- New
SEC climate risk disclosure requirements are likely to increase companies' climate-related liability risks - D&O insurance should respond to such liabilities, but policyholders should prepare for a fight
- With respect to liability, ESG programs can be a double-edged sword
Introduction
Climate change arrived on our doorsteps in 2021, in the form of devastating hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires. Along with escalating property claims, intensifying natural disasters and longer-term effects like drought and coastal erosion are also generating increased liability risks.
For protection against liability stemming from climate-related claims, Directors and Officers ("D&O") policies increasingly come into play. We expect that trend will continue, as the
Nature of Underlying Suits Implicating D&O Insurance Policies
A suit recently filed in the
Even before
D&O Coverage Issues
Climate change suits against D&O insurance companies may present difficult coverage issues. Many D&O policies contain pollution exclusions, and insurance companies already have indicated their intention to rely on pollution exclusions to deny coverage for lawsuits alleging "losses" as a result of D&Os' "wrongful acts" in financial reporting related to climate change. No case law exists as of yet on the effect of pollution exclusions in D&O policies in this context.
Case law on the absolute pollution exclusion in general liability policies is split. Some courts have construed this exclusion very broadly to include almost anything that enters the environment, including for example fumes from a floor sealant. Other courts construe the exclusion to apply only to 'traditional environmental pollution,' a standard the borders of which are unclear: is a suit over climate change a suit concerning 'traditional environmental pollution'?
One issue in this analysis is proximate cause. In
Another typical coverage exclusion that D&O policyholders need to be mindful of when seeking coverage for climate change-related suits is the so-called conduct exclusion, which purports to exclude coverage for intentional, willful or deliberate misconduct or criminal acts. This exclusion might limit or eliminate coverage, for example, in lawsuits alleging that the company's directors and officers intentionally implemented a program of regulatory non-compliance, or in lawsuits alleging the deliberate withholding of information relating to the company's climate-change related vulnerabilities. This exclusion, however, is typically subject to a "final adjudication" requirement, so that it is not triggered until there is a final court decision finding such misconduct. Until that point the insurance company must fund defense costs as they are incurred. If a final adjudication does eventually find such misconduct, the insurance company may be able to recover the defense costs it advanced.
ESG: Source of Liability, or Liability Protection?
The rising societal concern over climate change is a major factor in the recent corporate emphasis on ESG - environmental, social and governance issues. One prong of ESG is sustainability and making companies more socially conscious and responsive to climate change. Companies are announcing aggressive programs to reduce their carbon footprint and their emissions, particular favorites of activist investors. A company's failure to meet its goals can result in shareholder suits against the company's officers and directors.
One example is Meyer v.
The insurance industry's reaction to climate change and ESG is following two paths. The first is to reduce coverage. Climate change-motivated reductions to property insurance in the form of higher "named storm" deductibles, for example, are already in the works. Additionally, some insurance industry commentators have advocated adding a climate change exclusion to D&O policies.
At the same time, the insurance industry is aware that ESG measures can reduce directors' and officers' exposure to suits. Insurance companies are paying increased attention in underwriting to companies' ESG activities. In particular, Marsh has partnered with certain insurance companies to provide more favorable coverage terms to companies that can demonstrate strong ESG programs through a review process.
Conclusion
As regulatory activity and private litigation activity surrounding climate change issues continue to increase, liabilities likely will follow. D&O insurance companies will be called upon to address those liabilities with increasing frequency. Those claims will present complex coverage issues of first impression, and policyholders can expect a fight. Policyholders also should be on the lookout for more restrictive coverage terms on D&O renewals. Policyholders should work with their brokers to obtain the broadest coverage available, and consult with sophisticated coverage counsel in the event that they are faced with climate change-related claims.
Originally published
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Mr
NY 10020
© Mondaq Ltd, 2022 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source