Stock Code: 1398
EUR Preference Shares Stock Code: 4604
USD Preference Shares Stock Code: 4620
2020
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report
CONTENTS
Introduction
Scope of Calculation of Capital Adequacy Ratio Capital and Capital Adequacy Ratio
- Implementation of Advanced Capital
- Management Approaches
- Capital Adequacy Ratio
- Capital Composition
- Risk-WeightedAssets
- Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment
- Capital Planning and Management Plan for
- Capital Adequacy Ratios
Enterprise Risk Management
Credit Risk
- Credit Risk Management
- Credit Risk Exposure
- Internal Ratings-based Approach
- Weighted Approach
- Credit Risk Mitigation
- Loan Quality and Allowance for Impairment Losses on Loans
- Counterparty Credit Risk
- Asset Securitization
Market Risk
- Market Risk Management
- Market Risk Measurement
2 | Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book | 29 |
3 | - Management of Interest Rate Risk in the | |
5 | Banking Book | 29 |
- Banking Book Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis | 30 | |
5 | Operational Risk | 31 |
5 | - Operational Risk Management | 31 |
5 | - Legal Risk | 32 |
8 | - Anti-Money Laundering | 33 |
8 | - Operational Risk Measurement | 33 |
Liquidity Risk | 34 | |
8 | - Liquidity Risk Management | 34 |
10 | - Liquidity Risk Analysis | 35 |
11 | Other Risks | 36 |
11 | - Equity Risk in the Banking Book | 36 |
13 | - Reputational Risk | 36 |
13 | - Country Risk | 37 |
16 | Remuneration | 38 |
17 | Appendixes | 40 |
19 | - Capital Composition | 40 |
- Balance Sheet at the Group's Level | 46 | |
20 | ||
- Explanations for Detailed Items | 48 | |
21 | ||
- Main Features of Eligible Capital Instruments | ||
27 | ||
at the End of 2020 | 50 | |
27 | Definitions | 60 |
27 |
This report is prepared in both Chinese and English. In the case of discrepancy between the two versions, the Chinese version shall prevail.
Introduction
Company Profile
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China was established on 1 January 1984. On 28 October 2005, the Bank was wholly restructured to a joint-stock limited company. On 27 October 2006, the Bank was successfully listed on both Shanghai Stock Exchange and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.
Through its continuous endeavor and stable development, the Bank has developed into the leading bank in the world, possessing an excellent customer base, a diversified business structure, strong innovation capabilities and market competitiveness. The Bank regards service as the very foundation to seek further development and adheres to creating value through services while providing a comprehensive range of financial products and services to over 8.60 million corporate customers and 680 million personal customers. The Bank has been consciously integrating the social responsibilities with its development strategy and operation and management activities, and gaining wide recognition in the aspects of supporting pandemic containment, promoting inclusive finance, backing poverty alleviation and rural revitalization, developing green finance and participating in public welfare undertakings.
The Bank always keeps in mind its underlying mission of serving the real economy with its principal business, and along with the real economy it prospers, suffers and grows. Taking a risk-based approach and never overstepping the bottom line, it constantly enhances its capability of controlling and mitigating risks. Besides, the Bank remains steadfast in understanding and following the business rules of commercial banks to strive to be a century-old bank. It also stays committed to seeking progress with innovation while maintaining stability, continuously enhances the key development strategies, actively develops the FinTech and accelerates the digital transformation. The Bank unswervingly delivers specialized services, and pioneers a specialized business model, thus making it "a craftsman in large banking".
The Bank was ranked the 1st place among the Top 1000 World Banks by The Banker, the 1st place in the Global 2000 by Forbes, and the 1st place in the list of commercial banks of the Global 500 in Fortune for the eighth consecutive year, and took the 1st place among the Top 500 Banking Brands of Brand Finance for the fifth consecutive year.
Disclosure Basis
This report is prepared and disclosed in accordance with the Capital Regulation and related regulations.
Disclosure Statement
The report contains forward-looking statements on the Bank's financial positions, business performance and development. The statements are made based on existing plans, estimates and forecasts, and bear upon future external events or the Group's future finance, business or performance in other aspects, and may involve future plans which do not constitute substantive commitment to investors. Hence, investors and persons concerned shall be fully aware of the risks and understand the difference between plans, estimates and commitments.
2
Scope of Calculation of Capital Adequacy Ratio
Investees' Consolidation Treatment under Capital Adequacy Ratio Calculation
The Bank calculated capital adequacy ratios at all tiers in accordance with the Capital Regulation. The scope of calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio includes the Bank and financial institutions in which the Bank directly or indirectly invested in accordance with the Capital Regulation.
TREATMENT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF INVESTEES FOR THE CALCULATION OF CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO
Treatment for the calculation of consolidated capital | ||
S/N | Type of investee | adequacy ratio |
1 | Financial institutions with majority voting | Included in the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio |
rights or controlling interest (excluding | ||
insurance companies) |
2 Insurance companies with majority voting rights or controlling interest
Excluded from the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio, deducted corresponding capital investment from capital at all tiers; deducted the corresponding capital shortfall, if any
3 Significant minority investments in capital instruments issued by financial institutions
Excluded from the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio, deducted the part of core tier 1 capital investments exceeding 10% of the Bank's core tier 1 capital and deducted all of additional tier 1 and tier 2 capital investments from corresponding tiers of capital. The part failing to reach the deduction threshold shall be calculated as risk-weighted assets
4 Non-significant minority investments in capital instruments issued by financial institutions
Excluded from the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio and deducted the part of total investments exceeding 10% of the Bank's core tier 1 capital from corresponding tiers of regulatory capital. The part failing to reach the deduction threshold shall be calculated as risk-weighted assets
5 Minority investments in the equity of commercial entities
Excluded from the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio and calculated as risk-weighted assets
At the end of 2020, the difference between the scope of the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio and the scope of financial reporting consolidation is ICBC-AXA. Pursuant to the Capital Regulation, ICBC-AXA was excluded from the calculation of consolidated capital adequacy ratio.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 3 |
Scope of Calculation of Capital Adequacy Ratio
Major Investees Included in and Deducted from the Calculation of Consolidated Capital Adequacy Ratio
TOP 10 INVESTEES INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION OF CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO
In RMB millions, except for percentages
Shareholding | |||||
Balance of | percentage | ||||
S/N | Name of investee | investment | (%) | Place of incorporation | Principal activity |
1 | ICBC (Asia) | 47,621 | 100.00 | Hong Kong, China | Commercial banking |
2 | ICBC Wealth | 16,000 | 100.00 | Beijing, China | Wealth management |
Management | |||||
3 | ICBC Investment | 12,000 | 100.00 | Nanjing, China | Financial assets |
investment | |||||
4 | ICBC Leasing | 11,000 | 100.00 | Tianjin, China | Leasing |
5 | ICBC (Macau) | 10,316 | 89.33 | Macau, China | Commercial banking |
6 | ICBC (Argentina) | 5,782 | 100.00 | Buenos Aires, Argentina | Commercial banking |
7 | ICBC Standard Bank | 5,348 | 60.00 | London, UK | Commercial banking |
8 | ICBC (Thai) | 4,898 | 97.86 | Bangkok, Thailand | Commercial banking |
9 | ICBC International | 4,066 | 100.00 | Hong Kong, China | Investment banking |
10 | ICBC (Europe) | 3,294 | 100.00 | Luxembourg | Commercial banking |
INVESTEES DEDUCTED FROM THE CALCULATION OF CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO | |||||
In RMB millions, except for percentages | |||||
Shareholding | |||||
Balance of | percentage | ||||
S/N | Name of investee | investment | (%) | Place of incorporation | Principal activity |
1 | ICBC-AXA | 7,980 | 60.00 | Shanghai, China | Insurance |
Capital Deficiencies and Restrictions on Capital Transfer
As at the end of 2020, there is no capital deficiency in the financial institutions in which the majority or controlling interests is held by the Bank as measured in accordance with local regulatory requirements. During the reporting period, there is no material restriction on the fund transfer within the Group.
4
Capital and Capital Adequacy Ratio
Implementation of Advanced Capital Management Approaches
According to the scope of implementing the advanced capital management approaches as approved by the regulatory authorities, the foundation internal ratings-based (IRB) approach was adopted for corporate credit risk, the IRB approach for retail credit risk, the internal model approach (IMA) for market risk, and the standardized approach for operational risk meeting regulatory requirements. The weighted approach was adopted for credit risk uncovered by the IRB approach and the standardized approach for market risk uncovered by the IMA.
Capital Adequacy Ratio
RESULTS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO CALCULATION OF THE GROUP AND PARENT COMPANY
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||
Parent | Parent | |||||
Item | Group | Company | Group | Company | ||
Net core tier 1 capital | 2,653,002 | 2,404,030 | 2,457,274 | 2,222,316 | ||
Net tier 1 capital | 2,872,792 | 2,605,594 | 2,657,523 | 2,403,000 | ||
Net capital base | 3,396,186 | 3,114,878 | 3,121,479 | 2,852,663 | ||
Core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (%) | 13.18 | 13.14 | 13.20 | 13.29 | ||
Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (%) | 14.28 | 14.24 | 14.27 | 14.37 | ||
Capital adequacy ratio (%) | 16.88 | 17.02 | 16.77 | 17.06 | ||
Capital Composition
As at the end of 2020, the core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio, tier 1 capital adequacy ratio and capital adequacy ratio calculated by the Bank in accordance with the Capital Regulation stood at 13.18%, 14.28% and 16.88%, respectively, complying with regulatory requirements.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 5 |
Capital and Capital Adequacy Ratio
CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO OF THE GROUP CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CAPITAL REGULATION
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December | At 31 December | ||
Item | 2020 | 2019 | |
Core tier 1 capital | 2,669,055 | 2,472,774 | |
Paid-in capital | 356,407 | 356,407 | |
Valid portion of capital reserve | 148,534 | 149,067 | |
Surplus reserve | 322,692 | 292,149 | |
General reserve | 339,486 | 304,876 | |
Retained profits | 1,508,562 | 1,367,180 | |
Valid portion of minority interests | 3,552 | 4,178 | |
Others | (10,178) | (1,083) | |
Core tier 1 capital deductions | 16,053 | 15,500 | |
Goodwill | 8,107 | 9,038 | |
Other intangible assets other than land use rights | 4,582 | 2,933 | |
Cash flow hedge reserves that relate to the hedging of items that | (4,616) | (4,451) | |
are not fair valued on the balance sheet | |||
Investments in core tier 1 capital instruments issued by financial | 7,980 | 7,980 | |
institutions that are under control but not subject to consolidation | |||
Net core tier 1 capital | 2,653,002 | 2,457,274 | |
Additional tier 1 capital | 219,790 | 200,249 | |
Additional tier 1 capital instruments and related premium | 219,143 | 199,456 | |
Valid portion of minority interests | 647 | 793 | |
Net tier 1 capital | 2,872,792 | 2,657,523 | |
Tier 2 capital | 523,394 | 463,956 | |
Valid portion of tier 2 capital instruments and related premium | 351,568 | 272,680 | |
Surplus provision for loan impairment | 170,712 | 189,569 | |
Valid portion of minority interests | 1,114 | 1,707 | |
Net capital base | 3,396,186 | 3,121,479 | |
Risk-weighted assets(1) | 20,124,139 | 18,616,886 | |
Core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (%) | 13.18 | 13.20 | |
Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (%) | 14.28 | 14.27 | |
Capital adequacy ratio (%) | 16.88 | 16.77 | |
Note: (1) Refers to risk-weighted assets after capital floor and adjustments.
For information disclosed in accordance with the Notice on Enhancing Disclosure Requirements for Composition of Capital, Appendix 2 to the Notice on Issuing Regulatory Documents on Capital Regulation for Commercial Banks, please refer to the Appendixes of this report, including Capital Composition, Balance Sheet at the Group's level (financial consolidation and regulatory consolidation), Illustrated Balance Sheet, Mapped Components of Balance Sheet to Capital Item as well as Main Features of Eligible Capital Instruments.
6
Capital and Capital Adequacy Ratio
CAPS IN THE CAPITAL CALCULATION
In RMB millions | ||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |
Item | 2020 | 2019 |
- Valid caps of surplus provision for loan impairment to tier 2 capital
Parts covered by internal ratings-based approach
Provision for loan impairment | 507,096 | 460,851 | |||
Expected loss | 241,738 | 227,853 | |||
Surplus provision for loan impairment | 265,358 | 232,998 | |||
Valid cap of surplus provision for loan impairment in tier 2 | 73,678 | 66,488 | |||
capital irrespective of adjustment during the parallel period | |||||
Valid portion of surplus provisions for loan impairment in | 89,232 | 115,158 | |||
tier 2 capital higher than 150% of allowance to | |||||
non-performing loans ("NPL") giving consideration to | |||||
adjustment during the parallel period | |||||
Valid cap of surplus provisions for loan impairment in | 162,910 | 181,646 | |||
tier 2 capital giving consideration to adjustment during the | |||||
parallel period | |||||
Valid portion of surplus provision for loan impairment in | 162,910 | 181,646 | |||
tier 2 capital during the parallel period | |||||
Parts uncovered by internal ratings-based approach | |||||
Provision for loan impairment | 23,204 | 17,647 | |||
Minimum requirement on provision for loan impairment | 15,402 | 9,724 | |||
Surplus provision for loan impairment | 7,802 | 7,923 | |||
Valid caps of surplus provision for loan impairment in tier 2 capital | 78,098 | 75,006 | |||
Valid portion of surplus provision for loan impairment in tier 2 capital | 7,802 | 7,923 | |||
II. | Deduction cap for items applicable to thresholds deduction | ||||
Non-significant minority investments in capital instruments | 138,247 | 84,515 |
- issued by financial institutions that are not subject
- to consolidation
Relevant cap | 265,300 | 245,727 | ||
Deductible portion | - | - | ||
Significant minority investments in core tier 1 capital instruments | 32,452 | 37,654 |
- issued by financial institutions that are not subject to
- consolidation
Relevant cap | 265,300 | 245,727 | ||
Deductible portion | - | - | ||
Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences | 65,719 | 60,846 | ||
Relevant cap | 265,300 | 245,727 | ||
Deductible portion | - | - | ||
Significant minority investments in core tier 1 capital | 98,171 | 98,500 |
- instruments issued by financial institutions that are not
- subject to consolidation and deferred tax assets arising
- from temporary differences
Relevant cap | 397,950 | 368,590 | ||
Deductible portion | - | - | ||
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 7 |
Capital and Capital Adequacy Ratio
For changes in share capital of the Bank during the reporting period, please refer to "Details of Changes in Share Capital and Shareholding of Substantial Shareholders" in the 2020 Annual Report. For material capital investment activities of the Bank during the reporting period, please refer to "Significant Events" in the 2020 Annual Report.
Risk-Weighted Assets
In RMB millions | ||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |
Item | 2020 | 2019 |
Credit risk-weighted assets | 18,535,324 | 17,089,815 |
Parts covered by internal ratings-based approach | 12,279,663 | 11,081,413 |
Parts uncovered by internal ratings-based approach | 6,255,661 | 6,008,402 |
Market risk-weighted assets | 174,784 | 178,718 |
Parts covered by internal model approach | 94,238 | 102,412 |
Parts uncovered by internal model approach | 80,546 | 76,306 |
Operational risk-weighted assets | 1,414,031 | 1,348,353 |
Total | 20,124,139 | 18,616,886 |
Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment
The Bank's internal capital adequacy assessment comprises the risk identification, risk assessment, capital adequacy forecast and enterprise risk stress testing. The risk identification is to make a judgment on all the major risks the Bank is exposed to. The risk assessment system provides an assessment on all major risks of the Bank and conducts a comprehensive analysis on the risk profile and management status of various major risks to compute the target capital adequacy ratio of the Bank. The capital adequacy forecast is to forecast changes in risk-weighted assets and capital, taking into account the Bank's business planning and financial planning so as to further predict the capital adequacy levels in the following years. The enterprise risk stress testing is to set stress scenarios reflecting business operation, asset-liability portfolio and risk features of the Bank under the premise of analysis on future macroeconomic trends to work out changes in indicators such as capital adequacy ratios of the Bank under the stress scenarios.
Capital Planning and Management Plan for Capital Adequacy Ratios
The Board of Directors and the Shareholders' General Meeting of the Bank reviewed and approved the 2018-2020 Capital Planning of ICBC in response to the new economic and financial trends and regulatory requirements. Comprehensively taking into account domestic and overseas regulatory requirements and the needs for sustainable development and shareholder return, the Planning defined the capital management objectives and specific measures to be undertaken. During the planning period, the Bank will endeavor to ensure that capital adequacy ratios at all tiers comply with regulatory rules of China and regulatory requirements on capital surcharges of Global Systemically Important Banks. The Bank will also endeavor to maintain a safety margin and buffer, so as to support its strategic development. On the basis of keeping capital adequacy ratio at a reasonable level, the Bank will attach great importance to the balance between capital adequacy and return on capital, and maintain stable capital adequacy ratio. Moreover, the Bank will continue to strengthen capital replenishment and coordinated management on capital use, further improve capital management mechanism and constantly deepen the reform on economic capital management to increase capital use efficiency. The Bank's capital adequacy ratios at all tiers had reached the regulatory standard during the reporting period and will continue to fulfill the regulatory requirements. In 2020, the Board of Directors and the Shareholders' General Meeting of the Bank reviewed and approved the 2021-2023 Capital Planning of ICBC, which will be implemented from 2021.
On the basis of capital replenishment by retained profits, the Bank proactively expanded the channels for external capital replenishment and continuously promoted the innovation of capital instruments, to reinforce the capital strength, optimize capital structure and control the cost of capital rationally.
8
Capital and Capital Adequacy Ratio
The Bank made a non-public issuance of 145 million USD-denominatednon-cumulative perpetual offshore preference shares in September 2020, raising a total amount of USD2.9 billion. Subject to applicable laws and the approval of regulatory authorities, all proceeds from the issuance, after deduction of commissions and issuance expenses, will be used to replenish additional tier 1 capital of the Bank.
The Bank received a reply from CBIRC in September 2020, pursuant to which, approval was granted to the Bank to issue undated additional tier 1 capital bonds in foreign currency of an amount no more than RMB40.0 billion equivalent in the offshore market, which will be counted as the additional tier 1 capital of the Bank in accordance with relevant regulatory requirements.
The Proposal on the Issuance of Undated Additional Tier 1 Capital Bonds was reviewed and approved at the Second Extraordinary General Meeting of 2020 of the Bank, pursuant to which, the Bank planned to issue undated additional tier 1 capital bonds with the total amount up to RMB100.0 billion in the domestic market, which will be used to replenish the Bank's additional tier 1 capital. The issuance plan of undated additional tier 1 capital bonds is still subject to the approval of relevant regulatory authorities.
The Bank publicly issued two tranches of tier 2 capital bonds, worth RMB60.0 billion and RMB40.0 billion, in September and November 2020 successively in China's national inter-bank bond market, raising a total amount of RMB100.0 billion. The Bank issued a tier 2 capital bond of RMB30.0 billion in China's national inter-bank bond market in January 2021. All proceeds will be used to replenish the Bank's tier 2 capital in accordance with the applicable laws as approved by relevant regulatory authorities.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 9 |
Enterprise Risk Management
Enterprise risk management is a process to effectively identify, assess, measure, monitor, control or mitigate and report risks in order to ensure the realization of the Group's operating and strategic objectives by setting up effective and balanced risk governance structure, fostering robust and prudent risk culture, formulating unified risk management strategies and risk appetite, and implementing the risk limit and risk management policies. The principles of enterprise risk management of the Bank include full coverage, matching, independence, perspectiveness and effectiveness, etc.
The Bank's organizational structure of risk management comprises the Board of Directors and its special committees, the Board of Supervisors, the Senior Management and its special committees, the risk management departments, the internal audit departments, etc. The risk management organizational structure is illustrated below:
Board of Directors | Board of Supervisors |
the Board of Directors Board of Supervisors
Senior Executive
Vice Presidents
Business departments
Banking | Banking | Banking | BankCard | Market |
Department | Department | Department | Department | |
Corporate | Personal | Institutional | Department | Global |
President
Chief Risk Officer
Enterprise risk, market risk,
country risk
Credit risk
Liquidity risk, interest rate risk in the banking book
Operational risk, compliance risk
Reputational risk
- Strategic risk
IT risk
Legal risk
Risk Management Committee | US Risk Committee | Audit Committee of | |||||
of the Board of Directors | the Board of | Directors | |||||
Asset & Liability | |||||||
Management Committee | |||||||
Risk Management | Credit Risk | ||||||
Committee | Management Committee | ||||||
Risk Management | Market Risk | ||||||
Department | Management Committee | ||||||
Credit and Investment | Operational Risk | ||||||
Management Department | |||||||
Management Committee | |||||||
Asset & Liability | Internal Audit Bureau | ||||||
Management Department | |||||||
Internal Control & | |||||||
Compliance Department |
Executive Office
Office of Steering Group for Deepening Reform
Financial Technology
Department
Legal Affairs Department
At the level of and the
At the level of Head Office
Board of directors of subsidiaries
Management of Branches | Senior management of subsidiaries |
Internal Audit Sub-bureau | |||||
Business departments of | Risk management departments and internal control & | ||||
branches and subsidiaries | compliance departments of branches and subsidiaries |
At the level of branches and subsidiaries
First line of defense Second line of defense
Primary reporting line
Secondary reporting line
Third line of defense
Risks not mentioned above have been incorporated into the enterprise risk management system.
In 2020, the Bank's overall objective was to "build an enterprise risk management framework that matches a world-class and modern financial enterprise with global competitiveness". It focused on the "management of personnel, assets, defense lines and bottom lines", continuously improved the top-level design of risk management, and enhanced enterprise risk management based on the path of "active prevention, smart control and comprehensive management". The Bank revised and ameliorated the enterprise risk management system, performed risk management responsibilities, transmitted risk management culture, and achieved full coverage of institutions, businesses and personnel with risk management measures. Besides, it optimized the risk appetite and risk limit management system, improved risk emergency management capabilities and consolidated the foundation of the Group's consolidated risk management, to promote the intelligent construction of risk control system, and deepen the application of new technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence.
10
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk where loss is caused to the banking business when the borrower or counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Bank's credit risks mainly originate from loans, treasury operations (including due from banks, placements with banks, reverse repurchase agreements, corporate bonds and financial bonds investment), receivables and off-balance sheet credit business (including guarantees, commitments and financial derivatives trading).
Credit Risk Management
The Bank strictly adheres to regulatory requirements regarding credit risk management, diligently fulfills established strategies and objectives under the leadership of the Board of Directors and the Senior Management, and implements an independent, centralized and vertical credit risk management mode. The Board of Directors assumes the ultimate responsibility for the effectiveness of credit risk management. The Senior Management is responsible for executing the strategies, overall policy and system regarding credit risk management approved by the Board of Directors. The Credit Risk Management Committee of the Senior Management is the reviewing and decision-making organ of the Bank in respect of credit risk management, is responsible for reviewing material and important affairs of credit risk management, and performs its duty in accordance with the Charters of the Credit Risk Management Committee. The credit and investment management departments at different levels undertake the responsibility of coordinating credit risk management at respective levels, and the business departments implement credit risk management policies and standards for their respective business areas in accordance with their functions.
The Bank's credit risk management has the following characteristics: (1) Unified risk appetite. Unified credit risk appetite is implemented for the Bank's credit risk exposures; (2) Entire-process management. The credit risk management covers the entire process including customer investigation, credit rating, loan evaluation, loan review and approval, loan payment and post-lending monitoring; (3) System management. It continues to enhance the building of credit information system, and improve the tools to manage and control credit risk; (4) Strict management over credits. Strict qualification management is enforced on the business institutions and the credit practitioners. The Bank supervises and inspects its credits to promote compliant and robust operation; (5) The specialized institution is set up to conduct unified risk monitoring over credit risk businesses; and (6) The specialized institution is established to effectively coordinate management and directly participate in the collection and disposal of non-performing assets ("NPAs") in a timely manner or guide branches to do so.
According to the regulatory requirement on loan risk classification, the Bank implemented five-category classification management in relation to loan quality and classified loans into five categories: pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss, based on the possibility of collecting the principal and interest of loans. In order to implement sophisticated management of credit asset quality and improve risk management, the Bank implemented the twelve-category internal classification system for corporate loans. The Bank applied five-category classification management to personal credit assets and ascertained the category of the loans based on the number of months in default, expected loss ratio, credit rating, collateral and other quantitative and qualitative factors.
Credit Risk Management of Corporate Loans
The Bank continued to strengthen the building of the credit policy system. A joint prevention and control mechanism was established to support key business development and risk management, with the coordinated participation by front-, middle- and back-office departments, and an intelligent credit risk management and control model consisting of "Three Gates" and "Seven-color Pools"1 was built, to highlight the strengthening of credit risk management and control. New credit approval regulations were implemented in an all-around manner, to optimize the review and approval system, and improve credit risk mitigation measures. Besides, the working capital loan management rules were optimized and integrated, the management
1 The intelligent credit risk management solutions of "Three Gates" and "Seven-color Pools" are the systematic summary of the Bank's management and control ideas on credit risk. "Three Gates" refer to asset selection at the entrance end, asset management at the threshold end and asset disposal at the exit end. "Seven-color Pools" cover seven color pools with risk rating from low to high, which are driven by intelligent risk control and can strengthen holistic coordination of the credit risk management and realize differential and precise risk management by pool, area and segment.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 11 |
Credit Risk
of risk control process was strengthened, and the transformation of supporting systems was completed. The Bank also formulated the loan management measures for supporting technological enhancements of manufacturing enterprises, so as to provide positive support for the financing needs of these enterprises for technological upgrading and transformation and for the construction of high-quality projects.
The Bank strengthened the strategic guidance on credit policies. It actively provided support for the infrastructure projects under construction such as highways, railways, airports, urban rail transit and municipal public facilities as well as the construction of major projects for tackling areas of weaknesses. It highlighted the support for high-quality customers and projects in the emerging manufacturing fields such as new generation information technology and high-end equipment, to continuously intensify the differentiated policy management of the traditional manufacturing industry. Besides, active support was also given to the financing demand for consumption upgrade in the service industry. Through organic connection between industrial and regional policies, the Bank revised and improved the credit policies for key regions such as the Yangtze River Delta, the Guangdong-HongKong-Macau Greater Bay Area, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Central China, and the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle. Priority was given to supporting key investment and financing projects along the Belt and Road, upgrading core technologies, stabilizing the global industrial chain, and promoting the dual-cycle related business needs at home and abroad.
The Bank strengthened the risk management in the real estate industry. It paid close attention to the risk changes in the real estate markets of different regions, focused on supporting ordinary commercial housing projects aimed to satisfy rigid demands that are in line with regulatory policies, proactively and prudently promote financing for commercial rental housing projects, and provided financial support for the building of government-subsidized housing projects in compliance with laws and regulations. In addition, it continued to implement quota management for commercial real estate investment and financing, for the purpose of reasonably controlling the total amount of investment and financing for such projects.
The Bank enhanced the risk management of inclusive loans. In adherence to the whole-process risk prevention and control of inclusive loans, the Bank followed the development direction of "digital inclusiveness", and created an inclusive loan risk management system featuring "data-driven, intelligent warning, dynamic management, and continuous operation". It optimized customer selection and model access, to strictly control customer access. The duration management model in combination with on-site inspection and off-site monitoring was constantly prompted, with the performance of on-site inspection responsibilities, to continuously enrich off-site monitoring data sources, optimize monitoring models, and improve the accuracy and coverage of off-site monitoring. Moreover, the Bank kept monitoring the use of loans related to epidemic prevention, strictly implemented bail-in policy arrangements such as deferred principal and interest repayment, and reinforced the tracking and monitoring of loans with deferred debt service.
Credit Risk Management of Personal Loans
For the purpose of proactively responding to the risks caused by the pandemic, the Bank made every effort to provide credit support and service guarantee for personal customers during the outbreak of the pandemic, and strengthened the mitigation of credit risk for customers whose repayment capability was severely affected by the pandemic. An intelligent implementation plan for credit risk management and control of personal loans was prepared, to strictly manage customer access, and strengthen differentiated risk warning and refined management of NPAs. Furthermore, the personal loan risk monitoring model was optimized to improve monitoring and warning capabilities, the case prevention management was properly conducted to enhance the tracking and remediation of risk events, and close attention was paid to the tracking and governance of key risk points.
Credit Risk Management of Credit Card Business
The Bank consolidated the credit management system for credit card business by improving related regulations and processes including the joint prevention and control mechanism for review and approval process and the authenticity review rules; and it established a scenario-based "1+N" credit management mechanism, to realize functions such as credit view, real-time credit granting, and real-time digital card issuance. The Bank innovated the limit management mode and built a customer-based financing limit management and control system was built. In addition, the Bank established and improved a multi-dimensional risk monitoring system, and developed a credit default risk management and control system for existing customers, to enhance differentiated risk management and control.
12
Credit Risk
Credit Risk Management of Treasury Operations
In terms of investment business, the Bank strengthened pre-investment screening and analysis, paid close attention to the redemption risk of bonds due within the year, strengthened the monitoring of exiting bonds in key risk industries, and reinforced duration management. With respect to money market business, the Bank tightened up the pre-review and regular risk assessment of counterparty access, strengthened the systematic management and control of important risk management processes such as authorization, credit extension, counterparty access, collateral, transaction price and concentration, and improved ex post duration management, with appropriate potential risk analysis and investigation. As for derivative business, the Bank actively promoted the negotiation and signing of ISDA, NAFMII and other legal agreements, strictly managed and controlled the credit line of derivative counterparties through the Global Financial Market Transaction platform, and maintained regular monitoring of client margins and credit line.
Credit Risk Exposure
In RMB millions | ||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||
Parts uncovered | Parts uncovered | |||||
Parts covered by | by internal | Parts covered by | by internal | |||
internal ratings- | ratings-based | internal ratings- | ratings-based | |||
Item | based approach | approach | based approach | approach | ||
Corporate | 10,942,603 | 1,400,916 | 9,905,090 | 1,437,024 | ||
Sovereign | - | 7,019,844 | - | 5,998,583 | ||
Financial institution | - | 3,472,859 | - | 3,727,940 | ||
Retail | 6,984,921 | 507,002 | 6,252,608 | 484,400 | ||
Equity | - | 176,993 | - | 161,426 | ||
Asset securitization | - | 97,887 | - | 97,663 | ||
Others | - | 5,359,568 | - | 5,034,184 | ||
Total risk exposure | 17,927,524 | 18,035,069 | 16,157,698 | 16,941,220 | ||
Internal Ratings-based Approach
Governance Structure of Internal Rating System
The Board of Directors assumes the ultimate responsibility for the internal rating system of the Bank, supervises and ensures formulation and implementation by the Senior Management of necessary internal rating policies and procedures, and approves major policies, rules and implementation plans regarding the internal rating system. The Senior Management is responsible for implementation of IRB system across the Bank. The Risk Management Department of the Head Office is responsible for design, development, implementation, monitoring and promotion of the IRB management. The Credit Approval Department of the Head Office is responsible for management of corporate customer rating of the Bank. Relevant departments of the Head Office including the Credit and Investment Management Department, the Personal Banking Department, the Bank Card Department, the Asset & Liability Management Department and the Finance & Accounting Department are responsible for application of the internal rating results. The Internal Audit Bureau is responsible for internal audit of the internal rating system. Risk management departments of the branches are responsible for monitoring, application, analysis and reporting of the internal rating system. Relevant customer management departments of the branches are responsible for investigation, implementation and rating application regarding the internal rating system.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 13 |
Credit Risk
Non-retail Business
The Bank adopts the foundation IRB approach to measure non-retail credit risk satisfying regulatory requirements with rating models established based on quantitative technologies as well as experts' judgmental experience. The models assess debt-paying ability and willingness of customers based on financial indicators, competitiveness, management quality and operation status of the customers from quantitative and qualitative aspects. Customer's rating is determined by rating score and their probability of default (PD) is mapped via the master scale uniformly set.
The Bank measures risk parameters of the internal rating models in strict accordance with relevant regulatory requirements. Under the non-retail credit risk foundation IRB approach, obligor PD is determined by referring to past 10 years or more defaults of corporate customers of the Bank as well as the long-term default tendency of different asset portfolios. The internal rating parameters, maintained according to the rules regarding management of internal rating parameters of the Bank, are monitored and validated on a regular basis.
MEASUREMENT RESULTS OF NON-RETAIL CREDIT RISK UNDER FOUNDATION IRB APPROACH
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December 2020 | ||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Risk- | Average risk | |||
Exposure at | average PD | average LGD | weighted | weight | ||
PD level | default | (%) | (%) | assets | (%) | |
Level 1 | 1,232,593 | 0.09 | 44.77 | 356,363 | 28.91 | |
Level 2 | 1,544,923 | 0.21 | 42.09 | 707,669 | 45.81 | |
Level 3 | 2,155,413 | 0.65 | 43.06 | 1,574,946 | 73.07 | |
Level 4 | 2,716,833 | 1.63 | 42.84 | 2,601,332 | 95.75 | |
Level 5 | 1,771,130 | 2.57 | 42.70 | 1,847,214 | 104.30 | |
Level 6 | 611,791 | 3.72 | 42.34 | 683,964 | 111.80 | |
Level 7 | 331,289 | 5.28 | 41.86 | 415,447 | 125.40 | |
Level 8 | 103,425 | 7.20 | 41.24 | 143,729 | 138.97 | |
Level 9 | 108,298 | 9.60 | 40.76 | 166,971 | 154.18 | |
Level 10 | 49,953 | 18.00 | 41.79 | 100,137 | 200.46 | |
Level 11 | 94,723 | 56.00 | 42.72 | 171,688 | 181.25 | |
Level 12 | 222,232 | 100.00 | 43.80 | 36,481 | 16.42 | |
Total | 10,942,603 | - | - | 8,805,941 | 80.47 | |
14
Credit Risk | ||||||
At 31 December 2019 | ||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Risk- | Average | |||
Exposure at | average PD | average LGD | weighted | risk weight | ||
PD level | default | (%) | (%) | assets | (%) | |
Level 1 | 1,149,672 | 0.09 | 44.85 | 329,997 | 28.70 | |
Level 2 | 1,330,325 | 0.21 | 41.77 | 592,970 | 44.57 | |
Level 3 | 1,926,387 | 0.65 | 43.31 | 1,430,541 | 74.26 | |
Level 4 | 2,531,365 | 1.63 | 42.94 | 2,467,274 | 97.47 | |
Level 5 | 1,525,028 | 2.57 | 42.44 | 1,569,509 | 102.92 | |
Level 6 | 607,498 | 3.72 | 42.19 | 680,813 | 112.07 | |
Level 7 | 265,605 | 5.28 | 41.68 | 333,085 | 125.41 | |
Level 8 | 119,075 | 7.20 | 41.38 | 172,230 | 144.64 | |
Level 9 | 101,558 | 9.60 | 42.01 | 164,425 | 161.90 | |
Level 10 | 49,294 | 18.00 | 41.82 | 96,161 | 195.08 | |
Level 11 | 104,928 | 56.00 | 42.51 | 193,303 | 184.22 | |
Level 12 | 194,355 | 100.00 | 44.00 | 21,472 | 11.05 | |
Total | 9,905,090 | - | - | 8,051,780 | 81.29 | |
Retail Business
The Bank adopts IRB approach to measure retail credit risk pursuant to regulatory requirements, establishes the internal grading models covering entire life cycle of all types of retail products and asset pool classification and risk parameter measurement models covering all risk exposures of retail credit assets by utilizing the historical data accumulated in a long term with the help of modeling methods and expert management experience, and realizes quantitative management of retail credit risk models.
The Bank conducts comprehensive analysis of loan repayment ability and willingness of customers by using modern mathematical statistics technologies to mine, analyze and extract data of customers, assets, debts and transactions, and develops the credit score model system including application score, behavior score and collection score models and realizing the coverage of entire life cycle of retail business.
According to relevant IRB approach requirements, the Bank has put in place asset pool classification procedures and technologies suited for the actual retail business, developed the asset pool classification system applied to measurement of all risk parameters and accordingly realized measurement of risk parameters for retail credit assets like probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD) and exposure at default, etc.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 15 |
Credit Risk
MEASUREMENT RESULTS OF RETAIL CREDIT RISK UNDER IRB APPROACH
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December 2020 | |||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Risk- | Average | ||||
Exposure at | average PD | average LGD | weighted | risk weight | |||
Type of risk exposure | default | (%) | (%) | assets | (%) | ||
Residential mortgages | 5,637,631 | 1.22 | 27.87 | 1,136,677 | 20.16 | ||
Qualifying revolving | 709,742 | 2.85 | 42.65 | 124,405 | 17.53 | ||
retail exposure | |||||||
Other retail exposures | 637,548 | 4.32 | 47.53 | 361,786 | 56.75 | ||
Total | 6,984,921 | - | - | 1,622,868 | 23.23 | ||
At 31 December 2019 | |||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Risk- | Average | ||||
Exposure at | average PD | average LGD | weighted | risk weight | |||
Type of risk exposure | default | (%) | (%) | assets | (%) | ||
Residential mortgages | 5,090,032 | 1.20 | 27.17 | 1,025,226 | 20.14 | ||
Qualifying revolving | 689,431 | 3.95 | 42.76 | 139,772 | 20.27 | ||
retail exposure | |||||||
Other retail exposures | 473,145 | 5.99 | 47.59 | 275,218 | 58.17 | ||
Total | 6,252,608 | - | - | 1,440,216 | 23.03 | ||
Application of Internal Rating Results
The internal rating results of the Bank are widely used throughout the whole credit risk management process including the credit risk strategy and credit policy formulation, customer access, credit approval, loan pricing, post-lending management, capital measurement, risk limit management, allowance management and performance assessment. While complying with the regulatory requirements, the Bank also takes into account the internal rating results as an important base for decision- making over credit risk management and credit business.
Weighted Approach
The Bank adopts weighted approach to measure credit risk exposures uncovered by the IRB approach.
16
Credit Risk | ||||||
RISK EXPOSURE UNCOVERED BY IRB APPROACH BY WEIGHT | ||||||
In RMB millions | ||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||
Unmitigated | Unmitigated | |||||
Risk weight | Risk exposure | risk exposure | Risk exposure | risk exposure | ||
0% | 6,072,406 | 6,071,002 | 5,546,742 | 5,544,641 | ||
2% | 237,156 | 55,756 | 365,057 | 19,111 | ||
20% | 4,744,264 | 4,698,028 | 4,053,912 | 3,961,892 | ||
25% | 2,022,522 | 1,917,209 | 2,160,000 | 1,765,233 | ||
50% | 165,739 | 164,245 | 137,065 | 132,505 | ||
75% | 767,592 | 765,825 | 662,334 | 661,318 | ||
100% | 3,652,796 | 3,038,413 | 3,725,953 | 3,337,843 | ||
150% | 39,124 | 25,735 | 11,147 | 11,147 | ||
250% | 119,989 | 119,867 | 113,752 | 113,618 | ||
400% | 139,686 | 139,686 | 110,617 | 110,617 | ||
1250% | 73,795 | 73,795 | 54,641 | 54,641 | ||
Total | 18,035,069 | 17,069,561 | 16,941,220 | 15,712,566 | ||
Note: The weights adopted in the weighted approach-based measurement of credit risk by the Bank were in strict compliance with the relevant provisions of the Capital Regulation.
RISK EXPOSURE OF CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS ISSUED BY OTHER COMMERCIAL BANKS HELD BY THE BANK, EQUITY INVESTMENT IN COMMERCIAL ENTITIES AND REAL ESTATE FOR NON-SELF USE
In RMB millions | ||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |
Item | 2020 | 2019 |
Ordinary shares issued by other commercial banks | 29,258 | 30,011 |
Long-term subordinated bonds issued by other commercial banks | 94,140 | 48,116 |
Preference shares issued by other commercial banks | 217 | 2,265 |
Equity investment in commercial entities | 134,417 | 111,544 |
Total | 258,032 | 191,936 |
Credit Risk Mitigation
The Bank generally transfers or lowers credit risk through collateral and guarantees. The credit risk mitigation instruments effectively cover credit risk exposure of borrowers. The Bank reviews its risk mitigation instruments in handling the credit business to ensure their credit risk mitigation capability.
The Bank monitors the market value of collateral and pledges and the solvency of a guarantor regularly or irregularly if special circumstances warrant. Collateral mainly includes real estate, land and the right of construction land use, and the management right of contracted land, and pledges mainly include document of title and marketable securities, etc. Collateral and pledges valuation procedures are divided into basic procedures and direct identification procedures.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 17 |
Credit Risk
Basic procedures include investigation, review and examination, and approval; direct identification procedures include investigation and approval. For initial value appraisal of collateral, the Bank shall consider the characteristics of different types of collateral and employ proper appraisal methods to determine collateral value in consideration of market price, difficulty degree of liquidation and existence of flaws and other factors affecting the asset disposal price, thereby reasonably identifying the amount of collateral that can be guaranteed. Revaluation cycle of collateral and pledges is determined according to regulatory requirements, changes of market and other risk factors, and revaluation shall be completed before the revaluation cycle expires. The Bank shall reassess the collateral and pledge value irregularly upon discovering conditions which may possibly result in an impairment of the collateral and pledge or obvious adverse changes happening to the customer.
The Bank analyzes concentration risk of mitigation regularly or according to changes in internal and external environment, and takes appropriate countermeasures. Through the Bank's efforts in adjusting credit structure, the Bank continues to improve the structure of collateral and pledges.
COVERAGE OF ELIGIBLE RISK MITIGATION INSTRUMENTS COVERED BY IRB APPROACH
In RMB millions | |||||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | ||||||||||
Eligible | Other | Eligible | Other | ||||||||
financial | eligible | financial | eligible | ||||||||
Type of risk exposure | pledge | collateral | Guarantee | Total | pledge | collateral | Guarantee | Total | |||
Non-retail business | |||||||||||
Corporate loans | 295,294 | 982,488 | 827,620 | 2,105,402 | 250,828 | 955,872 | 723,482 | 1,930,182 | |||
Subtotal | 295,294 | 982,488 | 827,620 | 2,105,402 | 250,828 | 955,872 | 723,482 | 1,930,182 | |||
Retail business | |||||||||||
Residential mortgages | - | 5,637,631 | - | 5,637,631 | - | 5,090,032 | - | 5,090,032 | |||
Other retail exposures | 7,670 | 515,244 | 4,413 | 527,327 | 7,003 | 374,507 | 5,206 | 386,716 | |||
Subtotal | 7,670 | 6,152,875 | 4,413 | 6,164,958 | 7,003 | 5,464,539 | 5,206 | 5,476,748 | |||
Total | 302,964 | 7,135,363 | 832,033 | 8,270,360 | 257,831 | 6,420,411 | 728,688 | 7,406,930 | |||
COVERAGE OF ELIGIBLE RISK MITIGATION INSTRUMENTS UNCOVERED BY IRB APPROACH | |||||||||||
In RMB millions | |||||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | ||||||||||
Mortgage | Mortgage | ||||||||||
& pledge | & pledge | ||||||||||
Netting | and | Netting | and | ||||||||
Type of risk exposure | settlement | guarantee | Others | Total | settlement | guarantee | Others | Total | |||
On-balance sheet | - | 384,272 | - | 384,272 | - | 399,969 | - | 399,969 | |||
credit risk | |||||||||||
Off-balance sheet | - | 54,796 | - | 54,796 | - | 44,584 | - | 44,584 | |||
credit risk | |||||||||||
Counterparty credit risk | 11,523 | - | 514,917 | 526,440 | 5,881 | - | 778,220 | 784,101 | |||
Total | 11,523 | 439,068 | 514,917 | 965,508 | 5,881 | 444,553 | 778,220 | 1,228,654 | |||
18
Credit Risk | ||||||||
Loan Quality and Allowance for Impairment Losses on Loans | ||||||||
DISTRIBUTION OF LOANS BY FIVE-CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION | ||||||||
In RMB millions, except for percentages | ||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||||
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||
Item | Amount | (%) | Amount | (%) | ||||
Pass | 17,918,430 | 96.21 | 16,066,266 | 95.86 | ||||
Special mention | 411,900 | 2.21 | 454,866 | 2.71 | ||||
NPLs | 293,978 | 1.58 | 240,187 | 1.43 | ||||
Substandard | 114,438 | 0.61 | 97,864 | 0.58 | ||||
Doubtful | 149,926 | 0.81 | 113,965 | 0.68 | ||||
Loss | 29,614 | 0.16 | 28,358 | 0.17 | ||||
Total | 18,624,308 | 100.00 | 16,761,319 | 100.00 | ||||
OVERDUE LOANS | ||||||||
In RMB millions, except for percentages | ||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||||
% of total | % of total | |||||||
Overdue periods | Amount | loans | Amount | loans | ||||
Less than 3 months | 98,963 | 0.54 | 83,084 | 0.50 | ||||
3 months to 1 year | 74,820 | 0.40 | 89,625 | 0.53 | ||||
1 to 3 years | 72,467 | 0.39 | 66,848 | 0.40 | ||||
Over 3 years | 21,257 | 0.11 | 28,659 | 0.17 | ||||
Total | 267,507 | 1.44 | 268,216 | 1.60 | ||||
Note: Loans and advances to customers are deemed overdue when either the principal or interest is overdue. For loans and advances to customers repayable by installments, the total amount of loans is deemed overdue if part of the installments is overdue.
MOVEMENTS OF ALLOWANCE FOR IMPAIRMENT LOSSES ON LOANS
In RMB millions | ||||||||||||
Movements of allowance for impairment losses on loans | Movements of allowance for impairment losses on loans | |||||||||||
and advances to customers measured at amortised cost | and advances to customers measured at FVOCI | |||||||||||
Item | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Balance at 1 January 2020 | 215,316 | 78,494 | 184,688 | 478,498 | 227 | - | 5 | 232 | ||||
Transfer: | ||||||||||||
to stage 1 | 24,002 | (22,507) | (1,495) | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
to stage 2 | (6,913) | 9,311 | (2,398) | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
to stage 3 | (4,838) | (53,754) | 58,592 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
Charge/(reverse) | (2,984) | 78,244 | 95,941 | 171,201 | (16) | - | 645 | 629 | ||||
Write-offs and transfer out | - | (7) | (120,317) | (120,324) | - | - | - | - | ||||
Recoveries of loans and advances | - | - | 4,977 | 4,977 | - | - | - | - | ||||
previously written off | ||||||||||||
Other movements | (880) | (630) | (2,542) | (4,052) | (0) | - | - | (0) | ||||
Balance at 31 December 2020 | 223,703 | 89,151 | 217,446 | 530,300 | 211 | - | 650 | 861 | ||||
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 19 |
Credit Risk
For provisioning method of allowance for impairment losses on loans, please refer to the Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates in the Notes to the Financial Statements of the 2020 Annual Report.
Counterparty Credit Risk
Counterparty credit risk is the risk that economic loss is caused when the counterparty fails to perform its contractual obligations. The Bank is exposed to counterparty credit risk mainly as a result of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives trading and securities financing trading.
The counterparty shall meet relevant requirements on customer access standards before conducting derivatives trading with the Bank. The Bank assesses credit status, risk management level and capital strength of the counterparty, approves and regularly reviews special credit extension for derivatives trading. Before trading, the Bank will first enquire whether the credit limit of the counterparty is adequate.
For OTC derivatives financial trading, the Bank concludes the Credit Support Appendix (CSA) under the ISDA master agreement with certain counterparty in accordance with the requirements of both sides' regulatory authorities. Where the counterparty's credit rating is downgraded, it shall be set based on the agreement provisions as to whether the downgraded party has to provide extra collateral to its counterparty. In case that there is no relevant expression in the agreement, such downgrading will not affect both sides' collateral swap; and if there is relevant expression in the agreement, the quantity of collateral will be adjusted as per the agreement. For institutions that have not signed the CSA agreement, the signing strategy will be adjusted in a timely manner in accordance with changes in compliance requirements of domestic and overseas regulatory authorities.
COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK EXPOSURE OF DERIVATIVES TRADING
In RMB millions | ||||||||||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||||||||
Item | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
Risk exposure at default of parts covered by netting settlement | 122,362 | 82,123 | ||||||||
Risk exposure at default of parts uncovered by netting settlement | 103,253 | 100,488 | ||||||||
Total of counterparty credit risk exposure of derivatives trading | ||||||||||
before mitigation | 225,615 | 182,611 | ||||||||
Counterparty credit risk mitigation | - | - | ||||||||
Total of counterparty credit risk exposure of derivatives trading | 225,615 | 182,611 | ||||||||
NOMINAL PRINCIPAL OF CREDIT DERIVATIVES | ||||||||||
In RMB millions | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||||||
Credit | Credit | Credit | Credit | |||||||
derivatives | derivatives | derivatives | derivatives | |||||||
Item | bought | sold | bought | sold | ||||||
Nominal principal of credit derivatives as | 1,569 | 5,251 | 2,284 | 1,755 | ||||||
credit portfolios of the Bank | ||||||||||
Credit default swap | 1,569 | 1,949 | 1,936 | 1,755 | ||||||
Total return swap | - | 3,302 | 348 | - | ||||||
Nominal principal of credit derivatives | 6,847 | 6,847 | 9,748 | 9,748 | ||||||
where the Bank acts as intermediary | ||||||||||
Credit default swap | 1,870 | 1,870 | 4,526 | 4,526 | ||||||
Total return swap | 4,977 | 4,977 | 5,222 | 5,222 | ||||||
20
Credit Risk
Asset Securitization
Credit asset securitization refers to structured financing activities where the originator trusts credit assets to the trustee, and the trustee issues beneficiary securities in the form of asset-backed securities to institutional investors, and the cash flow from the credit assets is used to pay income of asset-backed securities. All securitization originated by the Bank is traditional securitization.
Asset Securitization Business
The Bank participates in the asset securitization business mainly by acting as originator of asset securitization business, lending services provider, lead underwriter and institutional investor.
- ŠAs originator and lending services provider
The Bank continued to stimulate the development of asset securitization business and effectively supported disposal of non- performing loans, revitalization of stock assets and optimization of credit structure. As at the end of 2020, some underlying assets of the asset securitization projects originated by the Bank were still retained, and the project operation remained steady. As the originator, the Bank held part of asset-backed securities which the Bank issued in line with the regulatory authority's risk self-retention requirement, and took corresponding credit risk and market risk for the part the risk of which was self-retained. At the end of 2020, assets continued to be recognized by the Group amounted to RMB63,808 million.
CREDIT ASSET SECURITIZATION BUSINESS ORIGINATED BY THE GROUP AND NOT SETTLED AT THE END OF THE REPORTING PERIOD
In RMB millions | ||||||||||
Underlying assets | ||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||
External | Type of | Exposure at | performing | Overdue at | ||||||
Originating | credit rating | underlying | Exposure at | the end of | at the end of | the end of | ||||
Asset securitization product | year | Originator | institution | assets | origination | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | ||
2016 | Gongyuan Phase III | 2016 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal NPL | 4,080 | - | - | - | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | |||||||||
2016 | Gongyuan Phase IV | 2016 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 10,255 | 2,886 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2017 | Gongyuan Phase II | 2017 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal NPL | 3,600 | 28 | 28 | 28 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | |||||||||
2017 | Gongyuan Phase III | 2017 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 13,922 | 5,283 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2017 | Gongyuan Phase IV | 2017 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 12,726 | 4,859 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2017 | Gongyuan Phase V | 2017 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 13,052 | 4,970 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2017 | Gongyuan Phase VII | 2017 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal operating | 2,350 | 376 | 376 | 376 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | NPL claim | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase I | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 10,950 | 5,108 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 21 |
Credit Risk
CREDIT ASSET SECURITIZATION BUSINESS ORIGINATED BY THE GROUP AND NOT SETTLED AT THE END OF THE REPORTING PERIOD (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions | ||||||||||
Underlying assets | ||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||
External | Type of | Exposure at | performing | Overdue at | ||||||
Originating | credit rating | underlying | Exposure at | the end of | at the end of | the end of | ||||
Asset securitization product | year | Originator | institution | assets | origination | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | ||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase II | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 10,877 | 4,927 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase III | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 10,943 | 4,896 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase IV | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 11,864 | 7,202 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase II | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Non-performing | 1,240 | 362 | 362 | 362 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | residential | ||||||||
mortgage claim | ||||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase III | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 441 | 145 | 145 | 145 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | consumption | ||||||||
NPL claim | ||||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase IV | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal operating | 525 | 267 | 267 | 267 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | NPL claim | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase V | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 11,800 | 6,957 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase VI | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 11,409 | 6,836 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase VII | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 11,302 | 6,867 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase VIII | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 13,422 | 8,452 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase IX | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 13,363 | 8,349 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhiyuan Phase I | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Corporate loans | 5,455 | 382 | - | - | |
credit asset-backed securities | China Ratings | |||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase X | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 13,379 | 8,328 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Phase XI | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 13,341 | 8,291 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Anju Phase I | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 14,364 | 8,897 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Anju Phase II | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 14,323 | 8,990 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-back | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
22
Credit Risk
CREDIT ASSET SECURITIZATION BUSINESS ORIGINATED BY THE GROUP AND NOT SETTLED AT THE END OF THE REPORTING PERIOD (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions | ||||||||||
Underlying assets | ||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||
External | Type of | Exposure at | performing | Overdue at | ||||||
Originating | credit rating | underlying | Exposure at | the end of | at the end of | the end of | ||||
Asset securitization product | year | Originator | institution | assets | origination | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | ||
2018 | Gongyuan Anju Phase III | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 14,284 | 8,927 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-back | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase VI | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 2,250 | 640 | 640 | 640 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | residential NPL | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase VII | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 555 | 139 | 139 | 139 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | consumption | ||||||||
NPL | ||||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase VIII | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 880 | 264 | 264 | 264 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | consumption | ||||||||
NPL | ||||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Anju Phase IV | 2018 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 14,275 | 8,960 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2018 | Gongyuan Anju Phase V | 2018 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 14,328 | 8,989 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Anju Phase I | 2019 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 14,232 | 8,802 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Anju Phase II | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 14,193 | 8,738 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-back | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase I | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Non-performing | 860 | - | - | - | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | credit card | ||||||||
claim | ||||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase I | 2019 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 14,977 | 11,072 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase II | 2019 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Personal | 2,470 | 1,250 | 1,250 | 1,250 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Rating, China | residential NPL | ||||||||
Ratings | ||||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase II | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 14,995 | 11,571 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase III | 2019 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Personal operating | 261 | 116 | 116 | 116 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Rating, China | NPL | ||||||||
Ratings | ||||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase IV | 2019 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Personal | 489 | 221 | 221 | 221 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Rating, China | consumption | ||||||||
Ratings | NPL | |||||||||
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 23 |
Credit Risk
CREDIT ASSET SECURITIZATION BUSINESS ORIGINATED BY THE GROUP AND NOT SETTLED AT THE END OF THE REPORTING PERIOD (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions | |||||||||||
Underlying assets | |||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||
External | Type of | Exposure at | performing | Overdue at | |||||||
Originating | credit rating | underlying | Exposure at | the end of | at the end of | the end of | |||||
Asset securitization product | year | Originator | institution | assets | origination | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | |||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase III | 2019 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 15,129 | 11,654 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-back | China Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhiyuan | Phase I | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Corporate loans | 3,537 | 962 | - | - | |
credit asset-backed securities | Ratings | ||||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng | Phase V | 2019 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Non-performing | 437 | - | - | - | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | China Ratings | credit card | |||||||||
claim | |||||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase IV | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 13,913 | 10,376 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase V | 2019 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 13,938 | 10,549 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase VI | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 13,932 | 10,484 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase VII | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 7,942 | 5,891 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase VIII | 2019 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 7,989 | 5,998 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng | Phase VI | 2019 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 937 | 651 | 651 | 651 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | residential NPL | |||||||||
2019 | Gongyuan Zhicheng | Phase VII | 2019 | The Bank | Shanghai | Non-performing | 450 | - | - | - | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Brilliance | credit card | |||||||||
Rating, China | claim | ||||||||||
Ratings | |||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase I | 2020 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 15,633 | 11,446 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng | Phase I | 2020 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Non-performing | 349 | 28 | 28 | 28 | |
non-performing asset securitization | China Ratings | credit card | |||||||||
claim | |||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng | Phase II | 2020 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 120 | 22 | 22 | 22 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | consumption | |||||||||
NPL | |||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase II | 2020 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 15,590 | 11,106 | - | - | ||
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | |||||||||
24
Credit Risk
CREDIT ASSET SECURITIZATION BUSINESS ORIGINATED BY THE GROUP AND NOT SETTLED AT THE END OF THE REPORTING PERIOD (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions | ||||||||||
Underlying assets | ||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||
External | Type of | Exposure at | performing | Overdue at | ||||||
Originating | credit rating | underlying | Exposure at | the end of | at the end of | the end of | ||||
Asset securitization product | year | Originator | institution | assets | origination | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | ||
2020 | Gongyuan Yiju Phase III | 2020 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 15,616 | 11,119 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-back | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase III | 2020 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Non-performing | 366 | 11 | 11 | 11 | |
non-performing asset securitization | Rating, China | credit card | ||||||||
Ratings | claim | |||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase IV | 2020 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Personal | 1,950 | 1,950 | 1,950 | 1,950 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | residential NPL | ||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase I | 2020 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 14,488 | 13,129 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase II | 2020 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 14,284 | 12,923 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase III | 2020 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Residential | 14,291 | 12,936 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-back | Rating, China | mortgage | ||||||||
Ratings | ||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase IV | 2020 | The Bank | Shanghai | Residential | 14,288 | 12,901 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-back | Brilliance | mortgage | ||||||||
Rating, China | ||||||||||
Ratings | ||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase V | 2020 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Non-performing | 930 | 930 | 930 | 930 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | China Ratings | credit card | ||||||||
claim | ||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase V | 2020 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Residential | 12,498 | 12,498 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase VI | 2020 | The Bank | LH Ratings, | Residential | 12,496 | 12,496 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | China Ratings | mortgage | ||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Leju Phase VII | 2020 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Residential | 7,973 | 7,973 | - | - | |
residential mortgage asset-backed securities | Rating, China | mortgage | ||||||||
Ratings | ||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase VI | 2020 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Personal | 1,375 | 1,375 | 1,375 | 1,375 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Rating, China | residential NPL | ||||||||
Ratings | ||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase VII | 2020 | The Bank | CCXI, China | Non-performing | 127 | 127 | 127 | 127 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Ratings | auto installment | ||||||||
credit card | ||||||||||
claim | ||||||||||
2020 | Gongyuan Zhicheng Phase VIII | 2020 | The Bank | Golden Credit | Personal | 225 | 225 | 225 | 225 | |
non-performingasset-backed securities | Rating, China | consumption | ||||||||
Ratings | NPL | |||||||||
Total | 558,835 | 363,107 | 9,127 | 9,127 | ||||||
Note: As at the end of 2020, the Bank did not originate any credit asset securitization products with underlying assets with revolving and early amortization features.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 25 |
Credit Risk
- ŠAs lead underwriter
The Bank performs obligations that are set forth in relevant requirements and agreements, works diligently, and carries out the sales and distribution of asset-backed securities in strict compliance with laws and regulations, as well as codes of conducts and professional ethics.
- ŠAs institutional investor
The Bank invests in the asset-backed securities which the Bank issues and retains, and the asset-backed securities which the other institutions issue, most of which are senior AAA-rated. The Bank undertakes credit risk and market risk of the asset securitization products invested.
For accounting policies regarding asset securitization, please refer to the Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates in the Notes to the Financial Statements of the 2020 Annual Report.
Asset Securitization Risk Exposure and Capital Requirement
The Bank measures asset securitization risk exposure and capital requirement according to the Capital Regulation. At the end of 2020, risk-weighted assets for asset securitization stood at RMB229,632 million and capital requirement RMB18,371 million.
ASSET SECURITIZATION RISK EXPOSURE
In RMB millions | ||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |
Type of risk exposure | 2020 | 2019 |
As originator | ||
Asset-backed securities | 65,056 | 53,076 |
As investor | ||
Asset-backed securities | 32,513 | 44,587 |
Total | 97,569 | 97,663 |
26
Market Risk
Market risk is defined as the risk of loss to the Bank's on- and off-balance sheet activities caused by adverse movements in market rates (including interest rates, exchange rates, stock prices and commodity prices). The Bank is primarily exposed to interest rate risk and currency risk (including gold).
Market Risk Management
Market risk management is the process of identifying, measuring, monitoring, controlling and reporting market risk for the purposes of setting up and enhancing the market risk management system, specifying responsibilities and process, determining and standardizing the measurement approaches, limit management indicators and market risk reports, controlling and preventing market risk and improving the level of market risk management. The objective of market risk management is to control market risk exposures within a tolerable level and maximize risk-adjusted return according to the Bank's risk appetite.
The Bank strictly complies with regulatory requirements on market risk management, has implemented an independent, centralized and coordinated market risk management model, and formed a management organizational structure featuring the segregation of the front, the middle and the back offices in the financial market business. The Board of Directors assumes the ultimate responsibility for monitoring market risk management. The Senior Management is responsible for executing the strategies, overall policy and system concerning market risk management approved by the Board of Directors. The Market Risk Management Committee of the Senior Management is the reviewing and decision-making organ of the Bank in respect of market risk management, is responsible for reviewing material affairs of market risk management, and performs its duty in accordance with the Working Regulations for the Market Risk Management Committee. The risk management departments at different levels undertake the responsibility of coordinating market risk management at respective levels, and the business departments implement market risk management policies and standards for their respective business areas in accordance with their functions.
In 2020, the Bank continued to improve the Group's market risk management, and deepened the establishment of market risk management system at the Group's level, to enrich and ameliorate the market risk management policy system on an ongoing basis. It innovated the financial market business and product risk management system, and established a product life-cycle risk assessment and review mechanism. To cement the market risk management of overseas institutions, a major market risk emergency management plan for overseas institutions was formulated. The Group's market risk appetite and limit transmission mechanism was improved, to strictly control the Group's market risk limits. A forward-looking analysis of interest rate, exchange rate and commodity risks was conducted in a timely manner, with the establishment of a quick risk reporting mechanism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Empowered by technologies, the market risk management system was more intelligent, thus enhancing the optimization, management and application of functions such as stress testing and continuously promoting the extended application of global market risk management system to overseas institutions.
Market Risk Measurement
CAPITAL REQUIREMENT FOR MARKET RISK
In RMB millions | |||
At 31 December | At 31 December | ||
Risk type | 2020 | 2019 | |
Parts covered by internal model approach | 7,539 | 8,193 | |
Parts uncovered by internal model approach | 6,444 | 6,104 | |
Interest rate risk | 3,405 | 3,306 | |
Commodity risk | 3,015 | 2,713 | |
Stock risk | - | 8 | |
Option risk | 24 | 77 | |
Total | 13,983 | 14,297 | |
Note: According to the implementation scope of the advanced capital management approaches approved by the regulatory authorities, parts covered by the market risk internal model approach of the Bank include currency risk of the Group, general interest rate risk of the parent company and ICBC (Canada) and commodity risk of the parent company. Parts uncovered by the internal model approach are measured by the standardized approach.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 27 |
Market Risk
The Bank applied the Historical Simulation Method (adopting a confidence interval of 99%, holding period of ten days and historical data of 250 days) to measure the VaR, which is then used for capital measurement under the internal model approach.
VALUE AT RISK (VAR)
In RMB millions | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||
Period | Period | |||||||||||
Item | end | Average | Maximum | Minimum | end | Average | Maximum | Minimum | ||||
VaR | 696 | 1,487 | 2,107 | 597 | 1,824 | 2,249 | 3,522 | 987 | ||||
Interest rate risk | 451 | 247 | 711 | 92 | 133 | 174 | 263 | 93 | ||||
Currency risk | 846 | 1,483 | 1,996 | 767 | 1,845 | 2,297 | 3,564 | 1,044 | ||||
Commodity risk | 142 | 169 | 536 | 40 | 96 | 69 | 133 | 15 | ||||
Stressed VaR | 696 | 1,544 | 2,107 | 696 | 1,824 | 3,356 | 4,600 | 987 | ||||
Interest rate risk | 451 | 278 | 711 | 153 | 154 | 209 | 326 | 116 | ||||
Currency risk | 846 | 1,529 | 2,082 | 767 | 1,845 | 3,299 | 4,466 | 1,044 | ||||
Commodity risk | 142 | 170 | 536 | 38 | 95 | 68 | 122 | 32 | ||||
The Bank carries out daily back-testing to verify the accuracy of VaR models. During the past 250 trading days before the end of the reporting period, the number of back-testing exceptions of the Group lied in the green zone demarcated by CBIRC. The market risk measurement models of the Bank captured the financial market fluctuations timely and produced objective pictures of market risk faced by the Bank.
In 2020, the Bank continued to improve the market risk stress testing plan, and conducted the stress tests of market risk at different levels and of different trading portfolios on a regular basis or from time to time by using the Global Market Risk Management (GMRM) system, consistent with the regulatory requirements and the Group's internal management needs. The Bank kept widening the application of stress testing management of market risk and continued to ameliorate the Group's market risk stress testing level.
28
Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
Interest rate risk in the banking book is defined as the risk of loss in the economic value and overall profit of the banking book arising from adverse movements in interest rate and maturity structure, etc.
Management of Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
In 2020, the Bank actively responded to the challenges brought about by the deepened interest rate liberalization and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. It continued to optimize the interest rate risk portfolio control mechanism, improved the "group-wide,full-process and full-product" interest rate risk limit management system, developed a systematic and intelligent risk warning, prevention and control mechanism, and refined the access assessment, accountability and emergency management process, to enhance risk management capabilities in a complex interest rate environment. Besides, a proactive and forward-looking interest rate risk management strategy was implemented, cross-cycle policies were appropriately designed, and a combination of asset-liability quantitative instruments, price instruments and derivative instruments was utilized, to prop up the steady growth of the Group's overall income and long-term value.
Management System and Governance Structure for Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
The Bank's management system for interest rate risk in the banking book conforms to the system importance, risk status and business complexity, and fits the Bank's overall development strategy and the enterprise risk management system. The system mainly consists of the following elements: an effective risk governance structure; sound risk management strategies, policies and procedures; effective risk identification, measurement, monitoring, control and mitigation that cover all areas; a complete internal control and review mechanism; a fully-built risk management system; and adequate information disclosure and reporting.
The Bank strictly complied with regulatory requirements for interest rate risk in the banking book, effectively managed interest rate risk in the banking book at the Bank and consolidated level, and developed a sound governance structure for interest rate risk management in the banking book that is fully built and well-structured, with clearly defined rights and responsibilities. The Board of Directors and the Senior Management are vested with the ultimate and executive responsibilities, respectively, for managing interest rate risk in the banking book. The Asset & Liability Management Department of the Head Office takes the leading role in managing interest rate risk in the banking book, and other departments and institutions play their roles in implementing policies and standards concerning interest rate risk in the banking book. The Internal Audit Bureau and the Internal Control & Compliance Department of the Head Office are responsible for reviewing and evaluating duties in respective of interest rate risk in the banking book.
Objective, Strategy and Important Policy of Management of Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
The objective of management of interest rate risk in the banking book: The Bank aims at maximizing the risk-adjusted net interest income within the tolerable level of interest rate risk under its risk management and risk appetite.
The Bank formulated strategies and clarified objectives and modes for managing interest rate risk in the banking book based on risk appetite, risk status, macroeconomic and market changes. Based on the pre-judging of the interest rate trend and measurement results of the changes in overall profit and economic value, the Bank formulated and put into practice relevant management policies, and adopted a coordinated approach to using interest rate risk control tools to mitigate and manage risks, so as to ensure the Bank's actual interest rate risks conform to its bearing capability and willingness.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 29 |
Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
On the basis of management strategies and objectives, the Bank developed policies and made clear the modes and instruments for managing interest rate risk in the banking book. By developing and modifying such methods as on-balance sheet adjustment and off-balance sheet hedging to manage interest rate risk, adeptly using quantity, pricing and derivative instruments regarding assets and liabilities, and applying limit management system, business plan, performance assessment and capital evaluation in all areas for interest rate risk management and assessment, the Bank achieved effective control of interest rate risk at the business lines, the branches, the affiliates and the products and portfolios easily affected by interest rate risk.
Stress Testing
In line with the principles of comprehensiveness, prudence and foresight, the Bank's stress testing on interest rate risk in the banking book adopted the interest rate risk exposure measurement approach and standardized duration approach to measure the effect of interest rate changes under different stress scenarios on the overall profit and economic value. Based on the domestic and overseas regulatory requirements, the bank-wide asset and liability business structure, operation and management as well as risk appetite, the Bank set stress testing scenarios for interest rate risk in the banking book by taking into account the current interest rate level, historical changes and trends, total assets and liabilities and their term characteristics, business development strategies, customer behaviors and other factors, and conducted stress testing quarterly.
Banking Book Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The Bank measures interest rate risk in the banking book on a monthly basis and reports the same on a quarterly basis in accordance with relevant requirements of CBIRC. While measuring the impact of interest rate change on net interest income and equity value, the Bank assigns the deposits without a maturity date to a reasonable time bucket in consideration of the deposit and loan characteristics and historic data, and assesses the impact of prepayment on interest rate risk measurement by taking the possibility of prepaying residential mortgages into full consideration.
Supposing that there is parallel shift of overall market interest rates, and taking no account of possible risk management actions taken by the management to mitigate the interest rate risk, the analysis on interest rate sensitivity of the Bank categorized by major currencies at the end of 2020 is shown in the following table:
In RMB millions | |||||||
+100 basis points | -100 basis points | ||||||
Effect on | Effect on | ||||||
net interest | Effect on | net interest | Effect on | ||||
Currency | income | equity | income | equity | |||
RMB | (27,286) | (31,709) | 27,286 | 34,753 | |||
USD | (169) | (7,340) | 169 | 7,345 | |||
HKD | (1,734) | (68) | 1,734 | 68 | |||
Others | (30) | (1,766) | 30 | 1,769 | |||
Total | (29,219) | (40,883) | 29,219 | 43,935 | |||
30
Operational Risk
Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from insufficient or problematic internal processes, employees and IT systems or from external events, including legal risk, but excluding strategic and reputational risk. There are seven major types of operational risks faced by the Bank, including internal fraud, external fraud, employment system and workplace safety, customers, products and business activities, damage to physical assets, IT system, execution and delivery and process management. Among these, external fraud, execution, delivery and process management constitute major sources of operational risk losses of the Bank.
Operational Risk Management
The Bank strictly complies with regulatory requirements on operational risk management. The Board of Directors, the Board of Supervisors, the Senior Management and its Operational Risk Management Committee are respectively responsible for decision-making, supervision and execution with respect to operational risk management, and relevant departments act as the "three lines of defense" for operational risk management pursuant to their management functions, thus forming an operational risk management system with close connection and mutual checks and balances. Institutions and departments function as the first line of defense, which assume the direct responsibility for respective operational risk management. Classified management departments such as Internal Control & Compliance, Legal Affairs, Security, Financial Technology, Finance & Accounting, Operation Management and Human Resources as well as cross-risk management departments including Credit and Investment Management and Risk Management jointly perform the functions as the second line of defense, which are respectively responsible for the lead management of operational risk, the classified management of certain type of operational risk and the management of operational risk across credit and market risks. The Internal Audit Department performs the functions as the third line of defense and assumes the responsibility for supervision, which is responsible for supervising the effectiveness of operational risk management.
Operational risk management objectives of the Bank are: to enhance the confidence of shareholders and the public by establishing a sound operational risk governance structure and improving operational risk management and control; to enhance customer satisfaction and employees' sense of belonging as well as overall services by identifying high-risk areas and resolving potential operational risks; to enhance operational efficiency of the Bank by improving process control and operational risk management resources allocation while weighing benefits against costs; to reduce operational risk losses of the Bank and improve the control ability and level by taking effective risk control and mitigation measures; to minimize the legal risk by conducting review and supervision and satisfying the external regulatory requirements.
The Bank adopts a differential operational risk management strategy: avoiding operational risks characterized with high severity and high frequency, transferring those characterized with high severity and low frequency, mitigating those characterized with low severity and high frequency, and taking those characterized with low severity and low frequency.
The Bank's operational risk management procedures include operational risk identification, assessment, monitoring, control/ mitigation, measurement, reporting and liability determination.
- Risk identification: The Bank identifies operational risk of new products and new businesses, operational risk event, operational risk loss event, etc.
- Risk assessment: The Bank formulates and implements management measures for operational risk and control self- assessment and scenario analysis, and makes comprehensive, timely, objective and forward-looking estimation of inherent risk, control effectiveness and residual risk of all business lines and all branches on a regular basis.
- Risk monitoring: The Bank formulates and implements management measures for operational risk monitoring, establishes an overall, professional and regional operational risk indicators monitoring system, and monitors, checks, analyzes and warns key risk exposures of respective business line and institution on a regular basis.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 31 |
Operational Risk
- Risk control/mitigation: The Bank formulates and implements operational risk control basic standards and measures, establishes and implements operational risk mitigation related management measures, builds operational risk control system of the Bank, and promptly prevents and mitigates potential operational risk. The Bank's operational risk mitigation measures include but are not limited to business outsourcing, insurance purchase, business continuity plan and contingency plan, and capital allocation.
- Risk measurement: The Bank formulates and implements management measures for operational risk capital measurement; relevant departments research and improve calculation methods and models for economic capital and regulatory capital, make capital allocation and adjustment, and monitor operational risk capital management according to their responsibilities.
- Risk reporting: The Bank formulates and implements operational risk management measures for risk reporting, truly and fully reflects the operational risk profile of all business lines and institutions, reveals potential critical risks and proposes effective measures and suggestions for improvement.
- Liability determination: The Bank formulates and implements management measures for operational risk liability assessment and determination, determines duty performance by relevant personnel based on objective facts by assessing the subjective and objective reasons of operational risk loss event and material operational risk event, and determines and deals with direct, management, leadership and supervision liabilities.
In 2020, the Bank continued to reinforce operational risk management in line with regulatory focuses and operational risk trends. It optimized the risk limit decomposition and implementation mechanism, effectively transmitted the Group's operational risk management appetite, and strengthened risk warning and forward-looking control of large-value operational risk events. The operational risk and control self-assessment under "regulatory red line" was carried out, with the focus on key risk points in major areas of regulatory penalties, to further address gaps and energetically improve a long-term risk control mechanism. Moreover, the operational risk application and management system was optimized, to continuously enhance effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting capabilities. During the reporting period, the operational risk management system of the Bank operated smoothly, and the operational risk was controllable on the whole.
Legal Risk
Legal risk is the risk of incurring legal sanctions, regulatory penalties, financial losses, reputational losses or other negative consequences that arises out of or in connection with the failure of the Bank to comply with relevant laws, regulations, administrative rules, regulatory provisions or requirements of other relevant rules during the Bank's operation; the unfavorable legal defects that exist in products, services or information provided to clients, transactions engaged in, and contracts, agreements or other documents executed by the Bank; legal disputes (litigation or arbitration proceedings) between the Bank and its clients, counterparties and stakeholders; important changes in relevant laws and regulations, administrative rules, regulatory provisions and other relevant rules; and other relevant legal events that occur internally and externally.
Based on the objective to ensure legal and compliant operation, the Bank always attaches great importance to establishing a sound legal risk management system, forming a full-process legal risk prevention and control mechanism to support and secure business innovation and market competition, and to prevent and eliminate various potential or practical legal risks. The Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and determining the strategy and policy relating to legal risk management, and assumes the ultimate responsibility of legal risk management. The Senior Management is responsible for executing the strategy and policy relating to legal risk management, examining and approving relevant important affairs. The Legal Affairs Department of the Head Office is in charge of legal risk management across the Group, with relevant business departments providing related support and assistance on legal risk prevention and control. The affiliates, domestic and overseas branches undertake the responsibility of legal risk management of their respective institutions.
32
Operational Risk
In 2020, the Bank continued to strengthen legal risk management, by improving the risk prevention and control capacity in legal risk management, ensuring the legal and compliant operation, healthy business development and overall business stability of the Group. In accordance with new laws and regulations such as the Civil Code, its business rules and relevant agreements were continuously improved, and legal risk prevention and control in key areas and links was further pushed forward in line with new requirements of financial regulators. The Bank also improved both the vertical interconnection and horizontal coordination mechanism between the Head Office and branches. By systematically embedding legal risk prevention and control into business negotiations, product design, contract signing and other links, the Bank made risk prevention and control more prospective, proactive and targeted. It improved the cross-border coordination and management for legal work and strengthened the legal risk management of overseas institutions, properly responding to cross-border legal issues emerging in the development of international operations. Moreover, the Bank ameliorated the function design and management mechanic for the electronic signing system, to strengthen its strict control of seal use in business contracts during the whole process, and effectively prevent and control operational risk, legal risk and reputational risk caused by misuse of contract seal. It reinforced authorization management, related party management, trademark management and intellectual property protection, and made efforts to effectively institutionalize risk management and control, and refine the structure of the system. A variety of legal means were utilized comprehensively to improve the effectiveness of collection, practically cement the risk prevention and control of sued cases, avoid and reduce risk losses. In addition to the active assist in online judicial inquiry and enforcement, the Bank played a positive role in improving the efficiency of law enforcement and case handling by competent authorities and building a social credibility system.
Anti-Money Laundering
In strict compliance with anti-money laundering ("AML") laws and regulations of China and host countries (regions) of overseas institutions, the Bank earnestly implemented the "risk-based" regulatory requirements in respect of AML, and sincerely fulfilled the legal obligations and social responsibilities concerning AML, thus further enhancing the quality and efficiency of AML work.
The Bank pushed forward the all-around building of the Group's AML management capability by starting the "AML Management Capability Improvement Project". AML training and education activities covering "learning, training, speaking and testing" were organized and conducted, to popularize AML knowledge and improve AML skills. The governance of customer identification and the management and control of high-risk areas were effectively boosted, for the purpose of comprehensively reconstructing a money laundering risk assessment system integrating "customers, products and institutions". Besides, the prevention and control of sensitive information risks was intensified, and the research, judgment and reporting of suspicious transactions was reinforced, to facilitate the intelligent construction of AML system in an orderly manner, and build an intelligent, open, shared and integrated AML ecosystem.
Operational Risk Measurement
The Bank adopts the standardized approach to measure capital requirement for operational risk. As at the end of 2020, the capital requirement for operational risk was RMB113,122 million.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 33 |
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Bank is unable to raise funds on a timely basis or at a reasonable cost to settle liabilities as they fall due, or perform other payment obligations and satisfy other funding demands arising from the normal course of business. Liquidity risk may arise from the following events or factors: withdrawal of customers' deposits, drawing of loans by customers, overdue payment of debtors, mismatch between assets and liabilities, difficulties in assets realization, operating losses, derivatives trading risk and risk associated with its affiliates.
Liquidity Risk Management
In 2020, the Bank continued to uphold a steady and prudent liquidity risk management strategy, kept strengthening liquidity risk management, and took different measures to ensure that the Group's liquidity could be stable and safe. It tightened up the monitoring on funds, and maintained reasonable and affluent liquidity reserves, so as to manage liquidity risk properly during peak payments, important holidays and key points in time. Besides, the Group's liquidity risk management system was optimized constantly, the application of fund operation and monitoring system was strengthened, the automation level of liquidity risk measurement and control system was enhanced, and the multi-layer and multi-dimensional liquidity monitoring and warning system was upgraded, to further improve the Group's liquidity risk prevention capabilities.
Liquidity Risk Management System and Governance Structure
The Bank's liquidity risk management system conforms to the overall development strategy and the overall risk management system of the Bank, and is commensurate with the business scale, business nature, complexity and other aspects of the Bank. The system includes the following fundamental elements: effective governance structure for liquidity risk management; sound strategy, policy and procedures for liquidity risk management; effective identification, measurement, monitoring and control for liquidity risk and a complete management information system.
In respect of liquidity risk management, the Bank's governance structure embodies the decision-making system comprising the Board of Directors and its special committees as well as the Asset and Liability Management Committee and the Risk Management Committee of the Head Office; the supervision system comprising the Board of Supervisors, the Internal Audit Bureau and the Internal Control and Compliance Department of the Head Office; and the execution system comprising the Asset and Liability Management Department, leading management departments of on- and off-balance sheet businesses, the information technology departments, operation management departments of the Head Office and relevant departments of branches. Each of these systems performs the corresponding functions of decision making, supervision and execution according to division of responsibilities.
Objective, Strategy and Important Policy of Liquidity Risk Management
Objective of liquidity risk management: By establishing and improving the liquidity risk management system, the Bank aims at realizing complete identification, accurate measurement, continuous monitoring and effective control of the liquidity risk at the Group level, the Bank, the affiliates, the branches and the business lines, and ensuring the liquidity demand is satisfied at a reasonable cost in time under the normal business scenario and the stress scenario.
The Bank's liquidity risk management strategy and policy are formulated in accordance with the liquidity risk appetite, and they cover all businesses on- and off-balance sheet, all domestic and overseas business departments, branches and affiliates that are likely to have a material impact on the liquidity risk, and contain the liquidity risk management under normal and stressed scenarios. The liquidity risk management strategy specifies the overall objective and mode of liquidity risk management and lists major policies and procedures for liquidity risk management. The policies for liquidity risk management are formulated in accordance with external and macro operating environments and business development of the Bank, with a view to striking an effective balance among security, liquidity and profitability.
34
Liquidity Risk
Stress Testing
Following the prudence principle, the Bank employs the scenario analysis and the sensitivity analysis to perform stress testing on liquidity risk. The Bank has taken full consideration of various macroscopic and microscopic factors that may influence the Bank's liquidity status to set stress scenarios against those products, businesses and institutions with concentrated liquidity risk in line with the characteristics and complexity of the Bank's businesses. The Bank performs stress testing on a quarterly basis. Where necessary, the Bank may carry out temporary and special stress testing at a particular time in light of changes in the external operating environment and regulatory requirements.
Liquidity Risk Analysis
The Bank assesses liquidity risk status by comprehensive use of a variety of methods and tools such as liquidity indicator analysis and liquidity exposure analysis.
In 2020, RMB liquidity ratio and foreign currency liquidity ratio of the Bank were 43.2% and 91.4% respectively, both meeting the regulatory requirements. Loan-to-deposit ratio was 72.8%.
Net stable funding ratio aims to ensure commercial banks have sufficient stable sources of funding to meet the needs for stable funding of assets and off-balance sheet risk exposures. The net stable funding ratio is the ratio of the available stable funding to the required stable funding. As at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020, the net stable funding ratio was 128.33%, 1.32 percentage points higher than that at the end of the previous quarter, mainly because the Bank constantly strengthened the Group's liquidity coordination and management to ensure the sufficient sources of stable funds.
The daily average liquidity coverage ratio for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 123.28%, 1.88 percentage points lower than the previous quarter, mainly because the growth rate of net cash outflows exceeded the eligible high-quality liquid assets. High-quality liquid assets cover cash, available central bank reserve under stress and primary and secondary bond assets that can be included in the liquidity coverage ratio under the regulatory requirements.
As at the end of 2020, the negative liquidity exposure for 1 month to 3 months decreased from the end of last year, mainly due to the decrease of matured due to customers within corresponding term and increase of bond investments. The positive liquidity exposure for the 1 to 5 years category decreased, mainly due to the increase of matured due to customers and the decrease of loans and advances to customers within corresponding term. The positive liquidity exposure for the category of over 5 years expanded, which was mainly due to the increase in matured loans and advances to customers and bond investments within corresponding term. Deposits maintained steady growth with a high deposition rate, and at the same time the Bank made major investment in highly liquid bond assets, and possessed sufficient liquidity reserves. Therefore, the overall liquidity of the Bank maintained at a safe level.
LIQUIDITY EXPOSURE ANALYSIS
In RMB millions | ||||||||
Overdue/ | ||||||||
repayable | Less than | 1 to | 3 months | 1 to 5 | Over | |||
on demand | 1 month | 3 months | to 1 year | years | 5 years | Undated | Total | |
At 31 December 2020 | (14,309,956) | 335,580 | (209,780) | (563,541) | 981,145 | 13,324,640 | 3,351,427 | 2,909,515 |
At 31 December 2019 | (13,148,663) | 372,311 | (701,406) | (715,546) | 3,498,846 | 10,069,296 | 3,317,165 | 2,692,003 |
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 35 |
Other Risks
Equity Risk in the Banking Book
The Bank's equity investments in the banking book mainly include long-term equity investments, the portion of equity investments measured at fair value through profit or loss and equity investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income which belong to the banking book. The Bank strictly follows the Capital Regulation to measure significant and non-significant equity investment.
EQUITY RISK IN THE BANKING BOOK
In RMB millions | ||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||||
Publicly- | Non-publicly- | Publicly- | Non-publicly- | |||||
traded equity | traded equity | Unrealised | traded equity | traded equity | Unrealised | |||
investment risk | investment risk | potential gains | investment risk | investment risk | potential gains | |||
Equity type | exposure(1) | exposure(1) | (losses)(2) | exposure(1) | exposure(1) | (losses)(2) | ||
Financial institution | 28,675 | 15,423 | 9,025 | 33,859 | 16,023 | 6,618 | ||
Corporate | 12,686 | 126,595 | (2,709) | 3,537 | 108,007 | (1,486) | ||
Total | 41,361 | 142,018 | 6,316 | 37,396 | 124,030 | 5,132 | ||
Notes: (1) Publicly-traded equity investment refers to equity investment made in listed companies, and non-publicly-traded equity investment refers to equity investment made in non-listed companies.
- Unrealised potential gains (losses) refer to unrealised gains or losses recognized on the balance sheet but not recognized on the income statement.
For accounting policies regarding equity investment, please refer to the Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates in the Notes to the Financial Statements of the 2020 Annual Report.
Reputational Risk
Reputational risk is defined as the risk of negative comments on the Bank from stakeholders, the public or the media as a result of the behaviors of the Bank or practitioners or external events, thereby damaging brand value, detrimental to normal operation, and even affecting market and social stability. Reputational risk may arise in any part of the Bank's operation and management, and usually co-exists and correlates with credit risk, market risk, operational risk and liquidity risk. Good reputation is central to the operation and management of a commercial bank. The Bank highly values its reputation and has incorporated reputational risk management in the corporate governance and enterprise risk management system to prevent reputational risk.
The Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and finalizing bank-wide policies concerning reputational risk management that are in line with the strategic objective of the Bank, establishing a bank-wide system of reputational risk management, monitoring the overall status and effectiveness of reputational risk management across the Bank and assuming the ultimate responsibility for reputational risk management. The Senior Management is responsible for leading reputational risk management of the Bank, implementing the strategies and policies established by the Board of Directors, reviewing and finalizing the rules, measures and operating procedures for reputational risk management, preparing plans for responding to and coping with extraordinarily major reputational risk events and ensuring the proper and effective operation of the reputational risk management system. The Bank has established a special reputational risk management team to take charge of the daily management of reputational risk.
36
Other Risks
In 2020, the Bank kept improving the structure of reputational risk management system, to optimize relevant working mechanism and enhance reputational risk management. For the improvement of institutional construction, a sound responsibility review and identification mechanism for reputational risk events was established, to consolidate the main management responsibilities, strengthen the governance of reputational risk sources, and mitigate hidden reputational risk in an active and effective manner. In addition, the Bank promptly responded to social focuses and public concerns, and organized and promoted influential brand communication activities, to enhance the Bank's brand image. During the reporting period, the reputational risk of the Bank was stable and within a controllable range.
Country Risk
Country risk is the risk incurred to a bank arising from the inability or refusal by the borrower or debtor to repay bank debt, losses suffered by the Bank or its commercial presence in such country or region and other losses due to economic, political and social changes and events in a country or a region. Country risk may be triggered by deterioration of economic conditions, political and social turmoil, asset nationalization or expropriation, government's refusal to pay external debt, foreign exchange control or currency depreciation in a country or a region.
The Bank strictly observes regulatory requirements on country risk management. The Board of Directors assumes the ultimate responsibility for the effectiveness of country risk management. The Senior Management is responsible for executing the country risk management policies approved by the Board of Directors. The Risk Management Committee of the Head Office is responsible for reviewing matters regarding country risk management. The Bank manages and controls country risk with a series of tools, including country risk assessment and rating, country risk limit, country risk exposure calculation and monitoring and stress testing. The Bank reviews the country risk rating and limits at least once every year.
In 2020, facing the increasingly complicated international political and economic environment under the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank strictly abode by regulatory requirements and, with consideration of its business development needs, continued to strengthen country risk management. The Bank closely observed changes in country risk exposures, constantly tracked, monitored and reported country risk, and timely updated and adjusted the country risk rating and limits. It continued to strengthen early warning mechanism for country risk, proactively conducted stress testing on country risk and reasonably and effectively controlled country risk while steadily promoting internationalization.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 37 |
Remuneration
Remuneration Governance Framework
In line with corporate governance requirements, the Bank is committed to establishing and improving remuneration governance framework, specifying the scope of roles and responsibilities of relevant entities, improving decision-making mechanism of remuneration policies and building remuneration governance system with full participation of all stakeholders.
The Board of Directors assumes the ultimate responsibility of remuneration management. The Board of Directors proactively supervises the design and operation of the remuneration system, periodically reviews its compliance, and ensures the remuneration system achieves the intended goals. The Bank set up the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in accordance with the Articles of Association to assist the Board of Directors in remuneration management. The Senior Management is responsible for organizing and implementing remuneration management related resolutions of the Board of Directors as well as organizing and formulating incentive assessment and remuneration distribution measures within the scope of authorization. The Human Resources Department is responsible for implementing specific remuneration management issues. Departments including the Risk Management Department, the Internal Audit Bureau, the Internal Control and Compliance Department and the Finance and Accounting Department participate in and supervise the execution of remuneration management mechanism and provide feedback for improvement.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
The Compensation Committee is mainly responsible for formulating assessment measures on the performance of duties and compensation plans for Directors, organizing the assessment on the performance of duties of Directors, putting forth proposal on remuneration distribution for Directors, formulating and reviewing the assessment measures and compensation plans for Senior Management members of the Bank and evaluating the performance and behaviors of Senior Management members. As at the disclosure date of the results, the Compensation Committee consisted of four directors, including Independent Non-executive Directors Mr. Nout Wellink, Mr. Anthony Francis Neoh and Mr. Shen Si; Non-executive Director Mr. Lu Yongzhen. Independent Non-executive Director Mr. Nout Wellink was Chairman of the Committee. During the reporting period, the Compensation Committee held four meetings.
Remuneration Management Policies
The Bank adopts the remuneration policy that is in line with corporate governance requirements and sustainable development targets, adapted to risk management systems and talent development strategies, and matched to employees' value contribution so as to promote bank-wide steady business operation and sustainable development. The remuneration policy applies to all institutions and employees of the Bank.
Performance-based Remuneration Mechanism
The remuneration package of the Bank's employees mainly consists of basic remuneration and performance-based remuneration. The remuneration allocation takes "job value, capabilities and performance" as the basic principles. The basic remuneration level depends on the employees' value contribution and capabilities of fulfilling duties while the level of the performance-based remuneration depends on performance assessment of the Bank as a whole, the institution or department of the employee and the employee. Currently, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations promulgated by the state and regulatory authorities, the Bank has not yet implemented share options or any other form of long- or medium-term share incentives; all performance-based remuneration of the employees is paid in cash.
38
Remuneration
Focused on value creation, risk control and sustainable development, the Bank has established an integrated performance assessment system comprised of three categories of indicators: performance management, risk and internal control, operational transformation and business development, which guides the bank-wide attention to not only the indicators of current period, but also the indicators relating to long-term development, such as customers, markets and structural adjustments. The Bank also reasonably controls the balance of profits, risk and quality so as to improve the steadiness and scientism of business management.
Risk-aligned Remuneration Mechanism
The Bank's remuneration policy is in line with the risk management system and adapted to the institutional scale, and the nature and the sophistication of the business. The remuneration structures of each institution or position are different according to the need of risk management. The Bank adjusts the risks that have not yet been reflected in the period by taking risk mitigation measures including risk-adjusted performance and deferred remuneration payment, and implements performance assessment and incentives to promote a positive and healthy risk management culture.
The Bank gradually established deferred payment mechanism based on business needs and deferred part of the performance-related remuneration of employees who assume responsibilities for material risk and risk management and control. For persons receiving deferred payment, if significant losses of risk exposures are incurred within their responsibility during their employment, the Bank can recall part or all of performance-related remuneration paid in relevant period and stop further payments.
Independence of the Remuneration for Risk and Compliance Employees
Remuneration for risk and compliance employees is based on their value contributed, capability, and job performance, not directly related to their responsible businesses. The Bank sets up a vertical internal audit system, which takes on the responsibility for the Board of Directors and reports to the Board of Directors directly. The remuneration of the internal audit employees is independent from that of other lines of business.
For basic information and annual remuneration of Senior Management members and remuneration of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank, please refer to the 2020 Annual Report.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 39 |
Appendixes
The following information is disclosed in accordance with the Notice on Issuing Regulatory Documents on Capital Regulation for Commercial Banks Appendix 2 Notice on Enhancing Disclosure Requirements for Composition of Capital.
CAPITAL COMPOSITION
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||
S/N | Item | 2020 | 2019 | Reference(1) |
Core tier 1 capital: | ||||
1 | Paid-in capital | 356,407 | 356,407 | X18 |
2 | Retained earnings | 2,170,740 | 1,964,205 | |
2a | Surplus reserve | 322,692 | 292,149 | X21 |
2b | General reserve | 339,486 | 304,876 | X22 |
2c | Retained profits | 1,508,562 | 1,367,180 | X23 |
3 | Accumulated other comprehensive income | 138,356 | 147,984 | |
(and other public reserves) | ||||
3a | Capital reserve | 148,534 | 149,067 | X19 |
3b | Others | (10,178) | (1,083) | X24 |
4 | Valid portion to core tier 1 capital during the | - | - |
- transition period (only applicable to non-joint
- stock companies. Fill in 0 for joint stock banks)
5 | Valid portion of minority interests | 3,552 | 4,178 | X25 |
6 | Core tier 1 capital before regulatory | 2,669,055 | 2,472,774 | |
adjustments | ||||
Core tier 1 capital: Regulatory adjustments | ||||
7 | Prudential valuation adjustments | - | - | |
8 | Goodwill (net of deferred tax liabilities) | 8,107 | 9,038 | X16 |
9 | Other intangible assets other than land use rights | 4,582 | 2,933 | X14-X15 |
(net of deferred tax liabilities) | ||||
10 | Deferred tax assets that rely on future profitability | - | - |
- excluding those arising from temporary
- differences (net of deferred tax liabilities)
11 | Cash flow hedge reserves that relate to the | (4,616) | (4,451) | X20 |
- hedging of items that are not fair valued on
- the balance sheet
12 | Shortfall of provision for loan impairment | - | - | |
13 | Gain on sale related to asset securitization | - | - | |
14 | Unrealised gains and losses due to changes | - | - | |
in own credit risk on fair valued liabilities | ||||
15 | Defined-benefit pension fund net assets | - | - | |
(net of deferred tax liabilities) | ||||
Note: (1) For mapped components of the balance sheet under regulatory scope of consolidation to capital items, please refer to "Explanations for Detailed Items".
40
Appendixes | ||||
CAPITAL COMPOSITION (CONTINUED) | ||||
In RMB millions, except for percentages | ||||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||
S/N | Item | 2020 | 2019 | Reference |
16 | Direct or indirect investments in own ordinary | - | - | |
shares | ||||
17 | Reciprocal cross-holdings in core tier 1 capital | - | - |
- between banks or between banks and other
- financial institutions
18 | Deductible amount of non-significant minority | - | - |
- investment in core tier 1 capital instruments
- issued by financial institutions that are not
- subject to consolidation
19 | Deductible amount of significant minority | - | - |
- investment in core tier 1 capital instruments
- issued by financial institutions that are not
- subject to consolidation
20 | Mortgage servicing rights | N/A | N/A | |
21 | Deferred tax assets arising from temporary | - | - |
- differences (amount above 10% threshold,
- net of deferred tax liabilities)
22 | Deductible amount exceeding the 15% threshold | - | - |
- for significant minority capital investments in
- core tier 1 capital instruments issued by
- financial institutions that are not subject
- to consolidation and undeducted portion
- of deferred tax assets arising from temporary
- differences (net of deferred tax liabilities)
23 | Including: Deductible amount of significant | - | - | |
minority investments in core tier 1 | ||||
capital instruments issued by | ||||
financial institutions | ||||
24 | Including: Deductible amount of mortgage | N/A | N/A | |
servicing rights | ||||
25 | Including: Deductible amount in deferred | - | - | |
tax assets arising from temporary | ||||
differences | ||||
26a | Investments in core tier 1 capital instruments | 7,980 | 7,980 | X11 |
- issued by financial institutions that are under
- control but not subject to consolidation
26b | Shortfall in core tier 1 capital instruments issued | - | - |
- by financial institutions that are under control
- but not subject to consolidation
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 41 |
Appendixes
CAPITAL COMPOSITION (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||
S/N | Item | 2020 | 2019 | Reference |
26c | Others that should be deducted from core tier 1 | - | - | |
capital | ||||
27 | Undeducted shortfall that should be deducted | - | - | |
from additional tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital | ||||
28 | Total regulatory adjustments to core tier 1 | 16,053 | 15,500 | |
capital | ||||
29 | Core tier 1 capital | 2,653,002 | 2,457,274 | |
Additional tier 1 capital: | ||||
30 | Additional tier 1 capital instruments and related | 219,143 | 199,456 | |
premium | ||||
31 | Including: Portion classified as equity | 139,156 | 199,456 | X28+X32 |
32 | Including: Portion classified as liabilities | 79,987 | - | |
33 | Invalid instruments to additional tier 1 capital | - | - | |
after the transition period | ||||
34 | Valid portion of minority interests | 647 | 793 | X26 |
35 | Including: Invalid portion to additional tier 1 | - | - | |
capital after the transition period | ||||
36 | Additional tier 1 capital before regulatory | 219,790 | 200,249 | |
adjustments | ||||
Additional tier 1 capital: Regulatory adjustments | ||||
37 | Direct or indirect investments in own additional | - | - | |
tier 1 instruments | ||||
38 | Reciprocal cross-holdings in additional tier 1 | - | - |
- capital between banks or between banks
- and other financial institutions
39 | Deductible amount of non-significant minority | - | - |
- investment in additional tier 1 capital
- instruments issued by financial institutions
- that are not subject to consolidation
40 | Significant minority investments in additional tier 1 | - | - |
- capital instruments issued by financial
- institutions that are not subject to consolidation
41a | Investments in additional tier 1 capital | - | - |
- instruments issued by financial institutions that
- are under control but not subject to
- consolidation
41b | Shortfall in additional tier 1 capital instruments | - | - |
- issued by financial institutions that are under
- control but not subject to consolidation
42
Appendixes | ||||
CAPITAL COMPOSITION (CONTINUED) | ||||
In RMB millions, except for percentages | ||||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||
S/N | Item | 2020 | 2019 | Reference |
41c | Others that should be deducted from | - | - | |
additional tier 1 capital | ||||
42 | Undeducted shortfall that should be deducted | - | - | |
from tier 2 capital | ||||
43 | Total regulatory adjustments to additional | - | - | |
tier 1 capital | ||||
44 | Additional tier 1 capital | 219,790 | 200,249 | |
45 | Tier 1 capital (core tier 1 capital + additional | 2,872,792 | 2,657,523 |
- tier 1 capital)
Tier 2 capital:
46 | Tier 2 capital instruments and related premium | 351,568 | 272,680 | X17 |
47 | Invalid instruments to tier 2 capital after the | 40,570 | 60,855 | |
transition period | ||||
48 | Valid portion of minority interests | 1,114 | 1,707 | X27 |
49 | Including: Invalid portion to tier 2 capital after | - | 439 | |
the transition period | ||||
50 | Valid portion of surplus provision for | 170,712 | 189,569 | X02+X04 |
loan impairment | ||||
51 | Tier 2 capital before regulatory adjustments | 523,394 | 463,956 | |
Tier 2 capital: Regulatory adjustments | ||||
52 | Direct or indirect investments in own tier 2 | - | - | |
instruments | ||||
53 | Reciprocal cross-holdings in tier 2 capital | - | - |
- between banks or between banks and
- other financial institutions
54 | Deductible portion of non-significant minority | - | - |
- investment in tier 2 capital instruments issued
- by financial institutions that are not subject
- to consolidation
55 | Significant minority investments in tier 2 capital | - | - | X31 |
- instruments issued by financial institutions that
- are not subject to consolidation
56a | Investments in tier 2 capital instruments issued by | - | - |
- financial institutions that are under control
- but not subject to consolidation
56b | Shortfall in tier 2 capital instruments issued by | - | - |
- financial institutions that are under control
- but not subject to consolidation
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 43 |
Appendixes
CAPITAL COMPOSITION (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions, except for percentages
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||
S/N | Item | 2020 | 2019 | Reference |
56c | Others that should be deducted from tier 2 | - | - | |
capital | ||||
57 | Total regulatory adjustments to tier 2 capital | - | - | |
58 | Tier 2 capital | 523,394 | 463,956 | |
59 | Total capital (tier 1 capital + tier 2 capital) | 3,396,186 | 3,121,479 | |
60 | Total risk-weighted assets | 20,124,139 | 18,616,886 | |
Requirements for capital adequacy ratio and reserve capital | ||||
61 | Core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio | 13.18% | 13.20% | |
62 | Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio | 14.28% | 14.27% | |
63 | Capital adequacy ratio | 16.88% | 16.77% | |
64 | Institution specific buffer requirement | 4.0% | 4.0% | |
65 | Including: Capital conservation buffer | 2.5% | 2.5% | |
requirement | ||||
66 | Including: Countercyclical buffer requirement | - | - | |
67 | Including: G-SIB buffer requirement | 1.5% | 1.5% | |
68 | Percentage of core tier 1 capital meeting buffers | 8.18% | 8.20% |
- to risk-weighted assets
Domestic minima for regulatory capital
69 | Core tier 1 capital adequacy ratio | 5% | 5% | |
70 | Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio | 6% | 6% | |
71 | Capital adequacy ratio | 8% | 8% | |
Amounts below the thresholds for deduction | ||||
72 | Undeducted portion of non-significant minority | 138,247 | 84,515 | X05+X07+X08+ |
investments in capital instruments issued by | X09+X12+X29+ | |||
financial institutions that are not subject to | X30 | |||
consolidation | ||||
73 | Undeducted portion of significant minority | 32,452 | 37,654 | X06+X10+X13 |
- investments in capital instruments issued by
- financial institutions that are not subject to
- consolidation
74 | Mortgage servicing rights (net of deferred | N/A | N/A | |
tax liabilities) | ||||
75 | Deferred tax assets arising from temporary | 65,719 | 60,846 | |
differences (net of deferred tax liabilities) | ||||
Valid caps of surplus provision for loan impairment in tier 2 capital | ||||
76 | Provision for loan impairment under the | 23,204 | 17,647 | X01 |
weighted approach | ||||
44
Appendixes | ||||
CAPITAL COMPOSITION (CONTINUED) | ||||
In RMB millions, except for percentages | ||||
At 31 December | At 31 December | |||
S/N | Item | 2020 | 2019 | Reference |
77 | Valid cap of surplus provision for loan impairment | 7,802 | 7,923 | X02 |
in tier 2 capital under the weighted approach | ||||
78 | Surplus provision for loan impairment under | 507,096 | 460,851 | X03 |
the internal ratings-based approach | ||||
79 | Valid cap of surplus provision for loan | 162,910 | 181,646 | X04 |
- impairment in tier 2 capital under the
- internal ratings-based approach
Capital instruments subject to phase-out arrangements
80 | Valid cap to core tier 1 capital instruments for the | - | - | |
current period due to phase-out arrangements | ||||
81 | Excluded from core tier 1 capital due to cap | - | - | |
82 | Valid cap to additional tier 1 capital instruments | - | - |
- for the current period due to phase-out
- arrangements
83 | Excluded from additional tier 1 capital due to cap | - | - | ||
84 | Valid cap to tier 2 capital instruments for the | 40,570 | 60,855 | ||
current period due to phase-out arrangements | |||||
85 | Excluded from tier 2 capital for the | 67,463 | 63,383 | ||
current period due to cap | |||||
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 45 |
Appendixes
BALANCE SHEET AT THE GROUP'S LEVEL
In RMB millions | |||||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | ||||||||
Consolidated | Balance | Consolidated | Balance | ||||||
balance sheet | sheet under | balance sheet | sheet under | ||||||
as in published | regulatory | as in published | regulatory | ||||||
financial | scope of | financial | scope of | ||||||
Item | statements | consolidation | statements | consolidation | |||||
Assets | |||||||||
Cash and balances with central banks | 3,537,795 | 3,537,795 | 3,317,916 | 3,317,916 | |||||
Due from banks and other financial | 522,913 | 489,231 | 475,325 | 450,976 | |||||
institutions | |||||||||
Precious metals | 277,705 | 277,705 | 238,061 | 238,061 | |||||
Placements with banks and other financial | 558,984 | 558,984 | 567,043 | 567,043 | |||||
institutions | |||||||||
Derivative financial assets | 134,155 | 134,155 | 68,311 | 68,311 | |||||
Reverse repurchase agreements | 739,288 | 738,958 | 845,186 | 841,954 | |||||
Loans and advances to customers | 18,136,328 | 18,134,777 | 16,326,552 | 16,325,339 | |||||
Financial investments: | 8,591,139 | 8,429,328 | 7,647,117 | 7,528,268 | |||||
- Financial investments measured at | 784,483 | 732,478 | 962,078 | 921,042 | |||||
fair value through profit or loss | |||||||||
- Financial investments measured at | 1,540,988 | 1,498,008 | 1,476,872 | 1,451,357 | |||||
fair value through other comprehensive | |||||||||
income | |||||||||
- Financial investments measured at | 6,265,668 | 6,198,842 | 5,208,167 | 5,155,869 | |||||
amortised cost | |||||||||
Long-term equity investments | 41,206 | 49,186 | 32,490 | 40,470 | |||||
Fixed assets | 249,067 | 249,008 | 244,902 | 244,846 | |||||
Construction in progress | 35,173 | 35,166 | 39,714 | 39,712 | |||||
Deferred income tax assets | 67,713 | 67,713 | 62,536 | 62,536 | |||||
Other assets | 453,592 | 440,548 | 244,283 | 230,111 | |||||
Total assets | 33,345,058 | 33,142,554 | 30,109,436 | 29,955,543 | |||||
46
Appendixes | ||||||
BALANCE SHEET AT THE GROUP'S LEVEL (CONTINUED) | ||||||
In RMB millions | ||||||
At 31 December 2020 | At 31 December 2019 | |||||
Consolidated | Balance | Consolidated | Balance | |||
balance sheet | sheet under | balance sheet | sheet under | |||
as in published | regulatory | as in published | regulatory | |||
financial | scope of | financial | scope of | |||
Item | statements | consolidation | statements | consolidation | ||
Liabilities | ||||||
Due to central banks | 54,974 | 54,974 | 1,017 | 1,017 | ||
Due to banks and other financial institutions | 2,315,643 | 2,315,643 | 1,776,320 | 1,776,320 | ||
Placements from banks and other financial | 468,616 | 468,616 | 490,253 | 490,253 | ||
institutions | ||||||
Financial liabilities measured at fair value | 87,938 | 87,938 | 102,242 | 102,242 | ||
through profit or loss | ||||||
Derivative financial liabilities | 140,973 | 140,973 | 85,180 | 85,180 | ||
Repurchase agreements | 293,434 | 282,458 | 263,273 | 254,926 | ||
Certificates of deposit | 335,676 | 335,676 | 355,428 | 355,428 | ||
Due to customers | 25,134,726 | 25,134,726 | 22,977,655 | 22,977,655 | ||
Employee benefits payable | 32,460 | 32,073 | 35,301 | 34,960 | ||
Taxes payable | 105,380 | 105,356 | 109,601 | 109,545 | ||
Debt securities issued | 798,127 | 798,127 | 742,875 | 742,875 | ||
Deferred income tax liabilities | 2,881 | 1,994 | 1,873 | 1,690 | ||
Other liabilities | 664,715 | 483,519 | 476,415 | 339,246 | ||
Total liabilities | 30,435,543 | 30,242,073 | 27,417,433 | 27,271,337 | ||
Equity | ||||||
Share capital | 356,407 | 356,407 | 356,407 | 356,407 | ||
Other equity instruments | 225,819 | 225,819 | 206,132 | 206,132 | ||
Capital reserve | 148,534 | 148,534 | 149,067 | 149,067 | ||
Other comprehensive income | (10,428) | (10,178) | (1,266) | (1,083) | ||
Surplus reserve | 322,911 | 322,692 | 292,291 | 292,149 | ||
General reserve | 339,701 | 339,486 | 305,019 | 304,876 | ||
Retained profits | 1,510,558 | 1,508,562 | 1,368,536 | 1,367,180 | ||
Equity attributable to equity holders of | 2,893,502 | 2,891,322 | 2,676,186 | 2,674,728 | ||
the parent company | ||||||
Minority interests | 16,013 | 9,159 | 15,817 | 9,478 | ||
Total equity | 2,909,515 | 2,900,481 | 2,692,003 | 2,684,206 | ||
Note: Prepared in accordance with PRC GAAP.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 47 |
Appendixes
EXPLANATIONS FOR DETAILED ITEMS
In RMB millions | |||
At 31 December 2020 | |||
Balance sheet under | |||
regulatory scope of | |||
Item | consolidation | Reference | |
Loans and advances to customers | 18,134,777 | ||
Total loans and advances to customers | 18,665,077 | ||
Less: Provision for loan impairment under the weighted approach | 23,204 | X01 | |
Including: Valid cap of surplus provision for loan impairment in tier 2 | 7,802 | X02 | |
capital under the weighted approach | |||
Less: Provision for loan impairment under the internal ratings-based | 507,096 | X03 | |
approach | |||
Including: Valid cap of surplus provision for loan impairment in tier 2 capital under | 162,910 | X04 | |
the internal ratings-based approach | |||
Financial investments: | |||
Financial investments measured at fair value through profit or loss | 732,478 | ||
Including: Non-significant minority investments in core tier 1 capital | 67 | X05 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject | |||
to consolidation | |||
Including: Significant minority investments in core tier 1 capital | 1,658 | X06 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject to | |||
consolidation | |||
Including: Non-significant minority investments in additional tier 1 capital | 217 | X07 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject to | |||
consolidation | |||
Including: Non-significant minority investments in tier 2 capital | 126,749 | X08 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject to | |||
consolidation | |||
Financial investments measured at fair value through other | 1,498,008 | ||
comprehensive income | |||
Including: Non-significant minority investments in core tier 1 capital | 10,998 | X09 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject to | |||
consolidation | |||
Including: Significant minority investments in core tier 1 capital | 3,445 | X10 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject to | |||
consolidation | |||
Including: Non-significant minority investments in tier 2 capital | - | X29 | |
instruments issued by financial institutions that are not subject to | |||
consolidation | |||
Financial investments measured at amortised cost | 6,198,842 | ||
Including: Non-significant minority investments in tier 2 capital instruments | 199 | X30 | |
issued by financial institutions that are not subject to consolidation | |||
Including: Significant minority investments in tier 2 capital instruments | - | X31 | |
issued by financial institutions that are not subject to consolidation | |||
48
Appendixes
EXPLANATIONS FOR DETAILED ITEMS (CONTINUED)
In RMB millions | |||
At 31 December 2020 | |||
Balance sheet under | |||
regulatory scope of | |||
Item | consolidation | Reference | |
Long-term equity investments | 49,186 | ||
Including: Investment in core tier 1 capital instruments issued by financial | 7,980 | X11 | |
institutions that are under control but not subject to consolidation | |||
Including: Undeducted portion of non-significant minority investments | 17 | X12 | |
in capital instruments issued by financial institutions that are not | |||
subject to consolidation | |||
Including: Undeducted portion of significant minority investments in | 27,349 | X13 | |
capital instruments issued by financial institutions that are not | |||
subject to consolidation | |||
Other assets | 440,548 | ||
Interest receivable | 1,985 | ||
Intangible assets | 20,717 | X14 | |
Including: Land use rights | 16,135 | X15 | |
Other receivables | 359,902 | ||
Goodwill | 8,107 | X16 | |
Long-term deferred expenses | 4,639 | ||
Repossessed assets | 5,325 | ||
Others | 39,873 | ||
Debt securities issued | 798,127 | ||
Including: Valid portion of tier 2 capital instruments and their premium | 351,568 | X17 | |
Share capital | 356,407 | X18 | |
Other equity instruments | 225,819 | ||
Including: Preference shares | 139,156 | X28 | |
Including: Perpetual bonds | 79,987 | X32 | |
Capital reserve | 148,534 | X19 | |
Other comprehensive income | (10,178) | X24 | |
Reserve for changes in fair value of financial assets | 22,726 | ||
Reserve for cash flow hedging | (4,725) | ||
Including: Cash flow hedge reserves that relate to the hedging of items | (4,616) | X20 | |
that are not fair valued on the balance sheet | |||
Changes in share of other owners' equity of associates and joint ventures | (1,381) | ||
Foreign currency translation reserve | (27,518) | ||
Others | 720 | ||
Surplus reserve | 322,692 | X21 | |
General reserve | 339,486 | X22 | |
Retained profits | 1,508,562 | X23 | |
Minority interests | 9,159 | ||
Including: Valid portion to core tier 1 capital | 3,553 | X25 | |
Including: Valid portion to additional tier 1 capital | 647 | X26 | |
Including: Valid portion to tier 2 capital | 1,114 | X27 | |
Capital Adequacy Ratio Report 2020 | 49 |
50
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020
Undated additional | |||||||||
Main features of | Ordinary shares | Ordinary shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | tier 1 capital bonds | ||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | (A share) | (H share) | (Domestic) | (Domestic) | (Offshore) | (Offshore) | (Domestic) | |
1 | Issuer | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | |
2 | Unique identifier | 601398 | 1398 | 360011 | 360036 | 4604 | 4620 | 1928018 | |
3 | Governing law(s) of the | Securities Law | Securities and | Company Law of the | Company Law of the | The creation and issue of | The creation and issue of | Governed by the | |
instrument | of the People's | Futures Ordinance | People's Republic of | People's Republic of | the Offshore Preference | the Offshore Preference | Commercial Banking | ||
Republic of China/ | of Hong Kong/Hong | China, Securities Law of | China, Securities Law of | Shares and the rights and | Shares and the rights and | Law of the People's | |||
China | Kong, China | the People's Republic of | the People's Republic of | obligations (including non- | obligations (including non- | Republic of China, the | |||
China, Guidance of the | China, Guidance of the | contractual rights and | contractual rights and | Regulation Governing | |||||
State Council on Launch | State Council on Launch | obligations) attached to | obligations) attached to | Capital of Commercial | |||||
of Preference Shares | of Preference Shares | them are governed by, | them are governed by, | Banks (Provisional) | |||||
Pilot, Trial Administrative | Pilot, Trial Administrative | and shall be construed in | and shall be construed in | and the Measures for | |||||
Measures on Preference | Measures on Preference | accordance with, PRC law | accordance with, PRC law | Administration of Financial | |||||
Shares, Guidance on the | Shares, Guidance on the | Bond Issuance in China's | |||||||
Issuance of Preference | Issuance of Preference | Inter-bank Bond Market, | |||||||
Shares of Commercial | Shares of Commercial | as well as other applicable | |||||||
Banks to Replenish Tier 1 | Banks to Replenish Tier 1 | laws, regulations and | |||||||
Capital/China | Capital /China | normative documents/ | |||||||
China | |||||||||
Regulatory treatment | |||||||||
4 | Including: Transition | Core tier 1 capital | Core tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | |
arrangement of Regulation | |||||||||
Governing Capital of | |||||||||
Commercial Banks | |||||||||
(Provisional) | |||||||||
5 | Including: Post-transition | Core tier 1 capital | Core tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | |
arrangement of Regulation | |||||||||
Governing Capital of | |||||||||
Commercial Banks | |||||||||
(Provisional) | |||||||||
6 | Including: Eligible to the | Parent company/ | Parent company/ | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | |
parent company/group level | Group | Group | |||||||
7 | Instrument type | Core tier 1 capital | Core tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | Additional tier 1 capital | |
instrument | instrument | instrument | instrument | instrument | instrument | instrument | |||
8 | Amount recognized in | RMB336,554 | RMB168,374 | RMB44,947 | RMB69,981 | RMB equivalent 4,542 | RMB equivalent 19,687 | RMB79,987 | |
regulatory capital (in millions, as | |||||||||
at the latest reporting date) | |||||||||
Appendixes
51 2020 Report Ratio Adequacy Capital
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Undated additional | ||||||||
Main features of | Ordinary shares | Ordinary shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | tier 1 capital bonds | |
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | (A share) | (H share) | (Domestic) | (Domestic) | (Offshore) | (Offshore) | (Domestic) |
9 | Par value of instrument (in | RMB269,612 | RMB86,795 | RMB45,000 | RMB70,000 | EUR600 | USD2,900 | RMB80,000 |
millions) | ||||||||
10 | Accounting treatment | Share capital, | Share capital, | Other equity | Other equity | Other equity | Other equity | Other equity |
Capital reserve | Capital reserve | |||||||
11 | Original date of issuance | 19 October 2006 | 19 October 2006 | 18 November 2015 | 19 September 2019 | 10 December 2014 | 23 September 2020 | 26 July 2019 |
12 | Perpetual or dated | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual |
13 | Including: Original maturity | No maturity date | No maturity date | No maturity date | No maturity date | No maturity date | No maturity date | No maturity date |
date | ||||||||
14 | Issuer call (subject to prior | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
supervisory approval) | ||||||||
15 | Including: Optional call date, | N/A | N/A | The First Redemption Date | The First Redemption Date | The First Redemption Date | The First Redemption Date | The First Redemption Date |
contingent call dates and | is 18 November 2020, in | is 24 September 2024, in | is 10 December 2021, in | is 23 September 2025, in | is 30 July 2024, in full or | |||
redemption amount | full or partial amount | full or partial amount | full or partial amount | full or partial amount | partial amount | |||
16 | Including: Subsequent call | N/A | N/A | Commences on the | Commences on the | 10 December in each year | 23 September in each year | Redemption of present |
dates, if applicable | First Redemption Date | First Redemption Date | after the First Redemption | after the First Redemption | bonds in full or in part | |||
(18 November 2020) and | (24 September 2024) and | Date | Date | on each Distribution | ||||
ends on the completion | ends on the completion | Payment Date since the | ||||||
date of redemption or | date of redemption or | First Redemption Date | ||||||
conversion of all the | conversion of all the | (30 July 2024). The Issuer | ||||||
Domestic Preference | Domestic Preference | has the right to redeem | ||||||
Shares | Shares | the present bonds in | ||||||
full rather than in part | ||||||||
if the present bonds | ||||||||
are no longer qualify as | ||||||||
additional tier 1 capital | ||||||||
after they are issued due | ||||||||
to unpredictable changes | ||||||||
in regulatory rules | ||||||||
Coupons/dividends | ||||||||
17 | Including: Fixed or floating | Floating | Floating | Fixed to floating | Fixed to floating | Fixed to floating | Fixed to floating | Fixed to floating |
dividend/coupon | ||||||||
Appendixes
52
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Undated additional | ||||||||
Main features of | Ordinary shares | Ordinary shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | tier 1 capital bonds | |
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | (A share) | (H share) | (Domestic) | (Domestic) | (Offshore) | (Offshore) | (Domestic) |
18 | Including: Coupon rate and | N/A | N/A | 4.5% (dividend rate) | 4.2% (dividend rate) | 6% (dividend rate) before | 3.58% (dividend rate) | 4.45% (interest rate) |
any related index | before 23 November | before 24 September | 10 December 2021 | before 23 September | before 30 July 2024 | |||
2020, and 4.58% | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||
(dividend rate) between | ||||||||
23 November 2020 and | ||||||||
22 November 2025 | ||||||||
19 | Including: Existence of a | N/A | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
dividend stopper | ||||||||
20 | Including: Fully discretionary, | Fully discretionary | Fully discretionary | Partially discretionary | Partially discretionary | Partially discretionary | Partially discretionary | Partially discretionary |
partially discretionary or | ||||||||
mandatory cancellation of | ||||||||
coupons/dividends | ||||||||
21 | Including: Redemption | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
incentive mechanism | ||||||||
22 | Including: Non-cumulative or | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative |
cumulative | ||||||||
23 | Convertible or non-convertible | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
24 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | Additional Tier 1 Capital | Additional Tier 1 Capital | Additional Tier 1 Capital | Non-viability Trigger Event | N/A |
conversion trigger(s) | Trigger Event or Tier 2 | Trigger Event or Tier 2 | Trigger Event or Tier 2 | |||||
Capital Trigger Event | Capital Trigger Event | Capital Trigger Event | ||||||
25 | Including: If convertible, fully | N/A | N/A | Fully or partially convertible | Fully or partially convertible | Fully or partially convertible | Fully or partially convertible | N/A |
or partially | when an Additional Tier | when an Additional Tier | when an Additional Tier | when an Non-viability | ||||
1 Capital Trigger Event | 1 Capital Trigger Event | 1 Capital Trigger Event | Trigger Event occurs | |||||
occurs; fully convertible | occurs; fully convertible | occurs; fully convertible | ||||||
when a Tier 2 Capital | when a Tier 2 Capital | when a Tier 2 Capital | ||||||
Trigger Event occurs | Trigger Event occurs | Trigger Event occurs |
Appendixes
26 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | The initial conversion price |
conversion rate | is equal to the average | |||
trading price of the A | ||||
shares of the Bank for the | ||||
20 trading days preceding | ||||
25 July 2014, the date of |
publication of the Board resolution in respect of the issuance plan
The initial conversion price is equal to the average trading price of the A shares of the Bank for the 20 trading days preceding 30 August 2018, the date of publication of the Board resolution in respect of the issuance plan
The initial conversion price is equal to the average trading price of the H shares of the Bank for the 20 trading days preceding 25 July 2014, the date of publication of the Board resolution in respect of the issuance plan
The initial conversion | N/A |
price is equal to the | |
average trading price of | |
the H shares of the Bank | |
for the 20 trading days | |
preceding 30 August 2018, | |
the date of publication of | |
the Board resolution in | |
respect of the issuance plan |
53 2020 Report Ratio Adequacy Capital
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Undated additional | ||||||||
Main features of | Ordinary shares | Ordinary shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | Preference shares | tier 1 capital bonds | |
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | (A share) | (H share) | (Domestic) | (Domestic) | (Offshore) | (Offshore) | (Domestic) |
27 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | N/A |
mandatory or optional | ||||||||
conversion | ||||||||
28 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | Core tier 1 capital | Core tier 1 capital | Core tier 1 capital | Core tier 1 capital | N/A |
specify instrument type | ||||||||
convertible into | ||||||||
29 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | N/A |
specify issuer of instrument it | ||||||||
converts into | ||||||||
30 | Write-down feature | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
31 | Including: If write-down, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Additional Tier 1 Capital |
write-down trigger(s) | Trigger Event or Tier 2 | |||||||
Capital Trigger Event | ||||||||
32 | Including: If write-down, full | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Full or partial write-down |
or partial | when an Additional Tier | |||||||
1 Capital Trigger Event | ||||||||
occurs; full write-down | ||||||||
when a Tier 2 Capital | ||||||||
Trigger Event occurs | ||||||||
33 | Including: If write-down, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Permanent write-down |
permanent or temporary | ||||||||
34 | Including: If temporary | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
write-down, description of | ||||||||
write-up mechanism | ||||||||
35 | Position in subordination | Subordinated | Subordinated | Subordinated to | Subordinated to | Subordinated to | Subordinated to | Subordinated to |
hierarchy in liquidation (specify | to depositor, | to depositor, | deposits, general debts, | deposits, general debts, | deposits, general debts, | deposits, general debts, | deposits, general debts, | |
instrument type immediately | general creditor, | general creditor, | subordinated debts, tier 2 | subordinated debts, tier 2 | subordinated debts, tier 2 | subordinated debts, tier 2 | subordinated debts and tier | |
senior to instrument) | creditor of the | creditor of the | capital bonds and undated | capital bonds and undated | capital bonds and undated | capital bonds and undated | 2 capital bonds | |
subordinated debts | subordinated debts | additional tier 1 capital | additional tier 1 capital | additional tier 1 capital | additional tier 1 capital | |||
and preference | and preference | bonds | bonds | bonds | bonds | |||
shareholders | shareholders | |||||||
36 | Non-compliant transitioned | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
features | ||||||||
Including: If yes, specify | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
non-compliant features | ||||||||
Appendixes
54
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Main features of | ||||||||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | ||
1 | Issuer | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | ||
2 | Unique identifier | Rule 144A ISIN: | 1728021 | 1728022 | 1928006 | 1928007 | ||
US455881AD47 | ||||||||
Regulation S ISIN: | ||||||||
USY39656AC06 | ||||||||
3 | Governing law(s) of the | The Notes and the Fiscal | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | ||
instrument | Agency Agreement shall be | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | |||
governed by, and shall be | Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | ||||
construed in accordance with, | Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | ||||
New York law, except that the | Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | ||||
provisions of the Notes relating | (Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | ||||
to subordination shall be | for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | ||||
governed by, and construed in | Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | ||||
accordance with, PRC law | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | ||||
well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | |||||
regulations and normative | regulations and normative | regulations and normative | regulations and normative | |||||
documents /China | documents /China | documents /China | documents /China | |||||
Regulatory treatment | ||||||||
4 | Including: Transition | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | ||
arrangement of Regulation | ||||||||
Governing Capital of | ||||||||
Commercial Banks (Provisional) | ||||||||
5 | Including: Post-transition | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | ||
arrangement of Regulation | ||||||||
Governing Capital of | ||||||||
Commercial Banks (Provisional) | ||||||||
6 | Including: Eligible to the parent | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | ||
company/group level | ||||||||
7 | Instrument type | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | ||
8 | Amount recognized in regulatory | RMB equivalent 12,998 | RMB44,000 | RMB44,000 | RMB45,000 | RMB10,000 | ||
capital (in millions, as at the latest | ||||||||
reporting date) | ||||||||
9 | Par value of instrument (in | USD2,000 | RMB44,000 | RMB44,000 | RMB45,000 | RMB10,000 | ||
millions) | ||||||||
10 | Accounting treatment | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | ||
11 | Original date of issuance | 21 September 2015 | 6 November 2017 | 20 November 2017 | 21 March 2019 | 21 March 2019 | ||
12 | Perpetual or dated | Dated | Dated | Dated | Dated | Dated | ||
13 | Including: Original maturity date | 21 September 2025 | 8 November 2027 | 22 November 2027 | 25 March 2029 | 25 March 2034 | ||
Appendixes
55 2020 Report Ratio Adequacy Capital
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Main features of | ||||||||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | ||
14 | Issuer call (subject to prior | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
supervisory approval) | ||||||||
15 | Including: Optional call date, | N/A | 8 November 2022, in full | 22 November 2022, in full | 25 March 2024, in full | 25 March 2029, in full | ||
contingent call dates and | amount | amount | amount | amount | ||||
redemption amount | ||||||||
16 | Including: Subsequent call | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
dates, if applicable | ||||||||
Coupons/dividends | ||||||||
17 | Including: Fixed or floating | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | ||
dividend/coupon | ||||||||
18 | Including: Coupon rate and any | 4.875% | 4.45% | 4.45% | 4.26% | 4.51% | ||
related index | ||||||||
19 | Including: Existence of a | No | No | No | No | No | ||
dividend stopper | ||||||||
20 | Including: Fully discretionary, | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | ||
partially discretionary or | ||||||||
mandatory cancellation of | ||||||||
coupons/dividends | ||||||||
21 | Including: Redemption incentive | No | No | No | No | No | ||
mechanism | ||||||||
22 | Including: Non-cumulative or | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | ||
cumulative | ||||||||
23 | Convertible or non-convertible | No | No | No | No | No | ||
24 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
conversion trigger(s) | ||||||||
25 | Including: If convertible, fully or | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
partially | ||||||||
26 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
conversion rate | ||||||||
27 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
mandatory or optional | ||||||||
conversion | ||||||||
28 | Including: If convertible, specify | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
instrument type convertible into | ||||||||
Appendixes
56
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Main features of | ||||||||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | ||
29 | Including: If convertible, specify | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
issuer of instrument it converts | ||||||||
into | ||||||||
30 | Write-down feature | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
31 | Including: If write-down, write- | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | ||
down trigger(s) | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | |||
a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | ||||
without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | ||||
would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | ||||
(ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | ||||
having decided that a public | having decided that a public | having decided that a public | having decided that a public | having decided that a public | ||||
sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | ||||
equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | ||||
without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | ||||
become non-viable | become non-viable | become non-viable | become non-viable | become non-viable | ||||
32 | Including: If write-down, full or | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | ||
partial | ||||||||
33 | Including: If write-down, | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | ||
permanent or temporary | ||||||||
34 | Including: If temporary write- | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
down, description of write-up | ||||||||
mechanism | ||||||||
35 | Position in subordination | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | ||
hierarchy in liquidation (specify | general creditor, pari passu | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | |||
instrument type immediately | with other subordinated debts | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | |||
senior to instrument) | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | ||||
capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | |||||
other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | |||||
that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | |||||
Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | |||||
the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | |||||
passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | |||||
instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | |||||
be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | |||||
pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | |||||
bonds | bonds | bonds | bonds | |||||
36 | Non-compliant transitioned | No | No | No | No | No | ||
features | ||||||||
Including: If yes, specify non- | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
compliant features | ||||||||
Appendixes
57 2020 Report Ratio Adequacy Capital
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Main features of | ||||||||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | ||
1 | Issuer | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | The Bank | ||
2 | Unique identifier | 1928011 | 1928012 | 2028041 | 2028049 | 2028050 | ||
3 | Governing law(s) of the | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | Governed by the Commercial | ||
instrument | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | Banking Law of the People's | |||
Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | Republic of China, the | ||||
Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | Regulation Governing | ||||
Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | Capital of Commercial Banks | ||||
(Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | (Provisional) and the Measures | ||||
for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | for Administration of Financial | ||||
Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | Bond Issuance in China's | ||||
Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | Inter-bank Bond Market, as | ||||
well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | well as other applicable laws, | ||||
regulations and normative | regulations and normative | regulations and normative | regulations and normative | regulations and normative | ||||
documents /China | documents /China | documents /China | documents /China | documents /China | ||||
Regulatory treatment | ||||||||
4 | Including: Transition | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | ||
arrangement of Regulation | ||||||||
Governing Capital of | ||||||||
Commercial Banks (Provisional) | ||||||||
5 | Including: Post-transition | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | Tier 2 capital | ||
arrangement of Regulation | ||||||||
Governing Capital of | ||||||||
Commercial Banks (Provisional) | ||||||||
6 | Including: Eligible to the parent | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | Parent company/Group | ||
company/group level | ||||||||
7 | Instrument type | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | Tier 2 capital instruments | ||
8 | Amount recognized in regulatory | RMB45,000 | RMB10,000 | RMB60,000 | RMB30,000 | RMB10,000 | ||
capital (in millions, as at the latest | ||||||||
reporting date) | ||||||||
9 | Par value of instrument (in | RMB45,000 | RMB10,000 | RMB60,000 | RMB30,000 | RMB10,000 | ||
millions) | ||||||||
10 | Accounting treatment | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | Debt securities issued | ||
11 | Original date of issuance | 24 April 2019 | 24 April 2019 | 22 September 2020 | 12 November 2020 | 12 November 2020 | ||
12 | Perpetual or dated | Dated | Dated | Dated | Dated | Dated | ||
13 | Including: Original maturity date | 26 April 2029 | 26 April 2034 | 24 September 2030 | 16 November 2030 | 16 November 2035 | ||
14 | Issuer call (subject to prior | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
supervisory approval) | ||||||||
Appendixes
58
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Main features of | ||||||||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | ||
15 | Including: Optional call date, | 26 April 2024, in full | 26 April 2029, in full | 24 September 2025, in full | 16 November 2025, in full | 16 November 2030, in full | ||
contingent call dates and | amount | amount | amount | amount | amount | |||
redemption amount | ||||||||
16 | Including: Subsequent call | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
dates, if applicable | ||||||||
Coupons/dividends | ||||||||
17 | Including: Fixed or floating | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | ||
dividend/coupon | ||||||||
18 | Including: Coupon rate and any | 4.40% | 4.69% | 4.20% | 4.15% | 4.45% | ||
related index | ||||||||
19 | Including: Existence of a | No | No | No | No | No | ||
dividend stopper | ||||||||
20 | Including: Fully discretionary, | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory | ||
partially discretionary or | ||||||||
mandatory cancellation of | ||||||||
coupons/dividends | ||||||||
21 | Including: Redemption incentive | No | No | No | No | No | ||
mechanism | ||||||||
22 | Including: Non-cumulative or | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | Non-cumulative | ||
cumulative | ||||||||
23 | Convertible or non-convertible | No | No | No | No | No | ||
24 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
conversion trigger(s) | ||||||||
25 | Including: If convertible, fully or | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
partially | ||||||||
26 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
conversion rate | ||||||||
27 | Including: If convertible, | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
mandatory or optional | ||||||||
conversion | ||||||||
28 | Including: If convertible, specify | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
instrument type convertible into | ||||||||
29 | Including: If convertible, specify | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
issuer of instrument it converts | ||||||||
into | ||||||||
30 | Write-down feature | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
Appendixes
59 2020 Report Ratio Adequacy Capital
MAIN FEATURES OF ELIGIBLE CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT THE END OF 2020 (CONTINUED)
Main features of | ||||||||
S/N | regulatory capital instrument | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | Tier 2 capital bonds | ||
31 | Including: If write-down, | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | Whichever occurs earlier: | ||
write-down trigger(s) | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | (i) CBIRC having decided that | |||
a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | a write-down is necessary, | ||||
without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | without which the Issuer | ||||
would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | would become non-viable; or | ||||
(ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | (ii) any relevant authority | ||||
having decided that a public | having decided that a public | having decided that a public | having decided that a public | having decided that a public | ||||
sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | sector injection of capital or | ||||
equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | equivalent support is necessary, | ||||
without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | without which the Issuer would | ||||
become non-viable | become non-viable | become non-viable | become non-viable | become non-viable | ||||
32 | Including: If write-down, full or | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | Partial or full write-down | ||
partial | ||||||||
33 | Including: If write-down, | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | Permanent write-down | ||
permanent or temporary | ||||||||
34 | Including: If temporary | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
write-down, description of | ||||||||
write-up mechanism | ||||||||
35 | Position in subordination | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | Subordinated to depositor and | ||
hierarchy in liquidation (specify | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | general creditor, but senior | |||
instrument type immediately | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | to equity capital, other tier 1 | |||
senior to instrument) | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | capital instruments and hybrid | |||
capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | capital bonds; pari passu with | ||||
other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | other subordinated debts | ||||
that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | that have been issued by the | ||||
Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | Issuer and are pari passu with | ||||
the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | the present bonds; and pari | ||||
passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | passu with other tier 2 capital | ||||
instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | instruments that will possibly | ||||
be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | be issued in the future and are | ||||
pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | pari passu with the present | ||||
bonds | bonds | bonds | bonds | bonds | ||||
36 | Non-compliant transitioned | No | No | No | No | No | ||
features | ||||||||
Including: If yes, specify | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
non-compliant features | ||||||||
Appendixes
Definitions
In this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the meanings set out below:
Articles of Association | The Articles of Association of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China |
Limited | |
Capital Regulation | Regulation Governing Capital of Commercial Banks (Provisional) promulgated |
in June 2012 | |
CBIRC | China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission |
CCXI | China Cheng Xin International Credit Rating Co., Ltd. |
China Ratings | China Bond Rating Co., Ltd. |
Global Systemically Important Banks/G-SIB | Banks undertaking key functions with global features in the fiinancial markets |
as released by the Financial Stability Board | |
Golden Credit Rating | Golden Credit Rating International Co., Ltd. |
ICBC (Argentina) | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A. |
ICBC (Asia) | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited |
ICBC (Canada) | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Canada) |
ICBC (Europe) | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Europe) S.A. |
ICBC (Macau) | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Macau) Limited |
ICBC (Thai) | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Thai) Public Company Limited |
ICBC International | ICBC International Holdings Limited |
ICBC Investment | ICBC Financial Asset Investment Co., Limited |
ICBC Leasing | ICBC Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. |
ICBC Standard Bank | ICBC Standard Bank PLC |
ICBC Wealth Management | ICBC Wealth Management Co., Ltd. |
ICBC-AXA | ICBC-AXA Assurance Co., Ltd. |
LH Ratings | China Lianhe Credit Rating Co., Ltd. |
PBC | The People's Bank of China |
Securities and Futures Ordinance of | Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) |
Hong Kong | |
Shanghai Brilliance Rating | Shanghai Brilliance Credit Rating & Investors Service Co, Ltd. |
SEHK | The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited |
SSE | Shanghai Stock Exchange |
the Bank/the Group/ICBC | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited; or Industrial and |
Commercial Bank of China Limited and its subsidiaries |
60
中國北京市西城區復興門內大街55號 郵編:100140
55 Fuxingmennei Avenue, Xicheng District, Beijing, China | Post Code: 100140 |
www.icbc.com.cn, www.icbc-ltd.com |
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
ICBC - Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited published this content on 23 April 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 23 April 2021 10:29:06 UTC.