Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.

● According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is good.


Strengths

● Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 3.93 and 5.81 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2023 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.

● The stock, which is currently worth 2022 to 0.37 times its sales, is clearly overvalued in comparison with peers.

● The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.

● Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.

● This company will be of major interest to investors in search of a high dividend stock.

● Over the last twelve months, the sales forecast has been frequently revised upwards.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.

● Consensus analysts have strongly revised their opinion of the company over the past 12 months.

● Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.


Weaknesses

● As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.

● The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.

● Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.

● The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.