The following discussion includes forward-looking statements. Please refer to
the Cautionary Information about Forward-Looking Statements section of this
report for important information about these types of statements. Throughout the
following discussion, we explain changes between the three months ended
March 31, 2022, compared with the three months ended December 31, 2021
("sequential quarterly" or "sequentially"), as well as the year-to-date ("YTD")
change between the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared with the three
months ended March 31, 2021 ("YTD 2022-over-YTD 2021").

Overview of the Company

General Overview



Our strategic objective is to be a premier operator of top-tier oil and gas
assets. Our purpose is to make people's lives better by responsibly producing
energy supplies, contributing to domestic energy security and prosperity, and
having a positive impact in the communities where we live and work. Our
short-term operational and financial goals include generating positive cash
flows while strengthening our balance sheet through absolute debt reduction and
improved leverage metrics, and increasing the value of our capital project
inventory through exploration and development optimization. Our long-term vision
is to sustainably grow value for all of our stakeholders. Our strategy for
achieving our goals is to focus on high-quality economic drilling, completion,
and production opportunities. Our investment portfolio is comprised of oil and
gas producing assets in the state of Texas, specifically in the Midland Basin of
West Texas and in the Maverick Basin of South Texas.

We are committed to exceptional safety, health, and environmental stewardship;
supporting the professional development of a diverse and thriving team of
employees; making a positive impact in the communities where we live and work;
and transparency in reporting on our progress in these areas. We have
prioritized ESG initiatives by, among other things, integrating enhanced
environmental and social programs throughout the organization and setting
near-term and medium-term goals that include reducing flaring and greenhouse gas
emissions intensity and maintaining low methane emissions intensity.
Additionally, we are putting systems in place to track additional ESG metrics to
enable increased reporting in the future and to increase employee awareness. The
Environmental, Social and Governance Committee of our Board of Directors
oversees, among other things, the development and implementation of the
Company's ESG policies, programs and initiatives, and, together with management,
reports to our Board of Directors regarding such matters. Further demonstrating
our commitment to sustainable operations and environmental stewardship,
compensation for our executives and eligible employees under our long-term
incentive plan, and compensation for all employees under our short-term
incentive plan is calculated based on, in part, certain Company-wide
performance-based metrics that include key financial, operational, and
environmental, health, and safety measures.

Prices for the commodities produced by our industry remained strong during the
first quarter of 2022 with benchmark oil prices increasing compared with the
fourth quarter of 2021, in part due to the impact of the conflict between Russia
and Ukraine on global commodity and financial markets, and in response to
economic and trade sanctions that certain countries have imposed on Russia.
Additionally, although the Pandemic remains a global health crisis and continues
to evolve, consumer demand has strengthened as cases of the Omicron variant of
COVID-19 have decreased from winter levels. Increased demand for oil and gas
products has outpaced increased supply, resulting in strong commodity prices
which, for 2021, rose to their highest average annual prices since 2014.
However, global commodity and financial markets remain subject to heightened
levels of uncertainty and volatility related to these events, and future
disruptions and industry-specific impacts could result, which may require us to
adjust our business plan. For additional detail, please refer to the Risk
Factors section in Part I, Item 1A of our   2021 Form 10-K  . Despite continuing
impacts of geopolitical issues, the Pandemic, and future uncertainty, we expect
to maintain our ability to sustain strong operational performance and financial
stability while maximizing returns, improving leverage metrics, and increasing
the value of our top-tier Midland Basin and South Texas assets.

Throughout the Pandemic, the safety of our employees, contractors, and the
communities where we work has remained our first priority. While our core
business operations required certain individuals to be physically present at
well site locations, the majority of our office-based employees worked remotely
from the onset of the Pandemic through February of 2022. We maintain and
continually assess procedures designed to limit the spread of COVID-19, and we
continue to communicate to and train all of our employees regarding best
practices for maintaining a healthy and safe work environment. We believe that
we meet or exceed Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and federal
Occupational Safety and Health Act guidelines related to the prevention of the
transmission of COVID-19. Throughout the Pandemic, we have operated without
significant disruptions to our business, and we believe that our pre-existing
control environment and internal controls continue to be effective.

Areas of Operations



Our Midland Basin assets are comprised of approximately 80,000 net acres located
in the Permian Basin in West Texas ("Midland Basin"). In the first quarter of
2022, drilling and completion activities within our RockStar and Sweetie Peck
positions continued to focus primarily on development optimization and further
delineating our Midland Basin position. Our current Midland Basin position
provides substantial future development opportunities within multiple oil-rich
intervals, including the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations.

                                       21
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our South Texas assets are comprised of approximately 155,000 net acres located
in the Maverick Basin in Dimmit and Webb Counties, Texas ("South Texas"). In the
first quarter of 2022, our operations in South Texas were focused on production
from both the Austin Chalk formation and Eagle Ford shale formation, and further
development of the Austin Chalk formation. Our overlapping acreage position in
the Maverick Basin covers a significant portion of the western Eagle Ford shale
and Austin Chalk formations, and includes acreage across the oil,
gas-condensate, and dry gas windows with gas composition amenable to processing
for NGL extraction.

First Quarter 2022 Overview and Outlook for the Remainder of 2022



During the first quarter of 2022, we remained committed to our goal of reducing
the principal balance of our outstanding debt through cash flow generation. For
the three months ended March 31, 2022, net cash provided by operating activities
exceeded net cash used in investing activities by $192.0 million, and we reduced
the principal balance of our total outstanding long-term debt by $104.8 million.
Further, cash and cash equivalents increased from $332.7 million at December 31,
2021, to $419.9 million at March 31, 2022. We executed on this goal through
strong operational performance and a diligent focus on cost management, and we
benefited from increased commodity pricing which has improved from historic lows
experienced during the height of the Pandemic.

Our 2022 capital program is expected to be approximately $750.0 million. Our
financial and operational flexibility allows us to continually monitor the
economic environment and adjust our activity level as warranted. Our 2022
capital program remains focused on highly economic oil development projects in
both our Midland Basin and South Texas assets. We believe that our high-quality
asset portfolio is capable of generating strong returns in the current
macroeconomic environment, which we expect will enable us to grow cash flows,
improve leverage metrics, and maintain strong financial flexibility. Please
refer to Overview of Liquidity and Capital Resources below for discussion of how
we expect to fund the remainder of our 2022 capital program.

Financial and Operational Results. Average net daily equivalent production for
the three months ended March 31, 2022, decreased three percent sequentially to
153.3 MBOE, primarily driven by a decrease in oil volumes of 15 percent, or 12.7
MBbl per day, which was the result of timing of well completions. The decrease
in oil volumes was partially offset by an increase of 37 percent, or 6.3 MBbl
per day, in NGL volumes.

Increases in benchmark oil prices during the first quarter of 2022 resulted in
an increased realized oil price, before the effect of derivative settlements, of
24 percent sequentially. Gas and NGL realized prices, before the effect of
derivative settlements, decreased sequentially by 15 percent, and three percent,
respectively. Total realized price before the effect of derivative settlements
("realized price" or "realized prices") per BOE increased six percent
sequentially. The increase in total realized price per BOE was partially offset
by the decrease in total net equivalent production volumes, resulting in a one
percent increase in oil, gas, and NGL production revenue, which was
$858.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared with
$852.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2021. Oil, gas, and NGL
production expense per BOE of $10.49 for the three months ended March 31, 2022,
increased seven percent sequentially, primarily as a result of increased ad
valorem tax expense, production tax expense, and transportation costs per BOE.

We recorded a net derivative loss of $418.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2022, compared to a net derivative gain of $22.5 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2021. Included within these amounts are derivative
settlement losses of $168.2 million and $268.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, respectively, resulting from
increased benchmark commodity prices.

Please refer to Overview of Selected Production and Financial Information, Including Trends and Comparison of Financial Results and Trends Between the Three Months Ended March 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, and Between the Three Months Ended March 31, 2022, and 2021 below for additional discussion.

Operational and financial activities during the three months ended March 31, 2022, resulted in the following:



•Net cash provided by operating activities of $342.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2022, compared with $429.6 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2021.

•A cash and cash equivalents balance of $419.9 million and no outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2022, and a reduction of the principal balance of our total outstanding long-term debt of $104.8 million from December 31, 2021, to March 31, 2022.



•Net income of $48.8 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, for the three months
ended March 31, 2022, compared with net income of $424.9 million, or $3.43 per
diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2021. Net income for the
three months ended March 31, 2022, was primarily a result of strong oil pricing
partially offset by a net derivative loss of $418.5 million. Please refer to
Comparison of Financial Results and Trends Between the Three Months Ended March
31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, and Between the Three Months Ended March 31,
2022, and 2021 below for additional discussion regarding the components of net
income (loss) for the periods presented.

•Adjusted EBITDAX, a non-GAAP financial measure, for the three months ended
March 31, 2022, was $524.6 million, compared with $406.9 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2021. Please refer to the caption Non-GAAP

                                       22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial Measures below for additional discussion and our definition of adjusted EBITDAX and reconciliations to net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities.



Operational Activities. In our Midland Basin program, we operated three drilling
rigs and one completion crew, and drilled 16 gross (14 net) wells and completed
six gross (five net) wells during the first quarter of 2022. Net equivalent
production volumes decreased sequentially by 17 percent to 7.9 MMBOE. Costs
incurred in our Midland Basin program during the three months ended March 31,
2022, totaled $84.4 million, or 48 percent of our total costs incurred for the
period. During the remainder of 2022, we anticipate operating three drilling
rigs and one completion crew, which will continue to utilize both zipper or
simul-frac techniques, where two or more horizontal wells are stimulated at the
same time using a single fleet. Activity will focus primarily on developing the
Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations within our RockStar and Sweetie Peck positions
in the Midland Basin.

In our South Texas program, we operated two drilling rigs and one completion
crew, and drilled nine gross (nine net) wells and completed 13 gross (13 net)
wells during the first quarter of 2022. Net equivalent production volumes
increased sequentially by 16 percent to 5.9 MMBOE. Costs incurred in our South
Texas program during the three months ended March 31, 2022, totaled
$76.1 million, or 43 percent of our total costs incurred for the period. During
the remainder of 2022, we anticipate operating two drilling rigs and one
completion crew, focused primarily on developing the Austin Chalk formation.

The table below provides a quarterly summary of changes in our drilled but not
completed well count and current year drilling and completion activity in our
operated programs for the three months ended March 31, 2022:

                                         Midland Basin              South Texas (1)                 Total
                                     Gross             Net      Gross              Net        Gross         Net
Wells drilled but not completed at
December 31, 2021                     30               27        32                 32         62           59
Wells drilled                         16               14         9                  9         25           23
Wells completed                       (6)              (5)      (13)               (13)       (19)         (18)

Wells drilled but not completed at
March 31, 2022                        40               36        28                 28         68           64


____________________________________________

(1) The South Texas drilled but not completed well count as of March 31, 2022, includes 11 gross (11 net) wells that are not included in our five-year development plan, 10 of which are in the Eagle Ford shale.



Costs Incurred. Costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration,
and development activities, whether capitalized or expensed, totaled
$175.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, and were primarily
incurred in our Midland Basin and South Texas programs as further detailed in
Operational Activities above.

                                       23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Production Results. The table below presents our production by product type for
each of our assets for the three months ended March 31, 2022, December 31, 2021,
and March 31, 2021:

                                              For the Three Months Ended
                                       March 31, 2022       December 31, 2021          March 31, 2021
Midland Basin Production:
Oil (MMBbl)                                       5.3                  6.7                      5.1
Gas (Bcf)                                        15.5                 16.5                     10.6
NGLs (MMBbl)                                        -                    -                        -
Equivalent (MMBOE)                                7.9                  9.4                      6.9
Average net daily equivalent (MBOE
per day)                                         87.4                102.6                     76.1
Relative percentage                                57  %                65  %                    68  %

South Texas Production:
Oil (MMBbl)                                       1.2                  1.1                      0.3
Gas (Bcf)                                        15.9                 14.7                     11.0
NGLs (MMBbl)                                      2.1                  1.6                      1.0
Equivalent (MMBOE)                                5.9                  5.1                      3.2
Average net daily equivalent (MBOE
per day)                                         65.8                 55.7                     35.5
Relative percentage                                43  %                35  %                    32  %

Total Production:
Oil (MMBbl)                                       6.5                  7.8                      5.4
Gas (Bcf)                                        31.4                 31.3                     21.5
NGLs (MMBbl)                                      2.1                  1.6                      1.0
Equivalent (MMBOE)                               13.8                 14.6                     10.0
Average net daily equivalent (MBOE
per day)                                        153.3                158.3                    111.6


____________________________________________

Note: Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.

Please refer to Overview of Selected Production and Financial Information, Including Trends and Comparison of Financial Results and Trends Between the Three Months Ended March 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, and Between the Three Months Ended March 31, 2022, and 2021 below for discussion on production.

Oil, Gas, and NGL Prices



Our financial condition and the results of our operations are significantly
affected by the prices we receive for our oil, gas, and NGL production, which
can fluctuate dramatically. When we refer to realized oil, gas, and NGL prices
below, the disclosed price represents the average price for the respective
period, before the effect of derivative settlements. While quoted NYMEX oil and
gas and OPIS NGL prices are generally used as a basis for comparison within our
industry, the prices we receive are affected by quality, energy content,
location and transportation differentials, and contracted pricing benchmarks for
these products.

                                       24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table summarizes commodity price data, as well as the effect of
derivative settlements, for the three months ended March 31, 2022, December 31,
2021, and March 31, 2021:

                                                    For the Three Months Ended
                                     March 31, 2022      December 31, 2021      March 31, 2021
Oil (per Bbl):
Average NYMEX contract monthly      $         94.29      $          77.19      $        57.84
price
Realized price                      $         94.03      $          76.08      $        56.33
Effect of oil derivative
settlements                         $        (20.00)     $         (22.97)     $       (10.38)
Gas:
Average NYMEX monthly settle price  $          4.95      $           5.83      $         2.69
(per MMBtu)
Realized price (per Mcf)            $          5.42      $           6.35      $         4.16
Effect of gas derivative
settlements (per Mcf)               $         (0.86)     $          (2.05)     $        (1.88)
NGLs (per Bbl):
Average OPIS price (1)              $         48.36      $          44.21      $        30.47
Realized price                      $         38.56      $          39.63      $        26.93
Effect of NGL derivative            $         (5.67)     $         (16.64)     $       (10.79)
settlements

____________________________________________



(1)  Average OPIS price per barrel of NGL, historical or strip, assumes a
composite barrel product mix of 37% Ethane, 32% Propane, 6% Isobutane, 11%
Normal Butane, and 14% Natural Gasoline for all periods presented. This product
mix represents the industry standard composite barrel and does not necessarily
represent our product mix for NGL production. Realized prices reflect our actual
product mix.

Oil prices continued to increase during the first quarter of 2022, compared with
2021. However, given the uncertainty surrounding the ongoing conflict between
Russia and Ukraine, the economic and trade sanctions that certain countries have
imposed on Russia, the dynamic nature of the Pandemic, and the potential impacts
to global commodity and financial markets, we expect future benchmark prices for
oil, gas, and NGLs to remain volatile for the foreseeable future, and we cannot
reasonably predict the timing or likelihood of any future impacts that may
result. In addition to supply and demand fundamentals, as a global commodity,
the price of oil is affected by real or perceived geopolitical risks in various
regions of the world as well as the relative strength of the United States
dollar compared to other currencies. Our realized prices at local sales points
may also be affected by infrastructure capacity in the area of our operations
and beyond. Please refer to First Quarter 2022 Overview and Outlook for the
Remainder of 2022 above for additional discussion of factors impacting pricing.

The following table summarizes 12-month strip prices for NYMEX WTI oil, NYMEX Henry Hub gas, and OPIS NGLs as of April 20, 2022, and March 31, 2022:



                                     As of April 20, 2022       As of March 31, 2022
NYMEX WTI oil (per Bbl)             $               96.54      $            

93.25


NYMEX Henry Hub gas (per MMBtu)     $                6.89      $                5.72
OPIS NGLs (per Bbl)                 $               47.89      $               47.30


We use financial derivative instruments as part of our financial risk management
program. We have a financial risk management policy governing our use of
derivatives, and decisions regarding entering into commodity derivative
contracts are overseen by a financial risk management committee consisting of
certain of our senior executive officers and finance personnel. We make
decisions about the amount of our expected production that we cover by
derivatives based on the amount of debt on our balance sheet, the level of
capital commitments and long-term obligations we have in place, and the terms
and futures prices that are made available by our approved counterparties. With
our current commodity derivative contracts, we believe we have partially reduced
our exposure to volatility in commodity prices and basis differentials in the
near term. Our use of costless collars for a portion of our derivatives allows
us to participate in some of the upward movements in oil and gas prices while
also setting a price floor below which we are insulated from further price
decreases. Please refer to Note 10 - Derivative Financial Instruments in Part I,
Item 1 of this report and to Commodity Price Risk in Overview of Liquidity and
Capital Resources below for additional information regarding our oil, gas, and
NGL derivatives.

                                       25

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses