Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
2.75 AUD | -0.36% | -1.08% | -37.50% |
Mar. 15 | Nanosonics Chief Technology Officer to Retire | MT |
Feb. 26 | Nanosonics Shares Fall 8% as H1 FY24 Revenue Falls 2% to AU$79.6 Million; EPS Slips to AU$0.0202 | MT |
Summary
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.
- Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.
Weaknesses
- The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.
- The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 94.53 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
- With an enterprise value anticipated at 4.26 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
- In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
- The company is highly valued given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Advanced Medical Equipment & Technology
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-37.50% | 544M | B+ | ||
+8.19% | 218B | B | ||
+7.02% | 182B | B- | ||
+11.70% | 132B | B- | ||
+26.86% | 108B | A- | ||
+13.04% | 52.98B | B+ | ||
-0.62% | 47.59B | B+ | ||
-0.61% | 39.96B | A | ||
+11.88% | 39.22B | - | ||
+26.26% | 26.94B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- NAN Stock
- Ratings Nanosonics Limited