Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
33.11 USD | -0.06% | -7.25% | -15.62% |
May. 29 | Australian shares hit 3-week low as financials drag, inflation data in focus | RE |
May. 27 | Australian shares rise as banks and miners gain; Lendlease soars | RE |
Summary
- The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The group's activity appears highly profitable thanks to its outperforming net margins.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- The company's attractive earnings multiples are brought to light by a P/E ratio at 12.34 for the current year.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The company is one of the best yield companies with high dividend expectations.
- Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.
- For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.
- Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last few months, analysts have been revising downwards their earnings forecast.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The three month average target prices set by analysts do not offer high potential in comparison with the current prices.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Sector: Iron & Steel
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-15.62% | 50.53B | - | ||
-18.13% | 51.61B | C+ | ||
+24.27% | 9.14B | C | ||
-20.25% | 8.36B | A- | ||
+0.91% | 5.97B | - | - | |
-36.91% | 5.17B | B+ | ||
+16.93% | 2.11B | - | - | |
+7.13% | 1.94B | - | C+ | |
+14.64% | 1.74B | - | ||
-12.14% | 1.63B | C |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- FMG Stock
- FSUGY Stock
- Ratings Fortescue Ltd