On Nov. 5, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit restricted the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) remedial powers in its opinion in NLRB v. Starbucks Corp. The Sixth Circuit concluded that the Board overstepped its authority when it attempted to require employers to compensate unlawfully terminated employees for any "direct or foreseeable pecuniary harms" resulting from their termination.
The controversy springs from the Board's 2022 ruling in Thryv, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 22, where it expanded make-whole relief. Traditionally, the Board's remedial powers were limited to relief such as reinstatement, back pay, and interest. In Thryv, however, the Board asserted its remedial powers extended to include consequential damages for any other direct or foreseeable harm, which could include a myriad of possible damages. According to the Board, these damages could include things like interest and late fees on credit cards, penalties on early withdrawals from retirement accounts, the loss of a car or home from missed loan or mortgage payments, and even childcare costs.
The Sixth Circuit rejected the Board's attempt to expand its remedial powers to include consequential damages, concluding that it was not consistent with the Board's powers under the National Labor Relations Act. The Sixth Circuit's opinion aligns with recent rulings from the Third and Fifth Circuits, also holding that the Board impermissibly exceeded its remedial powers under the Thryv approach. The Ninth Circuit, however, has taken a different view and upheld the Board's expanded remedies earlier in 2025.
This growing circuit split could mean the issue heads to the U.S. Supreme Court for resolution. Alternatively, a newly composed NLRB could revisit and potentially overrule Thryv. In the meantime, for employers not covered by the Third, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits, the Board's consequential damages approach under Thryv still applies, and you may be on the hook for late credit card payments.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Colleen Schade
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
11 South Meridian Street
Indianapolis
IN 46204-3535
UNITED STATES
Tel: 317236 1313
Fax: 317231 7433
E-mail: Justin.Scott@btlaw.com
URL: www.btlaw.com
Starbucks Corporation specializes in owning and operating coffee shops. The group also develops a coffee roasting activity. Net sales break down by source of revenue as follows:
- sales within company-operated coffee shops (82.7%): as of September 28, 2025, owned a network of 21,514 coffee shops under the Starbucks Coffee®, Teavana®, Ethos®, Starbucks Reserve® and Princi® brands;
- sales within licensed stores (1.7%): 19,476 licensed stores located primarily in the United States (6,813), Korea (2,077), Latin America (1,813) and the United Kingdom (900);
- other (5.6%): sales of coffee, beverages and food products for companies, hotels, hospitals, airlines, etc.
Net sales break down by family of products between beverages (60.6%), food (19%) and other (20.4%).
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: the United States (72.9%), China (8.5%) and other (18.6%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
-
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
-
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
-
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.