Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON
  1. Homepage
  2. Equities
  3. United States
  4. Nasdaq
  5. Lyft, Inc.
  6. News
  7. Summary
    LYFT   US55087P1049

LYFT, INC.

(LYFT)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Lyft : Gig companies' push for state-level worker laws faces divided labor movement

06/09/2021 | 08:00pm EDT

June 9 (Reuters) - Uber and other gig economy companies are trying a new approach to ending their battles with unions, and getting ahead of possible federal regulation that could upend their business based on classifying workers as independent contractors.

In New York, for example, gig economy companies are working with several unions including the Machinists and Transport Workers Union to strike a compromise that would allow drivers and food delivery workers to organize in a union and negotiate minimum pay and other benefits without being reclassified as employees.

With the support of the unions, the gig economy companies are pushing state lawmakers in Albany to pass a bill that would allow workers to negotiate wages and caps on company commission fees, and provide unemployment insurance in some circumstances.

Among the most vocal opponents of a proposed bill to achieve that goal is the Service Employees International Union's (SEIU) northeastern Local 32BJ, which says the compromise would enshrine gig workers' misclassified status and create a company-sanctioned union that would only further erode workers' rights by setting no floor for the negotiations.

"This legislation moves workers backwards," Kyle Bragg, 32BJ's president said. "There's too much company manipulation."

Amid the controversy, efforts to have the bill introduced before the end of the state's legislative session this week failed.

New York is just one of several states where gig economy companies led by Uber, Doordash, Lyft and Instacart are courting unions and state officials in an effort to cement their workers' status as independent contractors across the United States.

FAULT LINES

The push by the gig economy companies has exposed divisions within organized labor over whether to bargain with the companies, or insist on workers being reclassified as employees with full protection of U.S. labor standards - and a clear legal right to join unions.

The rifts at times also run within the same union. For example, while 32BJ rejects the New York bill, SEIU President Mary Kay Henry in the past said she would back workers' demands in reaching a deal with companies. The SEIU declined to comment for this story.

Similarly, the New York chapter of the AFL-CIO, the largest U.S. labor federation, backs the compromise proposal, while members of its Colorado chapter said they were opposed to bargaining agreements with the gig companies.

According to a Reuters review, the companies over the past few months set up lobbying groups in Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Colorado and Washington to push for laws that declare app-based ride-hail and food delivery drivers independent contractors, while proposing to offer them some benefits. In some states the companies hope for buy-in from labor groups, company and union officials said.

The companies are trying to build on their success in California, where voters approved an industry-backed ballot measure that exempts ride-hail and food delivery workers from rules that require other types of contractors to be classified as employees, and provides them with limited benefits.

The companies say they pursue tailored policies for each state to combine flexibility for their mostly part-time workers with benefits and protections. They have yet to offer concrete proposals in most states.

Some executives hope state-based independent contractor laws can also forestall federal action by the labor-friendly Biden administration, which has vowed to end the misclassification of workers as independent contractors.

"The models that are developed at the state level can be given a framework at the federal level," Lyft President John Zimmer said during an interview last month.

While any state law could be superseded by federal rules, Zimmer's calculation assumes that the U.S. Labor Department is less likely to act once facts on the ground are established.

The companies' race for state backing runs counter to the labor movement's single biggest legislative priority, the passage of a far-reaching labor reform bill known as the PRO Act in Congress. The bill would make worker organizing easier and among other things reclassify most independent contractors as employees for the purpose of collective bargaining, though not for wage laws and benefits.

The bill is unlikely to pass the Republican-led U.S. Senate, but even if it did, several years of regulatory and court wrangling would ensue, a time during which gig workers' rights would remain unchanged, said Wilma Liebman, former chair of the National Labor Relations Board.

SKEPTICS ON BOTH SIDES

Some union figures have therefore taken a more pragmatic approach. Andy Stern, former president of the SEIU and at the time one of the most politically influential labor leaders, for the past six years has been trying to strike deals between the gig companies and unions, including failed attempts in California to ward off the ballot measure.

The California referendum, a costly victory for the gig companies, was also a cautionary tale for unions, as well as for drivers, who are now left without any avenues to organize or object to the terms stipulated by the companies.

Stern said internal union surveys in New York had repeatedly shown that a majority of drivers did not want to be employees and said debates focused solely on reclassification were based on unrealistic and purist sentiments.

Stern instead advocates for drivers' rights to organize in unions and negotiate their own contracts.

"Give a worker a union and collective bargaining and they'll decide themselves what kind of status, wages and benefits they want. People who believe litigation and legislation are the solution have failed these workers," Stern said.

Stern and others dubious of reclassification point to Seattle and New York City, where years of union efforts to organize drivers have led to the only driver minimum wage laws in the country.

Uber and Lyft have rocky histories with unions and workers who want to organize. The companies in 2015 enlisted the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for a years-long court battle against a Seattle law spearheaded by the Teamsters union that would have allowed ride-hail drivers to bargain collectively.

Uber more recently appears to have opened up to such agreements, however. The company last month recognized Britain's GMB union as the collective bargaining unit of its 70,000 British drivers. Lyft's Zimmer said the company was having constructive conversations with labor leaders.

Many union officials remain skeptical about basing workers' fate on the goodwill of companies.

"You never get everything you want out of collective bargaining...and it would be better to give drivers more options and protections under the law," said Kjersten Forseth, political and legislative director for the Colorado AFL-CIO, which plans to make state-based gig worker policy solutions its focus over the next two years. (Reporting by Tina Bellon in Austin; Editing by Andrea Ricci)


© Reuters 2021
All news about LYFT, INC.
07:46aALFI Installs 10,000 Digital Screens in Ubers, Lyfts Vehicles in Miami, 9 Mor..
MT
06/16RIDESHARE REBOUND : More drivers, less wait time
PU
06/16LYFT  : says wait times decrease as U.S. drivers mark gradual return
RE
06/15Alfi Agrees to Ship 10,000 Digital Tablets to Uber, Lyft Drivers
MT
06/15LYFT  : launches EV rental pilot program for ride-hail drivers in Northern Calif..
RE
06/10China's ride-hailing giant Didi sets stage for mega New York float
RE
06/10China's ride-hailing giant Didi sets stage for mega New York float
RE
06/09LYFT  : Gig companies' push for state-level worker laws faces divided labor move..
RE
06/09STUDY : Rideshare services reduce drunk-driving convictions, injuries from crash..
AQ
06/03LYFT  : Biden intends to nominate Uber critic to oversee gig worker rights
RE
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 3 137 M - -
Net income 2021 -1 042 M - -
Net cash 2021 1 131 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 -18,8x
Yield 2021 -
Capitalization 19 367 M 19 367 M -
EV / Sales 2021 5,81x
EV / Sales 2022 4,10x
Nbr of Employees 4 578
Free-Float 84,3%
Chart LYFT, INC.
Duration : Period :
Lyft, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends LYFT, INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishNeutralBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 38
Average target price 69,03 $
Last Close Price 58,80 $
Spread / Highest target 46,3%
Spread / Average Target 17,4%
Spread / Lowest Target -49,0%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
NameTitle
Logan D. Green Chief Executive Officer & Director
John Zimmer Vice Chairman & President
Brian Roberts Chief Financial Officer
Prashant Aggarwal Chairman
Valerie B. Jarrett Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
LYFT, INC.15.96%18 764
TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED6.21%731 122
NETFLIX, INC.-8.94%218 336
PROSUS N.V.-3.20%166 760
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.-4.14%91 814
AIRBNB, INC.1.60%90 731