit has previously been mined using | ||||||
or | mining | methods, | minimum | mining | selective open pit mining methods. It is assumed | |||||||
assumptions | dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, | that further open pit mining is possible at the | ||||||||||
external) mining dilution. It is always | project. | |||||||||||
necessary as part of the process of | • Portions of the deposit are considered to have | |||||||||||
determining | reasonable | prospects for | sufficient grade and continuity to be considered for | |||||||||
eventual economic extraction to consider | underground mining. | |||||||||||
potential mining methods, but the | • No mining parameters or modifying factors have | |||||||||||
assumptions | made | regarding | mining | been applied to the Mineral Resource. | ||||||||
methods | and | parameters | when | |||||||||
estimating Mineral Resources may not | ||||||||||||
always be rigorous. Where this is the | ||||||||||||
case, this should be reported with an | ||||||||||||
explanation of the basis of the mining | ||||||||||||
assumptions made. | ||||||||||||
Metallurgical | • The basis for assumptions or predictions | • | Extensive metallurgical test work has been | |||||||||
factors | or | regarding metallurgical amenability. It is | undertaken by Genesis and previous operators at | |||||||||
assumptions | always necessary as part of the process | the project and has been reviewed; | ||||||||||
of determining reasonable prospects for | • Results of recent test work and processing | |||||||||||
eventual economic extraction to consider | results from the 2016/2017 mining have | |||||||||||
potential metallurgical methods, but the | demonstrated that good gold recovery can be | |||||||||||
assumptions | regarding | metallurgical | expected from conventional processing methods. | |||||||||
treatment | processes | and parameters | ||||||||||
made when reporting Mineral Resources | ||||||||||||
may not always be rigorous. Where this is | ||||||||||||
the case, this should be reported with an | ||||||||||||
explanation of the basis of the | ||||||||||||
metallurgical assumptions made. | ||||||||||||
Environmental | • | Assumptions | made | regarding | possible | • | The previous mining operation included the | |||||
factors | or | waste and process residue disposal | development of waste dumps at the site. | |||||||||
assumptions | options. It is always necessary as part of | • | The area is not known to be environmentally | |||||||||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 16 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited | ||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||||||
the process of determining reasonable | sensitive and there is no reason to think that | ||||||||
prospects | for | eventual economic | approvals for further development including the | ||||||
extraction to consider the potential | dumping of waste would not be approved. | ||||||||
environmental impacts of the mining and | |||||||||
processing operation. While at this stage | |||||||||
the | determination | of | potential | ||||||
environmental impacts, particularly for a | |||||||||
greenfields project, may not always be | |||||||||
well advanced, the status of early | |||||||||
consideration | of | these | potential | ||||||
environmental | impacts | should | be | ||||||
reported. Where these aspects have not | |||||||||
been considered this should be reported | |||||||||
with an explanation of the environmental | |||||||||
assumptions made. | |||||||||
Bulk density | • Whether | assumed | or | determined. | If | • | Bulk density determinations were made on | ||
assumed, the basis for the assumptions. | samples from drill core using the weight in | ||||||||
If determined, the method used, whether | air/weight in water method. | ||||||||
wet | or | dry, | the | frequency | of | the | • | Bulk density values used in the resource were | |
measurements, the nature, size and | 2.0t/m3, 2.25t/m3 and 2.90t/m3 for oxide, | ||||||||
representativeness of the samples. | transitional and fresh mineralisation respectively. |
- The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit.
- Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials.
Classification | • The basis | for the classification | of the | • | Mineral Resources were classified in accordance | |
Mineral | Resources | into | varying | with the Australasian Code for the Reporting of | ||
confidence categories. | Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore |
- Whether appropriate account has been Reserves (JORC, 2012). The Mineral Resource
taken of all relevant factors (ie relative | was classified as Measured, Indicated and | |||
confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, | Inferred Mineral Resource on the basis of data | |||
reliability of input data, confidence in | quality, sample spacing, and lode continuity; | |||
continuity of geology and metal values, | • Measured Mineral Resource was defined where | |||
quality, quantity and distribution of the | robust continuity of mineralisation was evident | |||
data). | across the area drilled by 6.25m spaced holes, | |||
• Whether the result appropriately reflects | confined to the lodes in the west of the deposit; | |||
the Competent Person's view of the | • Measured Mineral Resource was also defined | |||
deposit. | where infill drilling to 25m by 12.5m-25m had | |||
confirmed the excellent continuity of structure | ||||
and grade in the vicinity of the high grade lodes; | ||||
• The Indicated portion of the Mineral Resource | ||||
was defined where good continuity of | ||||
mineralisation was evident and within the drilled | ||||
area where hole spacing ranged from 25m by | ||||
25m or less in the well drilled portion to 40m-60m | ||||
by 40m spacing in the deeper extensions; | ||||
• The remaining portions of the deposit were | ||||
classified as Inferred Mineral Resource due to | ||||
poor grade continuity or sparse drilling; | ||||
• The definition of mineralised zones is based on | ||||
sound geological understanding producing a | ||||
robust model of mineralised domains. This model | ||||
has been confirmed by previous mining which | ||||
supported the interpretation; | ||||
• The Mineral Resource estimate appropriately | ||||
reflects the view of the Competent Person. | ||||
Audits | or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | • A documented internal audit of the Mineral | |
reviews | Mineral Resource estimates. | Resource estimate was completed by the | ||
consulting company responsible for the estimate. | ||||
Discussion | of | • Where appropriate a statement of the | • The Ulysses Mineral Resource estimate is | |
relative | relative accuracy and confidence level in | considered to be reported with a high degree of | ||
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 17 |
19 December 2019 | Genesis Minerals Limited |
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | |||||
accuracy/ | the Mineral Resource estimate using an | |||||
confidence | approach | or | procedure | deemed | ||
appropriate by the Competent Person. | ||||||
For example, the application of statistical | ||||||
or geostatistical procedures to quantify | ||||||
the relative accuracy of the resource | ||||||
within stated confidence limits, or, if such | ||||||
an approach is not deemed appropriate, | ||||||
a qualitative discussion of the factors that | ||||||
could affect the relative accuracy and | ||||||
confidence of the estimate. | ||||||
• The statement should specify whether it | ||||||
relates to global or local estimates, and, if | ||||||
local, state the relevant tonnages, which | ||||||
should be relevant to technical and | ||||||
economic | evaluation. Documentation | |||||
should include assumptions made and | ||||||
the procedures used. | ||||||
• These statements of relative accuracy | ||||||
and confidence of the estimate should be | ||||||
compared with production data, where | ||||||
available. |
Commentary
confidence. The consistent lode geometry and continuity of mineralisation is reflected in the Mineral Resource classification. The data quality is good and the drill holes have detailed logs produced by qualified geologists.
- The Mineral Resource statement relates to global estimates of tonnes and grade.
- The deposit is not currently being mined. Production records are available for the two phases of open pit mining completed at the deposit.
ASX Release: Ulysses Mineral Resource Update. | 18 |
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Genesis Minerals Limited published this content on 19 December 2019 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 18 December 2019 22:10:03 UTC