Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

THE BOEING COMPANY

(BA)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Boeing Co. v. United States: Waiver Of A Solicitation Defect – Interpreting Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P.

06/24/2021 | 04:09pm EDT

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a Court of Federal Claims decision, stating that the trial court incorrectly ruled that a company had waived its right to challenge an error in a solicitation. The lower court based its ruling on its interpretation of Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United States, 492 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2007), which states that those who bid on government contracts must notify the agency of any errors in the solicitation before award, or else waive that right. Specifically, the Federal Circuit in Blue & Gold Fleet determined that:

A party who has the opportunity to object to the terms of a government solicitation containing a patent error and fails to do so prior to the close of the bidding process waives its ability to raise the same objection subsequently in a bid protest action in the Court of Federal Claims.

Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United States, 492 F.3d 1308, 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2007). The ruling in that case was extended in 2012 when the Federal Circuit included "situations in which the protesting party had the opportunity to challenge a solicitation before the award and failed to do so." COMINT Sys. Corp. v. United States, 700 F.3d 1377, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2012). The court has also determined that the waiver requirement applies to patent ambiguities or defects within a contract, including obvious omissions, inconsistencies, and significant discrepancies, so long as the contractor/bidder knew of the problem during the contract-formation process but failed to disclose it. See Inserso Corp. v. United States, 961 F.3d 1343, 1349-52 (Fed. Cir. 2020).

In this instance, the contract required Boeing to abide by both (1) FAR § 30.606; and (2) cost accounting standards. This was an error because both cannot be used simultaneously. Yet if Boeing had objected to the inclusion to either one in the solicitation, their entire proposal would have been rejected. Including both requirements in the solicitation was not a defect or ambiguity, but rather a clash between two requirements.

Thus, the Circuit Court agreed with Boeing and stated that a pre-award challenge "would have been futile." Because there was no avenue for Boeing to raise this dispute without an outright rejection of its bid, it is not reasonable to conclude that Boeing waived its right to later challenge the applicability of FAR § 30.606. The Federal Circuit was unwilling to find waiver in a circumstance where the Government had not provided a judicial forum in which Boeing would have been clearly entitled to object.

References

Boeing Co. v. United States, No. 19-2148 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2020).

Year in Review - Law 360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Ms Chelsea A. Padgett
Ward & Berry
1751 Pinnacle Drive
Suite 900
Tysons
VA 22102
UNITED STATES

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about THE BOEING COMPANY
08:31aMICHAEL O'LEARY : Ryanair raises passenger forecast as O'Leary targets rapid gro..
RE
08:31aRyanair raises passenger forecast as O'Leary targets rapid growth
RE
04:51aFTSE Drops After Downbeat Asia Trading; Banks Fall
DJ
03:38aRYANAIR : may order Boeing MAX 10 this year but only at the right price
RE
01:11aMARKET CHATTER : Airbus, Boeing Contend For Italy's $5.3 Billion Aircraft Deal
MT
07/25BOEING : The Deputy Commander of the Air Mobility Command, U.S. Air Force Announ..
AQ
07/23S&P 500 Posts 2% Weekly Gain to Fresh Closing High, Led by Communication Serv..
MT
07/23Wall Street surges to all-time closing high on earnings, economic revival
RE
07/23Wall Street extends rally, S&P, Nasdaq on course for record closing highs
RE
07/23BOEING : sponsored ISS experiment shows CRISPR gene editing can be used in space
PU
More news
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 76 720 M - -
Net income 2021 374 M - -
Net Debt 2021 49 528 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 406x
Yield 2021 -
Capitalization 130 B 130 B -
EV / Sales 2021 2,33x
EV / Sales 2022 1,86x
Nbr of Employees 141 000
Free-Float 57,7%
Chart THE BOEING COMPANY
Duration : Period :
The Boeing Company Technical Analysis Chart | MarketScreener
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends THE BOEING COMPANY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishNeutralBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 26
Last Close Price 221,52 $
Average target price 266,55 $
Spread / Average Target 20,3%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
David L. Calhoun President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
Gregory D. Smith CFO & Executive VP-Enterprise Operations
Lawrence W. Kellner Non-Executive Chairman
Gregory L. Hyslop Chief Engineer, EVP-Engineering, Test & Technology
Susan Doniz Chief Information Officer & SVP-Data Analytics
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
THE BOEING COMPANY3.49%145 255
AIRBUS SE24.19%103 507
TEXTRON INC.40.76%15 165
DASSAULT AVIATION12.93%10 348
AVIC ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS CO.,LTD.-11.27%6 210
AVICHINA INDUSTRY & TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED0.74%5 464