Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY

(CPB)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (August 16-20): Controlling For Authentication

08/25/2021 | 12:09pm EDT

It has been another steamy August week here in Washington and at the Federal Circuit, with eleven new opinions fresh off the press. Below we provide our usual weekly statistics and our case of the week—our highly subjective selection based on whatever case piqued our interest.

Precedential opinions: 5

Non-precedential opinions: 6

Rule 36: 2

Longest pending case from argument: Tie between Campbell Soup Company v. Gamon Plus, Inc., No. 20-2322 and Campbell Soup Company v. Gamon Plus, Inc., No. 20-2344 (73 days)

Shortest pending case from argument (non-Rule 36): NuVasive, Inc. v. Hirshfeld, No. 20-2321 (68 days)

Case of the week: Valve Corporation v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd., No. 20-1315.

Panel: Judges Newman, Lourie, and Dyk, with Judge Dyk writing the opinion

You should read this case if: you have a case involving the authentication of prior art from the internet.

Have you heard of the Wayback Machine? If not, this digital archive of the internet has been cataloguing webpages since 1996. Have you wondered whether courts would consider archived pages retrieved from this service as authentic prior art? This week, the Federal Circuit endorsed the practice of patent examiners who rely on the Wayback Machine as evidence of web article's public availability.

Ironburg sued Valve Corp. for patent infringement over the Valve's "Steam Controller." Valve challenged Ironburg's patents in two inter partes reviews. In both reviews, Valve asserted as prior art a printout of an online magazine article reviewing an Xbox360 controller. This so-called "Burns article" was published in 2010, three years before the priority date of the patents-in-suit. Valve's printout of the article, however, was dated after the priority date. Despite Valve's request that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board compare the printout with copies of the Burns article included in the prosecution histories of related Ironburg patents, the Board declined to consider Valve's printout as prior art as it had not been authenticated.

The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded, holding that the Board had "an obligation" to compare Valve's printout to the Burns article included in the submitted prosecution histories. The Court explained that "[a]uthentication through comparison is routine." Further, a comparison of Valve's ten-page printout with the nine-page copy of the Burns article from the submitted prosecution histories is "not burdensome." Conducting the comparison itself, the Court concluded that these were "substantially the same." The only difference was the date, which did not bear on the subject matter of the disclosure.

The Federal Circuit also rejected Ironburg's argument that, in the alternative, the Burns article is not prior art because it was not "publicly accessible." The Federal Circuit found overwhelming evidence of public accessibility based on several factors: (1) an inventor of the challenged patents had submitted a declaration during prosecution of related patents stating that he facilitated the publication of the Burns article for promotional purposes; (2) patent examiners confirmed during those related prosecutions that the Burns article was published by a date that was before the priority date of the challenged patents; (3) the applicants during those related prosecutions, including a named inventor on the challenged patents, did not dispute the status of the Burns article as prior art; and (4) a patent examiner had found the Burns article through an internet search. Although the Board did not address this argument, the Federal Circuit held that "overwhelming evidence" in the record precludes the Board from finding that the Burns article is not prior art.

The Federal Circuit specifically noted the evidence of availability based on the "Wayback Machine." The Court noted that, according to Patent Office practice, examiners may use the Wayback Machine "as a source of information to determine when a Web reference was first made available to the public." The Court also observed that several district courts—including the Northern and Central Districts of California and the Northern District of Florida—have similarly taken judicial notice of the contents of webpages retrieved from the Wayback Machine and relied on the accessibility dates given by the Wayback Machine. The Federal Circuit endorsed this approach, which may open the door for more district courts to follow the same practice going forward.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

Nate Tan
Morrison & Foerster LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 5500
Washington, DC
20006-1888
UNITED STATES
Tel: 4152687000
Fax: 4152687522
E-mail: mcervantes@mofo.com
URL: www.mofo.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
10/21CAMPBELL SOUP : Adds Diane Johnson May as Chief Human Resources Officer
MT
10/21CAMPBELL SOUP : Appoints Diane Johnson May Chief Human Resources Officer
BU
10/21Campbell Soup Company Appoints Diane Johnson May as Executive Vice President and Chief ..
CI
10/19CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY : Launches Program to Advance School Nutrition
BU
10/18CAMPBELL SOUP : Annual Report
PU
10/06CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY : Ex-dividend day for
FA
10/05CAMPBELL SOUP : S&P Affirms Campbell Soup Ratings On Solid Operating Performance And Debt ..
MT
10/05CAMPBELL SOUP : Citigroup Adjusts Campbell Soup's Price Target to $45 from $47, Keeps Neut..
MT
09/27CAMPBELL SOUP CO : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Termination of a Material D..
AQ
09/27Campbell Soup Company Enters into A Five-Year Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank..
CI
More news
Analyst Recommendations on CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2022 8 431 M - -
Net income 2022 794 M - -
Net Debt 2022 4 736 M - -
P/E ratio 2022 15,6x
Yield 2022 3,69%
Capitalization 12 296 M 12 296 M -
EV / Sales 2022 2,02x
EV / Sales 2023 1,97x
Nbr of Employees 14 100
Free-Float 60,3%
Chart CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Duration : Period :
Campbell Soup Company Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishBearishBearish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 18
Last Close Price 40,70 $
Average target price 45,59 $
Spread / Average Target 12,0%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Mark A. Clouse President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
Mick J. Beekhuizen Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
Keith R. McLoughlin Chairman
Francisco Fraga Chief Technology & Information Officer, VP
Craig Slavtcheff Chief Innovation, Research & Development Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY-15.82%12 296
NESTLÉ S.A.12.28%351 210
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.3.51%84 596
YIHAI KERRY ARAWANA HOLDINGS CO., LTD-41.62%53 700
THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY4.96%44 507
DANONE4.41%42 494